Construction of a Bile-responsive Expression System in Lactobacillus plantarum

Jong Pyo Chae, Edward Alain Pajarillo, In-Chan Hwang, Dae-Kyung Kang*
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
*Corresponding author : Dae-Kyung Kang, Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea Tel: +82-41-550-3655 Fax: +82-41-559-7881 E-mail:

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 10, 2018 ; Revised: Nov 14, 2018 ; Accepted: Nov 18, 2018

Published Online: Feb 28, 2019


This study aimed to develop a bile-responsive expression system for lactobacilli. The promoters of four genes, encoding phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase (mannose-specific), L-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), HPr kinase, and D-alanine-D-alanine ligase, respectively, which were highly expressed by bile addition in Lactobacillus johnsonii PF01, were chosen. Each promoter was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and fused upstream of the β-glucuronidase gene as a reporter, respectively. Then, these constructs were cloned into E. coli-Lactobacillus shuttle vector pULP2, which was generated by the fusion of pUC19 with the L. plantarum plasmid pLP27. Finally, the constructed vectors were introduced into L. plantarum for a promoter activity assay. The LDH promoter showed the highest activity and its activity increased 1.8-fold by bile addition. The constructed vector maintained in L. plantarum until 80 generations without selection pressure. A bile-responsive expression vector, pULP3-PLDH, for Lactobacillus spp. can be an effective tool for the bile-inducible expression of bioactive proteins in intestine after intake in the form of fermented dairy foods.

Keywords: bile-responsive; expression; Lactobacillus; plasmid


Lactobacilli are members of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and are generally acid- and bile-tolerant (Herbel et al., 2013; Lebeer et al., 2008; Yuki et al., 1999). They are found in a variety of fermented foods and in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals (Mandal et al., 2016; Valeriano et al., 2017). Some Lactobacillus strains have also been reported to colonize the intestinal mucosal layer and epithelium of the host (Valeriano et al., 2017, Wang et al., 2009). Therefore, intake of Lactobacillus strains which express bioactive proteins in intestine in the form of fermented dairy foods is very attractive (Bermudez-Humaran et al., 2013).

There continues to be great interest in the development of genetic tools for the regulation of gene expression in lactobacilli. In particular, inducible promoters have proven to be powerful tools in many biotechnological areas. Indeed, several regulated expression systems for LAB have been reported in recent years, including a heat-shock inducible system (Maidin et al., 2014), sugar-inducible systems (Duong et al., 2011), bacteriocin-inducible systems (Axelsson et al., 2003; Sorvig et al., 2003), as well as other stresses (Benbouziane et al., 2013; Bohmer et al., 2013; Perez-Arellano and Perez-Martinez, 2003). One of the best characterised expression systems is the nisin-controlled gene expression (NICE) system in Lactococcus lactis, in which gene expression is activated by the addition of nisin in the culture medium (Horn et al., 2003), following which the L. lactis strain successfully secretes human interleukin-22 under regulation of the nisin-inducible promoter (Loera-Arias et al., 2014).

In the intestine, lactobacilli are exposed to bile, which facilitates fat absorption during digestion. Some lactobacilli can withstand the physiological concentrations of bile to survive or colonise the gut (Hamon et al., 2012; Taranto et al., 2006), and several groups have characterized gene expression in intestinal lactobacilli under gastrointestinal conditions (Alcantara and Zuniga, 2012; Chen et al., 2017; Pajarillo et al., 2015; Pfeiler et al., 2007). Previously, a gene expression system using a bile-responsive element located upstream of the bile-inducible transporter was developed in Bifidobacterium longum to induce protein expression in the intestinal tract (Ruiz et al., 2012). However, to the best of our knowledge, Lactobacillus expression system induced by bile, an intestinal signal, has not yet been developed.

Our previous proteomic study on the bile response of Lactobacillus johnsonii PF01 identified highly expressed proteins by bile (Lee et al., 2013). In this study, we selected promoter regions of the genes upregulated by bile and compared their bile-responsiveness using β-glucuronidase reporter gene. Herein, we report the development of a bile-responsive expression system for Lactobacillus plantarum.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth (Difco, Petroit, MI, USA) at 37°C with shaking, while Lactobacillus strains were grown in De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) medium (Difco, USA) at 37°C without shaking. E. coli DH5α was used as a host strain for vector construction. When appropriate, ampicillin and erythromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used at concentrations of 100 μg/mL and 3 μg/mL, respectively, for selection of transformants of E. coli and Lactobacillus.

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Strain or plasmid Characteristics Source or reference
Lactobacillus plantarum LP27 Source of plasmid pLP27 This study
L. plantarum SK156 Transformation host, erythromycin resistance negative This study
Escherichia coli DH5α Transformation host for cloning Takara Bio Inc. (Japan)
 pUC19 pBR322 replication origin, lacZ, Ampr, multicloning site Takara Bio Inc. (Japan)
 pNZ8008 Source of β-glucuronidase gene (gusA) Mo Bio Laboratories (USA)
 pLP27 Cryptic plasmid from L. plantarum LP27 This study
 pULP1 pUC19 with pLP27 fragment This study
 pULP2 pULP1 with erythromycin resistance gene (Emr) This study
 pULP3-xxx1) pULP2 with promoter xxx and gusA gene This study

1) xxx: promoter EIIDMan, LDH, HPrK, or DDL.

Download Excel Table
DNA isolation, transformation, and bile induction

General procedures for DNA manipulation were performed as described previously (Sambrook et al., 1989). All enzymes were purchased from Takara Bio, Inc. (Japan). E. coli plasmid DNA was isolated using a QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and Lactobacillus genomic DNA was isolated according to the method of Walker and Klaenhammer (1994).

E. coli DH5a transformation was done by heat shock method performed as described by Sambrook et al. (1989). Preparation of electrocompetent Lactobacillus cells and electrotransformation were done as described by Kim et al. (2005), with some modifications. Lactobacillus cells were grown in MRS broth supplemented with 1% glycine at 37°C until it reached early-log phase (OD600=0.2–0.3) and placed on ice for 10 min. Afterwards, they were washed twice in cold washing buffer (5 mM sodium phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4), and resuspended in ice-cold electroporation buffer (1 M sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4). On the other hand, 1 μg of plasmid DNA was added to 50 μL of ice-cold cell suspension (~109 CFU/mL) in a disposable cuvette (Gene Pulser® Cuvette, 0.2 cm electrode gap; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and held on ice for 5 min. This mixture was subjected to electroporation using GenePulser Xcell™ (BioRad, USA) using 200 Ω, 2.0 kV and 25 μF capacitance conditions. Finally, the cell suspension was spread on MRS agar plate supplemented with 3 μg/mL of erythromycin and then incubated at 37°C.

For bile induction experiments, recombinants were grown in MRS-erythromycin broth, harvested, and resuspended in MRS-erythromycin broth supplemented with bile (Bile bovine; Sigma-Aldrich, USA).

Promoter selection

Among the genes upregulated by bile in L. johnsonii (Lee et al., 2013), four genes, which encode phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase, mannose-specific (EIIDMan), L-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), HPr kinase (HPrK), and D-alanine-D-alanine ligase (DDL), were chosen for this study (Supplementary Table 1). The potential Pribnow box and –35 region of the promoters were predicted from the complete genome sequences of L. johnsonii PF01 (GenBank accession no: PRJNA67469), using BPROM and Neural Network Promoter Prediction tools at 80%–90% confidence, with a consensus length of 0.5-kb for each promoter sequence (Supplementary Table 2). Primers specific to the sequences of each promoter were designed (Supplementary Table 3) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed using Pfu DNA polymerase with a thermal cycler (Takara, Japan) using standard procedures.

Isolation and sequence analysis of plasmid pLP27

Plasmid pLP27 (Fig. 1) was isolated from L. plantarum LP27 from fermented cabbage for use as the backbone plasmid. Plasmid DNA was extracted using the standard alkaline lysis method (Sambrook et al., 1989) with modifications and purified using a gel extraction kit (Qiagen, USA). Purified pLP27 was digested with the restriction enzyme SacI and cloned into pUC19 for sequencing. Nucleotide sequence similarity searches and open reading frame (ORF) analysis were performed using the BLAST program at the NCBI site (

Fig. 1. Physical and genetic map of plasmid pLP27 from Lactobacillus plantarum LP27. Arrows indicate the length and direction of the open reading frames (ORFs). Relevant restriction enzyme sites are indicated.
Download Original Figure
Construction of bile-responsive expression vectors

The primers to clone the promoter regions for this study are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Erythromycin resistance gene as a selection marker was amplified by PCR from the genome of L. johnsonii PF01 with the primers Emr-F and Emr-R and cloned into the KpnI site of plasmid pULP1, yielding the pULP2, as shown in Fig. 2. Next, promoter sequences and the reporter gene β-glucuronidase (gusA) were amplified from the genome of L. johnsonii PF01 and pNZ8008, respectively, and fused via a second round of PCR. The resulting product was inserted into the SalI and PstI sites of pULP2, generating pULP3-xxx (xxx: PEIIDM, PLDH, PHPrK, or PDDL), which contain different kinds of promoters, respectively. Finally, the constructed plasmids were introduced into L. plantarum SK156 to measure promoter activity.

Fig. 2. Construction of bile-responsive expression vectors.
Download Original Figure
Promoter activity assay

The transformants were selected and incubated in MRS broth containing erythromycin (3 μg/mL). After growth to mid-log phase (A600=0.4–0.5), cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C and washed with ice-cold MRS broth. Then they were resuspended in an equal volume of MRS broth supplemented with bile (0%–0.1% (w/v)) and erythromycin (3 μg/mL), and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Cell-free extracts (CFEs) were harvested following cell disruption by sonication. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bradford, 1976). Promoter activity was assessed according to the GusA activity of CFEs, which was measured by the hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl β-D-glucuronide (PNPG; Sigma-Aldrich) as described previously (Platteeuw et al., 1994). For assay, CFEs were warmed to 37°C and 200 μL of CFE was added to 800 μL of GUS buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 1.0 mM PNPG, pH 6.0). After incubation at 37°C for 5 min, 1 mL of 0.2 M Na2CO3 was added to stop the reaction. The units of Gus activity are described as picomoles of 4-nitrophenyl liberated per minute per milligram of protein. Three biological replicates were performed for all experiments.

Segregational stability of the plasmid vector

The segregational stability of the construct pULP3-xxx was evaluated in plasmid-free L. plantarum SK156. Transformed L. plantarum SK156 was grown in MRS medium without erythromycin for approximately 120 generations. Every 20 generations, an aliquot of the culture was collected, spread on erythromycin-free MRS agar medium, and 100 colonies were picked and replicated on MRS agar medium with and without erythromycin. Colonies grown on each medium were counted and calculated as follows: (Ne/N)×100, where Ne and N are the number of colonies grown on MRS medium with and without erythromycin, respectively. Three biological replicates were performed for all experiments and data are represented as mean±SEM.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The complete nucleotide sequence of pLP27 was deposited in the GenBank database under accession number MG944248.

Results and Discussion

Sequence analysis of plasmid pLP27

Plasmid pLP27 is a native plasmid of L. plantarum LP27 originally isolated from fermented cabbage. This plasmid was linearized with the restriction enzyme SacI and cloned into vector pUC19, generating pULP1. DNA sequencing of pLP27 revealed a 1,751 bp product with a GC content of 41.2% and three putative ORFs (Fig. 1). The products of the three ORFs and the most homologous protein of each identified in the GenBank database are listed in Table 2. The translated protein sequence of ORF1 showed that it shares 93% identity with the CopG family transcriptional regulator of L. heveticus DSM 20775. CopG is the prototype of a series of repressor proteins that are encoded by plasmids exhibiting a similar genetic structure at their leading strand initiation and control regions (del Solar et al., 1995). CopG also regulates plasmid copy number by binding the replication protein promoter for CopG (Gomis-Ruth et al., 1998; Hernandez-Arriaga et al., 2009). Therefore, ORF1 may be a transcriptional regulator for the expression of pLP27. ORF2 encoded a protein of 219 amino acids with 98% identity with the replication protein RepB of plasmid pLH2 of L. helveticus ATCC15009, which belongs to the rolling-circle replication plasmid family (van Kranenburg et al., 2005; Zhai et al., 2009). This indicates that pLP27 may replicate by a rolling-circle mechanism, which should be elucidated in the future. The predicted protein of ORF3 had no conserved domains or homolog sequences in the database, indicating that it is a unique, hypothetical protein. Plasmid pLP27 combined with pUC19, namely pULP1, was used as a backbone for the construction of bile-responsive expression vectors.

Table 2. ORF analysis of pLP27 from Lactobacillus plantarum LP27
ORF Function Position % identity Best BLAST match GenBank accession no.
ORF1 CopG family transcriptional regulator 329–469 93 Lactobacillus helveticus DSM 20775 WP_003627912.1
ORF2 Replication protein RepB 542–1,201 98 Plasmid replication protein of pLH2, Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 15009 WP_003627911.1
ORF3 Hypothetical protein 1,681–76 98 Lactobacillus plantarum WP_063723612.1
Download Excel Table
Selection of promoters and construction of bile-responsive expression vectors

Our previous proteomic analysis of L. johnsonii PF01 revealed some proteins were upregulated by bile (Lee et al., 2013). Among the genes upregulated above two-fold at protein level by bile, genes encoding EIIDMan, LDH, HPrK, and DDL were selected and their promoters were used to construct bile-responsive expression vectors (Supplementary Table 1). Fig. 2 shows the cloning steps for construction of the pLP27-derived bile-responsive expression vectors. First, the erythromycin resistance gene from L. johnsonii PF01 was cloned into the KpnI site of pULP1, generating pULP2. The promoter regions of four genes were amplified, respectively, from the genome of L. johnsonii PF01 and fused upstream of the gusA reporter gene. Then, these constructs were cloned into the SalI and PstI sites of pULP2, generating pULP3-PEIIDM, pULP3-PLDH, pULP3-PHPrK, and pULP3-PDDL, respectively (Fig. 2).

Comparison of promoter activity and bile-responsiveness

Once all of the constructs were obtained, they were introduced by electroporation into L. plantarum SK156 (Table 1), and GusA activity was measured in different bile concentrations (Kim et al., 2006). The promoterless vector, which contains the gusA gene only was used as a negative control. Transformants were grown to early stationary phase either in the presence or absence of bile. Promoter activity was analysed by measuring GusA activity using PNPG as a substrate. As shown in Fig. 3, the LDH promoter showed the highest β-glucuronidase activity in L. plantarum and its activity increased 1.8-fold by bile addition. EIIDM and HPRK promoters were also inducible by bile, although their activities were lower than LDH promoter. On the other hand, DDL promoter was not responsive to bile.

Fig. 3. β-Glucuronidase activity of protein extracts of L. plantarum SK156 harbouring pULP3-xxx (xxx: PLDH, PEIIDM, PHPrK, or PDDL). The bars indicate activities in the absence (light grey) and in the presence of 0.05% (dark grey) and 0.1% (black) bile. Error bars represent the standard error of the means for three independent experiments.
Download Original Figure

Interestingly, the expression of EIIDM was more inducible by bile than that of LDH in L. johnsonii (Supplementary Table 1). A report by Ruiz et al. (2012) showed that a bile-responsive expression system responded differently according to bifidobacterial species, suggesting that host difference might cause different expression level. In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that the bile responsiveness of these promoters also varies according to bile composition, because arabinofuranosidase activity as a reporter in Bifidobacteria was strongly induced by cholate and conjugated cholate, but not by other bile salts (Ruiz et al., 2012). The activity of promoters used in this study according bile salts also need to be elucidated in the future.

Interestingly, GusA activities in all constructs was observed without bile, although their levels except for DDL promoter were lower than in the presence of bile. It indicates that the promoter’s strength can be regulated by other factors, too.

Segregational stability of pULP3-PLDH in L. plantarum

pULP3-PLDH showing the highest GusA activity was used to investigate segregational stability in the L. plantarum. The transformation efficiency was 1.2×104 CFU/μg DNA in L. plantarum SK156 (data not shown). It was also successfully introduced into L. fermentum. However, no transformants of pULP3-PLDH were obtained from L. acidophilus, L. johnsonii, and L. reuteri (data not shown). These results indicate that this vector has a limited host range. After selection of recombinant transformants, the stability of pULP3-PLDH in L. plantarum SK156 was monitored over 120 generations of growth in MRS broth. No loss of the plasmid was observed until 80 generations in the absence of erythromycin, and plasmid possession ratio decreased gradually to 63% after 120 generations (Fig. 4), indicating relatively high stability of the plasmid vector without selection pressure.

Fig. 4. Segregational stability of the vector pULP3LDH in L. plantarum SK156. L. plantarum SK156 harbouring the plasmid was cultured without selection pressure, plated on the same medium, and verified for plasmid maintenance by replica-plating onto erythromycin-containing MRS medium at approximately 20 generation intervals until 120 generations. Em, erythromycin. Error bars represent the standard error of the means for three independent experiments.
Download Original Figure


Although there continues to be great interest in the development of genetic tools for the regulation of gene expression in lactobacilli, to the best of our knowledge, a bile-responsive expression system in lactobacilli has not yet been developed. Herein, we report the development of a bile-responsive expression system for Lactobacillus plantarum. This system can be an effective tool for the expression of bioactive proteins in intestine after intake of the Lactobacillus spp. in the form of fermented dairy food.


Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.


This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016R1D1A1A09918986). In addition, this work was also supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01322303), Rural Development Administration, Korea.


Author’s Contributions

Conceptualization: Kang DK. Data curation: Chae JP, Pajarillo EA. Formal analysis: Chae JP, Hwang IC. Methodology: Chae JP, Hwang IC. Software: Chae JP, Pajarillo EA. Validation: Chae JP. Investigation: Kang DK. Writing - original draft: Chae JP, Kang DK. Writing - review & editing: Chae JP, Pajarillo EA, Hwang IC, Kang DK.


Ethics Approval (IRB/IACUC)

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

Supplemenrary Materials

Supplementary materials are only available online from:



Alcantara C, Zuniga M. 2012; Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of the response to bile stress of Lactobacillus casei BL23. Microbiology. 158:1206-1218


Axelsson L, Lindstad G, Naterstad K. 2003; Development of an inducible gene expression system for Lactobacillus sakei. Lett Appl Microbiol. 37:115-120


Benbouziane B, Ribelles P, Aubry C, Martin R, Kharrat P, Riazi A, Langella P, Bermudez-Humaran LG. 2013; Development of a Stress-Inducible Controlled Expression (SICE) system in Lactococcus lactis for the production and delivery of therapeutic molecules at mucosal surfaces. J Biotechnol. 168:120-129


Bermudez-Humaran LG, Aubry C, Motta JP, Deraison C, Steidler L, Vergnolle N, Chatel JM, Langella P. 2013; Engineering lactococci and lactobacilli for human health. Curr Opin Microbiol. 16:278-283


Bohmer N, Konig S, Fischer L. 2013; A novel manganese starvation-inducible expression system for Lactobacillus plantarum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 342:37-44


Bradford MM. 1976; A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72:248-254


Chen MJ, Tang HY, Chiang ML. 2017; Effects of heat, cold, acid and bile salt adaptations on the stress tolerance and protein expression of kefir-isolated probiotic Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1. Food Microbiol. 66:20-27


del Solar G, Acebo P, Espinosa M. 1995; Replication control of plasmid pLS1: Efficient regulation of plasmid copy number is exerted by the combined action of two plasmid components, CopG and RNA II. Mol Microbiol. 18:913-924


Duong T, Miller MJ, Barrangou R, Azcarate-Peril MA, Klaenhammer TR. 2011; Construction of vectors for inducible and constitutive gene expression in Lactobacillus. Microb Biotechnol. 4:357-367


Gomis-Ruth FX, Sola M, Acebo P, Parraga A, Guasch A, Eritja R, Gonzalez A, Espinosa M, de Solar G, Coll M. 1998; The structure of plasmid-encoded transcriptional repressor CopG unliganded and bound to its operator. EMBO J. 17:7404-7415


Hamon E, Horvatovich P, Bisch M, Bringel F, Marchioni E, Aoude-Werner D, Ennahar S. 2012; Investigation of biomarkers of bile tolerance in Lactobacillus casei using comparative proteomics. J Proteome Res. 11:109-118


Herbel SR, Vahjen W, Wieler LH, Guenther S. 2013; Timely approaches to identify probiotic species of the genus Lactobacillus. Gut Pathog. 5:27


Hernandez-Arriaga AM, Rubio-Lepe TS, Espinosa M, del Solar G. 2009; Repressor CopG prevents access of RNA polymerase to promoter and actively dissociates open complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:4799-4811


Horn N, Fernandez A, Dodd HM, Gasson MJ, Rodriguez JM. 2003; Nisin-controlled production of pediocin PA-1 and colicin V in nisin- and non-nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:5030-5032


Kim KW, Franceschi VR, Davin LB, Lewis NG. 2006; Beta-glucuronidase as reporter gene: Advantages and limitations. Methods Mol Biol. 323:263-273.


Kim YH, Han KS, Oh S, You S, Kim SH. 2005; Optimization of technical conditions for the transformation of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains by electroporation. J Appl Microbiol. 99:167-174


Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. 2008; Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 72:728-764


Lee JY, Pajarillo EA, Kim MJ, Chae JP, Kang DK. 2013; Proteomic and transcriptional analysis of Lactobacillus johnsonii PF01 during bile salt exposure by iTRAQ shotgun proteomics and quantitative RT-PCR. J Proteome Res. 12:432-443


Loera-Arias MJ, Villatoro-Hernandez J, Parga-Castillo MA, Salcido-Montenegro A, Barboza-Quintana O, Muñoz-Maldonado GE, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R, Saucedo-Cardenas O. 2014; Secretion of biologically active human interleukin 22 (IL-22) by Lactococcuslactis. Biotechnol Lett. 36:2489-2494


Maidin MS, Song AA, Jalilsood T, Sieo CC, Yusoff K, Rahim RA. 2014; Construction of a novel inducible expression vector for Lactococcus lactis M4 and Lactobacillus plantarum Pa21. Plasmid. 74:32-38


Mandal H, Jariwala R, Bagchi T. 2016; Isolation and characterization of lactobacilli from human faeces and indigenous fermented foods for their potential application as probiotics. Can J Microbiol. 62:349-359


Pajarillo EA, Kim SH, Lee JY, Valeriano VD, Kang DK. 2015; Quantitative proteogenomics and the reconstruction of the metabolic pathway in Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. Korean J Food Sci An. 35:692-702


Perez-Arellano I, Perez-Martinez G. 2003; Optimization of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression from a lactose-inducible promoter in Lactobacillus casei. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 222:123-127


Pfeiler EA, Azcarate-Peril MA, Klaenhammer TR. 2007; Characterization of a novel bile-inducible operon encoding a two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Bacteriol. 189:4624-4634


Platteeuw C, Simons G, de Vos WM. 1994; Use of the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene as a reporter gene for analyzing promoters in lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 60:587-593


Ruiz L, Alvarez-Martin P, Mayo B, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Gueimonde M, Margolles A. 2012; Controlled gene expression in bifidobacteria by use of a bile-responsive element. Appl Environ Microbiol. 78:581-585


Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989 Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd edCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. New York, USA: .


Sorvig E, Gronqvist S, Naterstad K, Mathiesen G, Eijsink VGH, Axelsson L. 2003; Construction of vectors for inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and L. plantarum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 229:119-126


Taranto MP, Perez-Martinez G, de Valdez GF. 2006; Effect of bile acid on the cell membrane functionality of lactic acid bacteria for oral administration. Res Microbiol. 157:720-725


Valeriano VD, Balolong MP, Kang DK. 2017; Probiotic roles of Lactobacillus sp. in swine: Insights from gut microbiota. J Appl Microbiol. 122:554-567


van Kranenburg R, Golic N, Bongers R, Leer RJ, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, Kleerebezem M. 2005; Functional analysis of three plasmids from Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 71:1223-1230


Walker DC, Klaenhammer TR. 1994; Isolation of a novel IS3 group insertion element and construction of an integration vector for Lactobacillus spp. J Bacteriol. 176:5330-5340


Wang B, Li J, Li Q, Zhang H, Li N. 2009; Isolation of adhesive strains and evaluation of the colonization and immune response by Lactobacillus plantarum L2 in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Int J Food Microbiol. 132:59-66


Yuki N, Watanabe K, Mike A, Tagami Y, Tanaka R, Ohwaki M, Morotomi M. 1999; Survival of a probiotic, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, in the gastrointestinal tract: Selective isolation from faeces and identification using monoclonal antibodies. Int J Food Microbiol. 48:51-57


Zhai Z, Hao Y, Yin S, Luan C, Zhang L, Zhao L, Chen D, Wang O, Luo Y. 2009; Characterization of a novel rolling-circle replication plasmid pYSI8 from Lactobacillussakei YSI8. Plasmid. 62:30-34