REVIEW

Clean Label Meat Technology: Pre-Converted Nitrite as a Natural Curing

Hae In Yong1,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0970-4496, Tae-Kyung Kim1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-4314, Hee-Don Choi1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-0330, Hae Won Jang1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-9880, Samooel Jung3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-188X, Yun-Sang Choi1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-6237
Author Information & Copyright
1Research Group of Food Processing, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul 01133, Korea
3Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*Corresponding author : Yun-Sang Choi, Research Group of Food Processing, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea, Tel: +82-63-219-9387, Fax: +82-63-219-9076, E-mail: kcys0517@kfri.re.kr

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 15, 2020 ; Revised: Nov 17, 2020 ; Accepted: Nov 25, 2020

Published Online: Mar 01, 2021

Abstract

Clean labeling is emerging as an important issue in the food industry, particularly for meat products that contain many food additives. Among synthetic additives, nitrite is the most important additive in the meat processing industry and is related to the development of cured color and flavor, inhibition of oxidation, and control of microbial growth in processed meat products. As an alternative to synthetic nitrite, pre-converted nitrite from natural microorganisms has been investigated, and the applications of pre-converted nitrite have been reported. Natural nitrate sources mainly include fruits and vegetables with high nitrate content. Celery juice or powder form have been used widely in various studies. Many types of commercial starter cultures have been developed. S. carnosus is used as a critical nitrate reducing microorganism and lactic acid bacteria or other Staphylococcus species also were used. Pre-converted nitrite has also been compared with synthetic nitrite and studies have been aimed at improving utilization by exploiting the strengths (positive consumer attitude and decreased residual nitrite content) and limiting the weaknesses (remained carcinogenic risk) of pre-converted nitrite. Moreover, as concerns regarding the use of synthetic nitrites increased, research was conducted to meet consumer demands for the use of natural nitrite from raw materials. In this report, we review and discuss various studies in which synthetic nitrite was replaced with natural materials and evaluate pre-converted nitrite technology as a natural curing approach from a clean label perspective in the manufacturing of processed meat products.

Keywords: clean label; technology; nitrite; natural curing; pre-converted nitrite

Introduction

Clean labels require no synthetic additives, minimal processing, a concise list of raw materials, easy-to-understand selection of raw materials, and the use of traditional processing methods (Asioli et al., 2017). Clean labeling of food products was first started in the UK in the 1990s (Yong et al., 2020). Clean label foods have been preferred by consumers because the ingredients in the product are clearly indicated on the packaging of the product (Lee, 2015; Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2019). In particular, clean labeling of meat products, which typically contain many food additives and are prepared using complicated manufacturing methods, is a major concern. Accordingly, food manufacturers have started to evaluate the use of ecofriendly, natural additives rather than synthetic chemicals (Ryu and Lee, 2018).

Despite many recent advancements in the meat processing industry, consumers continue to change preferences owing to health issues. In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer under the World Health Organization announced that processed meat products and red meat are associated with carcinogenicity (Hur et al., 2015). Since then, researchers have focused on the development of healthy meat products. In particular, the use of nitrite, a synthetic additive commonly used in meat products, has been scrutinized, and food manufacturing has shifted focus to the development of processed meat products that are not harmful to health by eliminating food additives or replacing them with natural materials (Kim et al., 2019). Synthetic additive-free approaches have become important in the meat processing industry and are also related to clean labeling (Câmara et al., 2020). Because of the risks associated with additives used in the generation of some meat products, consumers have become skeptical of all types of food additives, and the food industry is therefore aiming to develop alternative technologies.

Accordingly, in this report, we discuss the use of pre-converted nitrite as a natural curing agent from a clean label perspective in processed meat products.

The Role of Nitrite in Meat Products

For years, nitrite has been used in the food and pharmaceutical industries because of its biological and functional roles. In particular, nitrite is widely used as an essential additive in meat products and has been applied for improving microbial safety, developing cured color and flavor, and inhibiting oxidation in meat products (Parthasarathy and Bryan, 2012). In this section, we discuss the roles and chemical reactions of nitrite in meat products.

Nitrite is commonly used in meat products because it inhibits microbial growth, including the growth of food-borne pathogens. When pork meat supplemented with sodium nitrite (150 mg/kg) was stored for 9 d at 4°C, the numbers of total aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes were more than 1 Log CFU/g lower than those of the control group (Lamas et al., 2016). Nitrite can also inhibit anaerobic bacteria, particularly the neurotoxigenic species Clostridium botulinum. C. botulinum is a spore-forming bacterium, and some of its spores can survive at mild heating temperatures or pressures above 1,500 MPa (Majou and Christieans, 2018). According to Lebrun et al. (2020), sodium nitrite (≥ 30 mg/kg) can prevent the outgrowth and toxinogenesis of C. botulinum in cooked ham. In this regard, various studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanisms mediating the bactericidal effects of nitrite, which could be explained by the reactions of nitric oxide (NO) and peroxinitrite.

When nitrite (NO2, pKa=3.3) is added to a meat product having a pH of 5.5–6.5, it is progressively reduced to nitrous acid (HNO2) and NO, as describe as Eqs. (13). In this process, ascorbic acid, which is generally added to meat products with nitrite, accelerates the formation of NO via the reaction shown in Eq. (4) (Honikel, 2008). Another pathway involved in the production of NO in meat involves the activity of deoxy-myoglobin (MbFe2+), which exhibits nitrite reductase activity, as shown in Eq. (5) (Majou and Christieans, 2018).

NO 2 + H + HNO 2
(1)
HNO 2 + H + N 2 O 3 + H 2 O
(2)
N 2 O 3 NO + NO 2
(3)
N 2 O 3 + ascorbic acid (reductase) 2 NO + H 2 O + dehydroascorbic acid
(4)
NO 2 + MbFe 2 + + H + NO + MbFe 3 + + OH
(5)

The NO produced by the above processes easily reacts with iron (Fe) or the SH-group in amino acids (Honikel, 2008). Thus, NO can inhibit microbial growth by reacting with iron-sulfur proteins and forming iron-NO complexes (Majou and Christieans, 2018). Tompkin (1978) explained that when nitrite is added to canned ham, it reacts with ferredoxin (Fig. 1a), which is an iron-sulfur enzyme necessary for energy production in clostridial vegetative cells. Subsequently, modification of ferredoxin by NO results in inhibition of Clostridium outgrowth. Ren et al. (2008) suggested that NO induces bacteriostasis in Escherichia coli because it reacts with iron dihydroxyacid dehydratase, which is an iron-sulfur protein.

kosfa-41-2-173-g1
Fig. 1. Chemical structure of ferredoxin (a) and schematic diagram of nitroso-myoglobin formation reaction (b).
Download Original Figure

When meat products are progressively oxidized, superoxide radical anion (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be produced; these compounds can react with NO and nitrite, respectively, and then produce peroxynitrite (ONOO), as shown in Eqs. (67) (Jo et al., 2020). Peroxynitrite is a strong oxidant and bactericidal compound that causes oxidative stress, denaturation of the cell wall, and DNA damage (An et al., 2019). For these reasons, nitrite addition improves the microbial safety of meat products.

NO + O 2 ONOO
(6)
NO 2 + H 2 O 2 ONOO + H 2 O
(7)

The color of cured meat products is also an important factor that affects consumers’ purchase decisions (Flores and Toldrá, 2020). Generally, cured meat products exhibit a heat-stable pink color owing to changes in the form of myoglobin. Myoglobin, the main factor associated with meat color, is composed of globin protein and a heme-group containing a centrally located iron atom (Jo et al., 2020). Because NO is produced via nitrite addition to meat (Eqs. 15) and can react with iron, MbFe2+ (purple-red color) can bind to NO and be converted to nitroso-myoglobin (NO-MbFe2+, dark red), as described in Eq. (8) and Fig. 1b (Yong et al., 2019). Additionally, NO can also bind met-myoglobin (MbFe3+, brown color) and form nitroso-myoglobin through the action of reductases, such as ascorbic acid, as shown in Eq. (9) (Sebrane and Bacus, 2007). Subsequently, when the cured meat undergoes cooking, nitroso-myoglobin is denatured and converted to bright pink nitrosohemochrome. The pink color of cured meat products is caused by the presence of nitrosohemochrome (Parthasarathy and Bryan, 2012).

NO + MbFe 2 + NO - MbFe 2 +
(8)
NO + MbF 3 + NO - MbFe 3 + (reductase) NO - MbFe 2 +
(9)

Another remarkable property of nitrite is its ability to inhibit lipid oxidation of meat products during storage or heating (Flores and Toldrá, 2020). Pork jerky made with sodium nitrite (70 mg/kg) shows low lipid oxidation compared with that without sodium nitrite (Yong et al., 2019). Additionally, NO converted from nitrite can act as a metal ion chelator. Indeed, NO binds to and stabilizes heme-iron and reduces the amount of free iron released from myoglobin. Because these irons are the major pro-oxidants in meat products, NO can block lipid oxidation (Parthasarathy and Bryan, 2012). Furthermore, NO can react with free radicals to terminate the lipid oxidation reaction (Jo et al., 2020). Because of its antioxidant effects, nitrite can suppress warmed-over flavor, an unpleasant rancid flavor detected in meats. Thomas et al. (2013) reported that the addition of nitrite inhibits the production of aldehyde by fatty acid oxidation production. However, the antioxidant effects of nitrite alone are insufficient for explaining the characteristic flavor of cured meats, and more complex reactions are involved in determining the flavor of meat products (Jo et al., 2020).

The Need for Natural Alternatives to Synthetic Nitrite

In the food industry, synthetic nitrites, such as sodium nitrite (NaNO2) and potassium nitrite (KNO2), are often used because they are inexpensive, stable, uniform, and easy to prepare. However, consumers’ perceptions that organic foods are healthier and more nutritious than inorganic foods, resulting in major concerns regarding the exposure of consumers to synthetic nitrite (Jo et al., 2020). Despite the fact that there really are no differences between organic food and inorganic food, consumers are willing to pay 10%–40% more for organic and natural foods (Sebranek and Bacus, 2007). Thus, the clean label food market stresses the use of natural additives instead of synthetic additives (Asioli et al. 2017).

In accordance with consumer demand, several studies have been conducted to identify substitutes for synthetic nitrite. Some studies have focused on the possibility of substituting synthetic nitrite with bacteriocins, organic acids, essential oils, and plant extracts showing strong antimicrobial activity (Flores and Toldrá, 2020). However, nitrite itself is difficult to replace using simple antioxidants or antimicrobial substances because it can serve multiple functions simultaneously. Accordingly, food manufacturers have explored the use of nitrite (NO2) converted from nitrate (NO3) from natural plants as a substitute for synthetic nitrite (Gassara et al., 2016). Using nitrate as a natural substance for meat products is not a new concept; centuries ago, meat curing processes used natural nitrate in the form of saltpeter (KNO3) (Honikel, 2008). However, modern technology has significantly improved, and various starter cultures are now used to reduce nitrate to nitrite with shorter incubation times. In addition, natural nitrite additives are being developed that do not affect the quality of the product, such as flavor (Sebranek et al., 2012).

Natural Nitrate Sources Used in Meat Product

Nitrate naturally occurs in soils, the atmosphere, plants, and waste waters. Among these natural nitrate sources, some plants contain considerable amounts of nitrates and are easy to use in meat products (Gassara et al., 2016). The general nitrate concentrations in plants are shown in Table 1. Several plants, including celery, spinach, radishes, and lettuce contain more than 2,500 mg nitrate/kg (Gassara et al., 2016; Schullehner et al., 2018). Among these plants, celery is the most extensively studied plant and has been used commercially because it does not significantly affect the sensory properties of meat products (Sebranek et al., 2012). Table 2 shows studies in which meat products were produced using various nitrate sources, including celery powder. Most of the studies used both nitrate-containing plants and a starter culture (nitrate-reducing bacteria) to reduce nitrate to nitrite. Sindelar et al. (2007) added celery juice powder and starter culture in emulsified sausages and incubated the sample. As a result, sausages made with celery juice powder showed similar quality to those made with sodium nitrite. Moreover, Kim et al. (2017) reported that when Swiss chard was fermented with starter culture and used in cooked loin ham, there were positive effects on color (particulary redness) and lipid oxidation. In cooked sausages, the addition of celery powder (0.8%) effectively inhibits quality deterioration during storage (Jin et al., 2018). Choi et al. (2017) showed that a meat-emulsion containing pre-converted nitrite from red beets (10%) with ascorbic acid had similar quality compared with that prepared using sodium nitrite. Importantly, natural nitrite sources are effective for controlling microbial growth and quality in meat products. According to Golden et al. (2014), pre-converted celery powder (nitrite content: 80 mg/kg) inhibits the growth of L. monocytogenes in deli-style turkeys.

Table 1. General nitrate content (mg/100 g fresh weight) in different plants (Gassara et al., 2020; Schullehner et al., 2018)
Nitrate content Type of plant
>2,500 Celery, cress, lettuce, spinach, rucola
1,000–2,500 Chinese cabbage, endive, leek, parsley
500–1,000 Turnip, savoy cabbage, cabbage
200–500 Carrot, cucumber, pumpkin, broccoli
<200 Potato, tomato, onion, eggplant, mushroom, asparagus
Download Excel Table
Table 2. Studies of pre-converted nitrite sources and starter cultures in meat products
Meat product Pre-converted nitrite sources (added concentration) Strain in starter culture Reference
Ham
 Ground, cooked and sliced ham Celery powder (1%) Staphylococcus carnosus Krause et al. (2011)
 Ready to eat uncured ham Celery powder (1%, 2%) S. carnosus Sindelar et al. (2007)
 Ham Celery juice powder (0.2%) and vinegar, lemon powder, and cherry powder blend (0.45%) S. carnosus Jackson et al. (2011)
Sausage
 Cooked sausage Cabbage (250 g/kg), chinese cabbage (250 g/kg), young radish (250 g/kg) S. carnosus and S. xylosus Ko et al. (2017)
 Cold smoked sausage Celery (2.58%) S. xylosus and Pediococcus pentosaceus Eisinaitė et al. (2020)
 Dried sausage/Chorizo Citric acid (200 ppm), acerola (100 ppm), rosemary (200 ppm), lettuce (3,000 ppm), arugula (1,500 ppm), watercress (1,500 ppm), spinach (3,000 ppm), celery (3,000 ppm), chard (3,000 ppm), and beet (3,000 ppm) Pediococcus, S. xylosus, and S. carnosus Martínez et al. (2019)
 Dried fermented sausage Freeze-dried leek powder (75 ppm, 150 ppm) S. carnosus Tsoukalas et al. (2011)
 Fermented sausage Radish (0.5%, 1%) and beetroot (0.5%, 1%) S. carnosus Ozaki et al. (2020)
 Mortadella-type sausages Parsley extract powder (1.07 g/kg, 2.14 g/kg, 4.29 g/kg) S. carnosus Riel et al. (2017)
 Pork sausage Fermented spinach extract (3.0 g/100 g), fermented lettuce extract (3.0 g/100 g), fermented celery extract (3.0 g/100 g), and fermented red beet extract (3.0 g/100 g) S. carnosus Hwang et al. (2018)
 Sausage Celery power (0.8%), fruits extract powder (0.6%), purple sweet potato powder (0.45%), and fruit and vegetable extract powder (0.5%) (Not mentioned) Jin et el. (2018)
 Turkish fermented beef sausage (sucuk) Beetroot (0.12%, 0.24%, 0.35%) S. carnosus, P. acdilactici, and Lactobacillus sakei Sucu and Turp (2018)
Ground meat product
 Ground pork meat product Chinese cabbage powder (0.4%), radish powder (0.4%), spinach powder (0.4%) S. carnosus Jeong et al. (2020)
 Cooked ground pork product White kimchi powder (0.2%), acerola juice powder (0.1%), celery powder (0.4%) S. carnosus Choi et al. (2020)
Others
 Cured pork loin Fermented spinach (10%, 20%, 30%) L. farciminis Kim et al. (2017a)
 Cured pork loin Swiss chard (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) Bactoferm S-B-6 (Chr. Hansen, Gainesville, FL, USA) and S. carnosus Kim et al. (2019a)
 Cured meat model system Freeze-dried leek powder (0.84%, 1.68%) (Not mentioned) Tsoukalas et al. (2011)
 Deli-style turkey Celery powder (1%, 3.8%) Lactic acid starter culture Golden et al. (2014)
 Deli-style turkey breast Celery powder (0.21%, 0.41%) S. carnosus King et al. (2015)
 Meat emulsion Fermented red beet extract (5%, 10%) S. carnosus Choi et al. (2017)
 Pork patties Swiss chard and celery (2%) S. carnosus Shin et al. (2017)
Download Excel Table

Nitrate obtained from plant sources can be used in two ways. The first is the direct addition of a plant and starter culture to the brine or product during the manufacturing process. This process requires an incubation time to allow adequate formation of nitrite by the culture. However, this method is difficult to use because the amount of generated nitrite is unknown and depends on the incubation conditions (Sebranek et al., 2012). Accordingly, industries prefer to use different methods. The second method uses the ‘cultured’, ‘prefermented’, or ‘pre-converted’ nitrate-containing plant source, which has already been incubated with starter culture to produce nitrite. Pre-converted plant powder is simple to use because certain nitrites can be applied (Flores and Toldrá, 2020). Sebranek et al. (2012) reported that pre-converted vegetable products typically contain about 15,000–20,000 mg/kg nitrite.

Starter Culture

For manufacturing meat products, several microorganisms, called starter cultures, are used for different purposes. Many types of commercial starter cultures have been developed, and these starter cultures can be divided into four types: lactic acid bacteria, protective bacteria, curing agent cultures, and molds or yeasts (Frece et al., 2014). Among these starter cultures, those that can reduce nitrate to nitrite are essential in meat production (Gassara et al., 2016). Meat products are generally incubated with nitrate and starter cultures at the same time. However, generation of nitrite by this process is often slow, and incubation at appropriate temperature for culture can reduce the quality of meat products (Sindelar et al., 2007). To overcome these limitations, pre-converted nitrite can be added directly to meat products (Kim et al., 2017a; Krause et al., 2011).

Because pre-converted nitrite is formed before adding meat products, the selection of proper starter culture and incubation conditions is essential for the production of stable and abundant nitrite (Sebranek et al., 2012). Starter cultures, which contain lactic acid bacteria, micrococci, yeast, and molds, are generally added to meat during fermentation and have various important roles in fermented meat products. The major roles of lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, and molds are to decrease the pH and improve the flavor of meat products (Miralles et al., 1996; Sunesen and Stahnke, 2003). However, these starter cultures may not be helpful for reducing nitrate to nitrite, except in some microorganisms that express nitrate reductases (Ammor and Mayo, 2007).

Kim et al. (2017b) reported that Lactobacillus strains exhibit nitrate reduction capacity and that L. farciminis, L. coryniformis, L. fructosus, L. reuteri, L. amylophilus, L. hilgardii, L. delbrueckii, L. fermentum, L. plantarum, and L. brevis reduce nitrate. Among these microorganisms, almost all Lactobacillus sp. reduce nitrate to a lesser extent than Staphylococcus carnosus; however, L. farciminis has the most abundant reduction ratio, although the reduction ratio is higher than that of S. carnosus. L. farciminis also reduces nitrate, showing the highest reduction ratio at 30°C for 36–72 h. Coagulase-negative micrococci or staphylococci possess high reduction activity at various temperature ranges (15°C–20°C and over 30°C) (Casaburi et al., 2005). For example, S. carnosus cannot produce nitrite well at low temperatures (6°C), and medium temperatures (24°C) are more suitable than high temperatures (38°C) with regard to the amount of nitrite produced, but the reduction rate is increased at high temperatures compared with that at medium or low temperatures (Krause et al., 2011). Although the incubation temperature is an important factor when reducing nitrate to nitrite, the incubation time is a more critical factor because excessive incubation time induces a decrease in the nitrite content of pre-converted nitrite sources (Kim et al., 2019b; Sindelar et al., 2007). This decline in nitrite content may be due to a decrease in the pH value of the pre-converted nitrite solution. The acidic condition decreases the activity of nitrate reductase and the release of nitrite to NO easily (Paik and Lee, 2014).

Strengths and Weaknesses of Natural Nitrite

Nitrite is an important curing agent with roles in antioxidant activity, antibiotic effects, flavor enhancement, and color development (Honikel, 2008). Because excessive use of nitrite is harmful to human health, various countries regulate and limit the amount of added or residual nitrate and nitrite in meat products (Gassara et al., 2016). Therefore, despite difficulties in developing a complete nitrite substitute, researchers have investigated approaches for replacement of sodium nitrite.

Among the various weaknesses of natural nitrite, residual nitrite content may be the most challenging problem. Pre-converted nitrite, called natural nitrite, may not be harmful to humans; however, the risk of nitrite inducing carcinogenesis cannot be ignored. Amines and residual nitrite in meat can still be a threat to human health because of the formation of n-nitrosamine (Honikel, 2008). Furthermore, although spices can be used to mask vegetable flavor, the flavor of vegetable powder in meat products may not be acceptable to consumers (Kim et al., 2017a; Sebranek and Bacus, 2007). Moreover, some patients may experience allergic reactions to certain vegetables, which could limit the use of natural nitrite sources as a replacement for synthetic nitrite (Sebranek et al., 2012). Despite these weaknesses, natural nitrite may still have applications in the replacement of synthetic nitrite.

In terms of consumer behavior, pre-converted nitrite from vegetable powder could have positive effects because it can be considered ‘natural’. Consumers generally have limited information regarding the form of natural nitrite added to meat products, and this positive feature of such meat products may represent an effective marketing approach (Hung et al., 2016). Furthermore, the residual nitrite contents of meat products supplemented with natural nitrite were found to be lower than those of meat products supplemented with synthetic nitrite in various studies (Choi et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2017a; Kim et al., 2017b; Sindelar et al., 2007). Natural nitrite-containing vegetable powder could accelerate the formation of colorants (NO-MbFe2+) because the acidic conditions of these sources and natural antioxidants in vegetables could help reduce nitrite to NO (Kim et al., 2017a). Therefore, decreased residual nitrite contents reduce the formation of nitrosamine in frying process or the stomach when the same concentration of nitrite is used compared with that of synthetic nitrite (Honikel, 2008). Appropriate addition of natural nitrite does not result in a bad odor or cause the product to have a flavor typical of fermented vegetables, and a significant difference was not observed (Shin et al., 2017). In addition because almost all vegetables contain nitrate, it may be possible to substitute for vegetables that are common causes of allergic reactions (Choi et al., 2017; Hwang et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2019a; Kim et al., 2017a).

Conclusion

Various additives are used to improve the quality characteristics of meat products. The addition of nitrite in the manufacturing of meat products is restricted, and nitrites are thought to have negative effects on health. In this review, we discussed pre-converted nitrite technology as a natural curing agent in processed meat products from a clean label perspective. This approach can eliminate the use of synthetic nitrites, which are disliked by consumers, and instead promote natural curing using natural materials. The development of clean label meat products may be improved by exploiting the strengths and limiting the weaknesses of natural nitrite, and the use of natural ingredients may improve consumer perception of meat products. Overall, pre-converted nitrite technology is expected to have important applications in natural curing of meat products.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0211200-01) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (Korea).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yong HI, Kim TK, Choi YS. Data curation: Kim TK, Choi HD. Formal analysis: Yong HI, Kim TK, Jang HW. Methodology: Yong HI, Kim TK. Software: Yong HI, Jung S. Validation: Choi HD, Jung S. Investigation: Kim TK, Choi YS. Writing - original draft: Yong HI, Kim TK, Choi YS, Jang HW. Writing - review & editing: Yong HI, Kim TK, Choi HD, Jang HW, Jung S, Choi YS.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Ammor MS, Mayo B. 2007; Selection criteria for lactic acid bacteria to be used as functional starter cultures in dry sausage production: An update. Meat Sci. 76:138-146

2.

An JY, Yong HI, Kim H-J, Park JY, Lee SH, Baek KH, Choe W, Jo C. 2019; Estimation of inactivation effects against Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm by different plasma-treated solutions and post-treatment storage. Appl Phys Lett. 114:073703

3.

Aschemann-Witzel J, Varela P, Peschel AO. 2019; Consumers’ categorization of food ingredients: Do consumers perceive them as ‘clean label’producers expect? An exploration with projective mapping. Food Qual Prefer. 71:117-128

4.

Asioli D, Aschemann-Witzel J, Caputo V, Vecchio R, Annunziata A, Næs T, Varela P. 2017; Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res Int. 99:58-71

5.

Câmara AKFI, Vidal VAS, Santos M, Bernardinelli OD, Sabadini E, Pollonio MAR. 2020; Reducing phosphate in emulsified meat products by adding chia (Salvia hispanica L.) mucilage in powder or gel format: A clean label technological strategy. Meat Sci. 163:108085

6.

Casaburi A, Blaiotta G, Mauriello G, Pepe O, Villani F. 2005; Technological activities of Staphylococcus carnosus and Staphylococcus simulans strains isolated from fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 71:643-650

7.

Choi JH, Bae SM, Jeong JY. 2020; Effects of the addition levels of white kimchi powder and acerola juice powder on the qualities of indirectly cured meat products. Food Sci Anim Resour. 40:636-648

8.

Choi YS, Kim TK, Jeon KH, Park JD, Kim HW, Hwang KE, Kim YB. 2017; Effects of pre-converted nitrite from red beet and ascorbic acid on quality characteristics in meat emulsions. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 37:288-296

9.

Eisinaitė V, Tamkutė L, Vinauskienė R, Leskauskaitė D. 2020; Freeze-dried celery as an indirect source of nitrate in cold-smoked sausages: Effect on safety and color formation. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 129:109586

10.

Flores M, Toldrá F. 2021; Chemistry, safety, and regulatory considerations in the use of nitrite and nitrate from natural origin in meat products. Meat Sci. 171:108272

11.

Frece J, Kovačević D, Kazazić S, Mrvčić J, Vahčić N, Ježek D, Hruškar M, Babić I, Markov K. 2014; Comparison of sensory properties, shelf-life and microbiological safety of industrial sausages produced with autochthonous and commercial starter cultures. Food Technol Biotechnol. 52:307-316.

12.

Gassara F, Kouassi AP, Brar SK, Belkacemi K. 2016; Green alternatives to nitrates and nitrites in meat-based products-a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 56:2133-2148

13.

Golden MC, Mcdonnell LM, Sheehan V, Sindelar JJ, Glass KA. 2014; Inhibition of listeria monocytogenes in deli-style turkey breast formulated with cultured celery powder and/or cultured sugar–vinegar blend during storage at 4°C. J Food Prot. 77:1787-1793

14.

Honikel KO. 2008; The use and control of nitrate and nitrite for the processing of meat products. Meat Sci. 78:68-76

15.

Hung Y, de Kok TM, Verbeke W. 2016; Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Sci. 121:119-126

16.

Hur SJ, Jang A, Jeong JY, Jo C, Chin KB, Lee KT. 2015; Misunderstanding and truths for controversy of carcinogenic substances in meat products. Food Sci Anim Resour Ind. 4:7-22.

17.

Hwang KE, Kim TK, Kim HW, Seo DH, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Choi YS. 2018; Effect of natural pre-converted nitrite sources on color development in raw and cooked pork sausage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 31:1358-1365

18.

Jackson AL, Kulchaiyawat C, Sullivan GA, Sebranek JG, Dickson JS. 2011; Use of natural ingredients to control growth of Clostridium perfringens in naturally cured frankfurters and hams. J Food Prot. 74:417-424

19.

Jeong JY, Bae SM, Yoon J, Jeong DH, Gwak SH. 2020; Effect of using vegetable powders as nitrite/nitrate sources on the physicochemical characteristics of cooked pork products. Food Sci Anim Resour. 40:831-843

20.

Jin SK, Choi JS, Yang HS, Park TS, Yim DG. 2018; Natural curing agents as nitrite alternatives and their effects on the physicochemical, microbiological properties and sensory evaluation of sausages during storage. Meat Sci. 146:34-40

21.

Jo K, Lee S, Yong HI, Choi YS, Jung S. 2020; Nitrite sources for cured meat products. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 129:109583

22.

Kim TK, Hwang KE, Song DH, Ham YK, Kim YB, Paik HD, Choi YS. 2019a; Effects of natural nitrite source from Swiss chard on quality characteristics of cured pork loin. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 32:1933-1941

23.

Kim TK, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Park JD, Sung JM, Choi HW, Hwang KE, Choi YS. 2017a; Effect of fermented spinach as sources of pre-converted nitrite on color development of cured pork loin. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 37:105-113

24.

Kim TK, Seo DH, Sung JM, Ku SK, Jeon KH, Kim YB, Choi YS. 2017b; Study of optimization of natural nitrite source production from spinach. Korean J Food Sci Technol. 49:459-461.

25.

Kim TK, Yong HI, Jang HW, Lee H, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Choi YS. 2019b; Quality of sliced cured pork loin with spinach: Effect of incubation period with starter culture. J Food Qual. 2019:6373671

26.

King AM, Glass KA, Milkowski AL, Sindelar JJ. 2015; Comparison of the effect of curing ingredients derived from purified and natural sources on inhibition of Clostridium perfringens outgrowth during cooling of deli-style turkey breast. J Food Prot. 78:1527-1535

27.

Ko YM, Park JH, Yoon KS. 2017; Nitrite formation from vegetable sources and its use as a preservative in cooked sausage. J Sci Food Agric. 97:1774-1783

28.

Krause B, Sebranek J, Rust R, Mendonca A. 2011; Incubation of curing brines for the production of ready-to-eat, uncured, no-nitrite-or-nitrate-added, ground, cooked and sliced ham. Meat Sci. 89:507-513

29.

Lamas A, Miranda JM, Vázquez B, Cepeda A, Franco CM. 2016; An evaluation of alternatives to nitrites and sulfites to inhibit the growth of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in meat products. Foods. 5:74

30.

Lebrun S, Van Nieuwenhuysen T, Crèvecoeur S, Vanleyssem R, Thimister J, Denayer S, Jeuge S, Daube G, Clinquart A, Fremaux B. 2020; Influence of reduced levels or suppression of sodium nitrite on the outgrowth and toxinogenesis of psychrotrophic Clostridium botulinum group II type B in cooked ham. Int J Food Microbiol. 334:108853

31.

Lee K. 2015; Industrialization trend of natural ingredient with clean label focusing on ingredion clean label products. Food Ind Nutr. 20:11-14.

32.

Majou D, Christieans S. 2018; Mechanisms of the bactericidal effects of nitrate and nitrite in cured meats. Meat Sci. 145:273-284

33.

Martínez L, Bastida P, Castillo J, Ros G, Nieto G. 2019; Green alternatives to synthetic antioxidants, antimicrobials, nitrates, and nitrites in clean label Spanish chorizo. Antioxidants. 8:184

34.

Miralles MC, Flores J, Perez-Martinez G. 1996; Biochemical tests for the selection of Staphylococcus strains as potential meat starter cultures. Food Microbiol. 13:227-236

35.

Ozaki MM, Munekata PE, Jacinto-Valderrama RA, Efraim P, Pateiro M, Lorenzo JM, Pollonio MAR. 2020; Beetroot and radish powders as natural nitrite source for fermented dry sausages. Meat Sci. 171:108275

36.

Paik HD, Lee JY. 2014; Investigation of reduction and tolerance capability of lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi against nitrate and nitrite in fermented sausage condition. Meat Sci. 97:609-614

37.

Parthasarathy DK, Bryan NS. 2012; Sodium nitrite: The “cure” for nitric oxide insufficiency. Meat Sci. 92:274-279

38.

Ren B, Zhang N, Yang J, Ding H. 2008; Nitric oxide‐induced bacteriostasis and modification of iron‐sulphur proteins in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 70:953-964

39.

Riel G, Boulaaba A, Popp J, Klein G. 2017; Effects of parsley extract powder as an alternative for the direct addition of sodium nitrite in the production of Mortadella-type sausages–impact on microbiological, physicochemical and sensory aspects. Meat Sci. 131:166-175

40.

Ryu YA, Lee JS. 2018; Clean label guideline for entry into UK and EU agro-food markets. Food Ind Nutr. 23:20-26.

41.

Schullehner J, Hansen B, Thygesen M, Pedersen CB, Sigsgaard T. 2018; Nitrate in drinking water and colorectal cancer risk: A nationwide population‐based cohort study. Int J Cancer. 143:73-79

42.

Sebranek JG, Bacus JN. 2007; Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues?. Meat Sci. 77:136-147

43.

Sebranek JG, Jackson-Davis AL, Myers KL, Lavieri NA. 2012; Beyond celery and starter culture: Advances in natural/ organic curing processes in the united states. Meat Sci. 92:267-273

44.

Shin DM, Hwang KE, Lee CW, Kim TK, Park YS, Han SG. 2017; Effect of Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) as nitrite replacement on color stability and shelf-life of cooked pork patties during refrigerated storage. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 37:418-428

45.

Sindelar JJ, Cordray JC, Sebranek JG, Love JA, Ahn DU. 2007; Effects of varying levels of vegetable juice powder and incubation time on color, residual nitrate and nitrite, pigment, pH and trained sensory attributes of ready‐to‐eat uncured ham. J Food Sci. 72:S388-S395

46.

Sucu C, Turp GY. 2018; The investigation of the use of beetroot powder in Turkish fermented beef sausage (sucuk) as nitrite alternative. Meat Sci. 140:158-166

47.

Sunesen L, Stahnke L. 2003; Mould starter cultures for dry sausages: Selection, application and effects. Meat Sci. 65:935-948

48.

Thomas C, Mercier F, Tournayre P, Martin JL, Berdagué JL. 2013; Effect of nitrite on the odourant volatile fraction of cooked ham. Food Chem. 139:432-438

49.

Tompkin R, Christiansen L, Shaparis A. 1978; The effect of iron on botulinal inhibition in perishable canned cured meat. Int J Food Sci Technol. 13:521-527

50.

Tsoukalas D, Katsanidis E, Marantidou S, Bloukas J. 2011; Effect of freeze-dried leek powder (FDLP) and nitrite level on processing and quality characteristics of fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 87:140-145

51.

Yong HI, Kim TK, Choi HD, Jung S, Choi YS. 2020; Technological strategy of clean label meat products. Food Life. 1:13-20

52.

Yong HI, Lee SH, Kim SY, Park S, Park J, Choe W, Jo C. 2019; Color development, physiochemical properties, and microbiological safety of pork jerky processed with atmospheric pressure plasma. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 53:78-84

Change of publication charge


As day of June 1, 2021 (based on date of article submission), article processing charges (APC) will be applied to papers accepted after peer review as follows:
 

Author APC Remark
Member 1,000,000 KR won First and corresponding authors should pay membership fee to Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.
Non-member in Korea 1,200,000 KR won
Other countries except Korea 500 US $ Affiliation of corresponding author

I don't want to open this window for a day.

Special Issue: 67th ICoMST 2021


The 67th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST) is currently accepting abstracts.

The deadline for submitting abstracts has been extended to April 15th, 2021, and FSAR will apply a 50% publishing fee discount to this special issue.

For more information, please check the website below.

https://www.icomst2021.com/

 


I don't want to open this window for a day.