ARTICLE

Effects of Dipping Chicken Breast Meat Inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes in Lyophilized Scallion, Garlic, and Kiwi Extracts on Its Physicochemical Quality

Hye-Jin Kim1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-6720, Joko Sujiwo1,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-3922, Hee-Jin Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-9790, Aera Jang1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-8956
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea

These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author : Aera Jang, Department of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea Tel: +82-33-250-8643 Fax: +82-33-250-5574 E-mail: ajang@kangwon.ac.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Mar 13, 2019 ; Revised: Apr 17, 2019 ; Accepted: Apr 22, 2019

Published Online: Jun 30, 2019

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of lyophilized extracts of scallions (Allium fistulosum L., SLE), garlic (Allium sativum, GLE), and gold kiwi (Actinidia chinensis, GKE) and their effects on the quality of chicken breast meat inoculated with L. monocytogenes during storage for 9 days at 4°C. The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration (25 and 100 mg/mL, respectively) against L. monocytogenes were observed for SLE and GLE, respectively. GKE had the lowest half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid radical scavenging activity (5.06 mg/mL). The pH values of meat inoculated with L. monocytogenes and dipped in 1% SLE (LSLE), 1% GLE (LGLE), or 1% GKE (LGKE) were lower than that of the control on day 3 of storage (p<0.05). The initial population of L. monocytogenes in meat was 4.95–5.01 Log CFU/g. However, the population in the LSLE (5.73 Log CFU/g) was lower than that in the control (6.23 Log CFU/g) on day 5 (p<0.05). The volatile basic nitrogen value of the LSLE (19.90 mg/100 g) was lower than that of the control (24.38 mg/100 g) on day 7 (p<0.05). Moreover, treatment with SLE resulted in the maintenance of meat quality and reduced the population of L. monocytogenes on the meat. Thus, SLE may be used as an alternative natural and environmentally friendly sanitizer for reducing L. monocytogenes contamination in the chicken meat industry.

Keywords: chicken meat quality; scallion; garlic; gold kiwi; Listeria monocytogenes

Introduction

The production of poultry meat, including chicken, is predicted to reach 130.7 million tons in 2023, making the poultry meat industry the largest industry in the meat production sector (Skarp et al., 2016). The huge demand for poultry meat is attributed to its nutritional benefits, including high protein content and low cholesterol and saturated fat contents (Lopez-Andres et al., 2018). In chicken meat, the content of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids is also higher than that in beef, lamb, and pork, thus providing more health benefits.

However, the short shelf life of chicken and the risk of pathogen contamination are the main problems faced by the chicken meat industry. The short shelf life of chicken is attributed to the rapid oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids, whose content is relatively high in chicken meat (Marcinkowska-Lesiak et al., 2016). Pathogen contamination can occur in slaughter houses. In some countries, the volume of chicken processed in a single slaughterhouse is as high as 12,000 birds/h; therefore, maintenance of sanitary conditions is difficult, and the spread of microorganisms between carcasses is increased (Lin et al., 2004).

Listeria monocytogenes contamination in slaughterhouses has been frequently reported (Schafer et al., 2017). Moreover, ready-to-eat chicken is often associated with L. monocytogenes infection outbreaks (Elmali et al., 2015). Indeed, the pathogen can survive over wide temperature (−0.4°C to 45°C) and pH (4.4–9.4) ranges and is resistant to many disinfectants (Schafer et al., 2017). Foodborne illnesses resulting from L. monocytogenes infection (listeriosis) are a serious public health concern, with 1,600 cases and 260 deaths reported in the United States of America (Garner and Kathariou, 2016) and 2,206 cases (20%–30% mortality) reported in the European Union (Luth et al., 2018) in recent years.

Many attempts have been made to reduce L. monocytogenes contamination in the chicken meat industry. The use of high hydrostatic pressure (Kruk et al., 2011) and ultraviolet-C irradiation (Chun et al., 2010) effectively reduce the population of L. monocytogenes in artificially inoculated chicken breasts. Although chlorine is well known as effective antimicrobial compound, scientist tried to find natural antimicrobial compounds in consumer’s point of view (Brackett, 1987). Additionally, treatments with slightly acidic electrolyzed water (Mansur et al., 2015) and lauric arginate (Sharma et al., 2013) have also been effective in reducing L. monocytogenes contamination in different food products. Extracted oil from members of the genus Allium, including garlic (Allium sativum) and scallions (Allium ascalonicum L.), has been reported to exhibit antimicrobial and antioxidant activities (Yin et al., 2003), owing to the presence of organosulfur compounds, such as diallyl sulfide (DAS), diallyl disulfide (DADS), allicin, and ajoene (Yin et al., 2003) in them. Similarly, gold kiwi (Actinidia chinensis) possesses antioxidant and antimicrobial properties because of the presence of vitamin C and flavonoids (Du et al., 2009) in it. However, reports on the use of those scallions, garlic, and kiwi fruits extracts for reducing L. monocytogenes contamination in chicken meat have been scarce.

Therefore, in the current study, we evaluated the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of lyophilized scallion, garlic, and gold kiwi extracts (SLE, GLE, and GKE, respectively) as natural antimicrobial or marinating compounds for chicken breast meat inoculated with L. monocytogenes.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of plant extracts

Scallions, garlic, and gold kiwis were obtained from a local supermarket in Korea. All samples were washed in running tap water before extraction. Extracts were prepared by squeezing in a juice extractor (NJE-3834, NUC electronics, Daegu, Korea), lyophilizing, and storing at −20°C until analysis. The garlic and gold kiwi were peeled before squeezing. The yields of plant extracts in the powder form after lyophilization were 5.77% for SLE, 22.01% for GLE, and 7.15% for GKE.

Preparation of bacterial strains and inocula

Escherichia coli (KCCM 11234), L. monocytogenes (KCCM 40307), Staphylococcus aureus (KCCM 12256), and Salmonella Enteritidis (CCARM 8260) cultures, stored at −70°C, were streaked on tryptic soy agar (MB Cell, Seoul, Korea) plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The inocula of the test organisms were prepared by transferring a single colony from culture plates into 10 mL sterile tryptic soy broth (TSB; MB Cell) and culturing at 37°C for 24 h. These cultures were further used for testing the antimicrobial activities and for inoculation of chicken breasts.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) determination

The MIC and MBC were determined using microdilution of TSB in 96-well plates; 130 μL TSB, 20 μL microorganism suspension, and 50 μL extract were added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the absorbance was detected at 600 nm using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M2e; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The MIC was determined as the lowest sample concentration showing no visible microbial growth in the broth. The MBC was recorded as the lowest concentration that killed 99.9% of the inoculated bacterial cells.

Measurement of 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity

The ABTS scavenging assay was performed according to the method of Re et al. (1999). The activities of the lyophilized plant extracts measured absorbance at 735 nm at 30°C. The percentage of inhibition was shown as IC50 values, which was concentration need for 50% inhibition of ABTS radical scavenging activity.

Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay

The FRAP assay was conducted as described by Benzie and Strain (1996). The absorbance of the sample was measured at 590 nm using a microplate reader. The FRAP activity was determined as percentage of the ratio between absorbance of sample against blank and absorbance of sample. The results are expressed as the effective concentration (EC50, in mg/mL) to reduce the FRAP activity by 50%, calculated from the graph of FRAP activity plotted against the concentration of the sample.

L. monocytogenes inoculation on chicken breast

Forty skinless chicken breasts (approximately 170–200 g) were obtained immediately after slaughter from a local slaughterhouse and were promptly transported to the laboratory with remaining at 4°C. After chicken breast was decontaminated by wiping with 70% ethanol using a hand towel, the meat was then inoculated by dipping in a 700 mL solution containing 70 mL TSB with 6–7 Log CFU/mL L. monocytogenes and 630 mL sterile saline solution for 15 min at 23°C according to the method of Alonso-Hernando et al. (2015). Then, the chicken breasts were dried for 20 min at 23°C in a clean room.

Treatment of plant extract on chicken breast and storage condition

Total forty inoculated chicken breast were separated into four treatment groups (n=10). Treatment of plant extract on chicken breast performed by the method of Alonso-Hernando et al. (2015) with slight modification. The lyophilized powder of SLE, GKE, and GLE dissolved in distilled water as original concentration of extracts and made final concentration of 1% SLE, GKE, and GLE as a dipping solution. The inoculated chicken breasts in each treatment group were dipped into a 700 mL solution containing 1% SLE (LSLE), 1% GKE (LGKE), 1% GLE (LGLE), respectively, or in distilled water (LCON, used as a control) for 15 min at 23°C in a clean room. The dipping solution was changed with fresh one after dipping every five breast meats. Thereafter, the chicken breasts were removed from the solution and allowed to dry for 20 min at 23°C in a clean room. Subsequently, the samples were placed on styrofoam trays, wrapped with low-density polyethylene, and stored for 9 days at 4°C. Analysis were done on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 of storage.

Measurement of pH value

Ten grams of chicken breast meat was homogenized with 90 mL distilled water for 30 s using a homogenizer (Polytron R PT-2500 E; Kinematica, Switzerland), and the pH of the homogenates was directly measured using a pH meter (Orion 230 A; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Measurement of shear force

The samples were placed in a polyethylene bag and boiled in a constant temperature water bath until the internal temperature of meat reached 75±2°C. The samples were then cut into 1×3×2 cm pieces and used for measurement of shear force using a texture analyzer (TA 1; Lloyd Instruments, Berwyn, PA, USA). The texture analyzer was set to a 50 kg load cell, 50 mm/min trigger speed, 50 mm/min test speed, and 10 gf trigger force.

Measurement of instrumental color

The color of the meat was measured using a colorimeter with an illuminant-D65, standard observer-2°, and 8 mm aperture size (Colorimeter CR-400; Minolta Co., Osaka, Japan). The Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) color values (lightness CIE L*, redness CIE a*, and yellowness CIE b*) were repeatedly measured on the surface of the meat.

Determination of total viable count (TVC) and L. monocytogenes cell count

Chicken meat samples (10 g) were minced and placed aseptically into individual stomacher bags. Ninety milliliters of sterile saline solution were added, and the samples were homogenized for 40 s using stomacher (Bag Mixer 400 P, Interscience, St Nom, France). For each sample, serial dilutions were performed with sterile saline solution. The appropriate dilutions of sample homogenates were spread on the surface of selective agar plates. Plate count agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) was used for TVC and the plate incubated for 48 h at 37°C. The L. monocytogenes count was determined using selective PALCAM agar media (MB Cell, Seoul, Korea) after incubation of the plate at 30°C for 48 h.

Measurement of volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) content

The VBN content was analyzed by the micro diffusion method, as described by Kim et al. (2018). Ten grams of minced chicken breast meat was homogenized for 30 min in 50 mL distilled water on a magnetic stirrer, and the homogenate was then filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 1). The Conway unit containing the filtrate was incubated with 0.01 N H2SO4 for 1 h at 25°C. After incubation, 10 μL Brunswik indicator was added to the inner chamber of the Conway unit and titrated against 0.01 N NaOH. The VBN value was calculated using the following equation:

VBN(mg/100g)=0.14×(ba)×F/W×100×d
where a is the volume of 0.01 N NaOH added to the sample (mL), b is the volume of 0.01 N NaOH added to the blank (mL), F is the standard factor for 0.01 N NaOH, W is the sample weight (g), and d is the dilution factor.

2-Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay

The TBARS value was determined according to the method of Kim et al. (2018). Briefly, the meat samples (5 g) were homogenized with 15 mL distilled water, and a 1 mL aliquot was used for the reaction. One milliliter of sample aliquot was added to 2 mL of 20 mM 2-trichloroacetic acid (dissolved in 15% thiobarbituric acid) and boiled at 90°C in a water bath for 15 min. After cooling in cold water, the sample was centrifuged at 2,000×g for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 531 nm. The TBARS values were quantified as mg of malondialdehyde (MDA) per kg of meat sample.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by the SAS program (ver. 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) using one-way analysis of variance with a general linear model. The significance of differences in the mean values for different samples was determined by Tukey’s test. Differences with p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and Discussion

MIC and MBC against L. monocytogenes

All plant extracts showed inhibitory and bactericidal activities against L. monocytogenes (Fig. 1). The SLE and GLE had the lowest MIC values of 25 mg/mL each. The SLE had the most effective inhibitory activity against L. monocytogenes, as previously suggested by Yin et al. (2003), who showed that scallion oil had high antimicrobial activity. The high antimicrobial activities of members of the genus Allium, such as scallions and garlic, are attributed to the high content of allicin-derived organo-sulfur compounds, including DAS, DADS, and ajoene (Yin et al., 2003).

kosfa-39-3-418-g1
Fig. 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs, A) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs, B) of lyophilized plant extracts. SLE, scallion extract; GLE, garlic extract; GKE, gold kiwi extract.
Download Original Figure
Antioxidant activity of lyophilized plant extracts

The antioxidant activities of the lyophilized plant extracts were evaluated using ABTS radical scavenging assays and FRAP assays, showed similar trend of antioxidant activity among treatments. GKE had the lowest IC50 value (5.06 mg/mL) in the ABTS radical scavenging assays and the lowest EC50 value (0.67 mg/mL) as determined using the FRAP assay (Fig. 2). The EC50 values of GLE determined using the FRAP assay were significantly higher than that of SLE and GKE. The high antioxidant activity of GKE was reported to be associated with the high content of pyrogallol as the main phenolic compound and vitamin C (Du et al., 2009). It was reported that the antioxidant activity of SLE and GLE was due to its organosulfur compounds such as DAS and DADS (Yin et al., 2003).

kosfa-39-3-418-g2
Fig. 2. ABTS radical scavenging activity (A) and FRAP activity (B) of lyophilized plant extracts. a–c Values of bar with different superscripts differ significantly among the treatments at p<0.05. SLE, scallion extract; GLE, garlic extract; GKE, gold kiwi extract.
Download Original Figure
pH value

On day 1 of storage, the pH value in the LGKE was 5.99, which was significantly lower than that in the other treatment groups (p<0.05), and the pH values in the LCON, LSLE, and LGLE were not different (Table 1). However, the pH value in the LCON was significantly higher than that in the treatment groups on days 3 and 5. Specifically, the pH in the LCON was significantly increased on day 3 (pH 6.30) of storage and was significantly higher than that on day 1 (pH 6.11) (p<0.05). The pH value in the LSLE was maintained until day 5 of storage. The normal pH value of fresh chicken meat is around 6.09–6.10 (Sujiwo et al., 2018). However, the meat begins to spoil if the pH value reaches 6.20, according to the Food Code of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2019) of Korea. In this study, the LCON sample was found to be decayed after 3 days of storage, whereas in the treatment groups, the decay started only after 5 days of storage. The increase in the pH was related to the growth of spoilage microorganisms. As reported by Knox et al. (2008), spoilage microorganisms, such as Shewanella putrefaciens and Brochothrix thermosphacta, grow at pH values higher than 5.8. The increase in pH may also result from protein degradation (Sujiwo et al., 2018), which occurs during storage via the action of either microorganisms or enzymes (Kruk et al., 2011).

Table 1. Effects of lyophilized plant extract solutions on the pH, shear force, and color values of chicken breast inoculated with L. monocytogenes during storage at 4°C
Traits Treatment1) Storage time (d) SEM
1 3 5 7 9
pH LCON 6.11Ac 6.30Ab 6.32Ab 6.32Bb 6.50Aa 0.015
LSLE 6.12Ac 6.09Bc 6.14Cc 6.31Cb 6.45Aa 0.016
LGLE 6.13Ad 6.13Bd 6.19Bc 6.39Ab 6.46Aa 0.018
LGKE 5.99Bd 6.02Cd 6.12Cc 6.28Cb 6.42Aa 0.008
SEM 0.020 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.020
Shear force (kgf) LCON 2.55Aa 2.19Aab 1.84Abc 1.51ABcd 1.18Ad 0.112
LSLE 2.52Aa 2.05Aab 1.51ABbc 1.41Bc 1.26Ac 0.127
LGLE 2.63Aa 2.04Aab 1.83Ab 1.73Ab 1.63Ab 0.131
LGKE 2.44Aa 1.39Bb 1.38Bb 1.37Bb 1.13Ab 0.116
SEM 0.171 0.134 0.081 0.070 0.125
Color CIE L* LCON 60.07Aa 58.28Aab 56.65Bb 57.16Ab 53.13Bc 0.687
LSLE 60.06Aa 58.49Aa 54.73Bb 54.57Ab 54.89ABb 0.472
LGLE 60.27Aa 57.59Aab 58.98Aab 57.85Aab 57.01Ab 0.701
LGKE 59.86Aa 58.97Aa 55.33Bb 54.90Ab 54.72ABb 0.728
SEM 0.629 0.506 0.529 0.846 0.704
CIE a* LCON 1.22Ac 1.38Abc 1.37ABbc 1.54Ab 1.86Aa 0.066
LSLE 1.27Aa 1.33Aa 1.29BCa 1.43Aa 1.37Ba 0.089
LGLE 1.17Ab 1.22Ab 1.13Cb 1.68Aa 1.81Aa 0.063
LGKE 1.13Ab 1.35Aab 1.53Aa 1.74Aa 1.71Aa 0.097
SEM 0.074 0.112 0.048 0.080 0.071
CIE b* LCON 4.71Ab 5.03Ab 5.19Cb 6.45Ca 7.13Ca 0.195
LSLE 5.04Ac 5.34Ac 6.24Bb 7.72Ba 7.90Ba 0.190
LGLE 4.97Ac 5.44Ac 7.42Ab 8.60Aa 8.57Aa 0.162
LGKE 4.87Ac 6.11Abc 6.57Bab 6.65Cab 7.76BCa 0.349
SEM 0.276 0.297 0.194 0.220 0.165

1) The chicken breast was dipped in distilled water (LCON), 1% scallion extract (LSLE), 1% garlic extract (LGLE), or 1% gold kiwi extract (LGKE).

A–C Means within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

a–d Means within the same row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table
Shear force value

The shear force values on day 1 of storage did not differ among the treatments and were around 2.44–2.63 kgf (Table 1), similar to the values reported by Shim et al. (2018). The shear force value of the chicken breast gradually decreased during storage, indicating that the meat had become tender. On days 3 and 5, the shear force values of LGKE were significantly lower than those of LCON. Actinidin, which is a cysteine protease present in kiwifruit (Christensen et al., 2009), may be responsible for the lower shear force value in LGKE. Moreover, the meat tenderness can be affected by the level of myofibrillar protein degradation in the meat (Marcinkowska-Lesiak et al., 2016).

Meat color

No significant differences were observed in the CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b* color values between the control and treatment groups on day 1 and until day 3 of storage (Table 1). However, on day 9, the CIE a* value in the LSLE was significantly lower than that in the LCON. The CIE a* value in the LSLE could be maintained until day 9 of storage with no significant differences from the control. However, the CIE a* value in the other treatment groups and control group increased gradually. On days 5, 7, and 9 of storage, the CIE b* value was lower in the LCON than in the LSLE and LGLE (p<0.05). The CIE b* value of all chicken breast samples was gradually increased during storage. Similarly, in our previous study (Sujiwo et al., 2018), the CIE b* value of chicken breast was increased from 3.66 (day 1) to 5.89 (day 12). The CIE L* values obtained in the current study were similar to those obtained by Sujiwo et al. (2018), who showed that the CIE L* value ranged from 58.30 to 59.06. The color deterioration of meat occurs because of the oxidation of myoglobin, which is converted to metmyoglobin, imparting brown color to the meat (Young and Lyon, 1997). The discoloration of meat is also related to the growth of microorganisms during storage, which reduces the oxygenation of myoglobin and results in discoloration (Zhang et al., 2011).

TVC and L. monocytogenes cell count

The initial TVC of chicken breast was not significantly different between the control and treatments (Fig. 3A). However, on days 3 and 5, the TVC in the LSLE and LGKE were significantly lower than that in the LCON. On days 7 and 9, the TVCs in all treatment groups were significantly lower than that in the control group. The initial L. monocytogenes counts in the inoculated chicken breast were not different among the treatment and control groups and ranged from 4.95 to 5.01 Log CFU/g (Fig. 3B). From day 3 to day 9, the L. monocytogenes level in the LSLE and LGKE was significantly lower than that in the LCON. On day 3, the L. monocytogenes counts in the LSLE and LGKE were 5.60 and 5.51 Log CFU/g, respectively, whereas that in the LCON was 5.74 Log CFU/g. On day 7, the L. monocytogenes counts in the LSLE and LGKE were 6.07 and 6.10 Log CFU/g, which were significantly lower than the levels in the LCON (6.41 Log CFU/g). During storage, the L. monocytogenes count was gradually increased in both the control and treatment groups. This could be explained by the fact that the growth temperature of L. monocytogenes ranges from −0.4°C to 45°C (Schafer et al., 2017). The temperature for the growth limit of L. monocytogenes is 0°C–0.3°C (Cole et al., 1990).

kosfa-39-3-418-g3
Fig. 3. Effects of lyophilized plant extract solutions on total viable count (A) and L. monocytogenes count (B) in chicken breast inoculated with L. monocytogenes during storage at 4°C. The chicken breasts were dipped in distilled water (LCON), 1% scallion extract (LSLE), 1% garlic extract (LGLE), or 1% gold kiwi extract (LGKE). A–D Values of bars with different superscripts differ significantly among the treatments at p<0.05. a–d Values of bars with differenta-b superscripts differ significantly among days at p<0.05.
Download Original Figure

The effectiveness of SLE against microorganisms in the chicken breast as well as against the population of L. monocytogenes is attributed to its content of active antimicrobial allicin-derived organo-sulfur compounds, including DAS, DADS, and ajoene (Yin et al., 2003). In particular, allicin inhibits certain thiol-containing enzymes in these microorganisms (Ankri and Mirelman, 1999).

Yin et al. (2003) reported that the growth of L. monocytogenes could inhibited by scallion oil extract in a paper disc diffusion assay. Additionally, kiwi fruit has been reported to inhibit the growth of several gram-positive bacteria (Basile et al., 1997), similar to our results demonstrating that GKE inhibited L. monocytogenes. However, we found that the SLE was not quite effective as chlorine on L. monocytogenes, reducing 2 Log CFU/g of L. monocytogenes by chlorine solution at 200 ppm concentration (Brackett, 1987).

VBN value

No significant differences in VBN values were observed between the control and treatment groups until day 3 of storage (Table 2). However, on days 5 and 7, the VBN values were significantly lower in the LSLE than in the LCON. The VBN value of the chicken breast was increased significantly upon prolonged storage. The spoilage bacteria or enzymatic degradation of proteins in meat resulted in an increase in VBN values (Kruk et al., 2011). These results were associated with the gradual increase in the microorganism population in the chicken breast during storage (Fig. 3). Indeed, the VBN value is highly related to the population of microorganisms (Sujiwo et al., 2018). In Korea, the acceptable VBN value for fresh meat is below 20 mg/100 g (Min et al., 2007). In this study, the VBN value in the LSLE on day 7 of storage was 19.90 mg/100 g, whereas that in the LCON was 24.38 mg/100 g. This result suggested that, according to the VBN value, the chicken breast in the LSLE was still acceptable, whereas in the LCON, the meat started to decay on day 7.

Table 2. Effects of lyophilized plant extract solutions on the volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) and 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) values of chicken breast inoculated with L. monocytogenes during storage at 4°C
Treatment1) Storage time (d) SEM
1 3 5 7 9
VBN (mg/100 g) LCON 10.50Ae 12.72Ad 15.98Ac 24.38Ab 35.85ABa 0.273
LSLE 10.29Ae 12.13Ad 14.00BCc 19.90Bb 36.68ABa 0.384
LGLE 10.84Ad 12.02Ad 13.88Cc 25.13Ab 34.93Ba 0.400
LGKE 10.71Ae 12.95Ad 15.05ABc 24.55Ab 37.03Aa 0.370
SEM 0.360 0.286 0.241 0.453 0.418
TBARS (mg MDA/kg) LCON 0.096Ad 0.129Ac 0.152Ab 0.184Aa 0.183Aa 0.003
LSLE 0.102Ac 0.117Abc 0.126Cb 0.145Ca 0.156Ba 0.004
LGLE 0.098Ae 0.117Ad 0.132BCc 0.155BCb 0.169ABa 0.003
LGKE 0.098Ac 0.120Abc 0.142ABb 0.168ABa 0.173ABa 0.005
SEM 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004

1) The chicken breast was dipped in distilled water (LCON), 1% scallion extract (LSLE), 1% garlic extract (LGLE), or 1% gold kiwi extract (LGKE).

A–C Means within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

a–e Means within the same row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table
TBARS value

The TBARS values did not show significant differences in any of the samples until day 3 of storage (Table 2). However, the TBARS values in the LSLE on days 5–9 were significantly lower than those in the LCON. The TBARS values in the chicken breast in this study were slightly lower than those reported by Kruk et al. (2011), which were 0.28 mg MDA/kg on day 1 and 0.47 mg MDA/kg on day 7 of storage. The higher TBARS values indicated higher levels of lipid oxidation. On days 5–9, lipid oxidation was higher in the LCON than in the LSLE. Lipid oxidation produces lipid hydroperoxides by fatty acid autoxidation, and these lipid hydroperoxides then decompose into products such as aldehydes, alkenes, ketones, and alcohols, which are responsible for the off-flavor and off-odor of meat (Knox et al., 2008). These off-odors can be detected by consumers when TBARS values are in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 mg MDA/kg (Knox et al., 2008) because of the formation of ketones and aldehydes. From our results, we assumed that SLE reduced MDA formation via suppression of lipid oxidation and reduction of the microbial population, including L. monocytogenes.

Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrated that dipping of chicken breast in lyophilized plant extract solutions is effective for maintaining meat quality and reducing L. monocytogenes contamination in the meat. Treatment with SLE yielded the best results. SLE could maintain the pH value of chicken breast until day 5 of storage, and the L. monocytogenes population in the LSLE was also significantly lower than that in the other treatment group. The VBN and TBARS values in the LSLE were significantly lower than those in the control and other treatment groups. SLE treatment also effectively maintained the quality of chicken breast and reduced the TVC and L. monocytogenes count. Therefore, our findings suggest that SLE could be useful as a natural antimicrobial compound for reducing microbial contamination on the chicken meat surface, while the SLE was not effective as synthetic sanitizer in chicken meat industry. Further study should be needed to find a synergist to improve antimicrobial activity for a large scale in the chicken meat industry.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through High Value-added Food Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (118039032HD030).

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Hye-Jin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo. Data curation: Hye-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo. Formal analysis: Hee-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo. Methodology: Hye-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo. Software: Hee-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo. Validation: Aera Jang. Investigation: Joko Sujiwo. Writing - original draft: Joko Sujiwo, Aera Jang. Writing - review & editing: Hye-Jin Kim, Joko Sujiwo, Hee-Jin, Kim, Aera Jang.

Notes

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Alonso-Hernando A, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R. 2015; Effect of various decontamination treatments against Gram-positive bacteria on chicken stored under differing conditions of temperature abuse. Food Control. 47:71-76

2.

Ankri S, Mirelman D. 1999; Antimicrobial properties of allicin from garlic. Microbes Infect. 1:125-129

3.

Basile A, Vuotto ML, Violante U, Sorbo S, Martone G, Castaldo-Cobianchi R. 1997; Antibacterial activity in Actinidia chinensis, Feijoa sellowiana and Aberia caffra. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 8:199-203

4.

Benzie IF, Strain JJ. 1996; The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 239:70-76

5.

Brackett RE. 1987; Antimicrobial effect of chlorine on Listeria monocytogenes. J Food Prot. 50:999-1003

6.

Christensen M, Torngren MA, Gunvig A, Rozlosnik N, Lametsch R, Karlsson AH, Ertbjerg P. 2009; Injection of marinade with actinidin increases tenderness of porcine M. biceps femoris and affects myofibrils and connective tissue. J Sci Food Agric. 89:1607-1614

7.

Chun HH, Kim JY, Lee BD, Yu DJ, Song KB. 2010; Effect of UV-C irradiation on the inactivation of inoculated pathogens and quality of chicken breasts during storage. Food Control. 21:276-280

8.

Cole MB, Jones MV, Holyoak C. 1990; The effect of pH, salt concentration and temperature on the survival and growth of Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Microbiol. 69:63-72

9.

Du G, Li M, Ma F, Liang D. 2009; Antioxidant capacity and the relationship with polyphenol and vitamin C in Actinidia fruits. Food Chem. 113:557-562

10.

Elmali M, Can HY, Yaman H. 2015; Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in poultry meat. Food Sci Technol. 35:672-675

11.

Garner D, Kathariou S. 2016; Fresh produce-associated listeriosis outbreaks, sources of concern, teachable moments, and insights. J Food Prot. 79:337-344

12.

Kim D, Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JS, Kim H, Sujiwo J, Kang S, Gwak HA, Jang A. 2018; Effects of lemon and cranberry juice on the quality of chicken thigh meat during cold storage. Korean J Poult Sci. 45:53-62

13.

Knox BL, Van Laack RLJM, Davidson PM. 2008; Relationships between ultimate pH and microbial, chemical, and physical characteristics of vacuum-packaged pork loins. J Food Sci. 73:M104-M110

14.

Kruk ZA, Yun H, Rutley DL, Lee EJ, Kim YJ, Jo C. 2011; The effect of high pressure on microbial population, meat quality and sensory characteristics of chicken breast fillet. Food Control. 22:6-12

15.

Lin M, Al-Holy M, Mousavi-Hesary M, Al-Qadiri H, Cavinato AG, Rasco BA. 2004; Rapid and quantitative detection of the microbial spoilage in chicken meat by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (600–1,100 nm). Lett Appl Microbiol. 39:148-155

16.

Lopez-Andres JJ, Aguilar-Lasserre AA, Morales-Mendoza LF, Azzaro-Pantel C, Perez-Gallardo JR, Rico-Contreras JO. 2018; Environmental impact assessment of chicken meat production via an integrated methodology based on LCA, simulation and genetic algorithms. J Clean Prod. 174:477-491

17.

Luth S, Kleta S, Al Dahouk S. 2018; Whole genome sequencing as a typing tool for foodborne pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes: The way towards global harmonisation and data exchange. Trends Food Sci Technol. 73:67-75

18.

Mansur AR, Tango CN, Kim GH, Oh DH. 2015; Combined effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and fumaric acid on the reduction of foodborne pathogens and shelf life extension of fresh pork. Food Control. 47:277-284

19.

Marcinkowska-Lesiak M, Zdanowska-Sasiadek Z, Stelmasiak A, Damaziak K, Michalczuk M, Polawska E, Wyrwisz J, Wierzbicka A. 2016; Effect of packaging method and cold-storage time on chicken meat quality. CyTA-J Food. 14:41-46

20.

Min JS, Lee SO, Jang A, Jo C, Park CS, Lee M. 2007; Relationship between the concentration of biogenic amines and volatile basic nitrogen in fresh beef, pork, and chicken meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 20:1278-1284

21.

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Food code. 2019MDFSKoreaAvailable fromhttp://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/foodcode/01_02.jsp?idx=263Accessed at Feb 28, 2019

22.

Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999; Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 26:1231-1237

23.

Schafer DF, Steffens J, Barbosa J, Zeni J, Paroul N, Valduga E, Junges A, Backes GT, Cansian RL. 2017; Monitoring of contamination sources of Listeria monocytogenes in a poultry slaughterhouse. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 86:393-398

24.

Sharma CS, Ates A, Joseph P, Nannapaneni R, Kiess A. 2013; Reduction of Salmonella in skinless chicken breast fillets by lauric arginate surface application. Poult Sci. 92:1419-1424

25.

Shim Y, Kim J, Hosseindoust A, Choi Y, Kim M, Oh S, Ham H, Kumar A, Kim K, Jang A, Chae B. 2018; Investigating meat quality of broiler chickens fed on heat processed diets containing corn distillers dried grains with solubles. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 38:629-635.

26.

Skarp CPA, Hanninen ML, Rautelin HIK. 2016; Campylobacteriosis: The role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect. 22:103-109

27.

Sujiwo J, Kim D, Jang A. 2018; Relation among quality traits of chicken breast meat during cold storage: Correlations between freshness traits and torrymeter values. Poult Sci. 97:2887-2894

28.

Yin MC, Hsu PC, Chang HH. 2003; In vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of shallot and scallion. J Food Sci. 68:281-284

29.

Young LL, Lyon CE. 1997; Effect of postchill aging and sodium tripolyphosphate on moisture binding properties, color, and warner-bratzler shear values of chicken breast meat. Poult Sci. 76:1587-1590

30.

Zhang Y, Mao Y, Li K, Dong P, Liang R, Luo X. 2011; Models of Pseudomonas growth kinetics and shelf life in chilled longissimus dorsi muscles of beef. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 24:713-722