ARTICLE

Microbiological Characteristics of Gouda Cheese Manufactured with Pasteurized and Raw Milk during Ripening Using Next Generation Sequencing

Wonseo Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2229-3169, Jayeon Yoo1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-5191, Sangnam Oh2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-412X, Jun-sang Ham1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-6631, Seok-geun Jeong1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-1134, Younghoon Kim3,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-0657
Author Information & Copyright
1Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Department of Functional Food and Biotechnology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea
3Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*Corresponding author : Younghoon Kim Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea Tel: +82-2-880-4808 Fax: +82-2-873-2271 E-mail: ykeys2584@snu.ac.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 07, 2019 ; Revised: Jun 20, 2019 ; Accepted: Jun 20, 2019

Published Online: Aug 31, 2019

Abstract

Gouda cheese, one of most popular cheeses in the Korea, has been produced from only pasteurized milk in Korean dairy farms. Recently, it has become legally possible to produce ripened cheese manufactured with raw milk in Korea. In the present study, we investigated the physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of Gouda cheese manufactured with raw (R-GC) or pasteurized milk (P-GC) during manufacturing and ripening. Particularly, this study characterized the bacterial community structure of two cheese types, which are produced without pasteurization during ripening based on next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. During ripening, protein and fat content increased slightly, whereas moisture content decreased in both P-GC and R-GC. At the 6 wk of ripening, R-GC became softer and smoother and hence, the values of hardness and gumminess, chewiness in R-GC was lower than that of P-GC. Metagenomic analysis revealed that the bacterial genera used a starter cultures, namely Lactococcus and Leuconostoc were predominant in both P-GC and R-GC. Moreover, in R-GC, the proportion of coliform bacteria such as Escherichia, Leclercia, Raoultella, and Pseudomonas were detected initially but not during ripening. Taken together, our finding indicates the potential of manufacturing with Gouda cheese from raw milk and the benefits of next generation sequencing for microbial community composition during cheese ripening.

Keywords: Gouda cheese; raw milk; microbial community; fatty acid; texture property

Introduction

Raw milk contains more amino and fatty acids, volatile compounds, and a diverse microbial population than does pasteurized milk; these components are lost on pasteurization (Grappin and Beuvier, 1997). Hence, raw milk cheeses have a stronger taste and a richer flavor (Fuka et al., 2013). However, raw milk may also contain undesirable microbes, thereby increasing the probability of pathogens surviving in the “ready-to-eat” cheese matrix (Pelaez and Requena, 2005) and are hence considered microbiologically unsafe (Yoon et al., 2016). Moreover, global outbreaks of food-borne disease are attributed to consumption of raw milk cheese. According to a survey in the U.S., consumption of raw milk or its products resulted in 93 illness outbreaks, 1,837 illnesses, 195 hospitalizations, and 2 deaths, from 1998 to 2009. These outbreaks were primarily caused by intake raw milk products contaminated with Escherichia coli O157, Campylobacter and Salmonella species (Committee on Infectious Diseases; Committee on Nutrition; American Academy of Pediatrics, 2014). While limited microbiota in pasteurized milk cheese enabled the manufacture of cheese varieties with unique flavor and texture, the microbiological safety of raw milk cheese is disputable.

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), a representative subgroup of microbial species in raw milk cheese that inhibit the growth of food-borne pathogens by producing antimicrobial substances such as organic acids, H2O2, and bacteriocin. Previous studies reported that Lactobacillus plantarum appeared to inhibit the growth of Salmonella Typhimurium due to its acid production during ripening of raw milk Montasio cheese (Stecchini et al., 1991). Lactococcus garvieae strains were found to produce bacteriocins against food-related pathogens (Florez et al., 2012; Fortina et al., 2007). Non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) such as mesophilic lactobacilli are more diverse in raw than in pasteurized milk Cheddar cheese (McSweeney et al., 1993) and comprise strains that produce the characteristic flavors of traditional cheese during maturation (Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000; Wouters et al., 2002) hence being at least partly responsible for differences in flavor between pasteurized and raw milk cheese (Wouters et al., 2002).

Until present, culture-based microbial methodology was employed to explore a dynamics of microbial community in cheese. However, this method has critical limitation on detecting no-cultivable or no-abundant microorganisms during cheese ripening. For overcoming this disadvantages, recent reported advances, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, are useful because of the enhanced sequencing depth that can be less labor intensive and more informative in characterizing the microbial diversity in given habitats (Fuka et al., 2013). Particularly, the technology has also been used to study the bacterial diversity of cheeses as well, including various artisanal cheeses (Lusk et al., 2012).

The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires to sample and test raw milk cheese made aged 60 d. After 60 d, the acids, salts and LAB derived from raw milk cheese naturally prevent Listeria, E. coli and Salmonella from growing. Evidence indicates that raw milk cheese aged for 60 d may not eliminate or adequately reduce E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in raw milk cheese (Reitsma and Henning, 1996; Schlesser et al., 2006). In Korea, the distribution of natural cheese made from non-pasteurized milk has been limited to products that have been individually certified through safety tests. From 2016, Korea revised its processing standards to allow the manufacturing and import of raw milk cheese to ripening at least 60 d and 2°C. Currently, there were about 100 artisanal cheese factories in Korea, but most raw milk and its products were rare, as conventional dairy products were pasteurized, and consumers tend to be worried about the raw dairy products. Hence, this study aimed to analyze dynamics in bacterial diversity during the ripening of cheeses manufactured from raw and pasteurized milk. In addition, we evaluate variations in physico-chemical and microbiological parameters in raw and pasteurized milk Gouda cheese during ripening and provide evidence on the potential use of raw milk for the manufacture and ripening of Gouda cheese.

Materials and Methods

Manufacture of Gouda cheese

Two types of Gouda cheese, pasteurized (P-GC) and raw milk cheeses (R-GC) were manufactured using raw milk [obtained from five Holstein (cows averaging 5.5 parties and 32.7 kg/d of milk yield) in the National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea] and pasteurized milk. For each cheese type independent batches of milk were used resulting in 4 batches of milk (2 times×2 cheese types). From each cheese type per time 3 replicates based on the same batch of milk (100 kg) were analyzed at each time point of ripening (6, 12, 18, and 24 wk) in triplicate. To manufacture pasteurized milk cheese, 100 kg of raw milk was pasteurized at 65°C for 30 min and cooled to 32°C. The pasteurized and raw milk were inoculated with 0.0015% (w/v) of starter culture CHN-11 (Chr. Hansen, Horsholm, Denmark), which comprised four strains of Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis, and Lc. lactis subsp. diacetylactis, and Leuconostoc. Further, 0.019% (v/v) rennet (Naturen, 90% Chymosin, 290 IMCU/mL, Chr. Hansen, New Zealand) was added to induce the formation of curds. The milk was allowed to coagulate for 45 min, and the coagulum obtained was then cut vertically and horizontally into 7 mm cube-shaped particles. After the curds were simultaneously stirred for 20 min, the whey was removed (40% of the volume of the milk) and water (30% of the volume of the milk) pre-heated to 50°C was added, and the mixture was stirred for 20 min to maintain the final temperature at 35°C. Thereafter, 30% (the volume of the milk) of whey was removed and 20% (the volume of the milk) of 50°C water was added and the curds were stirred for 50 min, and the final temperature was 38°C. The whey was drained, and the curd was placed in a mold and prepressed at the low pressure of equal weight as cheese for 60 min, which is then gradually increased from 1.0 to 3.0 bar for 3–4 h. After overnight pressing, Gouda cheese was removed from the mold and soaked in a 20% saturated brine solution at 4°C for 8 h. The cheese was allowed to dry for 3 d, and was ripened for 24 wk or longer at 12°C–15°C. The raw milk cheese was made using the above procedure without pasteurization. Samples of Gouda cheese were collected for analysis every 6 wk post manufacture.

Compositional analysis

Samples of cheese were analyzed for protein, fat, moisture, and salt content via indirect near-infrared transmittance employing the FoodScan analyzer (FoodScanTM Lab 78810, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark). For each cheese, a representative sample was homogenized, placed in a 140-mm round sample dish, and the dish was placed in the FoodScan analyzer. The pH was determined using a pH meter (B22869, Thermo Scientific, Singapore).

Acetic acid, D-lactic acid, L-lactic acid, phosphate and calcium contents were determined using a discrete photometric Thermo Scientific Gallery analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy, Vantaa, Finland). Three grams of each cheese sample was diluted in 27 mL of sterile distilled water and centrifuged at 988×g for 10 min. Subsequently, 2 mL of each supernatant was loaded into combined sample disk with Gallery analyzer. Reagent vials are barcoded, and the barcoded system reagent containers are automatically identified. Reagent volumes are optimized for the system application. The reagent kits were listed as follows; acetic acid kit (Code 984318), D-lactic acid kits (Code 984306), L-lactic acid kits (Code 984308), phosphate kits (Code 984366 and 984368), and calcium kits (Code 984361). Automatic Gallery acetic acid application consists of two reagents (Acet R1 and Acet R2), end-point measurement, with sample blank and linear calibration curve for result calculation. First, 100 μL of acetic acid R1 reagent and 5 μL of sample were incubated for 300 s and absorbance was set to zero. After adding 25 μL of R2 reagent and incubating for 220 s, the reaction was measured at wavelength of 340 nm. The procedure was followed at 37°C. Similarly, D-lactic acid, L-lactic acid, phosphate and calcium were determined per the Gallery reference manual 1.0. These contents were determined automatically via Thermo Scientific Gallery analyzer software 4.0.

Texture analysis

The texture properties were assessed through force-deformation curves obtained using a texture analyzer (Instron model 4465, Instron Corp, High Wycombe, UK). For texture analysis, the cheese samples from each treatment was cut into cylindrical measuring 19 mm in diameter by 26 mm (length) at 4°C to prevent barreling and were equilibrated at 20°C for 1 h prior to testing (Hort et al., 1997). The core was axially compressed 5 times to 80% of its initial height each time. The speed of the load cell was set at 120 mm/min and the following parameters were evaluated: hardness (kg), springiness (mm), cohesiveness (%), gumminess (kg) and chewiness (kg×mm).

Fatty acid analysis with gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS)

The cheese samples were analyzed for fatty acid composition during ripening. Total lipids were extracted using the Folch solution with chloroform-methanol (2:1, v/v) (Folch et al., 1957). Each cheese samples (15 g) was homogenized with the solution (45 mL) for 10 min. Then the homogenates were filtered and centrifuged at 988×g for 10 min, and the lipids were extracted using Na2SO4 solution. An aliquot of total lipid extract was methylated Morrison and Smith’s method (Morrison and Smith, 1967). Fatty acid methyl esters thus obtained were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Star 3600; Varian Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) with a fused silica capillary column (Omegawax 205; 30 m×0.32 mm i.d., 0.2 μm film thickness). The sample injection port was maintained at 250°C; the detector, 300°C. The results are expressed as percentages based on the total peak area.

Microbiological analysis using plate counting

Twenty-five grams of each cheese sample were placed in sterile Stomacher bags and homogenized in 225 mL of 0.1% peptone water, using a stomacher (FR/BagMixer; Interscience, St Nom, France) for 3 min. Serial decimal dilutions of cell suspensions were screened for the following microbial groups: total aerobes quantified using plate count agar (PCA) media incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h; total LAB quantified using de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) agar with 0.005% (w/v) of bromocresol purple and 0.05% (w/v) of cysteine incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h; total E. coli and coliforms quantified using petri-film (3MTM PetrifilmTM 6414, MN, USA) incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h; total yeast and molds quantified using petri-film (3MTM PetrifilmTM 6417, MN, USA) incubated aerobically at 25°C for 5 or 7 d.

Illumina sequencing data analysis

Genomic DNA of the microbes was extracted using a PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio, Carlsbad, CA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was quantified its quality determined using Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).

A 16S rDNA sequencing sample was prepared in accordance with the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library protocols (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The 16S rRNA genes were amplified using specific primers for V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA (f: 5’- TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’ and r: 5’-GTCTCGT GGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’). The template genomic DNA (12.5 ng) was thus amplified and a subsequent limited‐cycle amplification step was performed to add multiplexing indices and Illumina sequencing adapters. The final products were normalized and pooled using the PicoGreen (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the size of libraries were verified using the LabChip GX HT DNA High Sensitivity Kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Further, sequencing was performed using the MiSeqTM platform (Illumina) per the standard Illumina sequencing protocols.

After sequencing, the PhiX sequences were removed and the primers were trimmed, and the paired-end reads were joined using the FLASH (Magoc and Salzberg, 2011). Sequences were then clustered at various percent identities using the Cluster Database at High Identity with Tolerance algorithm (Li et al., 2012). A sequence identity cutoff of 97% was used to identify operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and the results thus obtained were used in subsequent analysis. Clustered data were then evaluated for potential chimeric sequences, using UCHIME (Edgar et al., 2011).

Taxonomy was assigned to the representative sequence of each OTU, using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME, http://qiime.org/) (Caporaso et al., 2010)’s parallel wrappers for the Ribosomal Database Program (RDP) classifier. The most detailed taxonomic level assigned to an OTU’s representative sequence at a confidence level greater than or equal to 0.80 was considered the taxon of the OTU. Downstream data analysis including alpha-diversity analysis (phylogenetic information and Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson indices), beta-diversity analysis (Principal Coordinates analysis), and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were conducted using QIIME or R software (v 3.0.1).

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are presented as mean±SD. Differences between cheeses during ripening were assessed using Duncan’s multiple-range tests. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistics program (version 9.2; SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA; 2008). Differences with p<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Physico-chemical analysis

Protein and fat content increased and moisture content decreased in both P-GC and R-GC during the ripening period (p<0.05). Significant differences among all the maturation periods are presented in Table 1. Protein and fat content increased significantly at 6 and 12 wk in P-GC and R-GC whereas moisture content decreased significantly during ripening, from 35.90 to 28.90 in P-GC and from 39.01 to 27.29 in R-GC (p<0.05). In addition, organic acid formation, such as acetic acid, L-lactic acid, and D-lactic acid, was significantly higher in R-GC than in P-GC (p<0.05; Table 1). As shown in Table 1, pH values increased in both groups during ripening, depending on the levels of organic acids, which decreased significantly during ripening (p<0.05).

Table 1. General content composition of Gouda cheese made with pasteurized and raw milk during ripening
Time(wk) Protein(%) Fat(%) Moisture(%) FDM(%) MNFS(%) Salt(%) SM(%) pH Acetic acid(g/kg) D-Lactic acid(g/kg) L-Lactic acid(g/kg) Phosphate(g/kg) Calcium(g/kg)
P-GC 6 24.87Ac 37.90Ab 35.90Ba 59.13Ab 57.81Ba 1.32Ac 3.68Ac 5.73Ac 3.49Ba 0.19Ba 11.44Ba 10.28Bd 3.89Bd
12 26.22Ab 39.00Ba 32.88Ab 58.10Ba 53.90Ab 1.90Aab 5.78Aab 5.83Ab 1.18Bc 0.15Bb 9.46Bd 11.68Ac 4.40Ac
18 27.69Aa 38.50Ba 32.00Ab 56.62Ba 52.03Ab 1.81Ab 5.66Ab 5.86Ab 1.72Bb 0.17Bab 10.81Bb 10.91Ab 4.62Ab
24 28.51Aa 40.52Aa 28.90Ac 56.99Ba 48.59Ac 2.06Aa 7.13Aa 6.01Aa 1.28Ac 0.11Bc 10.55Bc 12.21Aa 4.81Aa
R-GC 6 23.90Ac 35.47Ab 39.01Aa 58.16Ab 60.45Aa 1.63Ab 4.18Bd 5.73Ac 4.70Aa 0.29Aa 15.36Aa 11.51Ab 3.96Ad
12 25.82Ab 41.69Aa 30.76Bb 60.21Aa 52.75Bb 1.73Ab 5.62Ac 5.75Bc 3.78Ab 0.31Ab 15.15Ab 14.48Aa 4.31Bb
18 28.81Aa 42.22Aa 27.13Bc 57.94Aa 46.95Bc 1.85Ab 6.82Bb 5.81Aab 3.26Ab 0.25Ab 14.49Ac 10.88Ab 4.55Bc
24 28.19Aa 42.27Aa 27.29Ac 58.14Aa 47.27Ac 2.25Aa 8.24Ba 5.84Ba 1.89Ac 0.20Ac 13.64Ad 10.69Bb 4.37Ba

a–d Means in the same column within the same cheese condition with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

A,B Means in the same column within the same ripening period with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

FDM, fat in dry matter; MNFS, moisture in not-fat solids; SM, salt in moisture; P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk.

Download Excel Table
Assessment of texture properties

The textural properties of raw milk cheese varied considerably from those of pasteurized milk cheese. Table 2 showed that levels of texture properties such as harness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness were significantly increased during ripening (p<0.05). Furthermore, the levels of these texture properties were higher in P-GC than in R-GC in the early ripening period, except for cohesiveness. During cheese ripening, the change in hardness indicated that significantly decrease in moisture content did not sufficiently compensate for the increased casein content. At the 6 wk of ripening, raw milk cheese became softer and smoother and hence, the values of hardness and gumminess, chewiness in R-GC was lower than that of P-GC in the early ripening period, due to the high proteolysis in the former type; however, the level of two groups tended to equalize as ripening progressed. The mean value of cohesiveness increased (p<0.05) from 1.46% to 1.94% in P-GC and from 1.52% to 2.07% in R-GC during ripening. Springiness refers to the height that the sample recovers between the first and second compressions after eliminating the deforming force (Patel et al., 1993). Changes in gumminess were similar to changes in hardness for both P-GC and R-GC for similar reasons deduced for reduction in moisture content during ripening. Chewiness, defined as the energy required to masticate a solid food item to a state ready for swallowing, was the product of hardness, cohesiveness and springiness (Patel et al., 1993). The mean value of chewiness displayed a significant rapid increase for both P-GC and R-GC during ripening (p<0.05).

Table 2. Texture properties of Gouda cheese made with pasteurized and raw milk during the ripening period
Time(wk) Hardness(kg) Cohesiveness(%) Springiness(mm) Gumminess(kg) Chewiness(kg×mm)
P-GC 6 0.44Ac 1.46Ab 32.01Ab 0.65Ac 20.69Ac
12 0.86Ab 1.50Bb 32.58Ab 1.29Ab 42.21Ab
18 1.25Ab 1.64Bb 32.95Ab 2.05Ab 67.44Ab
24 1.72Ab 1.94Ab 32.92Ab 3.32Ab 109.40Ab
R-GC 6 0.25Bc 1.52Ac 31.23Bb 0.38Bb 11.87Bb
12 0.68Ab 1.64Ab 32.44Ab 1.13Ab 36.55Ab
18 1.18Ab 1.95Ab 32.68Ab 2.31Ab 75.70Ab
24 1.70Ab 2.07Ab 32.58Bb 3.51Ab 114.33Ab

a–d Means in the same column within the same cheese condition with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

A,B Means in the same column within the same ripening period with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk.

Download Excel Table
Cheese fatty acid analysis

Fatty acid content in P-GC and R-GC was similar. During ripening, EPA (C20:5n3), nervonic acid (C22:4n6), and DHA (C22:6n3) were low in both P-GC and R-GC (Table 3). However, major fatty acids displayed significant differences during ripening. Myristic acid (C14:0) ratio was 11.87% in R-GC and 11.14% in P-GC on week 6 of ripening. As ripening progressed, a significant reduction (C14:0) of 0.19 units was observed in R-GC, whereas P-GC displayed a significant increase of 0.78 units (p<0.05). Palmitic acid (C16:0) ratio in the cheese was determined to be 40.78% in R-GC and 37.96% in P-GC in the 6 wk of ripening, and there were significant increases of 0.68 and 3.47 units in R-GC and P-GC, respectively, after ripening (p<0.05). Stearic acid (C18:0) in R-GC was 14.59% and 13.92% in P-GC at the beginning of ripening (6 wk), and increased to 15.24% and 15.01%, respectively, at 18 wk of ripening (p<0.05). Oleic acid (C18:1n9) ratio increased from 27.13% at 6 wk of ripening to 30.43% at 12 wk and finally to 27.42% after ripening in R-GC, and decreased gradually from 31.53% to 27.38% in P-GC, during ripening. Interestingly, the changes in saturated fatty acid (SFA) ratio between 64.34% and 68.04% in R-GC, and between 63.02% and 67.96% in P-GC during ripening (p<0.05). Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) ratio was 2.17%–2.32% in P-GC and 2.20%–2.45% in R-GC; however, this ratio did not differ significantly between the two cheese groups. Medium- and long-chain fatty acids in R-GC and P-GC were 51.23%–54.85% and 52.09%–54.88%, and 45.15%–48.77% and 45.12%–47.91%, respectively.

Table 3. Monitoring of fatty acid composition (percent) in Gouda cheese made with pasteurized and raw milk during the ripening period
P-GC (wk) R-GC (wk)
6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24
C14:0 11.14Bc 11.56Ab 11.92Aa 11.92Aa 11.87Aa 11.45Aa 11.76Aa 11.68Aa
C16:0 37.96Bd 39.36Ac 40.27Ab 41.43Aa 40.78Ab 38.71Bd 40.10Ac 41.46Aa
C16:1n7 2.13Aa 1.92Aab 1.86Bb 1.50Ac 2.23Aa 1.93Ab 2.01Ab 1.36Ac
C18:0 13.92Bd 14.26Ac 15.01Ab 14.60Aa 14.59Aab 14.18Ab 15.24Aa 14.90Aab
C18:1n9 31.53Aa 29.54Bb 27.46Ac 27.38Ac 27.13Bb 30.43Aa 27.41Ab 27.42Ab
C18:1n7 0.14Aa 0.12Aa 0.12Aa 0.09Ab 0.10Bb 0.11Aa 0.10Aab 0.08Ac
C18:2n6 2.32Aa 2.38Aa 2.44Aa 2.17Ab 2.38Aa 2.35Aa 2.45Aa 2.20Aa
C18:3n6 0.11Aa 0.11Aa 0.12Aa 0.10Aa 0.11Aa 0.11Aa 0.11Aa 0.11Aa
C18:3n3 0.32Aa 0.32Aa 0.34Aa 0.32Aa 0.32Aa 0.33Aa 0.33Aa 0.32Aa
C20:1n9 0.22Ba 0.20Aa 0.29Aa 0.31Aa 0.28Aab 0.19Ab 0.29Aab 0.30Aa
C20:4n6 0.12Aa 0.13Aa 0.12Aa 0.12Aa 0.12Ab 0.13Aa 0.12Ab 0.11Bc
C20:5n3 0.02Aa 0.03Aa 0.03Aa 0.03Aa 0.03Aa 0.03Aa 0.02Aa 0.02Aa
C22:4n6 0.02Aa 0.03Aa 0.04Aa 0.03Aa 0.03Ab 0.03Ab 0.04Aa 0.03Ab
C22:6n3 0.03Ab 0.05Aa 0.00Ac 0.00Ac 0.04Aa 0.03Aa 0.01Ab 0.00Ac
SFA 63.02Bd 63.02Bd 63.02Bd 63.02Bd 67.24Aab 64.34Bc 67.11Ab 68.04Aa
USFA 63.02Bd 34.82Bb 32.81Ac 32.04Ad 32.76Bbc 35.66Aa 32.89Ab 31.96Ac
MUFA 34.02Aa 31.78Bb 29.72Ac 29.28Ac 29.74Bb 32.66Aa 29.81Ab 29.16Ab
PUFA 2.96Aa 3.05Aa 3.09Aa 2.77Ab 3.02Aa 3.00Aab 3.08Aa 2.79Ab
n3 0.38Aa 0.40Aa 0.37Aa 0.34Aa 0.38Aa 0.39Aa 0.36Ab 0.34Ab
n6 2.58Ab 2.65Aab 2.72Aa 2.42Ac 2.63Aab 2.61Aab 2.72Aa 2.45Ab
n6/n3 6.98Aa 6.77Aa 7.37Aa 7.06Aa 6.87Aa 6.76Aa 7.48Aa 7.13Aa
MUFA/SFA 0.54Aa 0.49Bb 0.44Ac 0.43Ac 0.44Bbc 0.51Aa 0.44Ab 0.43Ac
PUFA/SFA 0.05Aa 0.05Aa 0.05Ac 0.04Ab 0.04Aab 0.05Aa 0.05Ac 0.04Abc

a–d Means in the same row within the same cheese condition with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

A,B Means in the same row within the same ripening period with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk; SFA, saturated fatty acid; USFA, unsaturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

Download Excel Table
Microbiological analysis using plate counting

Results of aerobic bacteria count (APC), LAB count, coliforms count, E. coli count, and yeast/mold counts are shown in Table 4. The viable cells of LAB in R-GC, with the highest levels observed at the beginning (6 wk), were significantly decreased at the end of the ripening period (p<0.05). The counts of LAB were higher in R-GC than in P-GC (p<0.05), owing to presence of NSLAB derived from raw milk. All cheese samples contained detectable amounts of coliforms; however, as ripening progressed, the counts of total coliforms were gradually decreased until at 24 wk of ripening. Importantly, E. coli was detected in only R-GC at the beginning of ripening (6 wk) and not throughout; E. coli were undetectable after 12 wk of ripening. The counts of yeasts and molds in P-GC during ripening significantly decreased until 12 wk and significantly increased at the end of the 24-week period (p<0.05). The counts of these microbial populations were similar in R-GC and P-GC.

Table 4. Microbial count in Gouda cheese made from pasteurized and raw milk during the ripening period
Time(wk) APC(Log CFU/mL) LAB(Log CFU/mL) Total coliforms(Log CFU/mL) E. coli(Log CFU/mL) Yeast & Mold(Log CFU/mL)
P-GC 6 5.65Aa 5.97Bb 2.20Aab ND 3.99Ab
12 5.01Ab 6.23Ba 1.36Aab ND 3.51Bc
18 5.02Bb 6.27Ba 1.20Aab ND 4.06Bb
24 4.75Ac 5.95Ab 0.87Ab ND 4.67Aa
R-GC 6 5.60Aa 7.44Aa 2.39Aa 0.67 3.98Ab
12 5.08Ac 7.32Aab 1.67Aa ND 4.14Ab
18 5.30Ab 6.93Aab 0.77Ab ND 4.87Aa
24 4.97Ac 6.59Ab 0.33Ab ND 4.70Aa

a–d Means in the same column within the same cheese condition with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

A,B Means in the same column within the same ripening period with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

APC, aerobic bacteria count; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk; ND, not detected.

Download Excel Table
Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities in R-GC and P-GC

For exploring dynamics of microbial community, we choose on sampling points with initial time point (6 wk) and aged time point (24 wk) during ripening. Samples of R-GC and P-GC at 6 and 24 wk of ripening were analyzed for microbial diversity, via sequencing analysis (Supplementary Table S1). A total of 628,952 bacterial sequence reads with an average of 78,619 sequence reads per sample were obtained from P-GC and R-GC. As an estimator of sampling completeness, goods coverage index for each data set was >99% in all samples.

The 16S rRNA gene sequencing reads were classified into different taxonomies. The relative abundance of R-GC and P-GC samples during ripening periods are indicated as phylum, order, family, genus, and species levels (Supplementary Table S3 and Fig. 1). At the phylum level, no significant differences in the proportion of phyla between the center and the surface of the two cheeses were observed. All cheese samples were dominated by Firmicutes, with >96.36% (P-GC) and >95.57% (R-GC). At the family level, all cheese samples were dominated by Streptococcaceae and Leuconostocaceae. The center of P-GC was dominated by >76.04% and >76.33 Streptococcaceae and Leuconostocaceae, respectively, and the surface contained >19.77% and >18.19%, respectively. Streptococcaceae increased from 76.04% to 76.33% (center) and decreased from 77.99% to 67.92% (surface) during ripening, and the proportion of Leuconostocaceae increased from 19.77% to 28.96% (center) and 18.19% to 20.42% (surface) in P-GC. R-GC was dominated by Streptococcaceae, with >87.15% (center) and >87.37% (surface), and the proportion of the family decreased during ripening. The proportion of the family decreased from 92.34% to 87.15% (center) and 92.58% to 87.37% during ripening. The second most abundant family, Leuconostocaceae increased from 3.18% to 11.19% (center) and 3.41% to 11.47% (surface), identified 3-fold higher than Leuconostocaceae at 6 wk.

kosfa-39-4-585-g1
Fig. 1. Taxonomic classification of (A) total; (B) under 30% of relative abundance reads at genus levels of bacteria retrieved from pooled DNA amplicons from Gouda cheese made with pasteurized and raw milk during the ripening period. P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk; center, center of cheese; surface, surface of cheese.
Download Original Figure

Pyrosequencing revealed that 16 genera (relative abundance >0.01%) of Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Staphylococcus, Brevibacterium, Brachybacterium, Chryseobacterium, Mucilaginibacter, Bacteroides, Loriellopsis, Agrobacterium, Escherichia, Leclercia, Raoultella, and Pseudomonas were identified in Gouda cheese. The most abundant genus was Lactococcus in all cheese samples. The type of starter culture used for the manufacture of Gouda cheese was Leuconostoc, the second most dominant genus. The taxonomic classification of bacteria in R-GC and P-GC at species level is presented in Supplementary Table S3 and Fig. 2. The Lc. lactis, Lc. laudensis, and Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides comprised most of the microbial community in Gouda cheese. Lc. lactis and Lc. laudensis tended to decrease with ripening, except that Lc. laudensis slightly increased from 0.31 to 0.36 on the surface of R-GC. P-GC had a higher proportion of L. plantarum than R-GC, which decreased during ripening. However, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides increased as ripening progressed.

kosfa-39-4-585-g2
Fig. 2. Taxonomic classification of (A) total; (B) under 30% of relative abundance reads at species levels of bacteria retrieved from pooled DNA amplicons from Gouda cheese made with pasteurized and raw milk during the ripening period. P-GC, Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk; R-GC, Gouda cheese made from raw milk; center, center of cheese; surface, surface of cheese.
Download Original Figure

In addition, as shown in Fig. 3, the CCA for bacterial communities depending on the region of Gouda cheese showed no discernible trend during ripening. However, microbial diversity of P-GC and R-GC differed significant during ripening.

kosfa-39-4-585-g3
Fig. 3. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of bacterial communities in Gouda cheese. P6-C, center of Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk at 6 wk; P6-S, surface of Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk at 6 wk; P24-C, center of Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk at 24 wk; P24-S, surface of Gouda cheese made from pasteurized milk at 24 wk; R6-C, center of Gouda cheese made from raw milk at 6 wk; R6-S, surface of Gouda cheese made from raw milk at 6 wk; R24-C, center of Gouda cheese made from raw milk at 24 wk; R24-S, surface of Gouda cheese made from raw milk at 24 wk.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

Pasteurized milk cheese (P-GC) revealed slightly higher moisture than raw milk cheese (R-GC) during ripening period (Table 1). The moisture content decreased in all cheeses throughout the storage period. The fat content was slightly lower in P-GC than in R-GC, while it increased during ripening period as a result of the decrease in moisture content (Table 1). Similar to these results, Salwa and Galal (2002) reported similar trends in raw milk cheese in comparison with the heat treated and pasteurized milk cheese in the manufacture of Egyptian Domiati cheese. A moisture decrease by evaporation led to a progressive weight decline and afterwards there was a progressive dehydration during the cheese maturation (Papetti et al., 2012). In addition, it probably owing to proteolysis and lipolysis (Zaki et al., 1975). At early ripening, L-lactic acid prevailed due to the predominance of LAB belonging to the used starter, which transforms lactose, mainly into L-lactic acid (Diezhandino et al., 2015; Thomas and Crow, 1983). Normally, a reduction in pH is expected at the initial stage of ripening because of residual lactose being metabolized to lactic acid, followed by an increase in pH depending on the type of cheese (Fox et al., 1993). Generally, values for theses parameter of texture properties gradually tended to increase during ripening depending on the moisture loss (Table 2). As ripening progressed, hardness was lower in R-GC than in P-GC, in particular, at the first 6 wk of ripening (p<0.05). This could be mainly due to the higher proteolysis in R-GC than in P-GC. Proteolysis is the most complex process, contributes to the development of cheese texture from hydrolysis of the protein matrix and an increase in the pH due to liberation of ammonia from amino acid. Hardness have been reported to have a good correlation with proteolysis (Fedrick, 1987).

The results of major fatty acids content (Table 3) are similar to those of a previous study, wherein myristic acid ratio in Tulum cheeses made from pasteurized milk was 9.74% at the beginning of ripening and 10.54% on the 180th day of storage, while that in raw milk cheese was 9.59% and 10.36% (Sert et al., 2014). The value of medium- and long-chain fatty acids in R-GC and P-GC were not differ significantly and hence they do not essentially contribute to the aroma of the cheese (Buffa et al., 2001; Freitas and Malcata, 1998). These results corroborate the fact that lipases (either from milk, rennet, or microbes) involved in cheese ripening display higher specificity towards short- and medium-chain fatty acid residues than towards long-chain residues (De la fuente et al., 1993). Short-chain fatty acids are known to have an important effect on cheese aroma (Attaie and Richter, 1996). Especially, lipolysis in milk preferentially releases short- and medium-chain fatty acids, because in milk triglycerides, short-chain fatty acids are esterified predominantly at the sn-3 position (Singh et al., 2003). Milk lipase appears to hydrolyze the fat selectively and is able to act on triglycerides, while lactococcal lipases seem to be active mainly on mono- and di-glycerides (Stadhouders and Veringa, 1973). The lipases of Lactobacillus and Lactococcus are specific for short-chain fatty acids, which accounts for the greater abundance of the free forms of such acids in cheeses (El Soda et al., 1986). Lipase and esterase activities have been detected in cell-free extracts of numerous Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species and a preference for short-chain fatty acids has been observed for lactococcal and lactobacilli lipases (El Soda et al., 1986; Kamaly and Marth, 1989; Singh et al., 1973). Lipolysis is of great importance for cheese ripening, and profiles of short- and medium-chain free fatty acids (FFA) are often analyzed during chemical characterization of the extent of cheese ripening (De la fuente et al., 1993; Downey, 1980; Woo et al., 1984).

Throughout the manufacturing and ripening process, especially in the late steps, LAB such as lactobacilli prevailed and played an important role in cheese production and could be part of the starter culture (de Souza et al., 2003). The reduction of LAB during ripening may have resulted from brine processing to inhibit the growth of these microorganisms or putrefactive bacteria such as coliform bacteria. The previous study reported that pasteurization, pH, water activity, milk type, and rind type were significantly associated with detection of coliforms in cheese, e.g., a higher coliform prevalence was detected in raw milk cheeses (42% with >10 CFU/g) than in pasteurized milk cheese (21%) (Trmcic et al., 2016). Also, the counts of molds and yeasts were similar to those reported previously (Centeno et al., 1994; Menendez et al., 2001), however, other studies reported that the counts of molds and yeasts from artisanal Serrano cheese during from 7–60 d were 0.67–4.70 Log CFU/mL for molds and 3.72–6.04 Log CFU/mL for yeast, decreasing during ripening period (de Souza et al., 2003). As ripening progresses, cheese matrix compaction increases, which reduces the diffusion of the oxygen required for the growth of these microbial populations (de Souza et al., 2003).

Interestingly, the proportion of coliform bacteria such as E. fergusonii, Leclercia adecarboxylata, Raoultella ornithinolytica, Pseudomonas azotoformans, and P. geniculate tended to decrease during ripening regardless of the center or surface in P-GC and R-GC, compared to those until 6 wk (Supplementary Table S2 and Fig. 2). In particular, E. fergusonii was only identified in R-GC; however, E. fergusonii was rarely identified as ripening progressed. Detection of coliform bacteria in finished products, including cheese, has traditionally been used to indicate unsanitary manufacturing conditions. The coliform bacteria include some thermotolerant coliforms genera, such as Serratia, Hafnia, Rahnella, and Leclercia. The coliforms detected represented environmental coliforms and were shown recently to include at least some strains able to grow in milk at refrigeration temperatures (Masiello et al., 2016; Trmcic et al., 2016), and Escherichia, Hafnia, and Enterobacter were significantly more common in raw milk cheese (Trmcic et al., 2016).

This study presents a first look at the bacterial communities of Gouda cheese manufactured from raw and pasteurized milk during cheese ripening through next-generation sequencing. Our findings offer insight into cheese microbiota composition, with raw and pasteurized milk cheese exhibiting unique bacterial diversity at 6 and 24 wk of ripening. However, more effort is needed to be taken into account to address best production process of raw milk cheese where no pasteurization related to the dynamics of microbial communities for the cheese quality during ripening. In conclusion, our result provides significant evidence on the potential use of raw milk in manufacturing and ripening of Gouda cheese and evaluation for risks and benefits of raw milk cheese during manufacturing. Further studies are required to investigate the optimal minimum ripening period by cheese types for assurance of consumer safety.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No: PJ01252501)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2018R1D1A3B07050304 to S.O).

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Data curation: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Formal analysis: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Methodology: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Software: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Validation: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Investigation: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Writing - original draft: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y. Writing - review & editing: Yoo J, Park W, Oh S, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Kim Y.

Notes

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

Supplemenrary Materials

Supplementary Tables

kosfa-39-4-585-suppl1.pdf

References

1.

Attaie R, Richter RL. 1996; Formation of volatile free fatty acids during ripening of Cheddar-like hard goat cheese. J Dairy Sci. 79:717-724

2.

Buffa M, Guamis B, Pavia M, Trujillo AJ. 2001; Lipolysis in cheese made from raw, pasteurized or high-pressure-treated goats’ milk. Int Dairy J. 11:175-179

3.

Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Mcdonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Tumbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010; Qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 7:335-336

4.

Centeno JA, Rodriguez-otero JL, Cepeda A. 1994; Microbiological study of Arzua cheese (NW spain) throughout cheese-making and ripening. J Food Saf. 14:229-241

5.

Committee on Infectious Diseases, Committee on Nutrition 2014; Consumption of raw or unpasteurized milk and milk products by pregnant women and children. Pediatrics. 133:175-179

6.

De la fuente MA, Fontecha J, Juarez M. 1993; Fatty acid composition of the triglyceride and free fatty acid fractions in different cows-milk, ewes-milk and goats-milk cheeses. Z Fur Lebensm-Unters Und-Forsch. 196:155-158

7.

De Souza CFV, Dalla Rosa T, Ayub MAZ. 2003; Changes in the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of Serrano cheese during manufacture and ripening. Braz J Microbiol. 34:260-266

8.

Diezhandino I, Fernandez D, Gonzalez L, Mcsweeney PL, Fresno JM. 2015; Microbiological, physico-chemical and proteolytic changes in a Spanish blue cheese during ripening (Valdeon cheese). Food Chem. 168:134-141

9.

Downey WK. 1980; Flavour impairment from pre- and post-manufacture lipolysis in milk and dairy products. J Dairy Res. 47:237-252

10.

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. 2011; Uchime improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 27:2194-2200

11.

El Soda M, Korayem M, Ezzat N. 1986; The esterolytic and lipolytic activities of lactobacilli III. Detection and characterization of the lipase system. Milchwissenschaft. 41:353-355.

12.

Fedrick I. 1987; Technology and economics of the accelerated ripening of Cheddar cheese. Aust J Dairy Technol. 42:33-36.

13.

Florez AB, Reimundo P, Delgado S, Fernandez E, Alegria A, Guijarro J, A, Mayo B. 2012; Genome sequence of Lactococcus garvieae ipla 31405, a bacteriocin-producing, tetracycline-resistant strain isolated from a raw-milk cheese. J Bacteriol. 194:5118-5119

14.

Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH. 1957; A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 226:497-509.

15.

Fortina MG, Ricci G, Foschino R, Picozzi C, Dolci P, Zeppa G, Cocolin L, Manachini PL. 2007; Phenotypic typing, technological properties and safety aspects of Lactococcus garvieae strains from dairy environments. J Appl Microbiol. 103:445-453

16.

Fox PF, Law J, Mcsweeney PLH, Wallace J. 1993; Biochemistry of cheese ripening. In Cheese: Chemistry, physics and microbiology. SpringerBoston, MA, USA:389-438

17.

Freitas AC, Malcata FX. 1998; Lipolysis in Picante cheese: Influence of milk type and ripening time on free fatty acid profile. Lait. 78:251-258

18.

Fuka MM, Wallisch S, Engel M, Welzl G, Havranek J, Schloter M. 2013; Dynamics of bacterial communities during the ripening process of different Croatian cheese types derived from raw ewe’s milk cheeses. PLOS ONE. 8:e80734

19.

Grappin R, Beuvier E. 1997; Possible implications of milk pasteurization on the manufacture and sensory quality of ripened cheese. Int Dairy J. 7:751-761

20.

Hort J, Grys G, Woodman J. 1997; The relationships between the chemical, rheological and textural properties of Cheddar cheese. Lait. 77:587-600

21.

Kamaly KM, Marth EM. 1989; Enzyme activities of lactic streptococci and their role in maturation of cheese: A review. J Dairy Sci. 72:1945-1966

22.

Li W, Fu L, Niu B, Wu S, Wooley J. 2012; Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform. 13:656-668

23.

Lusk TS, Ottesen AR, White JR, Allard MW, Brown EW, Kase JA. 2012; Characterization of microflora in Latin-style cheeses by next-generation sequencing technology. BMC Microbiol. 12:254

24.

Magoc T, Salzberg SL. 2011; Flash: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 27:2957-2963

25.

Masiello SN, Martin NH, Trmcic A, Wiedmann M, Boor KJ. 2016; Identification and characterization of psychrotolerant coliform bacteria isolated from pasteurized fluid milk. J Dairy Sci. 99:130-140

26.

Mcsweeney PLH, Fox PF, Lucey JA, Jordan KN, Cogan TM. 1993; Contribution of the indigenous microflora to the maturation of Cheddar cheese. Int Dairy J. 3:613-634

27.

Menendez S, Godinez R, Centeno JA, Rodriguez-Otero JL. 2001; Microbiological, chemical and biochemical characteristics of ‘tetilla’ raw cows-milk cheese. Food Microbiol. 18:151-158

28.

Morrison WR, Smith LM. 1967; Fatty acid composition of milk phospholipids Ii. Sheep, indian buffalo and human milks. Lipids. 2:178-182

29.

Papetti P, Costa C, Antonucci F, Figorilli S, Solaini S, Menesatti P. 2012; A RFID web-based infotracing system for the artisanal italian cheese quality traceability. Food Control. 27:234-241

30.

Patel HG, Upadhyay KG, Miyani RV, Pandya AJ. 1993; Instron texture profile of buffalo milk Cheddar cheese as influenced by composition and ripening changes. Food Qual Prefer. 4:187-192

31.

Pelaez C, Requena T. 2005; Exploiting the potential of bacteria in the cheese ecosystem. Int Dairy J. 15:831-844

32.

Reitsma CJ, Henning DR. 1996; Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7 during the manufacture and curing of Cheddar cheese. J Food Prot. 59:460-464

33.

Salwa AA, Galal EA. 2002; Effect of milk pretreatment on the keeping quality of Domiati cheese. Pak J Nutr. 1:132-136

34.

Schlesser JE, Gerdes R, Ravishankar S, Madsen K, Mowbray J, Teo AY. 2006; Survival of a five-strain cocktail of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the 60-day aging period of Cheddar cheese made from unpasteurized milk. J Food Prot. 69:990-998

35.

Sert D, Akin N, Aktumsek A. 2014; Lipolysis in Tulum cheese produced from raw and pasteurized goats’ milk during ripening. Small Rumin Res. 121:351-360

36.

Shakeel-Ur-Rehman , Fox PF, Mcsweeney PLH. 2000; Methods used to study non-starter microorganisms in cheese: A review. Int J Dairy Technol. 53:113-119

37.

Singh A, Srinivansan RA, Dudani AT. 1973; Studies on exocellular and endocellular lipases of some of the lipolytic bacteria. Milchwissenschaft. 28:164-166.

38.

Singh TK, Drake MA, Cadwallader KR. 2003; Flavor of Cheddar cheese: A chemical and sensory perspective. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2:166-189

39.

Stadhouders J, Veringa HA. 1973; Fat hydrolysis by lactic acid bacteria in cheese. Ned Melk- en Zuiveltijdschr. 27:77-91.

40.

Stecchini ML, Sarais I, De Bertoldi M. 1991; The influence of Lactobacillus plantarum culture inoculation on the fate of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium in Montasio cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 14:99-109

41.

Thomas TD, Crow VL. 1983; Mechanism of D (–)-lactic acid formation in Cheddar cheese. N Z J Dairy Sci Technol. 18:131-141.

42.

Trmcic A, Chauhan K, Kent DJ, Ralyea RD, Martin NH, Boor KJ, Wiedmann M. 2016; Coliform detection in cheese is associated with specific cheese characteristics, but no association was found with pathogen detection. J Dairy Sci. 99:6105-6120

43.

Woo AH, Kollodge S, Lindsay RC. 1984; Modified techniques for improved gas chromatographic quantification of free fatty acids in dairy foods. J Dairy Sci. 67:1517-1520

44.

Wouters JTM, Ayad EHE, Hugenholtz J, Smit G. 2002; Microbes from raw milk for fermented dairy products. Int Dairy J. 12:91-109

45.

Yoon Y, Lee S, Choi KH. 2016; Microbial benefits and risks of raw milk cheese. Food Control. 63:201-215

46.

Zaki MH, Metwally NH, Gewaily EM, El-Koussy LA. 1975; Domiati cheese stored at room temperature as affected by heat treatment of milk and different salting levels. Agric Res Rev. 52:217-231.

Journal Title Change

We announce that the title of our journal and related information were changed as below from January, 2019.

 

Before (~2018.12)

After (2019.01~)

Journal Title

Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources

Food Science of Animal Resources

Journal Abbreviation

Korean J. Food Sci. An.

Food Sci. Anim. Resour.

eISSN

2234-246X

2636-0780

pISSN

1225-8563

2636-0772

Journal Homepage

http://www.kosfaj.org

Same

JCR Citation Indexing

SCIE

SCIE


I don't want to open this window for a day.