Separation and Purification of Antioxidant Peptide from Fermented Whey Protein by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B2-1

Hao Guo1, Lei Fan1, Lin Ding1, Wenqin Yang1, Chuangang Zang1, Hong Guan1,*
Author Information & Copyright
1Research Office, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China
*Corresponding author: Hong Guan, Research Office, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China, Tel: +86-0452-2663563, E-mail:

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 24, 2022 ; Revised: Aug 18, 2022 ; Accepted: Sep 01, 2022

Published Online: Jan 01, 2023


In this study, a antioxidant activity peptide fraction was separated and purified from metabolites of whey protein fermented by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B2-1. The fermentation sample was separated by macroporous resin D101 and Sephadex G-15. The collected fractions were tested for antioxidant and antitumor activities. In order to test the antioxidant activity of fractions, Hydroxyl (·OH), 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), and Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) were used. The final purified peptide B11 showed highest ABTS and ·OH radical scavenging rate by 84.36±1.89% and 62.43±2.64%, respectively, and had an ORAC activity of 1,726.44± 2.76 μM Trolox equivalent/g. Further, the inhibitory effect of B11 on the proliferation of LoVo human colon cancer cells, KB and Cal-27 human oral cancer cells were enhanced with increasing concentrations of B11. B11 contains 51.421% amino acids, with Glu and Asp being the major constituents. In this study, we obtained peptide fraction B11 with antioxidant activity, which is promising for development.

Keywords: peptide; separation; purification; antioxidant; antitumor


The presence of free radicals is known to contribute to various chronic and degenerative diseases, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, inflammation, stroke, and cancer (Cheng et al., 2003). Under normal physiological conditions, the body constantly generates free radicals, but also strictly regulated by the antioxidant defense system, so as to maintain a healthy balance of free radicals and the normal functioning of multiple body functions (Laguerre et al., 2007), however, excessive accumulation of free radicals can occur when the internal defense mechanism is out of balance or external harmful stimuli cause the imbalance of free radicals to occur, then cause a series of diseases such as cancer (Leanderson et al., 1997), cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory disease (Wang et al., 2016).

Antioxidants are defined as any substance that prevent the adverse effects of oxygen. It is a class of substances that can help capture and neutralize free radicals to remove their damage to the human body (Theansungnoen et al., 2014). Meanwhile, antioxidants are increasingly used in the field of dietary supplements and should be widely used for disease prevention purposes. However, due to the disadvantages of synthetic antioxidants such as harm to health, high cost, and single mechanism of action (Shi et al., 1996), the development of green, pollution-free and high-safety antioxidants that can replace artificial synthesis has development and application prospects.

Bioactive peptides (BAPs) refer to peptide compounds which are beneficial to biological activities or have physiological effects. As a basic nutrient, active peptides have high bioavailability and are more easily absorbed than amino acids. Meanwhile, they have the function of regulating human physiological function, which is not possessed by original proteins and amino acids composed of them (Hartmann and Meisel, 2007). They have a variety of biological functions, such as hormone effect, immune regulation, anti-hypertension, antitumor effect, antioxidant effect, cholesterol lowering, inhibition of bacteria and viruses, etc. (Samaei et al., 2021; Sarabandi and Jafari, 2020). Among them, antioxidant peptides act as antioxidants by scavenging free radicals and relieving oxidative stress (Giordano et al., 2017; Pandya et al., 2019; Yi et al., 2022). It is found that certain BAPs do indeed have antioxidative properties and can be used as a natural substitute to synthetic antioxidants to improve health (Nadalian et al., 2019). Due to their low toxicity and high efficiency, antioxidant peptides are widely used by the product processing industry and in health care products (Tadesse and Emire, 2020; Wen et al., 2020).

Food protein from dairy products by fermentation method is a source of antioxidant peptides (Anukam and Reid, 2009). The fermentation method uses dairy products as raw materials, inserts protease-producing microorganisms, and utilizes protease produced in the fermentation process of microorganisms to hydrolyze milk protease into peptides with different amino acid sequences and molecular weights under aerobic or anaerobic conditions (Agbor et al., 2011; Chandrasekara and Shahidi, 2011), which are microbial cells themselves, or direct metabolites or secondary metabolites (Ali et al., 2019; Li et al., 2012). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the dominant group of protease-producing microorganisms, among which Lactobacillus spirochetes, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus paracasei have been reported (Sun et al., 2010). The abundance and characteristics of antioxidant peptides released from milk and dairy products are strain-dependent (Ayyash et al., 2020; Rubak et al., 2020).

Due to LAB’s ability to release BAPs in fermented dairy products, and the fact that it is “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for use in food, LAB has become more common for certain strains to produce fermented dairy products with certain functional properties (Kim et al., 2017). Therefore, the objective of this study was to obtain antioxidant peptides using Lactobacillus rhamnosus B2-1 from fermented whey protein. It has important practical significance for developing new whey protein products and improving the comprehensive utilization rate of whey protein.

Materials and Methods


Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). 2,2-amino-di (2-ethyl-benzothiazoline sulphonic acid-6) ammonium salt (ABTS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Trolox were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin, and dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Macroporous resin D101 was purchased from Amicogen Biopharm (Jining, China). Sephadex G-15 gel was purchased from GE healthcare AB Bio-Sciences (Concord, MA, USA). All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

Culture medium

Whey protein-MRS medium: According to the modified MRS (DeMan Rogosa-Sharpe) medium, the specific components are as follows: Desalinated whey powder 10 g, beef extract 10 g, yeast extract 5 g, glucose 20 g, Twain’s 80 1 mL, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2 g, sodium acetate 5 g, sodium citrate 2 g, magnesium sulfate 0.2 g, manganese sulfate 0.05 g, add water to 1 L, 121°C, sterilization for 15 min.

Strain isolation and purification

L. rhamnosus B2-1 was obtained from the soaking liquid of corn. The soaking solution was inoculated into 5% desalted whey powder medium and cultured for 48 h, centrifuged at 1,600×g for 10 min, and the supernatant was taken for preliminary antioxidant activity screening. After initial screening, the bacteria fermentation broth was expanded and enriched at 37°C for 48 h. Single colonies were isolated and selected after spreading the serially diluted fermentation broth on MRS agar plate and incubating them at 37°C for 48 h. The isolated strains were streaked on MRS agar plate and observed by Meilan staining.

By extracting the genome of the strain with properties, and identifying the 16S rRNA by Bioengineering Biotechnology (Shanghai, China), the data was submitted to National Biotechnology Information Center by basic local queue search methods for homology comparison.

Fermentation and sample preparation

L. rhamnosus B2-1 was cultured in 1 mL of sterilized whey protein-MRS medium and incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 48 h. After continuous expansion for 2 times, the culture was inoculated into 5% whey protein-MRS medium for 48 h, centrifuged at 4,600×g for 10 min, and the supernatant was freeze-dried.

Peptide isolation and purification

Peptides for whey protein fermentation (PWPF) were preliminary isolated by macroporous resin D101. PWPF (20 mL, 150 mg/mL) were loaded on macroporous resin D101 column (25 mm×460 mm), and stepwise eluted with a series of gradient ethanol solutions at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min. Automatic collectors were used to collect the eluate (2 min/tube). In order to obtain the elution curve of the sample solution, the absorbance of the fractions was measured at 214 nm, 254 nm, and 280 nm. Besides, the peptide content and ABTS radical clearance rate were measured in every three tubes. The absorption peaks were collected, pooled, rotary evaporation and lyophilized. The purified fractions, labeled F1, F2, F3, and F4, were stored at –20°C until needed.

A Sephadex G-15 chromatography was used to purify the fraction with strong radical scavenging activity. The column was pre-equilibrated with deionized water. The purified fraction was formulated into a 0.7 mg/mL solution with deionized water, and then the peptide solution (4 mL) was loaded onto the column (16 mm×100 cm). Deionized water was used to elute the column at a volume of 4 mL/tube, with absorbance monitoring at 214 nm, 254 nm, and 280 nm. The fractions were lyophilized for further use.

Tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Tricine-SDS-PAGE)

The concentrations of acrylamide in the resolving and stacking gels were 16% and 4%, respectively. The sample was mixed with one volume of 2×sample buffer [12% SDS (w/v), 6% mercaptoethanol (v/v), 30% glycerol (w/v), 0.05% G-250 (w/v) and 150 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.0)]. After boiling for 3 min, the samples were cooled and loaded onto polyacrylamide gels, which were pre-run at 60 V for 20 min before the sample was applied. The electrophoresis was performed by stacking and breaking down the gel at constant voltages of 60 V and 100 V, respectively. After electrophoresis, the gel was removed, the fixative was fixed for 30 min, stained for 1 h, and it was decolorated.

Amino acid composition

The sample was mixed with 10 mL of 6 mol/L HCl (containing 0.1% phenol), and nitrogen was filled into the prepared hydrolysis tube to protect the samples from oxidation during the hydrolysis process. The hydrolysis tube was hydrolyzed at 110°C under vacuum for 24 h. After drying, sodium citrate buffer solution (1 mL, pH 2.2) was added into the test tube and dissolved. The absorbed solution was transferred to a sample bottle for detection by the amino acid analyzer after passing through a 0.22 μm filter membrane.

2,2-Amino-di (2-ethyl-benzothiazoline sulphonic acid-6) ammonium salt (ABTS) radical scavenging activity

Antioxidant activity was measured by measuring the radical-scavenging ability of ABTS. The sample (40 μL, 1 mg/mL) was mixed with the ABTS reagent (160 μL) and reacted at room temperature for 6 min in the dark. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 734 nm. As a blank control, 50 mmol/L of Tris-HCl buffer was used, and Vc as a positive control. The calculation formula is:

ABTS radical scavenging ability/% = ( 1 A sample A blank ) × 100 %
Oxygen radical absorbance capacity

To determine the oxygen radical scavenging ability, ORAC method was used. The sample (20 μL) was added to FL working solution (80 μL), followed by 200 mmol/L AAPH added quickly. The fluorescence intensity of each well was measured every 6 min at 37°C at excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 538 nm using a microplate analyzer. The measurement time is usually set after the fluorescence attenuation has reached the baseline. With Trolox as positive control, the calculation formula is as follows:

Relatice ORAC value = [ AUC sample AUC blank AUC Trolox AUC blank ] × ( C Trolox / ω sample )

AUCsample and AUCblank in the formula represent the area under the curve of sample solution and blank solution respectively.

Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity

The hydroxyl (·OH) radical scavenging activity was determined using the salicylic acid method. The sample (2 mL) was incubated with ferrous sulfate solution (0.5 mL, 9 mmol/L), salicylic acid solution (2 mL, 9 mmol/L in absolute ethanol) and H2O2 solution (8.8 mmol/L) at 37°C for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. In the control, deionized water was used as a substitute for H2O2, while deionized water was also used for the blank, and Vc was used as a positive control. The calculation formula is:

OH radical scavenging activity/%= ( 1 A sample A blank A control ) × 100 %
Cell lines and culture conditions

LoVo human colon cancer cells, KB human oral cancer cells and Cal-27 human oral cancer cells were purchased from the Cell Resource Center, Peking Union Medical College which is the headquarter of National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource (NSTI). Three types of cells were cultivated in DMEM containing 10% FBS, ampicillin sodium, and streptomycin sulfate. All cells were cultivated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Cell proliferation assay

MTT assay was used to evaluate the effects of samples on cell proliferation. Cells were harvested during logarithmic growth phase and seeded at a density of 2×104 cells per well in 96-well plates. During overnight growth, the culture medium was replaced by various concentrations of the sample for 48 h. MTT was added to each well for 4 h. The supernatant was removed and dissolved in 150 μL of DMSO. ELISA plate readers were then used to measure absorption at 570 nm. Cell inhibition rate (percentage) was calculated using the following formula:

Inhibition rate/% = ( 1 A sample A blank ) × 100 %
Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the variance test analysis (SPSS Statistics 19 software). Significant differences between the groups with different treatments were examined using t-test. p<0.05 was set as statistically significant difference.


Identification of the fermented bacterial strain

In the experiment, the fermented bacterial strain was isolated from the soaking liquid of corn. The strain isolate was genotyped by using 16S rRNA gene sequences. The 16S rRNA gene sequences alignment of the isolated strain showed 99.15% identity with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strain NBRC 3425. L. rhamnosus B2-1 was identified and named based on these results. All the raw reads have been submitted to the NCBI SRA under the accession number SRR19749980.

Macroporous resin technology

The lyophilized powder from the fermentation broth of whey protein metabolites of L. rhamnosus B2-1 was separated by macroporous resin D101 column, and its elution was detected by ultraviolet detector. As can be seen from the Fig. 1A, four peaks were successively separated, namely F1, F2, F3, and F4. The yield of each component was 6.03%, 21.50%, 16.66%, and 9.69%, respectively.

Fig. 1. Macroporous resin D101 column chromatography (25 mm×460 mm) and Tricine-SDS-PAGE results of each fraction. (A) Macroporous resin D101 column chromatography. Eluent: A solution (water), B solution (ethanol). Flow rate: 2.5 mL/min, Fraction: 2 min /tube. Fractionation: F1 (tube on, 10–16), F2 (tube on, 19–34), F3 (tube on, 67–79), F4 (tube on, 80–88). (B) M: Marker, 1: F1, 2: F2, 3: F3, 4: F4, 5: Sterilized whey protein, 6: PWPF, 7: Unsterilized whey protein, α: α-lactalbumin protein, β: β-lactoglobulin protein. Tricine-SDS-PAGE, tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PWPF, peptides for whey protein fermentation.
Download Original Figure

The results of Tricine-SDS-PAGE electrophoresis were shown in Fig. 1B. Controlling with α-lactoglobulin and β-chylous protein, the results showed that the molecular weight of F1 mainly concentrated around 14.4–66 kD, while the molecular weight of F3 and F4 mainly concentrated around 14, 20, and 35 kD, showing obvious bands in these three molecular weights.

Amino acid composition of fractions

The amino acid compositions of F1, F2, F3, and F4 are represented in Table 1. Of the four fractions, the highest amino acid content was F4, followed by F3, F2, and F1. F4 was found to contain both essential and non-essential amino acids, with the main amino acids being Glu, Pro, Thr, Asp, and Ile. Hydrophobic amino acids (Ala, Val, Met, Ile, Leu, Phe, Pro, and Tyr) were 8.738% of F4 (Qian et al., 2008). Thus, F4 contained the highest proportion of hydrophobic amino acids.

Table 1. Amino acid composition of each fraction
Amino acids Contents of amino acids (%)
F1 F2 F3 F4 B11
Asp 0.311 0.031 0.808 2.145 6.013
Thr 0.183 0.017 0.553 2.346 4.281
Ser 0.157 0.017 0.373 1.320 2.950
Glu 0.555 0.058 1.434 4.551 11.180
Gly 0.070 0.016 0.129 0.437 1.011
Ala 0.152 0.019 0.344 0.961 2.865
Cys 0.023 0.004 0.088 0.084 0.575
Val 0.156 0.016 0.392 1.125 3.208
Met 0.052 0.005 0.095 0.410 1.229
Ile 0.149 0.014 0.463 2.021 3.608
Leu 0.308 0.025 0.693 1.078 5.629
Tyr 0.037 0.003 0.185 0.213 1.533
Phe 0.102 0.009 0.211 0.484 1.641
His 0.185 0.075 0.210 0.925 2.181
Lys 0.073 0.009 0.197 0.679 2.275
Arg 0.036 0.004 0.058 0.169 1.243
Pro 0.165 0.165 0.468 2.446 3.636
Total amino acid 2.550 0.322 6.234 18.949 51.421
Download Excel Table
Antioxidant activities of fractions

Antioxidant activity of protein fractions was determined by ABTS radical scavenging activity, oxygen radical absorbance capacity and ·OH radical scavenging activity.

Fig. 2A shows that ABTS radical scavenging activity of protein fractions. As shown in Fig. 2A, the ABTS radical scavenging activity of F4 was 34.46±1.71%, which was significantly higher than other fractions at the same concentration. The scavenging rate of ABTS radical was F4>F1>F3>F2. These results indicated that the F4 and F1 has potential antioxidant abilities.

Fig. 2. Antioxidant activity of each fraction at a concentration 1 mg/mL. (A) ABTS radical clearance rate, (B) fluorescence natural decay curves, (C) hydroxyl radical clearance rate. AAPH, 2,2’-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride; ABTS, 2,2-amino-di (2-ethyl-benzothiazoline sulphonic acid-6) ammonium salt.
Download Original Figure

Fig. 2B shows that the results of the fluorescence natural decay curves of protein fractions. Based on Fig. 2B, the antioxidant capacity of ORAC was measured for different fractions of the same concentration and compared with the positive control Trolox that was used to calculate ORAC value. The relative ORAC values of F1, F2, F3, and F4 were 1,060.36±1.52 μM Trolox equivalent/g, 704.82±1.55 μM Trolox equivalent/g, 631.00±0.96 μM Trolox equivalent/g and 1,388.80±2.34 μM Trolox equivalent/g, respectively. The results showed that F4 and F1 have good oxygen radical absorbance capacity.

Fig. 2C shows that ·OH radical scavenging activity of protein fractions. As shown in Fig. 2C, ·OH radical scavenging rates of F1, F2, F3, and F4 were 22.27±1.89%, 16.38±0.86%, 26.82±1.45% and 35.63±1.11%, respectively. Overall, ·OH radical scavenging rates of each fraction were F4>F3>F1>F2 in descending order. These data suggested that the fraction F4 protected cells effectively against damage and oxidative lipid peroxidation.

Antitumor activity of fractions

On Figs. 3A, B, and C, the effect of various concentrations on the inhibition of LoVo cells (A), KB cells (B), and Cal-27 cells (C) can be seen. With the increase of concentration, the inhibitory effect of F1 and F4 on tumor cells was significantly enhanced, while F2 and F3 were less effective than F1 and F4. At 8 mg/mL, F1 inhibited the growth of LoVo cells, KB cells, and Cal-27 cells by 58.28±0.89%, 21.71±0.53%, and 53.86±2.43%, respectively. At the same concentration, the inhibition rate of F4 was 66.23±0.61%, 57.14±1.67%, and 47.91±1.05%, respectively. These results confirmed that F1 and F4 inhibited cancer cell growth at low concentrations.

Fig. 3. Effect of various concentrations of each fraction on cancer cells inhibition rate. (A) LoVo cells, (B) KB cells, (C) Cal-27 cells.
Download Original Figure
Gel filtration chromatography

The fraction of F4 from macroporous resin D101 column with the highest antitumor and antioxidation effects was separated by gel filtration chromatography (Sephadex G-15). As shown in Fig. 4, two fractions (B11 and B2) were separated from F4. Due to the excessive conductivity of fraction B2, which contained more salt and less polypeptides, B11 was only used as the study material.

Fig. 4. Chromatogram profiles of separation of F4 by Sephadex G-15 (16 mm×100 cm). Eluent: Water. Flow rate: 0.5 mL/min, Fraction: 4 mL/tube, Fractionation: B11 (tube on, 14–18), B2 (tube on, 22–25).
Download Original Figure
Amino acid composition of antioxidant peptide

The results of the amino acids composition are presented in Table 1. The amino acid content of B11 is 51.421%, nearly three times that of F4 (18.949%). Acidic amino acids Glu and Asp, which are capable of scavenging radicals via proton transfer, were the primary amino acids contained in the peptide, accounting for 11.180% and 6.013%, respectively. There were seven kinds of essential amino acids (Thr, Val, Met, Ile, Leu, Phe, and Lys) in B11 accounting for 21.871% of total amino acids. Therefore, B11 not only had a high antioxidant activity, but also had higher nutritional value.

Antioxidant activities of antioxidant peptide

Fig. 5A shows that ABTS radical scavenging activity of B11. The ABTS radical clearance rates of B11 increased with the increase of sample concentration after purification, and when the concentration was 1.0 mg/mL, the ABTS radical scavenging rate was the highest, and the antioxidant activity was the strongest, reached 70.36±1.89%. In the control group, the ABTS radical scavenging rate gradually increased with increasing concentration, reaching 98% at the maximum concentration.

Fig. 5. Antioxidant and antitumor activity of the fraction B11. (A) ABTS radical clearance rate, (B) fluorescence natural decay curves, (C) hydroxyl radical clearance rate, (D) effect of various concentrations on cancer cells inhibition rate. AAPH, 2,2’-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride; ABTS, 2,2-amino-di (2-ethyl-benzothiazoline sulphonic acid-6) ammonium salt.
Download Original Figure

Fig. 5B shows that B11 has strong antioxidant capacity in a dose-dependent manner. The B11 (1.0 mg/mL) showed a high oxygen radical absorbance activity of 1,726.44±2.76 μM Trolox equivalent/g. The ORAC values for the remaining concentrations (0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mg/mL) of B11 were 465.66±3.05 μM Trolox equivalent/g, 982.84±1.65 μM Trolox equivalent/g and 1,614.07±2.41 μM Trolox equivalent/g, respectively.

Fig. 5C shows that ·OH radical scavenging activity of B11. As shown in Fig. 5C, B11 demonstrated significant ·OH radical scavenging activity, in which the activity increased significantly with increasing concentration, but all concentrations were significantly weaker than Vc. At 1.0 mg/mL, B11 demonstrated scavenging activity of 62.43±2.64% against ·OH radicals. At other concentrations, B11 displayed scavenging activity of 51.04±1.95%, 46.33±2.07%, 28.63±2.33%, respectively.

Antitumor activity of antioxidant peptide

As shown in Fig. 5D, the inhibition rate of cell proliferation gradually increased with increasing concentrations of B11 from 0.4 to 1.0 mg/mL, which demonstrates a dose-dependent relationship. For LoVo cells, the inhibition rate of B11 from 0.4 to 1.0 mg/mL was 20.78±1.65%, 30.47±1.63%, 44.41±1.56%, 52.36±2.36%, respectively. At this concentration, the cell activities of KB cells were 13.67±1.78%, 18.14±3.87%, 30.21±2.34%, and 48.42±3.42%, respectively, while that of Cal-27 cells were 18.97±2.87%, 24.10±2.96%, 35.74±2.78%, and 54.57±2.14%, respectively. Based on the above data, it can be can conclude that compared with the other tumor cells, B11 has a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation of LoVo cells.


Antioxidant peptides can be prepared through fermentation using microbial enzyme systems, to date, most studies have primarily concentrated on obtaining antioxidant peptides by fermenting whey protein with potential probiotics. Cui et al. (2022) found that the polypeptides of whey protein generated by Lactobacillus reuteri WQ-Y1 had the potential antioxidant activity. Virtanen et al. (2007) investigated the production of antioxidant activity during fermentation with 25 lactic acid bacterial strains, and all strains showed the antioxidant activity. In the present study, L. rhamnosus B2-1 isolated from the soaking liquid of corn was selected as the fermentation strain, and peptides with antioxidant activity were also obtained. It might mean that the antioxidant activity of peptides depends on the fermenting strains and the development of antioxidant activity is strain-specific.

The polypeptides produced by fermentation are generally a mixture, so it is particularly important to separate the purified parts. Macroporous resin adsorption technology and gel filtration chromatography have been widely used for natural products purification (Puchalska et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2015). Macroporous resin has the characteristics of distributed apertures, easy desorption regeneration ability, selectivity on the adsorbate and other features (Xu et al., 2010). As different volume fractions of ethanol have different polarity and affinity for antioxidant peptides with different hydrophobicity, gradient elution may produce antioxidant peptides with different hydrophobicity, and the physiological activity of these antioxidant peptides is closely related to their hydrophobicity. Therefore, in this study, the four fractions obtained by gradient elution with different volume fractions of ethanol had different antioxidant activities. The results showed that the most hydrophobic elution fraction F4 was indeed the best antioxidant activity among the four fractions, so it was completely feasible to use macroporous resin for preliminary separation and purification. Some researchers have reported that macroporous resin D101 can be used to separate and obtain hydrophobic active ingredients (Gao et al., 2018; Gu et al., 2019).

With the rise and in-depth study of antioxidant peptides, a variety of methods have been established to evaluate the activity of antioxidant peptides in vitro. The antioxidant activity of peptides may be classified into two groups, depending on the chemical reaction involved: 1) those peptides are based on the hydrogen atom transfer reaction, which are mainly analyzed by kinetic curves, and 2) those peptides are based on electron transfer reactions, which are mainly reflected by color changes (Moayedi et al., 2017; Ohata et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017b). In the first case, it consists of ORAC assay and ABTS radical scavenging assay, while in the second case it consists of ·OH and DPPH radical scavenging assays (Shen et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2010). In this study, three in vitro assays were used to determine the antioxidant activity of protein fractions. The results showed that the antioxidant activity of the target peptide B11 gradually increased as the fermented solution was separated by different separation methods.

Researchers reported that most antioxidant peptides contained one or more hydrophobic amino acids since hydrophobic amino acid residues can act as hydrogen donors to break off free radical peroxide chain reactions with their aromatic residues (Xing et al., 2016). In the fraction B11, 23.349% of the amino acids were hydrophobic, which would lead to better oxidation inhibition than in F4. In this study, the content of Met and Tyr in B11 was higher than that of other fractions (F1, F2, F3, and F4). Polypeptides with Met and Tyr could effectively scavenge free radicals (Yang et al., 2017a), which was also one of the reasons for the improved ABTS free radical scavenging ability of B11. Wattanasiritham et al. (2016) reported that peptides containing Pro, Gly, Ala, Val, and Leu had intrinsic antioxidant activity. Amino acids such as His, Leu, Gly, and Pro were suggested to play an important role in radical caging (Scholljegerdes et al., 2005). Moreover, peptides containing Tyr, Pro, Phe, and His, displayed strong antioxidant properties (Ren et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2010). The results of the present study supported the above statement by the strong antioxidant properties of B11 with the presence of intrinsic antioxidant amino acids. As a whole, the strong antioxidant properties of B11 may be attributed to their constituent amino acids, which can provide protons or act as electron donors to the free radicals and react with them to convert them to more stable products and terminate radical chain reaction (Zielinski et al., 2009). All of these reasons may explain the strong antioxidant activity of B11. Results from this study indicated that it was feasible to produce natural antioxidants from the whey protein fermented by L. rhamnosus.

Cells have an innate ability to modulate apoptosis using various redox systems, in which cancer cells are more dependent on antioxidant systems than other non-transformed cells, so they are especially vulnerable to increased oxidative stress as this redox balance is frequently deregulated in cancer cells (Eliassen et al., 2002; Trachootham et al., 2009). It was identified that antioxidants had been proposed as potential candidates in the prevention and treatment of diseases associated with active oxygen species, particularly cancer diseases (Leng et al., 2005). In this study, the results showed that B11 could significantly inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, indicating that that the antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of the peptide were interrelated. Therefore, it might be proposed that higher antioxidant activity leads to better antitumor activity, and the possible reason was the initial antitumor effect by regulating the level of oxidative stress in cancer cells (Kannan et al., 2008). Similar results were observed previously, Sun et al. (2017) demonstrated that the polypeptide from Pleurotus eryngii mycelium exerted significant antioxidant effects and could inhibit the growth of cervical, breast, and gastric cancer cells, which was also a bifunctional BAP.


In summary, our study reports the antioxidant activity of peptides derived from the whey protein fermented by L. rhamnosus B2-1 by macroporous resin and gel chromatography purification for the first time. After whey protein fermented from L. rhamnosus B2-1, the obtained fermented solution was separated by macroporous resin D101 to four fractions (F1, F2, F3, and F4). Fraction F4 showed significantly greater antioxidant activity than the other three fractions. F4 was re-separated using the Sephadex G-15 chromatography, and the final antioxidant fraction, B11, was obtained. Fraction B11 exhibited potent in vitro antioxidant activity in ABTS, ·OH radical scavenging activity and ORAC assay, and antitumor activity on LoVo, KB and Cal-27 cancer cells proliferation. The high antioxidant activity of B11 can be attributed to the presence of intrinsic antioxidant amino acids. Thus, B11 might be a good source of antioxidant peptide that may act as a food additive and bioactive material, and open up new possibilities for the utilization of whey by-products.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.


This research was supported by The Science and Technology Bureau of Qiqihar Project under Grant No. LHYD-202008 and Basic Scientific Research Project of Heilongjiang Province under Grant No. 2018-KYYWF-0108 and The project of Qiqihar Academy of Medical Sciences under Grant No. QMSI2022M-06.

Author Contributions

Conceputualization: Guan H. Data curation: Guo H. Formal analysis: Fan L. Methodology: Ding L. Validation: Yang WQ. Investigation: Zang CG. Writing - original draft: Guo H. Writing - review & editing: Guo H, Fan L, Ding L, Yang WQ, Zang CG, Guan H.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.



Agbor GA, Moumbegna P, Oluwasola EO, Nwosu LU, Njoku RCC, Kanu S, Emekabasi EI, Akin F, Obasi AP, Abudei FA. 2011; Antioxidant capacity of some plant foods and beverages consumed in the eastern region of Nigeria. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 8:362-369


Ali E, Nielsen SD, Abd-El Aal S, El-Leboudy A, Saleh E, LaPointe G. 2019; Use of mass spectrometry to profile peptides in whey protein isolate medium fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus LH-2 and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5. Front Nutr. 6:152


Anukam KC, Reid G. 2009; African traditional fermented foods and probiotics. J Med Food. 12:1177-1184


Ayyash M, Olaimat A, Al-Nabulsi A, Liu SQ. 2020; Bioactive properties of novel probiotic Lactococcus lactis fermented camel sausages: Cytotoxicity, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, antioxidant capacity, and antidiabetic activity. Food Sci Anim Resour. 40:155-171


Chandrasekara A, Shahidi F. 2011; Bioactivities and antiradical properties of millet grains and hulls. J Agric Food Chem. 59:9563-9571


Cheng HY, Lin TC, Yu KH, Yang CM, Lin CC. 2003; Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Terminalia chebula. Biol Pharm Bull. 26:1331-1335


Cui L, Yang G, Lu S, Zeng X, He J, Guo Y, Pan D, Wu Z. 2022; Antioxidant peptides derived from hydrolyzed milk proteins by Lactobacillus strains: A BIOPEP-UWM database-based analysis. Food Res Int. 156:111339


Eliassen LT, Berge G, Sveinbjørnsson B, Svendsen JS, Vorland LH, Rekdal Ø. 2002; Evidence for a direct antitumor mechanism of action of bovine lactoferricin. Anticancer Res. 22:2703-2710.


Gao H, Huang L, Ding F, Yang K, Feng Y, Tang H, Xu QM, Feng J, Yang S. 2018; Simultaneous purification of dihydrotanshinone, tanshinone I, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone IIA from Salvia miltiorrhiza and their anti-inflammatory activities investigation. Sci Rep. 8:8460


Giordano D, Locatelli M, Travaglia F, Bordiga M, Reyneri A, Coïsson JD, Blandino M. 2017; Bioactive compound and antioxidant activity distribution in roller-milled and pearled fractions of conventional and pigmented wheat varieties. Food Chem. 233:483-491


Gu S, Wang X, Zhou R, Huang J. 2019; Isolation and identification of nucleosides/nucleotides raising testosterone and NO levels of mice serum from Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) leaves. Andrologia. 51:e13191


Hartmann R, Meisel H. 2007; Food-derived peptides with biological activity: From research to food applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 18:163-169


Kannan A, Hettiarachchy N, Johnson MG, Nannapaneni R. 2008; Human colon and liver cancer cell proliferation inhibition by peptide hydrolysates derived from heat-stabilized defatted rice bran. J Agric Food Chem. 56:11643-11647


Kim BK, Choi IS, Kim J, Han SH, Suh HJ, Hwang JK. 2017; Effects of fermented milk with mixed strains as a probiotic on the inhibition of loperamide-induced constipation. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 37:906-916.


Laguerre M, Lecomte J, Villeneuve P. 2007; Evaluation of the ability of antioxidants to counteract lipid oxidation: Existing methods, new trends and challenges. Prog Lipid Res. 46:244-282


Leanderson P, Faresjö ÅO, Tagesson C. 1997; Green tea polyphenols inhibit oxidant-induced DNA strand breakage in cultured lung cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 23:235-242


Leng B, Liu XD, Chen QX. 2005; Inhibitory effects of anticancer peptide from Mercenaria on the BGC-823 cells and several enzymes. FEBS Lett. 579:1187-1190


Li S, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Zhang X, Huang L, Li D, Niu C, Yang Z, Wang Q. 2012; Antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from traditional Chinese fermented foods. Food Chem. 135:1914-1919


Moayedi A, Mora L, Aristoy MC, Hashemi M, Safari M, Toldrá F. 2017; ACE-inhibitory and antioxidant activities of peptide fragments obtained from tomato processing by-products fermented using Bacillus subtilis: Effect of amino acid composition and peptides molecular mass distribution. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 181:48-64


Nadalian M, Kamaruzaman N, Yusop MSM, Babji AS, Yusop SM. 2019; Isolation, purification and characterization of antioxidative bioactive elastin peptides from poultry skin. Food Sci Anim Resour. 39:966-979


Ohata M, Uchida S, Zhou L, Arihara K. 2016; Antioxidant activity of fermented meat sauce and isolation of an associated antioxidant peptide. Food Chem. 194:1034-1039


Pandya U, Dhuldhaj U, Sahay NS. 2019; Bioactive mushroom polysaccharides as antitumor: An overview. Nat Prod Res. 33:2668-2680


Puchalska P, Luisa Marina Alegre M, Concepción García López M. 2015; Isolation and characterization of peptides with antihypertensive activity in foodstuffs. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 55:521-551


Qian ZJ, Jung WK, Kim SK. 2008; Free radical scavenging activity of a novel antioxidative peptide purified from hydrolysate of bullfrog skin, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Bioresour Technol. 99:1690-1698


Ren J, Zhao M, Shi J, Wang J, Jiang Y, Cui C, Kakuda Y, Xue SJ. 2008; Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from grass carp muscle hydrolysates by consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 108:727-736


Rubak YT, Nuraida L, Iswantini D, Prangdimurti E. 2020; Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in milk fermented by indigenous lactic acid bacteria. Vet World. 13:345-353


Samaei SP, Martini S, Tagliazucchi D, Gianotti A, Babini E. 2021; Antioxidant and angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides obtained from alcalase protein hydrolysate fractions of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) bran. J Agric Food Chem. 69:9220-9228


Sarabandi K, Jafari SM. 2020; Effect of chitosan coating on the properties of nanoliposomes loaded with flaxseed-peptide fractions: Stability during spray-drying. Food Chem. 310:125951


Scholljegerdes EJ, Weston TR, Ludden PA, Hess BW. 2005; Supplementing a ruminally undegradable protein supplement to maintain essential amino acid supply to the small intestine when forage intake is restricted in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 83:2151-2161


Shen S, Chahal B, Majumder K, You SJ, Wu J. 2010; Identification of novel antioxidative peptides derived from a thermolytic hydrolysate of ovotransferrin by LC-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. 58:7664-7672


Shi H, Hiramatsu M, Komatsu M, Kayama T. 1996; Antioxidant property of Fructus momordicae extract. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 40:1111-1121


Sun J, Hu XL, Le GW, Shi YH. 2010; Lactobacilli prevent hydroxy radical production and inhibit Escherichia coli and Enterococcus growth in system mimicking colon fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol. 50:264-269


Sun Y, Hu X, Li W. 2017; Antioxidant, antitumor and immunostimulatory activities of the polypeptide from Pleurotus eryngii mycelium. Int J Biol Macromol. 97:323-330


Tadesse SA, Emire SA. 2020; Production and processing of antioxidant bioactive peptides: A driving force for the functional food market. Heliyon. 6:E04765


Tang X, He Z, Dai Y, Xiong YL, Xie M, Chen J. 2010; Peptide fractionation and free radical scavenging activity of zein hydrolysate. J Agric Food Chem. 58:587-593


Theansungnoen T, Yaraksa N, Daduang S, Dhiravisit A, Thammasirirak S. 2014; Purification and characterization of antioxidant peptides from leukocyte extract of Crocodylus siamensis. Protein J. 33:24-31


Trachootham D, Alexandre J, Huang P. 2009; Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 8:579-591


Virtanen T, Pihlanto A, Akkanen S, Korhonen H. 2007; Development of antioxidant activity in milk whey during fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 102:106-115


Wang L, Ding L, Yu Z, Zhang T, Ma S, Liu J. 2016; Intracellular ROS scavenging and antioxidant enzyme regulating capacities of corn gluten meal-derived antioxidant peptides in HepG2 cells. Food Res Int. 90:33-41


Wattanasiritham L, Theerakulkait C, Wickramasekara S, Maier CS, Stevens JF. 2016; Isolation and identification of antioxidant peptides from enzymatically hydrolyzed rice bran protein. Food Chem. 192:156-162


Wen C, Zhang J, Feng Y, Duan Y, Ma H, Zhang H. 2020; Purification and identification of novel antioxidant peptides from watermelon seed protein hydrolysates and their cytoprotective effects on H2O2-induced oxidative stress. Food Chem. 327:127059


Xing LJ, Hu YY, Hu HY, Ge QF, Zhou GH, Zhang WG. 2016; Purification and identification of antioxidative peptides from dry-cured Xuanwei ham. Food Chem. 194:951-958


Xu G, Zhang X, Guo P, Pan C, Zhang H, Wang C. 2010; MnII-based MIL-53 analogues: Synthesis using neutral bridging μ2-ligands and application in liquid-phase adsorption and separation of C6−C8 aromatics. J Am Chem Soc. 132:3656-3657


Yan QJ, Huang LH, Sun Q, Jiang ZQ, Wu X. 2015; Isolation, identification and synthesis of four novel antioxidant peptides from rice residue protein hydrolyzed by multiple proteases. Food Chem. 179:290-295


Yang R, Li X, Lin S, Zhang Z, Chen F. 2017a; Identification of novel peptides from 3 to 10 kDa pine nut (Pinus koraiensis) meal protein, with an exploration of the relationship between their antioxidant activities and secondary structure. Food Chem. 219:311-320


Yang R, Wang J, Lin S, Ye H, Chen F. 2017b; In vitro antioxidant activities of the novel pentapeptides Ser-His-Glu-Cys-Asn and Leu-Pro-Phe-Ala-Met and the relationship between activity and peptide secondary structure. J Sci Food Agric. 97:1945-1952


Yi J, Li X, Wang S, Wu T, Liu P. 2022; Steam explosion pretreatment of Achyranthis bidentatae radix: Modified polysaccharide and its antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 375:131746


Zielinski H, Michalska A, Amigo-Benavent M, del Castillo MD, Piskula MK. 2009; Changes in protein quality and antioxidant properties of buckwheat seeds and groats induced by roasting. J Agric Food Chem. 57:4771-4776