ARTICLE

Effect of Rice Bran and Wheat Fibers on Microbiological and Physicochemical Properties of Fermented Sausages during Ripening and Storage

Ji-Taek Jung1, Jin-kyu Lee1, Yeong-Seok Choi2, Ju-Ho Lee3, Jung-Seok Choi4, Yang-Il Choi1, Yoon-Kyung Chung5,*
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
2Boonong Industry Co., Ltd., Jecheon 27201, Korea
3Hansalimfood Agricul. Corp., Goesan 28041, Korea
4Swine Science & Technology Center, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Jinju 52725, Korea
5Department of Nutrition and Culinary Science, Hankyong National University, Ansung 17579, Korea
*Corresponding Author : Department of Nutrition and Culinary Science, Hankyong National University, Ansung 17579, Korea Tel: +82-10-7763-7400 Fax: +82-31-670-5189 E-mail: ykchung@hknu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2018 Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 28, 2017 ; Revised: Feb 21, 2018 ; Accepted: Feb 21, 2018

Published Online: Apr 30, 2018

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of rice bran fiber (RBF) and wheat fibers (WF) on microbiological and physicochemical properties of fermented sausages during ripening and storage. The experimental design included three treatments: Control, no addition; RBF, 1.5%; and WF, 1.5%. During the ripening periods, the addition of dietary fibers rapidly decreased pH and maintained high water activity values of fermented sausages (p<0.05). Lactic acid bacteria were more prevalent in fermented sausages with rice bran fiber than control and sausages with added wheat fiber. During cold storage, lower pH was observed in sausages with dietary fibers (p<0.05), and the water activity and color values were reduced as the storage period lengthened. Fermented sausages containing dietary fibers were higher in lactic acid bacteria counts, volatile basic nitrogen and 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance values compared to the control (p<0.05). The results indicate that, the addition of dietary fibers in the fermented sausages promotes the growth of lactic bacteria and fermentation, and suggests that development of functional fermented sausages is possible.

Keywords: fermented sausages; dietary fibers; quality characteristics; rice bran; wheat

Introduction

Fermented sausages originated from Mediterranean countries that feature an arid climate. They are one of the most popular meat products globally. (Nassu et al., 2003; Kurćubić et al., 2014). Generally, fermented sausages are manufactured by chopping and blending raw meat, fat, salt, spices, certain additives, and starter cultures, followed by stuffing into natural or synthetic casing and ripening and drying. Fermented sausages have high biological value and are a good source of energy, vitamins, mineral, and proteins (Seong et al., 2016). Fermented sausages contain a variety of animal fats that are added during sausage manufacture to a level of 10-25%. Following ripening and drying, the content of animal fat can reach 50% (Bloukas et al., 1997; Ordóñez et al., 1999; Wirth, 1998). Fat is one of the important factors contributing to enhanced flavor, texture, juiciness, and mouthfeel of meat products (Olivares et al., 2010). However, consuming high animal fat in meat products is associated with increases risks of cardiovascular disease, obesity, hyperpiesia, and other adult diseases. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that consumers lower their intake of animal fat (WHO, 2003; Ham et al., 2016).

As consumers continue to focus on good health, the demand for functional foods is increasing (Choi and Chin, 2003). Dietary fiber is a functional material. Recently, dietary fiber has gained attention in the meat product industry (Choi et al., 2016). Typically, dietary fiber is defined as non-digestible oligosaccharides and fructooligosaccharides (Gibson and Roberfroid, 1995). Owing to differences in solubility, dietary fiber can be classified as water-insoluble or water-soluble (Huang et al., 2011). Water-insoluble fiber is frequently utilized in preventing and treating constipation and adult disease, as well as adjusting body weight (Nguyen et al., 2004). Water-soluble dietary fiber is beneficial in reducing serum cholesterol and blood fat, and in lessening the risk of cardiovascular diseases (Pereira et al., 2004; Schulze et al., 2004). Dietary fiber helps improve human health and wellbeing, and is an essential vital food ingredients for human health. In meat products, dietary fiber can improve the water-binding or holding capacity, viscosity, oil-binding capacity, mineral and organic molecule binding capacity, and textural properties (Tungland and Meyer, 2002; Choi et al., 2015).

Rice bran is a by-product obtained from outer rice layers during the rice milling process (Qi et al., 2016). The main ingredients in rice bran are dietary fiber, proteins (essential amino acids), oils (fatty acids), minerals, vitamins (B and E), antioxidants (tocopherols, tocotrienols, oryzanol), and phenolic compounds (Friedman, 2013; Sharif et al., 2014). In addition, rice bran is used to enrich some foods, because of its high dietary fiber content (Hu et al., 2009).

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a member of the Poaceae (Gramineae) family, is a cultivated crop throughout the world and the most consumed grain globally (An, 2015). Wheat contains significant amounts of proteins, fiber, lipids, vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals, which may contribute to a healthy diet (Shewry and Hey, 2015). Wheat also contains flavonol glycoside compounds that can be used to prevent edema and hemorrhagic disease, and relieve high blood pressure (Chung and An, 2015). The various ingredients in wheat may it useful medicinally as well as in foods.

The present study investigated the effect of rice bran and wheat fibers on microbiological and physicochemical properties of fermented sausages during ripening and storage.

Materials and Methods

Formulation and processing procedure

Three different fermented sausage formulations were examined. Fermented sausages formulations and experimental design are shown in the Table 1. Hanwoo beef (top round), pork (ham), and pork back-fat were purchased in vacuum packaged containers from a butcher’s shop (Chungju, Korea). The beef and pork were trimmed of visible fat and fascia. The beef, pork, and pork back-fat were cut into 3.5 cm cubes and kept frozen at -24°C for 1 d prior to mincing using silent cutter (C50, FATOSA Co., Spain) at low speed (1,500 rpm). After wheat fiber (Vitacel WF200, J. Rettenmaier & Sohne, Germany), rice bran fiber (Organic Ineer Ricebran, Cheorwon Ecofriendly Agricultural Association Corporation, Korea), starter culture (Lyocarni VBL-73, Italy), ascorbic acid, mixed spices, and nitrite pickling salt containing nitrite 0.6% were added and mixed at high speed (2,700 rpm). The mixture was stuffed into 28-30 mm diameter hog casings (Farmyu Co., Korea) using a model H20PA vacuum stuffer (Talsa Co., Northampton, EU). The filled sausages were transferred to a chamber capable of controlled temperature and humidity (TH-ME-100, Jeio Tech Co., Korea) for fermenting and drying. The chamber was maintained at 20°C for 7 d were maintained. The initial humidity of 85% was reduced by 3% every day. During the ripening period, the sausages were smoked at 20±2°C for 30 min once a day. After ripening, the sausages packed in a polyethylene bag by applying vacuum and placed at 4°C for 28 d. We measured pH, water activity (aw), color, total microbial count (TMC), and lactic acid bacteria (LAB), volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) throughout the ripening period and storage periods. The analyses of each sample was repeated three times.

Table 1. Formulations of fermented sausages
Ingredients (%) Dietary fiber type
Control RBF WF
Major Beef 33.33 33.33 33.33
Pork 33.33 33.33 33.33
Pork back fat 23.33 23.33 23.33
Chicory fiber 10 10 10
Sum 100 100 100
Ascorbic acid 0.02 0.02 0.02
NPS 3.00 3.00 3.00
Starter culture 0.02 0.02 0.02
Mixed spice 6.25 6.25 6.25
Rice bran fiber - 1.5 -
Wheat fiber - - 1.5

*Ascorbic acid, NPS, starter culture, mixed spice, rice bran fiber and wheat fiber were added as percentage unit for sum of major ingredients.

RBF, rice bran 1.5%; WF, wheat 1.5%; NPS, NaCl:NaNO2=99:1.

Download Excel Table
Analysis items
pH and water activity

pH was determined as described previously (Khalil, 2000). Ten grams of fermented sausages were homogenized in 100 mL of distilled water for 30 s using a model 400 blender (Seward, London, UK), and pH was measured using a pH meter (WTW, Germany).

Water activity (aw) of the fermented sausages were measured in triplicate using an AquaLab series 4TE device (Decagon Devices Co, USA) at 25°C. Calibration and measurements were conducted in accordance with the instruction manual of manufacturer.

Color

The internal color of fermented sausages after removing hog casing and cutting sausages was measured using a model JX-777 spectrocolorimeter (Color Techno System Co., Japan) that was standardized to the white plate (lightness (L*), 94.04; redness (a*), 0.13; and yelllowness (b*), -0.51). At this time, a white fluorescent lamp (D65) was used as the light source, and the meat color was indicated with L*, a*, and b* value represented lightness of the Hunter lab color coordinates, redness, and yellowness, respectively.

Microbiological analysis

A 10 g sample was aseptically retrieved from fermented sausages, transferred into a sterile plastic bag, and homogenized with 0.1% peptone (90 mL) solution in a 400 Lab Blender (Seward) for 90 s. Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared from each sample using 1 mL in fluid agar, inoculated on TMC medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h (Vanderzant, 1992). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was inoculated on De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The results were expressed as Log CFU/g.

2-Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value

The 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value of fermented sausages was measured by the modified extraction method of Witte et al. (1970). Ten grams of each sample received cold 10% perchloric acid (15 mL) and triple distilled water (25 mL). After the sample was homogenized at 10,000 rpm for 10-15 s in a homogenizer (AM-Series), the homogenate was filtered using qualitative filter paper No. 2 (Advantec, Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Japan). The 5 mL of filtrate solution was mixed with 5 mL of TBA solution (0.02 M), and its absorbance was measured at 529 nm using a spectrophotometer (DU-650, Beckman, US). Triple distilled water was used in the blank sample. TBARS values were explained as mg of malonaldehyde per 1 kg sample (mg malonaldehyde/kg). The TBA level was calculated using a standard curve, where y=0.1975x–0.0011 (r=0.999), and expressed by calculating y = absorbance and x = the TBARS value.

Volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) value

VBN was measured by microdiffusion analysis (Short, 1954) using a Conway unit. Ten grams of each sample were added to 90 mL of distilled water and homogenized at 10,000 rpm for 30 sec in a homogenizer (AM-Series). The homogenate was filtered using qualitative filter paper No. 2. One milliliter of the slurry was put in the outer place of the Conway unit, and 1 mL of 0.01 N boric acid and three drops of indicator (0.066% methyl red+0.066% bromocresol green) were put in the inner chamber. Glycerine was then applied to glue the parts to the lid and, the lid was closed. One milliliter of 50% K2CO3 was injected into the outer chamber and the Conway unit was closed immediately. After horizontally stirring the vessel, after incubating at 37°C for 120 min, the boric acid in the inner chamber was titrated with 0.02 N H2SO4. The VBN values were expressed by converting it to mg% per 100 g sample.

VBN = {(a–b) × F × 28.014 × 100}/amount of sample

a: Amount of injected sulfuric acid (mL)

b: Amount of sulfuric acid injected in blank (mL)

F: Standardized index of 0.02 N H2SO4

28.014: Amount of required to consume 0.02 N H2SO4 of 1 mL

Statistical analysis

The entire experiment data was analyzed using analysis of variance in the SAS program 9.4 (2012) and statistical significance was verified among the means at a 95% level using Duncan’s multiple range test.

Results and Discussion

pH, aw, and meat color values of fermented sausages during ripening period

Table 2 shows the changes in pH, water activity (aw), and color of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during ripening period at 20°C. The pH of fermented sausages were higher than 5.70 until 3 days of ripening. After 4 day of ripening, pH of fermented sausages with dietary fibers began to decrease rapidly. In particular, the pH of RBF treatment was significantly lower than C and WF treatments until 7 days of ripening. The initial aw of fermented sausages ranged from 0.915 to 0.926. Because of the water evaporation during ripening procedure, aw of all fermented sausages started to gradually decrease. The aw of RBF and WF treatments, except for day 0 and 1, were significantly higher than the control throughout the ripening period, and the final aw of fermented sausages ranged from 0.851 to 0.857. As the ripening period increased, the Hunter L*, a* and b* values of fermented sausages significantly decreased. The initial L* values of fermented sausages were between 50.66 and 56.29. After ripening, the L* values of RBF and WF treatments significantly were higher than those of control from day 6 to 7. The initial a* values of fermented sausages were ranged from 17.08 and 20.14. The a* values of control and RBF treatment showed significantly lower values after day 1. However, a* values of WF treatment did not fluctuate significantly until day 5, and was decreased during ripening at day 6 and 7 (p<0.05). The initial b* values of fermented sausages ranged from 17.37 to 19.43. The b* value of RBF treatment showed significantly higher values than those of control and WF treatment during entire ripening periods (all p<0.05). In the b* values of WF treatment, after the 3 day, they were decreased significantly as the ripening period increased.

Blackburn et al. (1984) reported that dietary fiber was used as a substrate for lactic acid bacteria and promoted LAB growth. Therefore, it is presumed that the pH values of the fermented sausages containing dietary fiber formed lower pH values due to the production of organic acid by LAB. On the other hand, studies on meat products with added rice bran did not report significantly affected pH (Choi et al., 2008a), indicating this it was not a fermented product. In this study, the lowest pH of sausages formulated with rice bran was probably due to the excellent use of rice bran as a substrate. Cofrades et al. (2000) reported the dietary fiber addition to meat products increases the binding force between water and fat, and also absorbed minerals and other ingredients. So, we speculate that the water activity of the RBF and WF treatments is higher than the control after ripening. Choi et al. (2008a) reported that when rice bran fiber was added to the Tteokgalbi product, the water holding capacity was higher than that of the control. Huang et al. (2005) observed the same behavior. Addition of rice bran fiber reportedly decreases the L* and a* values of meat products, but increases the b* values due to the dark yellow of the rice bran itself (Choi et al., 2007; 2008b). The wheat fiber used in this study was a brilliant white powder, so that the addition of wheat fiber significantly affected the L* and a* values of fermented sausages. Fernández-Ginés et al. (2003) reported that the kind and amount of dietary fiber additives influence the color of meat products. Similar results have been reported by others (Kim et al., 2009; Pathera et al., 2017). On the other hand, the lightness, redness and yellowness in Turkish fermented sausage formulated with grape seed powder decreased significantly as the ripening and storage periods increased (Kurt, 2016). These results were similar to the present study.

Total microbial count (TMC) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of fermented sausages during ripening period
Table 2. Changes in pH, water activity (aw), and color of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during ripening period at 20°C
Items Days of ripening
0 day 1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day 6 day 7 day SEM
pH C 5.79Cb 5.92Ab 5.80Cc 5.88Ba 5.73Da 5.79Ca 5.78Ca 5.69Ea 0.01
RBF 5.94Ca 6.07Aa 5.99Ba 5.74Db 5.02Hc 5.19Fc 5.16Gc 5.38Ec 0.01
WF 5.82Bb 5.86ABc 5.90Ab 5.75Bb 5.11Fb 5.46Db 5.34Eb 5.44Db 0.01
SEM 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
aw C 0.926Aa 0.908Bb 0.909Bc 0.895Cc 0.881Db 0.872Ec 0.864Fc 0.851Gb 0.001
RBF 0.915Cb 0.925Aa 0.918Ba 0.901Da 0.901Da 0.884Ea 0.867Fb 0.854Ga 0.001
WF 0.918Ab 0.908Bb 0.916Ab 0.898Cb 0.897Ca 0.879Db 0.870Ea 0.857Fa 0.001
SEM 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
L* C 54.19Ab 44.63BCb 46.56BCb 45.50B 44.25Cb 42.14Db 40.29Ea 37.91Fa 0.38
RBF 50.66Ac 48.89Ba 46.78Cb 44.43D 47.24Ca 42.69Eb 37.20Fb 36.92Fab 0.43
WF 56.29Aa 47.36Ba 48.22Ba 44.57C 43.87Cb 43.52Ca 36.96Db 35.73Eb 0.41
SEM 0.50 0.53 0.45 0.47 0.26 0.22 0.20 0.43
a* C 20.14Aa 17.33CD 17.06Db 17.24D 17.89BCb 15.99CDb 18.14Ba 16.83Da 0.20
RBF 19.04Aa 17.13CD 17.80Ba 17.63BC 19.04Aa 17.02CDa 16.87Db 16.84Da 0.21
WF 17.08Ab 16.93A 16.95Ab 16.83A 16.77Ac 16.78Aa 15.78Bc 15.24Bb 0.20
SEM 0.36 0.19 0.13 0.29 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.13
b* C 18.09Ab 17.17Bb 16.34Cb 15.94Cb 15.32Db 13.76Eb 14.17Ea 12.01Fb 0.15
RBF 19.43Aa 18.10Ba 17.20Ca 16.83CDa 16.46Da 14.71Ea 13.97Fa 12.30Ga 0.22
WF 17.37Ab 17.08Ab 17.08Aa 15.59Bb 14.54Cc 14.55Ca 12.34Db 11.17Ec 0.11
SEM 0.33 0.18 0.12 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.16

1) C, Control (No addition); RBF, rice bran 1.5%; WF, wheat 1.5%.

2) L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness.

Means in the same row with different letters (A-H) are significantly different (p<0.05).

Means in the same column with different letters (a-c) are significantly different (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the means of three replicate experiments with three samples analyzed per replicate.

Download Excel Table

The changes in total microbial count (TMC) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during ripening period at 20°C were presented in Table 3. During 7 days of ripening, the total microbial counts of control and two treatments did not show a consistent tendency to increase or decrease with increasing ripening period, and remained at the level of 5.15 to 6.20 Log CFU/g. The initial LAB of fermented sausages on day 0 was between 6.04 and 6.07. Fermented sausages from the control and the two treatments rapidly increased lactic acid bacteria from the day 2 to 7 of ripening, and the number of LAB was significantly higher in the treatments than the control. Also, the count of LAB in fermented sausages formulated with rice bran fiber was significantly higher than that of fermented sausages containing wheat fiber during the ripening period from day 2 to 7. Presently the addition of dietary fiber had no significant effect on total microbial count. This may be due to the shorter ripening period of this study compared to the previous study. The reason for the presence of numerous LAB in the RBF and WF treatments is that dietary fibers like rice bran and wheat stimulate the growth of LAB (Blaut, 2002). Especially, the LAB of RBF treatment from day 3 to 7 day was significantly higher than the WF treatment. So, we can speculate that during ripening, rice bran promotes the growth of LAB more than does wheat fiber. Geisen et al. (1992) reported that a high LAB viable count of fermented sausages inhibits the growth of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, especially Staphylococcus aureus.

Table 3. Changes in total microbial count (TMC) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during ripening period at 20°C
Items Days of ripening
0 day 1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day 6 day 7 day SEM
TMC
(Log CFU/g)
C 5.80Bb 5.90Bab 5.82B 5.15Cb 5.81Ba 5.69B 5.15C 6.20Aa 0.09
RBF 5.76Ab 5.81Ab 5.77A 5.81Aa 5.69ABab 5.88A 5.45AB 5.23Bb 0.14
WF 5.98Aa 5.95ABa 5.89AB 5.66BCab 5.47Cb 5.92AB 5.65BC 5.95ABa 0.08
SEM 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.13 0.12 0.14
LAB
(Log CFU/g)
C 6.04D 5.86Dab 6.13CDb 6.39Cc 7.40A 6.90Bc 6.00Dc 6.73Ac 0.10
RBF 6.07G 5.78Hb 6.60Fa 7.12Ea 7.89C 8.16Aa 8.02Ba 7.65Da 0.02
WF 6.07F 5.95Fa 6.46Eab 6.71Db 7.84A 7.63Bb 7.73ABb 7.41Cb 0.05
SEM 0.03 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.02 0.03

1) C, Control (No addition); RBF, rice bran 1.5%; WF, wheat 1.5%.

Means in the same row with different letters (A-H) are significantly different (p<0.05).

Means in the same column with different letters (a-c) are significantly different (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the means of three replicate experiments with three samples analyzed per replicate.

Download Excel Table
pH, aw, and meat color values of fermented sausages during storage period

Table 4 shows the changes in pH, water activity (aw), and color of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during storage period at 4°C. The initial pH values of fermented sausages were between 5.05 and 5.63, and the RBF and WF treatments were significantly lower than the control until day 14. However, the pH values of RBF and WF treatments from day 21 to 28 were significantly higher than the control. The aw of fermented sausages decreased with the length of cold storage; aw of all fermented sausages at day 7 to 28 day were decreased compared to day 0. The initial aw of fermented sausages ranged from 0.840 to 0.853, and aw of fermented sausages on day 28 were between 0.821 and 0.828. The initial L* values of fermented sausages during cold storage ranged from 40.49 to 41.12. The L* values of all fermented sausages during storage from day 7 to 28 were significantly lower compared to day 0, and there was no significant difference between treatments during the cold storage period. The initial a* values of fermented sausages ranged from 16.17 to 16.65. As the storage period increased, the redness values of control and treatments with dietary fibers were reduced significantly. The a* values of the RBF treatment were significantly higher than those of control and WF treatment during cold storage period, except for day 0. As the storage period increased, the b* values of fermented sausages during storage for 28 d at 4°C showed a statistically significant change, but there was no consistent tendency and the impact on yellowness of fermented sausages by storage period and dietary fiber addition.

Sancho et al. (1994) reported that the increased pH values for fermented sausages at the end of storage due to the accumulation of peptides, amino acids, and ammonia as a result of proteolytic reactions. Similar results were observed for pH value of short-ripened salami (Lee et al., 2009). Kargozari et al. (2014) reported that lower aw helps control microbial growth and over-fermentation in fermented products. Lee et al. (2009) reported that aw of short-term fermented salami during cold storage for 120 days decreased with increasing storage period. These results were similar to the present study. Papastamatiou et al. (2007) reported that the decrease of L* values in sausages during storage is due to the browning reaction and concentration of color by the drying of sausages in the air flow. Also, Kurt (2016) reported that the lightness of Turkish fermented sausage decreased as the storage period increased. In the previous studies, addition of dietary fibers decreased the redness of meat products during cold storage (Choi et al., 2007; 2008b). For this reason, Shon and Chin (2008) reported that lipid oxidation may initiate the oxidation of myoglobin to metmyoglobin, and changed the* meat color from red to an unattractive brown. Although this can increase yellowness, presently the yellowness did not show any significant change. Harms et al. (2003) reported that the changes of b* values in meat products during storage period is associated with fat oxidation.

Table 4. Changes in pH, water activity (aw), and color of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during storage period at 4°C
Items Days of storage
0 day 7 day 14 day 21 day 28 day SEM
pH C 5.63Ba 5.74Aa 5.63Ba 5.28Db 5.47Cb 0.01
RBF 5.11Db 5.16Cc 5.09Dc 5.30Ba 5.60Aa 0.01
WF 5.05Dc 5.44Bb 5.41Bb 5.31Ca 5.61Aa 0.02
SEM 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
aw C 0.840Ac 0.818Ec 0.823Db 0.833Ba 0.828Ca 0.001
RBF 0.844Ab 0.824Db 0.832Ca 0.834Ba 0.821Ec 0.001
WF 0.853Aa 0.834Ba 0.822Db 0.831Cb 0.824Db 0.001
SEM 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
L* C 41.12Aa 32.22B 31.82BCb 31.31BCb 31.13C 0.33
RBF 40.51Ab 31.58B 32.00Bab 31.79Bb 31.52B 0.49
WF 40.49Ab 32.54BC 33.35Ba 33.29Ba 31.93C 0.27
SEM 0.12 0.39 0.45 0.47 0.34
a* C 16.17A 15.25Bb 14.57Cb 14.10Cb 12.97Db 0.17
RBF 16.65A 16.28Aa 15.95ABa 15.84ABa 14.86Ba 0.37
WF 16.37A 15.25Bb 14.93Bb 13.69Cb 12.70Db 0.14
SEM 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.25 0.33
b* C 11.77ABc 11.28Cb 12.23Aab 12.06Ab 11.11C 0.16
RBF 12.95a 12.45a 12.92a 12.84a 12.11 0.39
WF 12.40Ab 12.19Aa 11.61Bb 11.61Bb 10.98C 0.15
SEM 0.08 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.44

1) C, Control (No addition); RBF, rice bran 1.5%; WF, wheat 1.5%.

2) L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness.

Means in the same row with different letters (A-E) are significantly different (p<0.05).

Means in the same column with different letters (a-c) are significantly different (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the means of three replicate experiments with three samples analyzed per replicate.

Download Excel Table
Total microbial count (TMC), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), and 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) of fermented sausages during storage period

The changes in total microbial count (TMC), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) and volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during storage period at 4°C were presented in Table 5. The initial TMC in the fermented sausages on day 0 was about 5 Log CFU/g, which was maintained until day 28. There were no significant differences in TMC during all storage periods and treatments in the fermented sausages. The initial LAB of fermented sausages on the 0 day was between 6.99 and 8.00 Log CFU/g, and the RBF and WF treatments on the 0 day were significantly higher than control. Also, the LAB of RBF treatments on day 14 was significantly higher than the control. The LAB count of fermented sausages was about 7 Log CFU/g during cold storage, with no significant differences during all storage periods. The VBN values of the RBF and WF treatments were significantly higher than the control during all storage periods. The VBN values of treatments were significantly higher than the control during all storage period. The TBARS values of treatments with dietary fibers also were higher than the control during cold storage period, and the RBF treatment on day 7 and 28 had significantly higher TBARS values than those of WF treatment.

The reason for the higher number of LAB in the treatments compared to the control is the final LAB number was higher in the treatments during the ripening period. Therefore, the microbial counts seemed to be maintained during cold storage. In study of Ham et al. (2016), the total microbial bacteria counts and LAB counts of fermented sausages with dietary fiber significantly increased as cold storage period increase. These results were similar to the present study.

Table 5. Changes in total microbial count (TMC), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) and volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) of fermented sausages with dietary fibers during storage period at 4°C
Items Days of storage
0 7 14 21 28 SEM
TMC
(Log CFU/g)
C 5.40 5.38 5.15 5.45 5.15 0.12
RBF 5.30 5.03 5.00 5.15 5.53 0.16
WF 5.23 5.19 5.38 5.38 5.30 0.15
SEM 0.12 0.16 0.10 0.13 0.18
LAB
(Log CFU/g)
C 6.99c 7.02 7.15b 7.53 7.30 0.24
RBF 8.00a 7.65 7.81a 7.45 7.38 0.18
WF 7.63b 7.40 7.45ab 7.30 7.38 0.16
SEM 0.03 0.25 0.12 0.19 0.28
VBN
(mg%)
C 21.45Ac 16.70Cc 18.57Bc 19.08Bc 16.79Cc 0.53
RBF 32.53Aa 26.58Ba 31.93Aa 20.45Cb 29.97Aa 0.78
WF 29.23Ab 18.71Cb 23.7Bb 23.01Ba 19.81Cb 0.36
SEM 0.62 0.54 0.39 0.36 0.86
TBARS
(mg MA/kg)
C 0.19B 0.16Bc 0.43A 0.15B 0.08Bb 0.06
RBF 0.39A 0.45Aa 0.48A 0.19B 0.17Ba 0.04
WF 0.44B 0.32BCb 0.68A 0.17CD 0.09Db 0.05
SEM 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.01 0.01

1) C, Control (No addition); RBF, rice bran 1.5%; WF, wheat 1.5%.

Means in the same row with different letters (A-D) are significantly different (p<0.05).

Means in the same column with different letters (a-c) are significantly different (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the means of three replicate experiments with three samples analyzed per replicate.

Download Excel Table

In addition, Fista et al. (2004) reported that high LAB in sausages inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria and spoilage bacteria as well during the storage. The increase of VBN is highly associated with microbial growth (Kruk et al., 2011). Also, increased microbial degrades nutrients, such as proteins and fat, as enzymes, resulting in reduced quality of the meat products. Jin et al. (2015) reported that protein denaturation and fat oxidation of sausages together with inhibition of microbial growth decreased. Also, Choi et al. (2008b) reported that rice bran has considerable quantities of lipid and lipase, and especially the presence of enzymes, such as lipase, causes rancidity and rapidly degrades sausage quality during storage. In this study, the fermented sausages with rice bran tended to have high VBN values and TBARS values. Lee et al. (2009) reported that the VBN and TBARS values increased with increasing storage period in short-term fermented sausages. Also, Kurt (2016) reported that the TBARS values of fermented sausage added with grape seed flour increased significantly as the ripening and storage period increased.

Conclusion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of rice bran and wheat fibers on microbiological and physicochemical properties of fermented sausages during ripening and storage, and to develop functional meat products. The addition of rice bran and wheat fiber to fermented sausages during ripening decreased pH and accelerated fermentation by the rapid growth of LAB with a quality not markedly different from that of the control even though there were rise of VBN and TBARS values during cold storage. In conclusion, rice bran and wheat fibers promoted the fermentation of sausages. Thus, these fibers are excellent additives for the production of fermented sausage and are expected to be applied to the development of various functional meat products.

Acknowledgements

This work (Grants NO. C0505236) was supported by Business for Cooperative R & D between Industry, Academy, and Research Institute funded Korea Small and Medium Business Administration in 2017. This research also was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2009-0093813).

References

1.

An SH. Quality characteristics of cookies made with added wheat sprout powder. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2015; 31:687-695.

2.

Blackburn NA, Redfern JS, Jarjis H, Holgate AM, Hanning I, Scarpello JH, Johnson IT, Read NW. The mechanism of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clin Sci. 1984; 66:329-336.

3.

Blaut M. Relationship of prebiotics and food to intestinal microflora. European J Nutr. 2002; 41:11-16.

4.

Bloukas JG, Paneras ED, Fournitzis GC. Effect of replacing pork backfat with olive oil on processing and quality characteristics of fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 1997; 45:133-144.

5.

Cofrades S, Guerra MA, Carballo J, Fernández-Martín F, Colmenero FJ. Plasma protein and soy fiber content effect on bologna sausage properties as influenced by fat level. J Food Sci. 2000; 65:281-287.

6.

Choi SH, Chin KB. Evaluation of sodium lactate as a replacement for conventional chemical preservatives in comminuted sausages inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes. Meat Sci. 2003; 65:531-537.

7.

Choi YS, Lee MA, Jeong JY, Choi JH, Han DJ, Kim HY, Lee ES, Kim CJ. Effects of wheat fiber on the quality of meat batter. Korean J Food Sci An. 2007; 27:22-28.

8.

Choi YS, Choi JH, Han DJ, Kim HY, Lee MA, Lee ES, Jeong JY, Paik HS, Kim CJ. Effects of rice bran fiber on quality of low-fat Tteokgalbi. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2008a; 17:959-964.

9.

Choi YS, Jeong JY, Choi JH, Han DJ, Kim HY, Lee MA, Kim HW, Paik HW, Kim CJ. Effects of dietary fiber from rice bran on the quality characteristics of emulsion-type sausages. Korean J Food Sci An. 2008b; 28:14-20.

10.

Choi YS, Kim HW, Hwang KE, Song DH, Jeong TJ, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Kim CJ. Effects of fat levels and rice bran fiber on the chemical, textural, and sensory properties of frankfurters. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2015; 24:489-495.

11.

Choi HS, Choi HG, Choi YS, Kim JH, Lee JH, Jung EH, Lee SH, Choi YI, Choi JS. Effect of chicory fiber and smoking on quality characteristics of restructured sausages. Korean J Food Sci An. 2016; 36:131-136.

12.

Chung ES, An SH. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of muffins added with wheat sprout powder. Korean J Culinary Research. 2015; 121:207-220.

13.

Fernández-Ginés JM, Fernández-López J, Sayas-Barberá E, Sendra E, Pérez-Alvarez JA. Effect of storage conditions on quality characteristics of Bologna sausages made with citrus fiber. J Food Sci. 2003; 68:710-714.

14.

Fista GA, Bloukas JG, Siomos AS. Effect of leek and onion on processing and quality characteristics of Greek traditional sausages. Meat Sci. 2004; 68:163-172.

15.

Friedman M. Rice brans, rice bran oils, and rice hulls: Composition, food and industrial uses, and bioactivities in humans, animals, and cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61:10626-10641.

16.

Geisen R, Lücke FK, Kroeckel L. Starter and protective cultures for meat and meat products. Fleischwirtschaft. 1992; 72:894-898.

17.

Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. 1995; 125:1401-1412.

18.

Harms C, Fuhrmann H, Nowak B, Wenzel S, Sallmann HP. Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation on the shelf life of cured pork sausage. Meat Sci. 2003; 63:101-105.

19.

Huang SC, Shiau CY, Liu TE, Chu CL, Hwang DF. Effects of rice bran on sensory and physico-chemical properties of emulsified pork meatballs. Meat Sci. 2005; 70:613-619.

20.

Hu G, Huang S, Cao S, Ma Z. Effect of enrichment with hemicellulose from rice bran on chemical and functional properties of bread. Food Chem. 2009; 115:839-842.

21.

Huang SC, Tsai YF, Chen CM. Effects of wheat fiber, oat fiber, and inulin on sensory and physico-chemical properties of Chinese-style sausages. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2011; 24:875-880.

22.

Ham YK, Hwang KE, Kim HW, Song DH, Kim YJ, Choi YS, Kim CJ. Effects of fat replacement with a mixture of collagen and dietary fibre on small calibre fermented sausages. Internat J Food Sci Technol. 2016; 51:96-104.

23.

Jin SK, Ha SR, Choi JS. Effect of Caesalpinia sappan L. extract on physico-chemical properties of emulsion-type pork sausage during cold storage. Meat Sci. 2015; 110:245-252.

24.

Kim HW, Choi JH, Choi YS, Han DJ, Kim HY, Lee MA, Shim SY, Kim CJ. Effects of wheat fiber and isolated soy protein on the quality characteristics of Frankfurter-type sausages. Korean J Food Sci An. 2009; 29:475-481.

25.

Khalil AH. Quality characteristics of low-fat beef patties formulated with modified corn starch and water. Food Chem. 2000; 68:61-68.

26.

Kruk ZA, Yun HJ, Rutley DL, Lee EJ, Kim YJ, Jo CR. The effect of high pressure on microbial population, meat quality and sensory characteristics of chicken breast fillet. Food Control. 2011; 22:6-12.

27.

Kargozari M, Moini S, Basti AA, Emam-Djomeh Z, Gandomi H, Martin IR, Ghasemlou M, Carbonell-Barrachina ÁA. Effect of autochthonous starter cultures isolated from Siahmazgi cheese on physicochemical, microbiological and volatile compound profiles and sensorial attributes of sucuk, a Turkish dry-fermented sausage. Meat Sci. 2014; 97:104-114.

28.

Kurćubić VS, Mašković PZ, Vujić JM, Vranić DV, Vesković-Moračanin SM, Okanović ĐG, Lilić SV. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Kitaibelia vitifolia extract as alternative to the added nitrite in fermented dry sausage. Meat Sci. 2014; 97:459-467.

29.

Kurt Ş. The effects of grape seed flour on the quality of Turkish dry fermented sausage (sucuk) during ripening and refrigerated storage. Korean J Food Sci An. 2016; 36:300-308.

30.

Lee KT, Lee YK, Son SK, Choi SH, Lee SB. Changes in various quality characteristics of short-ripened salami during storage at chilled or room temperatures. Korean J Food Sci An. 2009; 29:24-33.

31.

Nassu RT, Gonçalves LAG, da Silva MAAP, Beserra FJ. Oxidative stability of fermented goat meat sausage with different levels of natural antioxidant. Meat Sci. 2003; 63:43-49.

32.

Nguyen VT, Legowski PL, Geise TJ, Zukley L, Yount BW, Rippe JM. A high fiber dietary intervention is effective in producing weight loss and improving dietary quality. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104:49.

33.

Ordóñez JA, Hierro EM, Bruna JM, Hoz LDL. Changes in the components of dry-fermented sausages during ripening. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1999; 39:329-367.

34.

Olivares A, Navarro JL, Salvador A, Flores M. Sensory acceptability of slow fermented sausages based on fat content and ripening time. Meat Sci. 2010; 86:251-257.

35.

Pereira MA, O’reilly E, Augustsson K, Fraser GE, Goldbourt U, Heitmann BL, Hallmans G, Knekt P, Liu S, Pietinen P, Spiegelman D, Stevens J, Virtamo J, Willett WC, Ascherio A. Dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. Arch Inter Med. 2004; 164:370-376.

36.

Papastamatiou F, Gerasopoulos D, Siomos A, Bloukas JG. Effect of degree of cutting of leek on physicochemical characteristics of Greek traditional sausages. Meat Sci. 2007; 75:648-654.

37.

Pathera AK, Riar CS, Yadav S, Sharma DP. Effect of dietary fiber enrichment and different cooking methods on quality of chicken nuggets. Korean J Food Sci An. 2017; 37:410-417.

38.

Qi J, Li Y, Masamba KG, Shoemaker CF, Zhong F, Majeed H, Ma J. The effect of chemical treatment on the in vitro hypoglycemic properties of rice bran insoluble dietary fiber. Food Hydrocoll. 2016; 52:699-706.

39.

Sancho J, Armengol MR, Vilalta N, Bota E. Evolución de la flora microbiana del fuet de la comarca de Osona. Alimentaria. 1994; 257:29-32.

40.

Short EI. The estimation of total nitrogen using the Conway micro-diffusion cell. J Clin Pathol. 1954; 7:81-83.

41.

Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80:348-356.

42.

Shon J, Chin KB. Effect of whey protein coating on quality attributes of low-fat, aerobically packaged sausage during refrigerated storage. J Food Sci. 2008; 73:C469-C475.

43.

SAS SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 9.2,. SAS Institute. Cary, NC: .

44.

Sharif MK, Butt MS, Anjum FM, Khan SH. Rice bran: A novel functional ingredient. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014; 54:807-816.

45.

Shewry PR, Hey SJ. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Security. 2015; 4:178-202.

46.

Seong PN, Seo HW, Kang SM, Kim YS, Cho SH, Kim JH, Hoa VB. Beneficial effects of traditional seasonings on quality characteristics of fermented sausages. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2016; 29:1173-1180.

47.

Tungland BC, Meyer D. Nondigestible oligo-and polysaccharides (dietary fiber): Their physiology and role in human health and food. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2002; 1:90-109.

48.

Vanderzant C. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. American Public Health Association. Washington, D.C., USA: p. 337-338.

49.

Witte VC, Krause GF, Baile ME. A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid values of pork and beef during storage. J Food Sci. 1970; 35:582-587.

50.

Wirth F. Technologies for making fat-reduced meat-products. Fleischwirtschaft. 1988; 68:1153-1156.

51.

World Health Organization Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO technical report series 916. Geneva: World Health Organization. .