ARTICLE

Comparison of the Fatty Acid Composition and Small Molecular Metabolites between Yanjin Blackbone Chicken and Piao Chicken Meat

Rong Jia1,2,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-1048, Wen Xun1,2,https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0737-7309, Guozhou Liao2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-5837, Yuan Yang1,2https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4733-5532, Guiying Wang1,2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-9943
Author Information & Copyright
1College of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2Livestock Product Processing and Engineering Technology Research Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
*Corresponding authors : Guiying Wang, College of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China, Tel: +86-87165227841, Fax: +86-87165227843, E-mail: ynkmwgy@ynau.edu.cn
*Corresponding authors : Guozhou Liao, Livestock Product Processing and Engineering Technology Research Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China, Tel: +86-87165227700, Fax: +86-87165227701, E-mail: liaoguozhou@ynau.edu.cn

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 06, 2023 ; Revised: Aug 24, 2023 ; Accepted: Sep 07, 2023

Published Online: Nov 01, 2023

Abstract

The fatty acid composition and small molecular metabolites in breast and leg meat of Yanjin blackbone chickens (YBC) and Piao chickens (PC) were detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-quadrupole static field orbital trap mass spectrometry. Thirty-two fatty acids were detected, and the total fatty acid content of PC was significantly higher than that of YBC (p<0.05). Oleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, and arachidonic acid were the main fatty acids in the two chicken varieties, and the composition of fatty acids in the two varieties were mainly unsaturated fatty acids, being more than 61.10% of the total fatty acids. Meanwhile, 12 and 16 compounds were screened out from chicken legs and chicken breasts of YBC and PC, respectively, which had important contributions to the differences between groups.

Keywords: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS); liquid chromatography-quadrupole static field orbital trap mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Exactive-MS); fatty acids; small molecular metabolites

Introduction

Yanjin blackbone chickens (YBC) and Piao chickens (PC) are both local chickens in Yunnan Province, China. YBC is mainly produced in Yanjin County, Zhaotong City, which has a warm and humid climate. While PC is mainly produced in Zhenyuan County, Pu’er City, which mostly grows in middle-high altitude mountainous areas with complex terrain and a cool climate. YBC and PC have tender meat, umami taste, rich nutritional value, and a good nourishing effect, which are favored by the local people (Fan et al., 2018; Pellattiero et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2017), and PC is unique in that it has no “tail” and has the characteristics of more meat and less bone (Huang, 2014). So far, there have been few studies on these two types of Chinese native chickens. Gu and Li (2020) studied the germplasm characteristics and slaughter performance of PC. Our research team investigated the effects of methods of cooking on volatile and non-volatile substances in PC (Yu et al., 2021), and compared the content of water-soluble low molecular weight compounds and fatty acids of YBC and a typical commercial chicken (Xiao et al., 2021).

The flavor is a significant determinant of the quality of chicken food items and has also been a food research hotspot (Gong et al., 2017). The flavor of chicken is a combination of taste and aroma, which is produced by a series of chemical changes caused by the heat of flavor precursors (Christensen et al., 2012; Delgado-Andrade, 2017). The main water-soluble precursors in chicken include free sugars, nucleotides, and free amino acids (Khan et al., 2015; Raza et al., 2015), and chicken is the main source of small molecular compounds in chicken soup, such as nucleotides, glutamic acid, threonine, tyrosine, and isoleucine, which can increase the umami of the soup and be proved to be the main contribution of the chicken soup flavor components (Zhan et al., 2020).

Sour, umami, sweet, and other taste amino acids belong to the amino acids, with umami amino acids and their derivatives contributing the most to the flavor of chicken soup (Li et al., 2018). Studies have shown that both 5’-adenine nucleotide and 5’-inosine hypoxanthine enhance the umami flavor of chicken soup (Sabikun et al., 2021). Medium- and long-chain free fatty acids (C>6) as aroma precursors can be used as substrates to further degrade and produce small molecules such as aldehydes and acids (Huang et al., 2020). Different fatty acid compositions lead to different flavors in various meat products. For example, the main fatty acids in pork were palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, and linolenic acid (Barola et al., 2020). In addition to free amino acids, nucleotides, and flavorable peptides, other small molecular metabolites, such as organic acids, sugars, and inorganic salts, also have an impact on how the final flavor of the chicken is formed.

Metabolomics is generally the quantitative analysis of small molecular metabolites with a relative molecular weight within 1,000, such as organic acids, and amino acids. Principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) are often used for multivariate statistical analysis of data (Liu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017). PCA usually displays the classification information of samples with score charts (Sharma et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2012). PLS-DA and OPLS-DA, belonging to supervised pattern recognition methods, can establish the relationship between metabolites and groups while reducing the dimension of the data, which can extract the difference information between groups more efficiently. Compared with PLS-DA, OPLS-DA has one more orthogonal conversion and stronger explanatory ability (Liu et al., 2019).

At present, metabolomics is used in many aspects of meat research. For example, Xiao et al. (2019b) studied the changes in water-soluble compounds in the processing of braised chicken by using metabolomics methods. Wang et al. (2017) analyzed the differences in metabolites in the meat between Linwu ducks and Beijing ducks. Zhang et al. (2018) used metabonomics to find out the characteristic taste substances of Jinhua ham, Xuanwei ham, American country ham, Parma ham, and Bama ham. Xiao et al. (2019a) analyzed metabolites in Yunnan Wuding chicken at different growth stages based on NMR and identified four metabolic pathways, including alanine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid, as the main metabolic pathways affecting the flavor of Wuding chicken at different days of age.

There have been few reports on the meat quality and processing characteristics of YBC and PC. In order to increase the development and utilization of these two local chickens, it is necessary to fully understand their meat-quality characteristics. Based on this, YBC and PC were used as the research objects in this study, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-quadrupole static field orbital trap mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Exactive-MS) were used to analyze the compositions of total fatty acids and small molecular metabolites in chicken breast and leg meat, respectively. Volatile flavor components were also discussed, and this part of the data has been published (Xun et al., 2021). The differences were discussed of the main flavor substances between YBC and PC, provided a scientific basis for their further development and utilization, and also laid a foundation for the establishment of quality evaluation standards for high-quality local chickens.

Materials and Methods

Materials and chemicals

In this experiment, 12 YBC and 12 PC (300 days of age, half male and half female) were selected from the same batch with the same nutritional level and feeding and management conditions, and all of them were provided by the experimental breeding chicken farm of Yunnan Agricultural University. After fasting for 12 hours, they were weighed and slaughtered. Their breast and leg muscles were further collected. After removing visible fat and fascia tissues, various indexes were analyzed, determined, and compared according to different varieties and different parts. There were six chickens for each indicator, half male and half female, that is, there were six repeated tests for each indicator. All of the compounds utilized were of HPLC grade.

Determination of total fatty acids

According to the previous method, condition optimization was carried out to determine the fatty acid content in chicken (Liu et al., 2019). The free fatty acids were detected by GC-MS (7890B-5977B, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with a DB-WAX capillary column (0.25 μm, 30 m×0.25 mm, Agilent). The right breast and leg meat of YBC and PC (half male and half female) were randomly selected from the test samples, which were ground with liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried for reserve use.

The chicken samples (0.2 g) were ground in a grinding tube at 60 Hz for 5 min. The ground samples were transferred to a glass centrifuge tube, 2 mL of methanol and 4 mL of chloroform were added, shaken at 25°C and 5×g for 20 min, and then 2 mL of deionized water was added and vortexed for 2 min. Then, it was centrifuged at 168×g for 10 min and it was dried with nitrogen. Then 1 mL n-hexane and 25 μL 10.211 mg/mL methyl 19 carbonates (the internal standard) were added and swirled for 2 min. Then added 1 mL 0.4 mol/L potassium hydroxide-methanol, vortexed for 1 min, and then reacted at 37°C for 30 min. Centrifugation was performed at 672×g for 5 min, and the supernatant was taken to be tested. Under the conditions of the injection temperature of 270°C, loading a sample of 1 μL, a column flow rate of 1 mL/min, an interface temperature of 280°C, and a split ratio of 20:1 were set. The heating program was set to hold at 70°C for 5 min, at 25°C/min to 200°C, and at 2°C/min to 240°C for 10 min. The ion source and the four-pole temperatures were set at 230°C and 150°C, respectively, for full scanning in the range of 33–500 aum.

Determination of small molecular metabolites

The small molecular metabolites were determined according to the previous method in chicken (Jin et al., 2019), which was determined by LC-Q-Exactive-MS (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), equipped with a column (C18, 1.9 μm, 100 mm×2.1 mm).

The chicken sample (50 mg) was weighed and added to 800 μL of 80% methanol and 10 μL of 2.8 mg/mL 2-chlorophenylalanine (the internal standard) in a grinder for 90 s at 65 Hz. Ultrasound was performed for 30 min in an ice bath and left for 1 hour at –20°C. It was then centrifuged in a 4°C centrifuge at 24,192×g for 15 min. The sample size was set to 10 μL and gradient elution was performed at a column temperature of 40°C and a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min (mobile phase A: water+5% acetonitrile+0.1% formic acid; mobile phase B: acetonitrile+0.1% formic acid). 0 min, 100% A; 1.5 min, 80% A; 9.5 min, 0% A; 14.5 min, 0% A; 14.6 min, 100% A; 18 min, 100% A. Scanning was carried out under electrospray ion sources in positive and negative ion modes, respectively. The heater temperature (300°C), sheath gas flow rate (45 arb), auxiliary gas flow rate (15 arb), and tail gas flow rate (1 arb) were all the same except that the S-Lens RF level [electrospray ionization (ESI)+, 30%; ESI-, 60%)] and electrospray voltage (ESI+, 3.0 KV; ESI-, 3.2 KV) were different in both modes.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel 2016 software and SPSS 25.0 software were used for statistical analysis of the data. Univariate analysis of variance and Duncan’s complex range method were used for difference analysis, and the significance level was p<0.05. Multivariate statistical analysis of data was used by SIMCA 14.1 software, and heat maps were drawn by TBtools software. PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA were used for multivariate statistical analysis of data.

Results and Discussion

Analysis of total fatty acids

The composition and content of fatty acids in chicken not only affect the flavor quality of chicken but are also vital indicators for measuring the nutritional value of chicken (Yu et al., 2021). Through the determination and analysis of fatty acids in YBC and PC chicken breast and leg meat, the influence of variety and part on chicken flavor was explored from the fatty acid perspective, and the results are shown in Table 1, Fig. 1, and Supplementary Fig. S1 of the Supplementary Materials. Thirty-two kinds of fatty acids were identified, and among them, UFA was the main fatty acid in chicken breast and leg meat of YBC and PC, accounting for 64.32%, 61.10%, 67.63%, and 62.97% of the total fatty acid content, respectively. In these two chicken varieties, fatty acids were mainly C16:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2n6, and C20:4n6, accounting for more than 89.35% of the total fatty acid content, which was similar to the results of the previous studies (Xiao et al., 2019b; Xiao et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2021), indicating that the composition of fatty acids in chicken was relatively stable and had certain regularity.

Table 1. The results of fatty acids composition and content in YBC and PC meat (μg/g)
Fatty acids YBC PC
Breast meat Leg meat Breast meat Leg meat
C6:0 0.44±0.07b 0.57±0.06a 0.34±0.04c 0.40±0.04bc
C8:0 0.20±0.03b 0.26±0.08ab 0.23±0.04ab 0.28±0.05a
C10:0 0.29±0.03b 1.54±1.42a 0.32±0.06b 0.39±0.08b
C11:0 0.19±0.03a 0.20±0.02a 0.08±0.01c 0.16±0.03b
C12:0 1.68±0.23c 1.89±0.18c 2.50±0.38b 3.88±0.55a
C13:0 0.76±0.09b 1.29±0.25a 0.83±0.13b 0.93±0.16b
C14:0 106.04±13.44b 140.14±21.41a 94.53±13.79b 95.34±8.44b
C14:1 1.00±0.18c 1.65±0.40b 1.28±0.19bc 4.62±0.87a
C15:0 3.20±0.52d 5.82±0.74c 8.14±0.92b 10.84±2.04a
C16:0 698.41±84.51c 1,174.80±218.26b 1,110.27±197.86b 1,919.25±261.08a
C16:1 28.18±2.73d 67.45±9.45c 149.18±17.94b 190.98±31.49a
C17:0 8.92±1.20b 19.60±2.85b 8.07±1.55a 21.18±4.03a
C17:1 1.76±0.32b 20.62±21.21a 8.11±0.97ab 13.25±2.65ab
C18:0 402.57±59.09b 1,219.37±212.24a 382.97±26.10b 1,068.38±144.84a
C18:1 897.41±20.43d 1,705.07±235.72b 1,390.79±210.11c 2,249.86±240.12a
C18:2n6 761.12±97.07d 1,493.48±274.15b 1,118.27±205.16c 1,886.84±327.00a
C18:3n3 16.39±3.00d 37.77±3.03c 49.06±5.12b 91.40±8.58a
C20:0 7.38±0.23b 14.17±1.56a 6.96±1.40b 14.45±1.25a
C20:1 11.36±2.43d 26.49±3.48b 21.53±4.02c 41.78±4.15a
C20:2 14.57±2.30c 36.04±9.54ab 30.69±2.22b 38.10±3.27a
C20:3n6 12.89±2.88c 28.52±4.12b 17.07±2.23c 49.04±6.55a
11,14,17 C20:3n3 1.47±0.22bc 1.72±0.23ab 1.17±0.22c 1.85±0.30a
C20:4n6 405.18±63.89c 532.13±33.15b 478.17±43.54b 598.17±37.73a
C20:5n3 8.31±0.72b 9.30±1.76b 9.02±0.72b 14.72±1.96a
C21:0 1.84±0.37c 1.95±0.24bc 2.68±0.36a 2.33±0.40ab
C22:0 2.25±0.26b 3.69±0.15a 1.76±0.21c 3.93±0.53a
C22:1 2.88±0.47c 6.00±1.38b 2.75±0.31c 8.27±0.82a
C22:2 1.10±0.13b 2.07±0.56b 1.39±0.27b 1.50±0.28a
C22:6n3 60.89±7.11b 68.47±3.19b 96.67±15.25a 102.20±12.40a
C23:0 1.67±0.32b 2.53±0.61b 1.73±0.24b 1.50±0.28a
C24:0 2.57±0.50ab 3.42±1.52a 1.70±0.17b 2.47±0.26ab
C24:1 8.19±0.50d 32.76±2.13b 16.31±3.04c 56.89±4.94a
Total fatty acids 3,471.09±196.71d 6,660.76±708.88c 5,014.55±247.02b 8,495.19±641.89d

a–d Means within a row with different superscript differ significantly at p<0.05.

YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens.

Download Excel Table
kosfa-43-6-975-g1
Fig. 1. Comparison of fatty acids content in the different parts of YBC and PC. a–d Means within a row with different superscript differ significantly at p<0.05. YX, breast meat of YBC; YT, leg meat of YBC; PX, breast meat of PC; PT, leg meat of PC; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens.
Download Original Figure

The C18:1 has the highest content in the breast meat and leg meat of YBC and PC, accounting for 25.85%, 25.60%, 27.74%, and 26.48% of the total fatty acid content, respectively. Studies have shown that high levels of C18:1 in meat can reduce some of the effects of amino acids themselves on fatty acid odor (Dashdorj et al., 2011), thereby contributing to the formation of the product’s flavor. The C16:0 content of chicken breast and leg meat in PC was 58.97% (p<0.05) and 63.37% (p<0.05) higher than that of YBC, respectively, but the C18:0 content of chicken breast and leg meat in PC was not significantly different from that of YBC. C16:0 and C18:0 were the main saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in YBC and PC, which is similar to previous findings (Dalziel et al., 2015; Nkukwana et al., 2014; Tian et al., 2011). When the human body is short of certain fatty acids, SFA is the preferred fatty acid used by the heart that is synthesized by the endogenous pathway of C16:0, and then polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) is produced by the action of carbon chain elongating enzymes and desaturase (Nkukwana et al., 2014). C18:2n6 and C20:4n6 were the main PUFA in YBC and PC, and the content of C18:2n6 and C20:4n6 in chicken breast and leg meat of PC was 31.49% (p<0.05), 26.34% (p<0.05), 18.01% (p<0.05), and 12.41% (p<0.05) higher than that in chicken breast and leg meat of YBC, respectively. C20:4n6 was mainly found in phospholipids (Tian et al., 2012), which were the most important precursors of flavor substances in chicken. Some researchers studied the contents of fatty acids and small molecular metabolites in frying chicken under different methods of cooking and found that boiled chicken had the highest content of arachidonic acid (Yu et al., 2021), frying chicken had the highest content of oleic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). In addition to the differences in fatty acid content and types of local chickens, cooking methods may also affect the fatty acid content and types of local chickens.

The total fatty acid content of chicken breast and leg meat of PC was 44.47% (p<0.05) and 27.54% (p<0.05) higher than YBC, respectively, indicating that the variety had an obvious effect on the fatty acid content of chicken, which was consistent with previous conclusions (Pavlovski et al., 2013). For different parts of the same variety, the total content of fatty acids in YBC and PC chicken legs was 91.89% (p<0.05) and 69.41% (p<0.05) higher than that in chicken breasts, respectively, which may be related to the differences in the amount of exercise and metabolism of muscles in different parts, and leg meat obtained higher energy during the exercise of chickens and deposited more intermuscular fatty acids.

The higher the content of UFA in chicken, the stronger the final flavor of chicken will be, which may be because UFA is easier to undergo automatic oxidation than SFA. And under proper heat-induced conditions, the automatic oxidation of UFA produces hydroperoxides, which continue to react to produce flavor substances such as alcohols, and aldehydes (Almela et al., 2010; Xun et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2019). Xiao et al. (2021) compared the contents of water-soluble compounds and fatty acids in typical commercial broilers with those in Yunnan native chickens (Yanjin blackbone chicken and Wuding chicken) and found that the contents in two Chinese native chickens were significantly higher than those in common commercial broilers (p<0.05). Hence, the flavor quality of PC was higher than that of YBC from the point of view of the evaluation of fatty acids.

Analysis of small molecular metabolites

Small molecular metabolites are important flavor precursors in chicken and make very important contributions to the taste (Khan et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2019b). LC-Q-Exactive-MS was used to identify small molecular metabtolites in YBC and PC, and the results are shown in Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2, and Supplementary Fig. S2 of the Supplement Materials. 106 and 67 small molecular metabolites, including amino acids, small peptides, lipids, nucleotides, organic acids, and their derivatives, were identified in positive and negative ion modes in different chicken samples, which was consistent with previous studies (Xiao et al., 2019b). Data on small molecular metabolites in samples were analyzed by the multivariate statistical pattern recognition method to better understand the distinction between small molecular metabolites in YBC and PC chicken. The results are shown in Fig. 2, which demonstrate that all samples were within the 95% confidence interval and that different groups of samples had their distinct distribution areas without coincidence, indicating that the composition and content of small molecular metabolites differed significantly between the two.

kosfa-43-6-975-g2
Fig. 2. PCA score plots of small molecular metabolites in different parts of YBC and PC meat. (A) ESI+; (B) ESI-. YX, breast meat of YBC; YT, leg meat of YBC; PX, breast meat of PC; PT, leg meat of PC; QC, quality control; PCA, principal component analysis; YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens; ESI, electrospray ionization.
Download Original Figure

The OPLS-DA scores of small molecular metabolites in chicken breast and leg meat of YBC and PC are shown in Fig. 3A. In positive and negative ion modes, all samples were within 95% confidence intervals, and the four groups of samples were separated in the first principal component direction, where R2 (cum) and Q2 (cum) respectively represented the model’s interpretation of the Y variable and the model’s predictability, and the closer the two values were to 1, the better. In chicken breast, R2 (cum)=0.99 and Q2 (cum)=0.96 under positive ion mode, and R2 (cum)=0.94 and Q2 (cum)=0.77 under negative ion mode; the R2 (cum)=0.99, Q2 (cum)=0.97 in the positive ion mode, and R2 (cum)=0.98, Q2 (cum)=0.96 in the negative ion mode in the chicken leg indicated that the model had a high interpretation rate and good prediction ability (Chong and Xia, 2018).

kosfa-43-6-975-g3
Fig. 3. OPLS-DA and VIP score plots, S-plots of small molecular metabolites in different parts of YBC and PC meat. OPLS-DA score plots of small molecular metabolites between YBC and PC (A); Permutations plots based on OPLS-DA models of small molecular metabolites between YBC and PC (B); VIP predictor plots of small molecular metabolites between YBC and PC (C); S-plots of small molecular metabolites between YBC and PC (D). The numbers in the figures (D) correspond to the numbers in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. YX, breast meat of YBC; PX, breast meat of PC; x, breast meat; ESI, electrospray ionization; YT, leg meat of YBC; PT, leg meat of PC; t, leg meat; OPLS-DA, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis; YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens; VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Download Original Figure

Only Q2 (cum) was not enough to prove the reliability of the OPLS-DA model, and to judge whether the model was overfitting, a replacement test was conducted on the model. As shown in Fig. 3B, all R2 and Q2 points simulated were lower than the original values, and the intercept of Q2’s regression line and Y-axis was less than zero, indicating that the model was stable and reliable and no overfitting occurred. In order to further screen differential compounds, VIP>1 was selected in combination with an S-type loading diagram, and the results are shown in Figs. 3C and D. The VIP value reflects the importance of variables to the model, and the larger the value, the greater the overall contribution of variables to the model. The S-type loading diagram was first proposed by Wiklund et al. (2008), which helps extract potentially differentiated compounds.

From YBC and PC chicken breast and chicken leg, a total of 12 and 16 substances that made important contributions to the difference between groups were screened, respectively, as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 4, which mainly included creatine, inosine, anserine, hypoxanthine, pantothenic acid, and other compounds. The content of palmityl carnitine in chicken breast and leg meat of YBC was higher than that in PC, while the content of inosine in chicken breast and leg meat of PC was higher than that in YBC. Compared with the chicken breast of PC, the content of betaine, palmityl carnitine, and tetracylacyl disacylcarnitine, was higher in YBC chicken breast, and the content of creatine, anserine, and inosine, was lower; compared with PC chicken legs, the content of hypoxanthine, pantothenic acid, and anserine in YBC chicken legs was higher than that in pyrimidine drumsticks, while the content of inosine, -alanine, and L-serine was lower. Yu et al. (2021) found that the total amount of small-molecule metabolites in each group decreased after boiling, frying, and roasting PC. Xiao et al. (2019b) found that lactic acid, creatine, taurine, and anserine in Wuding chicken accounted for about 75% of the total water-soluble small molecule compounds, which decreased significantly during processing.

Table 2. Identification of significantly different small molecular metabolites in breast meat and leg meat of YBC and PC
Source No. Mode Compound name RT/min VIP p-value
Breast meat 78 ESI+ Creatine 0.95 7.55 0.00
18 ESI+ Betaine 0.91 2.88 0.02
30 ESI+ Anserine 0.83 2.66 0.05
66 ESI+ Inosine 1.19 2.39 0.00
29 ESI+ L-Isoleucyl-L-proline 2.82 2.11 0.00
17 ESI+ Creatinine 1.18 2.00 0.01
42 ESI+ L-Palmitoylcarnitine 8.70 1.14 0.01
48 ESI+ Tetradecanoylcarnitine 7.87 1.13 0.00
47 ESI+ Tetracosahexaenoic acid 7.17 1.02 0.00
12 ESI- Anserine 0.81 6.76 0.01
24 ESI- Tauroursodeoxycholic acid 5.40 3.14 0.00
66 ESI- Sedoheptulose 0.88 2.06 0.00
Leg meat 93 ESI+ Hypoxanthine 0.93 4.04 0.00
64 ESI+ L-Acetylcarnitine 0.91 3.84 0.00
37 ESI+ Linoleyl carnitine 8.35 3.79 0.00
104 ESI+ Hydrouracil 0.95 3.47 0.00
42 ESI+ L-Palmitoylcarnitine 8.70 2.47 0.00
66 ESI+ Inosine 1.19 1.74 0.00
85 ESI+ Acetylcholine 0.91 1.57 0.01
24 ESI+ β-Alanine 0.91 1.36 0.00
25 ESI+ Glutathione 1.19 1.17 0.00
15 ESI+ N-Acetyl-L-histidine 0.81 1.17 0.01
20 ESI+ L-Serine 0.93 1.06 0.00
96 ESI+ Pantothenic acid 1.91 1.03 0.01
3 ESI+ DL-2-Aminooctanoic acid 0.91 1.00 0.00
12 ESI- Anserine 0.81 6.95 0.00
65 ESI- Pantothenic acid 2.06 2.91 0.00
24 ESI- Tauroursodeoxycholic acid 5.40 1.19 0.00

YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens; ESI, electrospray ionization; RT, retention time; VIP, variable importance in the projection.

Download Excel Table
kosfa-43-6-975-g4
Fig. 4. Heat map of significantly different small molecular metabolites in breast meat (A) and leg meat (B) of YBC and PC. ESI, electrospray ionization; PX, breast meat of PC; YX, breast meat of YBC; YT, leg meat of YBC; PT, leg meat of PC; YBC, Yanjin blackbone chickens; PC, Piao chickens.
Download Original Figure

Anserin has been found to have special antioxidant properties and is a bioactive endogenous compound (Peiretti et al., 2012), which can be considered an additional nutritional factor for meat (Jayasena et al., 2015). Creatine is mainly related to muscle energy metabolism, and its content depends on the type of muscle metabolism (Reig et al., 2013). In addition, the increase in creatine content has a certain cushioning effect on the decline of the pH of chicken after slaughter, which may improve its hydrodynamics. Inosine is generally caused by an increase in adenosine diphosphate from the degradation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in meat, and adenosine monophosphate is formed under the action of creatinase, which in turn is further formed under the action of the enzyme inosinemonophosphate (IMP), which is an important umami substance in chicken (Dashdorj et al., 2015; Yue et al., 2016).

Livestock and poultry meat belong to the middle purine class of food, dominated by hypoxanthine, and in the early stage of slaughtered chicken leg meat, there is more ATP, which is converted into inosine through enzyme decomposition and then further decomposed into hypoxanthine, ribose, and other substances. Although hypoxanthine itself has a certain bitterness, it has been shown to enhance the overall taste of dry-cured meat products (Ichimura et al., 2017). β-alanine is an amino acid that does not participate in protein synthesis and can be used as a precursor to synthesize carnosine, anserine, and other muscle-active peptides. L-serine is a sweet amino acid and a precursor to the synthesis of purine, thymine, and choline. Pantothenic acid, also known as vitamin B5, is a water-soluble vitamin that plays an important role in the formation of melanin in the body, and the content of pantothenic acid in YBC chicken legs is higher than that in PC, which may be related to its own higher aconitum.

Conclusion

The contents and differences of fatty acids and small molecular metabolites in the breast and leg meat of YBC and PC were analyzed by GC-MS and LC-Q-Exactive-MS in this study. Thirty-two fatty acids were determined in YBC and PC, among which UFA accounted for the largest proportion, and their content in descending order was PC leg (8,495.19 μg/g), YBC leg (66,660.76 μg/g), PC breast (5,014.55 μg/g), and YBC breast (3,471.09 μg/g). C18:1, C18:2n6, C16:0, C18:0, and C20:4n6 were the five main fatty acids in the two chicken varieties. The total fatty acid content of PC was significantly higher than that of YBC (p<0.05), and the fatty acid content of chicken breast was significantly lower than that of chicken leg (p<0.05). A total of 12 and 16 substances were selected from YBC and PC chicken breast and chicken leg, respectively, which had an important contribution to the difference between groups. This study provided a scientific theoretical basis for further development and utilization.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

kosfa-43-6-975-suppl1.pdf

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Yunnan Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Leader Reserve Talent Project (202105AC160068), and the major science and technology Project of Yunnan Province (2016ZA008).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G. Data curation: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G. Formal analysis: Jia R, Xun W, Yang Y, Wang G. Methodology: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G, Wang G. Software: Jia R, Xun W, Yang Y. Validation: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G. Investigation: Jia R, Xun W. Writing - original draft: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G. Writing - review & editing: Jia R, Xun W, Liao G, Yang Y, Wang G.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Almela E, Jordán MJ, Martínez C, Sotomayor JA, Bedia M, Bañón S. 2010; Ewe’s diet (pasture vs grain-based feed) affects volatile profile of cooked meat from light Lamb. J Agric Food Chem. 58:9641-9646

2.

Barola C, Moretti S, Giusepponi D, Paoletti F, Saluti G, Cruciani G, Brambilla G, Galarini R. 2020; A liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry method for the determination of thirty-three per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in animal liver. J Chromatogr A. 1628:461442

3.

Chong J, Xia J. 2018; MetaboAnalystR: An R package for flexible and reproducible analysis of metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 34:4313-4314

4.

Christensen L, Gunvig A, Tørngren MA, Aaslyng MD, Knøchel S, Christensen M. 2012; Sensory characteristics of meat cooked for prolonged times at low temperature. Meat Sci. 90:485-489

5.

Dalziel CJ, Kliem KE, Givens DI. 2015; Fat and fatty acid composition of cooked meat from UK retail chickens labelled as from organic and non-organic production systems. Food Chem. 179:103-108

6.

Dashdorj D, Amna T, Hwang I. 2015; Influence of specific taste-active components on meat flavor as affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors: An overview. Eur Food Res Technol. 241:157-171

7.

Dashdorj D, Cho BW, Odkhuu G, Park KM, Do KT, Lee KH, Seo KS, Choi JG, Lee MJ, Cho IK, Ryu KS, Jeong D, Hwang I. 2011; Meat quality and volatile flavor traits of Duroc, Berkshire and Yorksire breeds. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 31:807-816

8.

Delgado-Andrade C. 2017; New knowledge in analytical, technological, and biological aspects of the Maillard reaction. Foods. 6:40

9.

Fan M, Xiao Q, Xie J, Cheng J, Sun B, Du W, Wang Y, Wang T. 2018; Aroma compounds in chicken broths of Beijing youji and commercial broilers. J Agric Food Chem. 66:10242-10251

10.

Gong H, Yang Z, Liu M, Shi Z, Li J, Chen W, Qiao X. 2017; Time-dependent categorization of volatile aroma compound formation in stewed Chinese spicy beef using electron nose profile coupled with thermal desorption GC–MS detection. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 6:137-146

11.

Gu J, Li S. 2020; Next-generation sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome of the Piao chicken (Gallus gallus). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5:2870-2871

12.

Huang J, Zhao Q, Bu W, Zhang C, Yang Z, Zhang X, Zhang K. 2020; Ultrasound-assisted hydrolysis of lard for free fatty acids catalyzed by combined two lipases in aqueous medium. Bioengineered. 11:241-250

13.

Huang YH. 2014; Introduction and development of variety of resources of ladle chicken in Zhenyuan. Sci Technol Inf Anim Husb Vet Sci. 6:135-136.

14.

Ichimura S, Nakamura Y, Yoshida Y, Hattori A. 2017; Hypoxanthine enhances the cured meat taste. Anim Sci J. 88:379-385

15.

Jayasena DD, Jung S, Bae YS, Park HB, Lee JH, Jo C. 2015; Comparison of the amounts of endogenous bioactive compounds in raw and cooked meats from commercial broilers and indigenous chickens. J Food Compos Anal. 37:20-24

16.

Jin Z, Zhang J, Wu X, Cao G. 2019; Metabolomics study of the therapeutic mechanism of a Chinese herbal formula on collagen-induced arthritis mice. Rsc Adv. 9:3716-3725

17.

Khan MI, Jo C, Tariq MR. 2015; Meat flavor precursors and factors influencing flavor precursors: A systematic review. Meat Sci. 110:278-284

18.

Li X, Zhu J, Qi J, Wang P, Xu X, Zhou G. 2018; Superchilled storage (−2.5 ± 1°C) extends the retention of taste-active and volatile compounds of yellow-feather chicken soup. Anim Sci J. 89:906-918

19.

Liu S, Wang G, Xiao Z, Pu Y, Ge C, Liao G. 2019; 1H-NMR-based water-soluble low molecular weight compound characterization and free fatty acid composition of five kinds of Yunnan dry-cured hams. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 108:174-182

20.

Nkukwana TT, Muchenje V, Masika PJ, Hoffman LC, Dzama K, Descalzo AM. 2014; Fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of breast meat from broiler chickens supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaf meal over a period of refrigeration. Food Chem. 142:255-261

21.

Pavlovski Z, Škrbić Z, Stanišić N, Lilić S, Hengl B, Lukić M, Petričević V. 2013; Differences in fatty acid composition of meat between naked neck and two commercial broiler chicken breeds. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 29:467-476

22.

Peiretti PG, Medana C, Visentin S, Dal Bello F, Meineri G. 2012; Effect of cooking method on carnosine and its homologues, pentosidine and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance contents in beef and turkey meat. Food Chem. 132:80-85

23.

Pellattiero E, Tasoniero G, Cullere M, Gleeson E, Baldan G, Contiero B, Dalle Zotte A. 2020; Are meat quality traits and sensory attributes in favor of slow-growing chickens?. Animals. 10:960

24.

Raza A, Shabbir MA, Khan MI, Suleria HAR, Sultan S. 2015; Effect of thermal treatments on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in various meats. J Food Process Preserv. 39:376-383

25.

Reig M, Aristoy MC, Toldrá F. 2013; Variability in the contents of pork meat nutrients and how it may affect food composition databases. Food Chem. 140:478-482

26.

Sabikun N, Bakhsh A, Rahman MS, Hwang YH, Joo ST. 2021; Volatile and nonvolatile taste compounds and their correlation with umami and flavor characteristics of chicken nuggets added with milkfat and potato mash. Food Chem. 343:128499

27.

Sharma P, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Pow-Sang JM. 2016; Biomarkers for prostate cancer: Present challenges and future opportunities. Future Sci OA. 2:FSO72

28.

Tian XY, Cai Q, Zhang YM. 2012; Rapid classification of Hairtail fish and pork freshness using an electronic nose based on the PCA method. Sensors. 12:260-277

29.

Tian Y, Zhu S, Xie M, Wang W, Wu H, Gong D. 2011; Composition of fatty acids in the muscle of black-bone silky chicken (Gallus gellus demesticus brissen) and its bioactivity in mice. Food Chem. 126:479-483

30.

Wang X, Fang C, He J, Dai Q, Fang R. 2017; Comparison of the meat metabolite composition of Linwu and Pekin ducks using 600 MHz 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Poult Sci. 96:192-199

31.

Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjöström L, Mellerowicz EJ, Edlund U, Shockcor JP, Gottfries J, Moritz T, Trygg J. 2008; Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal Chem. 80:115-122

32.

Xiao Z, Ge C, Zhou G, Zhang W, Liao G. 2019a; 1H NMR-based metabolic characterization of Chinese Wuding chicken meat. Food Chem. 274:574-582

33.

Xiao Z, Luo Y, Wang G, Ge C, Zhou G, Zhang W, Liao G. 2019b; 1H-NMR-based water-soluble low molecular weight compound characterization and fatty acid composition of boiled Wuding chicken during processing. J Sci Food Agric. 99:429-435

34.

Xiao Z, Zhang W, Yang H, Yan Z, Ge C, Liao G, Su H. 2021; 1H NMR-based water-soluble lower molecule characterization and fatty acid composition of Chinese native chickens and commercial broiler. Food Res Int. 140:110008

35.

Xun W, Wang GY, Zhao WH, Yu YR, Liao GZ, Ge CR. 2021; Comparison of volatile flavor components in different parts of Baibao Chicken and Yanjin Black Bone Chicken based on HS-SPME-GC-MS method. J Nucl Agric. 35:923-932.

36.

Yu Y, Wang G, Yin X, Ge C, Liao G. 2021; Effects of different cooking methods on free fatty acid profile, water-soluble compounds and flavor compounds in Chinese Piao chicken meat. Food Res Int. 149:110696

37.

Yue J, Zhang Y, Jin Y, Deng Y, Zhao Y. 2016; Impact of high hydrostatic pressure on non-volatile and volatile compounds of squid muscles. Food Chem. 194:12-19

38.

Zhan H, Hayat K, Cui H, Hussain S, Ho CT, Zhang X. 2020; Characterization of flavor active non-volatile compounds in chicken broth and correlated contributing constituent compounds in muscle through sensory evaluation and partial least square regression analysis. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 118:108786

39.

Zhang J, Ye Y, Sun Y, Pan D, Ou C, Dang Y, Wang Y, Cao J, Wang D. 2018; 1H NMR and multivariate data analysis of the differences of metabolites in five types of dry-cured hams. Food Res Int. 113:140-148

40.

Zhang W, Naveena BM, Jo C, Sakata R, Zhou G, Banerjee R, Nishiumi T. 2017; Technological demands of meat processing: An Asian perspective. Meat Sci. 132:35-44

41.

Zhao J, Wang T, Xie J, Xiao Q, Cheng J, Chen F, Wang S, Sun B. 2019; Formation mechanism of aroma compounds in a glutathione-glucose reaction with fat or oxidized fat. Food Chem. 270:436-444