ARTICLE

Antioxidative Properties of Amaranth Cauline Leaf and Suppressive Effect against CT-26 Cell Proliferation of the Sausage Containing the Leaf

Heejeong Lee, Nami Joo*
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Food & Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
*Corresponding author : Nami Joo; Department of Food & Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea Tel: +82-2-710-9471 Fax: +82-2-710-9479 E-mail: 00nutrition@sookmyung.ac.kr

© Copyright 2018 Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 15, 2018 ; Revised: May 16, 2018 ; Accepted: May 20, 2018

Published Online: Jul 31, 2018

Abstract

The study investigated antioxidative properties and rectal cancer cell inhibition effect of amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) cauline leaves (ACL) to produce the sausage with ACL powder (ACLP). Antioxidative effects of ACLP prepared with different stem lengths (10–45 cm) were evaluated through DPPH, ABTS, reducing power, total phenol, and total flavonoid. Inhibition effect on rectal cancer cells growth was also examined with CT-26 cell. To determine appropriate ACL amounts in sausage formula, response surface methodology was used. The sausages without ACL (control) and the sausage with ACL (ACLP sausage) were the subjected to the examinations of antioxidation, growth inhibition on CT-26, and physicochemical properties (pH and water content). ACLP made from the leaf with 15 cm length stem generally showed the highest antioxidative effect through results of DPPH, ABTS, reducing power, total phenol, and total flavonoid. ACLP also showed inhibition effect on the proliferation of CT-26, depending on concentration of ACLP. The surface response model showed that 4.87 g of ACLP was optimized amount for sausage production. Physicochemical properties between optimized ACLP and control sausages were not significantly different. Higher antioxidative effect of optimized ACLP sausage extract was observed (p<0.05) in antioxidation tests than control sausage extract except for DPPH. Cell viability of CT-26 cells were higher (p<0.05) in ACLP than in control sausage extracts. These results indicate that ACLP has functional effects on antioxidation activity and growth inhibition on CT-26 cell, and thus, it should be useful as a supplement in sausage, which may some effect as ACLP itself.

Keywords: Amaranthus cruentus L. cauline leaves; sausage; antioxidative activity; CT-26 cell; response surface methodology (RSM)

Introduction

Economic development has introduced great changes in the necessities of life and lifestyle. In particular, consumption of meat and processed meat products have been increased because of westernization (Koo et al., 2007). However, the inclusion of food additives in processed meat products is common and studies have been oriented to develop healthy meat products (Bartsch et al., 1988). High-quality or healthy food items are known to contain less additives, fat and salt, and active research has been conducted to study these food items (Kruk et al., 2014).

Amaranth, an annual pseudocereal belonging to Amaranthus spp. L., is one of the oldest crops in Central and South America. Moreover, since they can grow well under unusual climatic and soil conditions, amaranth vegetables offer economic advantages with agricultural superiority. Most studies have focused on the nutritional values of amaranth grains, and only limited number of studies have investigated the use of amaranth as a vegetable (Lee et al., 2012). Amaranth leaves contain antimutagens and antioxidants (Anilakumar et al., 2006). Amaranth cauline leaf (ACL) extract prevents lipid oxidation, and hence lowers thiobarbituric acid and volatile basic nitrogen values during storage (Zhou et al., 2012). ACL is considered effective for lipid peroxidation of meat products, although there are only limited studies on meat and muscle-based products.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the effect of ACL on antioxidation and inhibition on cancer cell proliferation, and suitability of ACL for sausage production.

Materials and Methods

Amaranth cauline leaf powder (ACLP) preparation

ACL, A. cruentus L. containing leaf and stem, were harvested when their stem length were 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 cm in a farm at Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. ACL samples were then washed with water, followed by freeze-drying at –40°C for 48 h (Bondiro MCFD 8508 Freeze Dryer Ilsin, Korea). The samples were ground into 30 mesh, ACL powder (ACLP) samples were subjected to reflux extraction twice, each for 3 h at 60°C in 20ivolume of 70% ethanol (NVC-2100, EYELA, Japan). Finally, the extracts were stored at –40°C until analysis of the antioxidative activity.

Measurement of antioxidative activities

To evaluate antioxidative activities for ACLP, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) activity assay and 2,2T-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assay were conducted according to the methods by Brand-Williams et al. (1995) and Re et al. (1999) with some modifications, respectively. Optical densities for DPPH and ABTS were measured at 517 nm and 734 nm using a UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (V-530, Jasco Co., Japan), respectively. DPPH and ABTS activities were then calculated by [1–{Asample/Acontrol}]×100.

The analysis of the reducing power was carried out by measuring the absorbance of the solution at 700 nm according to method by Oyaizu (1986). Total phenol content and total flavonoid content were measured according to Folin-Denis method (Singleton and Rossi, 1965) and Davis method (Ghasemzadeh et al., 2010), followed by measurement of optical density at 750 nm and 420 nm, respectively. Total phenol content and total flavonoid content were calculated by each standard curves. Finally, total phenol content expressed as miligram gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per gram of extract, and total flavonoid content expressed as miligram catechin equivalent (CE) per gram of extract.

MTT assay of ACL on proliferation of CT-26 cell

For MTT assay of ACL, the protein concentrations of the ACLP extracts were measured, using Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). One milliliter of Bradford working solution diluted 5 times with Bradford stock solution was mixed with 5 μL aliquots of extract samples, and their optical densities were measured at 595 nm, using a UV-Visible Spectrophotometer. The protein concentrations were determined by substituting bovine serum albumin concentration (BSA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) in the standard curve. A mouse cell line of rectal cancer, CT-26, was obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank, Korea. CT-26 cell was cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's (DMEM) medium (WelGene, Korea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PS, SV30010, Hyclone, USA), followed by incubation in 5% CO2 at 37°C. The cells were seeded in a 96-well cell culture plate at concentrations of 5×103 cells/100 μL. Different ACLP concentrations (1–80 μg/mL) of the sample in DMEM were treated into the cell monolayer of CT-26, and they were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 h. The cell viability (%) was evaluated by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, USA), using CellTiter 96® Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (MTT, Promega Co., USA).

Determination of ACL amount for sausage production by response surface methodology
Determination of experimental design

Response surface methodology consists of a group of mathematical and statistical techniques used to determine appropriate ACLP amount in sausage production through Central Composite Design (CCD) of design ex expert 8 (Stat-Easy Co., USA), and experimental design was suggested from this anaylsis as presented in Table 1. For making sausage, we considered that 10 g of starch needed to be included in sausage formula, and ACLP needs to be replaced with some portion of the starch. Hence, the ratio of ACLP and starch combination was considered as one factor (factor A). In addition, we wanted to use olive oil rather than backfat, and thus, olive oil amount was considered the other factor (factor B). For the optimization, analysis of the sausage formulated with factor A (ACLP+starch) and factor B (olive oil) were independent variables, and it produced 10 experiment groups (Table 1). In the 10 experiment groups, the identical amounts of the factors A and B were included in experiment groups 9 and 10 to observe if sensory panel groups can have similar responses for sensory evaluation. The sausages were produced according to the procedure by Chung et al. (2016) with some modifications. The sausage mixture was tightly stuffed into 28-mm diameter of collagen sausage casing (Nippi Collagen Industries Ltd., Japan), heated at 75°C for 40 min, and cooled immediately in ice water for 10 min.

Table 1. Experimental design for sausages prepared with Amaranth cauline leaf powder and olive oil by response surface design
Experimental group Variable level Pork
(g)
Water
(g)
Salt
(g)
Garlic
(g)
Sodium phosphate
(g)
Black pepper
(g)
Nutmeg
(g)
Factor A Factor B
ACLP
(g)
Starch
(g)
Olive oil
(g)
1 1.00 9.00 5.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
2 9.00 1.00 5.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
3 1.00 9.00 25.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
4 9.00 1.00 25.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
5 1.00 9.00 15.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
6 9.00 1.00 15.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
7 5.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
8 5.00 5.00 25.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
9 5.00 5.00 15.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05
10 5.00 5.00 15.00 100.00 5.00 2.50 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.05

1) Powder (total 10 g) factor and oil factor were designed by response surface method (RSM).

ACLP, Amaranth cauline leaf powder.

Download Excel Table
Sensory evaluation of ACLP sausage

Sensory evaluation was concluded with 25 graduate students who took a sensory evaluation course for one semester. Ten types of sausages from 10 experimental groups were evaluated for color, flavor, texture, taste, tenderness, moistureness, and overall quality on a 7-point scale (1: dislike extremely, 7: like extremely) (SMWU-1710-HR-089-02).

Optimization of ACLP sausage

In order to determine an optimized ACLP amount in sausage formula, the sensory evaluation data were analyzed with the following equation to determine statistical optimum point.

D = ( d 1 × d 2 × × d n ) 1 n = [ i 1 n d i ] 1 n

Where D is overall quality, d is desirability, and n is number of responses.

Through this analysis, optimum olive oil amount was also determined.

Evaluation of physicochemical and texture properties of optimized ACLP sausage

Sausages were prepared without ACLP (control) and with optimized ACLP and olive oil. Optimized ACLP sausages were produced according to the producer as describe above. The pH of two types of sausage were measured with a pH meter (F-51, Horiba, Japan), after homogenizing of 5 g uncooked control and ACLP sausage in 45 mL distilled water. The moisture contents of the cooked sausages (1 g) were measured with a moisture analyzer (SW-90D, Sanwoo, Korea). The cooked sausages (28 mm diameter×10 mm height) were analyzed with a texture analyzer (TA-XT Express v2.1, UK) to measure their hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, chewiness, and gumminess. The parameters of texture analysis were 1 mm/s of pre-test speed, 5 mm/s of test speed, 5 mm/s of post-test speed, 4 mm of test distance, and 50 g of force.

Evaluation of antioxidative activity and cancer cell growth inhibition effects of optimized ACLP sausage

The antioxidative activities of control and optimized ACLP sausages were measured by same procedure as described above. Inhibition effect of control and optimized ACLP sausages on CT-26 cell were analyzed by same method as described above.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc, USA). Significant difference between the mean values was determined by independent t-test at p<0.05.

Results and Discussion

Antioxidative activity

The evaluation of the antioxidative activity of ACLP increased during the early growth phase and decreased thereafter (Table 2). The IC50 values of DPPH and ABTS ranged between 279.87 and 1,041.38 μg/mL, and 798.37 and 2,672.61 μg/mL, respectively. Higher antioxidative activities of ACLP were observed, when the stem length was 15–20 cm (p<0.01). DPPH value was observed to be 160 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g for methanolic extract amaranth leaves grown in South Africa (Mampholo et al., 2015). While the EC50 of DPPH was 1,364 μg/mL for methanolic extract amaranth leaves grown in Ghana (Morrison and Twumasi, 2010). The IC50 value of DPPH in 10-cm stem length ACLP was a similar to amaranth leaves of Ghana. The reducing power and total flavonoid content of ACLP ranged between 0.151 and 0.289 μg/mL, and 368.75 and 785.25 mg CE/g, respectively, and the highest values were observed for 15-cm stem length of ACLP (p<0.001). Total phenol content for 20-cm stem length of ACLP showed the highest value (203.86 mg GAE/g), which was higher than those values that reported for amaranth leaves from South Africa (1.4 mg GAE/100 g) and India (61.8 mg GAE/100 g) (Mampholo et al., 2015, Adebooye et al., 2008). The overall antioxidative activity was maximum when the stem length of ACLP was around 15 cm. Thus, ACLP prepared from 15 cm stem length of ACL was used for further analyzes.

Table 2. Changes in antioxidant characteristics of Amaranth cauline leaf according to growth
Stem length
(cm)
DPPH
(IC50, μg/mL)
ABTS
(IC50, μg/mL)
Reducing power
(OD)
Total phenol
(mg GAE/g)
Total flavonoid
(mg CE/g)
10 1,041.38±84.52 2,172.74±125.76 0.158±0.009 196.54±19.02 539.00±8.29
15 310.10±17.74 798.37±54.08 0.289±0.000 201.40±10.85 785.25±13.84
20 279.87±16.77 1,013.14±99.19 0.216±0.000 203.86±4.99 707.50±15.97
25 525.11±26.84 1,408.18±55.38 0.157±0.001a,b 175.66±12.53 745.00±11.53
30 566.86±10.43 1,735.85±46.49 0.151±0.000 177.21±25.54 714.75±12.09c,d
35 654.48±19.22 2,056.30±78.39 0.164±0.000 177.74±18.17 721.33±42.25c,d
40 743.36±38.24 2,391.15±27.96 0.159±0.003 146.28±16.68 559.00±40.32
45 812.16±38.12 2,672.61±51.68 0.152±0.000 138.27±1.10 368.75±10.21
F-value (p-value) 543.43 (0.000)*** 1,021.65 (0.000)*** 3,586.71 (0.000)*** 8.336 (0.000)*** 153.79 (0.000)***

1) The IC50 values were calculated by linear regression analysis.

a-i Values with different small letters within a column differ significantly (p<0.001).

Values are the mean±SD.

OD, optical density; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; CE, catechin equivalent.

Download Excel Table
Inhibition effects of ACLP on CT-26 cell proliferation

A decrease in CT-26 cell viability in the protein concentration of ACLP extract means that the proliferation of CT-26 cell was inhibited by the ACLP (Fig. 1). At 5 μg/mL of ACLP extract, the viability of CT-26 cells was 67%, and the extracts had 80% of the suppressive effect at 40 μg/mL concentration. In a study by Sani et al. (2004), Amaranthus gangeticus leaf extract suppressed hepatic cancer (HepG2) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cells, and exhibited a slight suppressive effect on a colorectal cancer cell line (Caco-2). ACL contains high levels of phenol compounds, including anthocyanin, flavonoids, gallic acid, and quercetin (Choi et al, 2010). In particular, anthocyanin, a type of flavonoid, is directly absorbed in the intestine of mice or humans (Youdim et al., 2000). Thus, inhibition effect of ACLP on CT-26 cell proliferation might be caused by the phenol compounds.

kosfa-38-3-570-g1
Fig. 1. Effect of Amaranth cauline leaf extract on the viability of CT-26 cells.
Download Original Figure
Optimization of ACLP amount in sausages formula

Quadratic models, evaluaing the interaction between the independent variables was chosen for the evaluation of sensory characteristics. r2 values of the models were more than 0.9 for color, texture, tenderness, moistness and overall quality, and suggests that the models were appropriate to determine appropriate ACLP amounts. Preference for all tested sensory evaluation factors were increased upto certain amount of ACLP, and then, the preference started to decrease. This trend was also observed for olive oil (Table 3). Response surface plots produced by the models of the surface evaluation factors suggested that the optimum formulation of ACLP sausage was 4.87 g of ACL powder with 5.13 g of starch, and 14.90 g of olive oil per 100 g pork. (Fig. 2).

kosfa-38-3-570-g2
Fig. 2. Response surface plot and overlay plot of the effect of factor A (Amaranth cauline leaf powder+starch) (A) and factor B (olive oil), (B) on the desirability of sausages.
Download Original Figure
Table 3. Analysis of the predicted model equation for quality characteristics of sausages with Amaranth cauline leaf powder
Response Model Mean±SD r2 F-value Prob>F Polynomial equation
Color Quadratic 3.73±0.56 0.9226 9.54 0.0242 5.528+0.175A-0.500B-0.475AB-
1.782A2-1.20B2
Flavor Quadratic 4.12±0.61 0.8368 4.1 0.0981 5.521-0.025A+0.158B-0.075AB-
1.267A2-1.067B2
Texture Quadratic 4.08±0.50 0.9278 10.29 0.0211 5.867+0.266A-0.216B+0.125AB-
1.610A2-1.360B2
Taste Quadratic 3.85±0.75 0.8355 4.065 0.0995 5.539+0.141A+0.041B+0.050AB-
1.728A2-1.078B2
Tenderness Quadratic 4.46±0.32 0.9734 29.32 0.0030 6.153-0.375A+0.608B+0.350AB-
1.057A2-1.757B2
Moistness Quadratic 4.26±0.47 0.9281 10.33 0.0210 5.857-0.200A+0.508B+0.225AB-
1.264A2-1.389B2
Overall quality Quadratic 3.84±0.51 0.9336 11.25 0.0180 5.853-0.275A-0.116B-0.025AB-
1.607A2-1.582B2

1) 1, dislike extremely; 7, like extremely.

2) 00 r2>1, close to 1 indicates the regression line fits the model.

3) A, Factor A (Amaranth cauline leaf powder+starch); B, Factor B (Olive oil).

*p<0.05

**p<0.01.

Download Excel Table
Quality characteristics of optimized ACLP sausage

We compared optimized ACLP and control sausages, and found that the optimized ACLP sausages had lower (p<0.05) moisture content and higher (p<0.05) hardness than control sausage, but other texture characteristics were not different between two groups (Table 4). This result indicates that ACLP does not influence on sausage texture characteristics.

Table 4. Quality characteristics of optimized ACLP and control sausage
Characteristic ACLP sausage Control sausage t-value
pH 6.28±0.00 6.15±0.00 18.385
Moisture content (%) 60.66±1.52 62.26±0.15 –1.805
Hardness (g) 3,512.71±191.03 2,842.35±237.64 3.808
Adhesiveness (g×s) -2.91±0.37 -2.79±0.39 –0.37
Springiness (mm) 8.58±0.21 8.54±0.24 0.175
Chewiness (N×mm) 2,486.10±147.57 2,314.81±137.35 1.472
Gumminess (N) 3,280.91±104.75 2,938.73±308.54 1.819

1) Sausage without ACLP

Values are the mean±SD.

*p<0.05

**p<0.01.

ACLP, Amaranth cauline leaf powder.

Download Excel Table
Antioxidative activities and cancer cell proliferation inhibition effect on optimized ACLP sausage

The comparison of the antioxidative activities of the optimized ACLP and control sausages revealed that higher (p<0.05) activities were generally observed in the optimized ACLP sausages than control except for DPPH radical scavenging activity (Table 5). The suppressive effects of optimized ACLP sausages on CT-26 cell proliferation were significantly higher (p<0.05) than in control sausages extract (Fig. 3). The optimized ACLP sausage extract yielded a viability of 68.34% at 40 μg/mL which is lower (p<0.01) than that of control sausage extract (Fig. 3). The highest suppressive effect was observed at 120 μg/mL, and the effect of optimized ACLP extract was still higher (p<0.01) than control sausage extract (Fig. 3). ACL contains a large amount of total flavonoids and phenols with antioxidant activity, and thus, they may reduce cell viability of CT-26 cells (Venskutonis and Kraujalis 2013; Paśko et al., 2009; Cho et al., 2008). The control sausages were also showed inhibition of CT-26 cell proliferation. It might be caused by the presence of olive oil. Olive oil is reported to influence the suppression of oxidative stress and inflammatory response in humans, and has been known to significantly suppress the proliferation of human breast cancer cells (Ramos et al., 2013; Márquez Martín et al., 2006).

kosfa-38-3-570-g3
Fig. 3. Effect of optimized sausage extract formulated with Amaranth cauline leaf on the viability of CT-26 cells. ACLP, Amaranth cauline leaf powder. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Table 5. Antioxidant activities of optimized ACLP and control sausage
Characteristic ACLP sausage Control sausage t-value
DPPH (%) 89.54±2.07 85.04±5.57 1.716
ABTS (%) 50.47±1.78 46.58±1.78 9.390
Reducing power (OD) 0.34±0.00 0.25±0.03 19.174
Total phenol (mg GAE/g) 11.96±0.51 8.75±1.22 17.535
Total flavonoid (mg CE/g) 546.94±4.675 487.22±8.194 120.228

1) Sausage without ACLP.

Values are the mean±SD.

*p<0.05

***p<0.001.

ACLP, Amaranth cauline leaf powder; OD, optical density; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; CE, catechin equivalent.

Download Excel Table

In conclusion, ACLP has antioxidation activity and inhibition effect on CT-26 cell proliferation, and optimized ACLP sausages at 4.87 g of ACLP showed still antioxidation activity and inhibition effect on CT-26 cell proliferation. Therefore, use of ACLP in sausage formula may be appropriate to promote functional value of sausage.

References

1.

Adebooye OC, Vijayalakshmi R, Singh V. Peroxidase activity, chlorophylls and antioxidant profile of two leaf vegetables (Solanum nigrum L. and Amaranthus cruentus L.) under six pretreatment methods before cooking. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2008; 43:173-178.

2.

Anilakumar KR, Khanum F, Santhanam K. Amelioration of hexachlorocyclohexane-induced oxidative stress by amaranth leaves in rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2006; 61:169-173.

3.

Bartsch H, Ohshima H, Pignatelli B. Inhibitors of endogenous nitrosation mechanisms and implications in human cancer prevention. Mutat Res. 1988; 202:307-324.

4.

Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 1995; 28:25-30.

5.

Chung MJ, Jung EK, Joo NM. Kkuaripepper (Capsicum annum L.) and olive oil effects on quality characteristics of pork sausage studied by response surface methodology. J Exp Food Chem. 2016; 2:1-9.

6.

Cho JY, Son DM, Kim JM, Seo BS, Yang SY, Kim BW, Heo BG. Effects of LEDs on the germination, growth and physiological activities of amaranth sprouts. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol. 2008; 26:106-112.

7.

Choi SJ. The difference of anthocyanin pigment composition and color expression in fruit skin of several grape cultivars. Korean J Food Preserv. 2010; 17:847-852.

8.

Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZE, Rahmat A. Antioxidant activities, total phenolics and flavonoids content in two varieties of Malaysia young ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Molecules. 2010; 15:4324-4333.

9.

Koo MS, Kim YS, Shin DB, Oh SW, Chun HS. Shelf-life of prepacked kimbab and sandwiches marketed in convenience stores at refrigerated condition. J Food Hyg Saf. 2007; 22:323-333.

10.

Kruk ZA, Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Rutley DL, Jung S, Lee SK, Jo C. Combined effects of high pressure processing and addition of soy sauce and olive oilon safety and quality characteristics of chicken breastmeat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014; 27:256-265.

11.

Lee JG, Jang YA, Um YC, Lee SG. Evaluation of baby-leaf growth and leaf red color intensity for Amaranthus germ plasm. J Agric Life Sci. 2012; 46:59-65.

12.

Mampholo MB, Sivakumar D, Van Rensburg J. Variation in bioactive compounds and quality parameters in different modified atmosphere packaging during postharvest storage of traditional leafy vegetables (Amaranthus cruentus L. and Solanum retroflexum). J Food Qual. 2015; 38:1-12.

13.

Márquez Martín A, de la Puerta Vázquez R, Fernández-Arche A, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V. Suppressive effect of maslinic acid from pomace olive oil on oxidative stress and cytokine production in stimulated murine macrophages. Free Radic Res. 2006; 40:295-302.

14.

Morrison JF, Twumasi SK. Comparative studies on the in vitro antioxidant activities of methanolic and hydro-ethanolic leafy extracts from eight edible leafy vegetables of Ghana. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010; 9:5177-5584.

15.

Oyaizu M. Studies on the products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 1986; 44:307-315.

16.

Paśko P, Bartoń H, Zagrodzki P, Gorinstein S, Fołta M, Zachwieja Z. Anthocyanins, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity in amaranth and quinoa seeds and sprouts during their growth. Food Chem. 2009; 115:994-998.

17.

Ramos P, Santos SA, Guerra ÂR, Guerreiro O, Felício L, Jerónimo E, Silvestre AJ, Neto CP, Duarte M. Valorization of olive mill residues: Antioxidant and breast cancer antiproliferative activities of hydroxytyrosol-rich extracts derived from olive oil by-products. Ind Crops Prod. 2013; 46:359-368.

18.

Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999; 26:1231-1237.

19.

Sani HA, Rahmat A, Ismail M, Rosli R, Endrini S. Potential anticancer effect of red spinach (Amaranthusgangengitus) extract. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004; 13:396-400.

20.

Singleton VL, Roossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965; 16:144-158.

21.

Venskutonis PR, Kraujalis P. Nutritional components of amaranth seeds and vegetables: A review on composition, properties, and uses. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013; 12:381-412.

22.

Youdim KA, Martin A, Joseph JA. Incorporation of the elderberry anthocyanins by endothelial cells increases protection against oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000; 29:51-60.

23.

Zhou C, Zhang L, Wang H, Chen C. Effect of Amaranthus pigments on quality characteristics of pork sausages. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012; 25:1493-1498.