ARTICLE

Beneficial Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 on Survival Rate of Clostridium difficile Infection in Mice

Bohyun Yun1,†, Minyu Song2,†, Dong-June Park3, Sejong Oh4,*
Author Information & Copyright
1Microbial Safety Team, Agro-Food Safety & Crop Protection Department, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea
3Food Research Institute, Seongnam 13539, Korea
4Division of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
These authors contributed equally to this study.
*Corresponding author Sejong Oh Division of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea Tel: +82-62-530-2116 Fax: +82-62-530-2129 E-mail: soh@chonnam.ac.kr

Copyright © 2017, Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Mar 07, 2017 ; Revised: Apr 29, 2017 ; Accepted: May 08, 2017

Published Online: Jun 30, 2017

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the main cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea that can cause colitis or even death. The medical-treatment cost and deaths caused by CDI are increasing annually worldwide. New approaches for prevention and treatment of these infections are needed, such as the use of probiotics. Probiotics, including Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus, are microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. The effect of Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 on infectious disease caused by C. difficile 027 was investigated in a mouse model. The survival rates for mice given the pathogen alone, and with live cells, or dead cells of B. longum were 40, 70, and 60%, respectively. In addition, the intestinal tissues of the B. longum-treated group maintained structural integrity with some degree of damage. These findings suggested that B. longum ATCC 15707 has a function in repressing the infectious disease caused by C. difficile 027.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707; infection model; probiotics

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic Gram-positive, endospore-forming bacteria that causes deadly intestinal infections (Liu et al., 2014). C. difficile infection begins with spore germination in the gut of infected persons and subsequent toxin production causing symptoms ranging from mild diarrhea to severe and life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis in infected patients (Surawicz et al., 2013). Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is one of the main causes of healthcareassociated infections worldwide. The recent increase in CDAD has placed a rising clinical and economic burden on health systems (Yin et al., 2015). Current treatment for CDAD that typically includes metronidazole, vancomycin, and fidaxomicin, is usually effective; however, disease recurrence occurs in many patients (Cornely et al., 2012; Louie et al., 2011; Mullane et al., 2011). Antibiotics treatment is notorious for high causal rates of CDAD, because C. difficile have antibiotic resistance. To address this issue in the treatment of CDAD, new strategies such as probiotics are being explored.

Probiotics are nonpathogenic microorganisms that can resist digestion within the small intestine of the host and reach the colon alive (Gan et al., 2014); in addition, they confer beneficial health-effects when administered in adequate amount. Dairy-based foods containing intestinal species of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and others strains are the major source of probiotics for humans (Kim et al., 2012). Bifidobacteria are indigenous members of the human intestinal microbiota, comprising up to 90% of all bacteria in fecal samples of breast-fed infants (Salazar et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2008). Bifidobacteria has the potential for use in enhancing digestive health and preventing disease. In particular, bifidobacteria are known to confer enteric protection against pathogenicity by inhibiting the growth of pathogens, including Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Asahara et al., 2004), Helicobacter pylori (Collado et al., 2005), Listeria monocytogenes (Touré et al., 2003), and Clostridium difficile (Kondepudi et al., 2012). In this study, we aimed at evaluating probiotics as a new treatment method for reducing the CDAD symptom caused by Bifidobacterium spp.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial cultures

Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 was obtained from the Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph (Canada). Prior to the experiments, stock culture was stored at −80°C in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco Laboratories, USA) containing 17% (v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant and supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract and 0.1% ʟ-cysteine (BHIS). The strain was subcultured in BHIS broth and incubated overnight at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 was grown under anaerobic conditions at 37°C in blood-glucose-liver (BL) broth.

Co-culture of C. difficile and B. longum ATCC 15707

C. difficile growth in co-culture with B. longum ATCC 15707 was investigated. For each pair of species, three combinations of the initial cell concentrations were assessed. Viable counts and pH were determined at four timeintervals. All flasks contained 105 cells of C. difficile. Decimal dilution series (105 to 108 CFU/mL) of B. longum ATCC 15707 cultures were adjusted to equal volume. Experiments were conducted in triplicate and repeated three times. C. difficile cultures were grown in MRS broth and B. longum ATCC 15707 were grown in MRS broth supplemented with 0.1% ʟ-cysteine at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. For enumeration of viable cells, samples were inoculated onto the CCFA agar (for C. difficile) and onto the BL-NPNL agar (for B. longum ATCC 15707), respectively, and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h (George et al., 1979; Teraguchi et al., 1978).

The experiment with mice

C57BL/6 female mice (5-7 wk old) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, USA). Sixty female mice were housed in groups of 4 per cage under the same conditions, in sterile cages containing bedding, food pellets, and water. For each experiment, mice were randomly assigned to a given treatment group. Each experimental condition was tested in triplicate. Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chonnam National University (CNU IACUC-YB-2012-45). The mouse model of C. difficile infection (CDI) was based on a previously reported method (Yun et al., 2014) with slight modification. An antibiotic mixture comprising kanamycin (0.4 mg/mL), gentamicin (0.035 mg/mL), colistin (850 U/mL), metronidazole (0.215 mg/mL), and vancomycin (0.045 mg/mL) was prepared in sterile drinking water. All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The antibiotic cocktail was administered for 3 d, after which, the animals were provided with regular autoclaved drinking water. A single dose of clindamycin (10 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally 1 d before the C. difficile challenge. Thereafter, the animals were infected by oral gavage with 7.0 Log CFU/mL of C. difficile PCR ribotype 027. We examined the effects of orally administered B. longum ATCC 15707 in the mouse model of CDI. The treatment groups received B. longum ATCC 15707 cells (~108 CFU/mL), or heat-killed B. longum ATCC (~108 CFU/mL) by gavage from 1 d to 4 d. The animals were monitored daily for symptoms such as diarrhea, hunched posture, and weight loss (Fig. 1). Body weight and survival data were collected daily on days 0 through 4. On day 2, some of the mice were euthanized, and the colons were removed for measuring morphometric, biochemical, and histological indices of colitis. The disease status of the animals was also assessed by monitoring C. difficile in the mouse feces using a PCR assay targeting the tcdA gene (Yun et al., 2014).

kosfa-37-3-368-f001
Fig. 1. Schematic overview of the CDI mouse model experimental design.
Download Original Figure

Histopathological analysis was performed to evaluate mucosal damage and inflammation induced by the toxins. Some mice were euthanized on day 2, and the colon was excised to measure morphometric and histological indices of colitis. Cecal and colonic tissues were collected from the mice, fixed in biopsy specimen-embedding cassettes using freshly made ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde or Carnoy’s fixative, and incubated overnight at 4°C. After the fixation, the samples were washed twice with PBS and dehydrated prior to processing for embedding and sectioning. For histological analysis, deparaffinized 6-μm-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Yun et al., 2014).

Statistical analyses

The experiments were repeated thrice. The data are expressed as mean±standard error. The differences between means were evaluated by using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni procedure for multiple-group comparison. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences with p<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Inactivation of C. difficile co-cultured with Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707

As shown in Fig. 2, B. longum ATCC 15707 exerted a growth-inhibitory effect on C. difficile when co-cultured. The growth inhibition of C. difficile was based on the growth curve of C. difficile per inoculum density of B. longum ATCC 15707 (105 to 108 CFU/mL). The higher the inoculum density of B. longum ATCC 15707, growth of C. difficile has been suppressed. The efficacy was observed in all samples at the log phase of B. longum ATCC 15707. In addition, the growth inhibition of C. difficile occurred at pH values of <5.5 (Fig. 3), indicating that the inhibitory effect was possibly due to organic acid-production by bifidobacteria. Bifidobacterium species can produce different relative amounts of acetate, lactate and formate under the same conditions (Bezkorovainy et al., 1989). In this study, the main end product was usually lactic acid, which is in agreement with other reports of growth inhibition due to the ability of lactic acid bacteria to lower pH and produce organic acids (Annuk et al., 2003; Ridwan et al., 2008; Røssland et al., 2003; Tejero-Sariñena et al., 2012; Yun et al., 2014). Tejero-Sariñena et al. (2012) showed that the probiotic strains producing organic acid could inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria including S. typhimurium, E. coli, E. faecalis, S. aureus and C. difficile; and Yun et al. (2014) reported that the production of organic acids by Lactobacillus acidophilus could inhibit growth of C. difficile. The results of our study indicated that B. longum ATCC 15707 produced lactic acid that led to the lowering of pH and consequently, the inhibition of C. difficile.

kosfa-37-3-368-f002
Fig. 2. Number of viable cell during incubation of co-cultured Clostridium difficile with Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707.
Download Original Figure
kosfa-37-3-368-f003
Fig. 3. Changes of pH during incubation of mixed C. difficile with B. longum ATCC 15707. All samples showed a decrease in pH. Inhibition of C. difficile growth was observed at < pH 5.5.
Download Original Figure
Effect of B. longum ATCC 15707 on CDAD Mice

We used a model of CDAD to determine the effects of B. longum ATCC 15707 on infection with C. difficile. This model has been previously used in studies on the effect of pre-and/or probiotics on CDI. Before infecting the mice with C. difficile, an antibiotic cocktail (kanamycin, gentamicin, colistin, metronidazole, and vancomycin) was used to disrupt the intestinal microbiota; and subsequently, B. longum ATCC 15707 was administered by gavage, in order to evaluate the effect of probiotics. All infected mice showed symptoms of CDAD, such as weight loss, hunching posture, and diarrhea. Consistent with some reports, most mice became moribund on days 2 or 3 post-infection. Nonetheless, the B. longum ATCC 15707-treated CDI mice showed a higher survival rate than that of the untreated CDI mice. As shown in Fig. 4, B. longum ATCC 15707 protected mice from death; whereas, untreated CDI mice showed 64% mortality; mice treated with live cells of B. longum ATCC 15707 showed 30% mortality; and mice treated with dead cells of B. longum ATCC 15707 showed 38% mortality. Probiotics have gained interest as a potential therapeutic modality for the prevention and treatment of CDAD. Probiotics, including Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, have been most frequently evaluated in the prevention and treatment of CDAD in adults and children (Biller et al., 1995; Buts et al., 1993; Guslandi et al., 2000). Studies have shown that probiotic yogurt or mixed probiotics decrease the risk of CDCD (Hickson et al., 2007; Plummer et al., 2010; Szajewska et al., 2001). Moreover, various studies have indicated that probiotics induce improved gut health, via defending the gut against colonization by exogenous microorganisms (Wolvers et al., 2010), producing anti-microbial compounds including short chain fatty acids and bacteriocins that suppress the growth of pathogenic bacteria (De Vuyst et al., 2009), increasing the immunity of the host through their cell wall components (Matsuguchi et al., 2003). Our results suggested that organic acids produced by B. longum ATCC 15707 and cell membrane of B. longum ATCC 15707 could protect the CDAD mice. However, despite the reduced mortality in the B. longum ATCC 15707-treated CDI groups, body-weight profiles of the untreated CDI groups were more favorable, as compared to that of the treated groups because the measurements for that period could only be performed on surviving mice.

kosfa-37-3-368-f004
Fig. 4. Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 on mice after the infection with Clostridium difficile.
Download Original Figure
Histopathological analysis of gut tissues from mice infected with C. difficile

We investigated whether B. longum ATCC 15707 protects gut tissue from damage in the course of infection with C. difficile. In mice infected with C. difficile, colonic histopathology includes submucosal edema, epithelial necrosis, mucosal proliferation, and the presence of inflammatory cells (Chen et al., 2008). Histologic analysis of the colon and cecum of the infected mice revealed that B. longum ATCC 15707 alleviated C. difficile infection-induced damage to the lower intestinal tract tissues. The infection group showed inflammatory cell infiltration, edema, and epithelial cell loss by C. difficile toxins in the colon and cecum (Fig. 5); whereas, the intestinal tissues and epithelial cells in both live and dead cell B. longum ATCC 15707-treated mice maintained structural integrity. This result suggested to have prevented the damage of intestinal tissue by preventing the growth of C. difficile due to organic acids produced by B. longum ATCC 15707. Also, a specific component of consists of the B. longum ATCC 15707 suggests that can prevent intestinal tissue damage caused by C. difficile infections. Similarly, some studies have shown that CDI symptom was alleviated after pre- and/or probiotics treatment (Yun et al., 2014; Yun et al., 2015). Thus, the finding that the epithelial cell loss in the lower intestinal tract was significantly reduced in CDAD mice following B. longum ATCC 15707 treatment, suggested that B. longum ATCC 15707 protects intestinal epithelial cells from apoptosis.

kosfa-37-3-368-f005
Fig. 5. Histopathologic analysis of the gut mucosa of C57BL/6 mice infected with Clostridium difficile and treated with Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 (Live BL group) or heat-killed B. longum ATCC 15707 (Heat BL group).
Download Original Figure

Conclusions

B. longum ATCC 15707 produced organic acid, which led to the lowering of pH and consequently, growth-inhibition of C. difficile when cocultured. B. longum ATCC 15707 also alleviated CDI symptoms in the CDI mouse model, which may be related to the reduced pH caused by organic acid-production by the probiotic bacterium. In addition, the cell wall components of B. longum ATCC 15707 were effective in alleviating CDI symptoms. Thus, this study supported that B. longum ATCC 15707 has potential for use in prevention as well as treatment of CDAD. Thus, B. longum ATCC 15707 may be utilized as an antipathogenic agent for CDAD.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2016R1A2B4007519).

References

1.

Annuk H., Shchepetova J., Kullisaar T., Songisepp E., Zilmer M., Mikelsaar. M. Characterization of intestinal lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003; 94:403-412.

2.

Asahara T., Shimizu K., Nomoto K., Hamabata T., Ozawa A., Takeda Y. Probiotic bifidobacteria protect mice from lethal infection with shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect. Immun. 2004; 72:2240-2247.

3.

Badger V. O., Ledeboer N. A., Graham M. B., Edmiston C. E. Clostridium difficile: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of a recalcitrant healthcare-associated pathogen. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 2012; 36:645-662.

4.

Bezkorovainy A. In: Miller-Catchpole R., editor. Biochemistry and physiology of bifidobacteria. CRC press. Boca Raton, FL: 1989; p. 93-129 Nutrition and metabolism of bifidobacteria..

5.

Biller J. A., Katz A. J., Flores A. F., Buie T. M., Gorbach S. L. Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis with Lactobacillus GG. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1995; 21:224-226.

6.

Buts J. P., Corthier G., Delmee M. Saccharomyces boulardii for Clostridium difficile-associated enteropathies in infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1993; 16:419-425.

7.

Chen X., Katchar K., Goldsmith J. D., Nanthakumar N., Cheknis A., Gerding D. N., Kelly C. P. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135:1984-1992.

8.

Collado M. C., González A., González R., Hernández M., Ferrús M. A., Sanz Y. Antimicrobial peptides are among the antagonistic metabolites produced by Bifidobacterium against Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2005; 25:385-391.

9.

Cornely O. A., Miller M. A., Louie T. J., Crook D. W., Gorbach S. L. Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012; 55:S154-S161.

10.

De Vuyst L., Vrancken G., Ravyts F., Rimaux T., Weckx S. Biodiversity, ecological determinants, and metabolic exploitation of sourdough microbiota. Food Microbiol. 2009; 26:666-675.

11.

Gan F., Chen X., Liao S. F., Lv C., Ren F., Ye G., Pan C., Huang D., Shi J., Shi X., Zhou H., Huang K. Selenium-enriched probiotics improve antioxidant status, immune function, and selenoprotein gene expression of piglets raised under high ambient temperature. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014; 62:4502-4508.

12.

George W. L., Sutter V. L., Citron D., Finegold S. M. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1979; 9:214-219.

13.

Guslandi M., Mezzi G., Sorghi M., Testoni P. A. Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2000; 45:1462-1464.

14.

Hickson M., D'Souza A. L., Muthu N., Rogers T. R., Want S., Rajkumar C., Bulpitt C. J. Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2007; 335:80.

15.

Johnston B. C., Ma S. S., Goldenberg J. Z., Thorlund K., Vandvik P. O., Loeb M., Guyatt G. H. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012; 157:878-888.

16.

Kim Y., Lee J. W., Kang S. G., Oh S., Griffiths M. W. Bifidobacterium spp. influences the production of autoinducer-2 and biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157: H7. Anaerobe. 2012; 18:539-545.

17.

Kondepudi K. K., Ambalam P., Nilsson I., Wadström T., Ljungh Å. Prebiotic-non-digestible oligosaccharides preference of probiotic bifidobacteria and antimicrobial activity against Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe. 2012; 18:489-497.

18.

Liu R., Suárez J. M., Weisblum B., Gellman S. H., Mc-Bride S. M. Synthetic polymers active against Clostridium difficile vegetative cell growth and spore outgrowth. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136:14498-14504.

19.

Louie T. J., Miller M. A., Mullane K. M., Weiss K., Lentnek A., Golan Y., Gorbach S., Sears P., Shue Y. K. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364:422-431.

20.

Matsuguchi T., Takagi A., Matsuzaki T., Nagaoka M., Ishikawa K., Yokokura T., Yoshikai Y. Lipoteichoic acids from Lactobacillus strains elicit strong tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducing activities in macrophages through Toll-like receptor 2. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2003; 10:259-266.

21.

McFarland L. V. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea and the treatment of Clostridium difficile disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:812-822.

22.

Mullane K. M., Miller M. A., Weiss K., Lentnek A., Golan Y., Sears P. S., Shue Y. K., Louie T. J., Gorbach S. L. Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as therapy for Clostridium difficile infection in individuals taking concomitant antibiotics for other concurrent infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011; 53:440-447.

23.

Plummer S., Weaver M. A., Harris J. C., Dee P., Hunter J. Clostridium difficile pilot study: Effects of probiotic supplementation on the incidence of C. difficile diarrhoea. Int. Microbiol. 2010; 7:59-62.

24.

Røssland E., Andersen Borge G. I., Langsrud T., Sørhaug T. Inhibition of Bacillus cereus by strains of Lactobacillus and Lactococcus in milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003; 89:205-212.

25.

Ridwan B. U., Koning C. J., Besselink M. G., Timmerman H. M., Brouwer E. C., Verhoef J., Gooszen H. G., Akkermans L. M. Antimicrobial activity of a multispecies probiotic (Ecologic 641) against pathogens isolated from infected pancreatic necrosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008; 46:61-67.

26.

Surawicz C. M., Brandt L. J., Binion D. G., Ananthakrishnan A. N., Curry S. R., Gilligan P. H., McFarland L. V., Mellow M., Zuckerbraun B. S. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:478-498.

27.

Szajewska H., Kotowska M., Mrukowicz J. Z., Arma M., Mikolajczyk W. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in prevention of nosocomial diarrhea in infants. J. Pediatr. 2001; 138:361-365.

28.

Tejero-Sariñena S., Barlow J., Costabile A., Gibson G. R., Rowland I. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: Evidence for the effects of organic acids. Anaerobe. 2012; 18:530-538.

29.

Teraguchi S., Uhara M., Ogasa K., Mitsuoka T. Enumeration of bifidobacteria in dairy products. Jpn. J. Bacteriol. 1978; 33:753-761.

30.

Touré R., Kheadr E., Lacroix C., Moroni O., Fliss I. Production of antibacterial substances by bifidobacterial isolates from infant stool active against Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003; 95:1058-1069.

31.

Wolvers D., Antoine J. M., Myllyluoma E., Schrezenmeir J., Szajewska H., Rijkers G. T. Guidance for substantiating the evidence for beneficial effects of probiotics: Prevention and management of infections by probiotics. J. Nutr. 2010; 140:698S-712S.

32.

Yin N., Li J., He Y., Herradura P., Pearson A., Mesleh M. F., Mascio C. T., Howland K., Steenbergen J., Thorne G. M., Citron D., Van Praagh A. D. G., Mortin L. I., Keith D., Silverman J., Metcalf C. Structure-activity relationship studies of a series of semisynthetic lipopeptides leading to the discovery of surotomycin, a novel cyclic lipopeptide being developed for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 58:5137-5142.

33.

Yuan J., Wang B., Sun Z., Bo X., Yuan X., He X., Zhao H., Du X., Wang F., Jiang Z., Zhang L., Jia L., Wang Y., Wei K., Wang J., Zhang X., Sun Y., Huang L., Zeng M. Analysis of host-inducing proteome changes in Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705 grown in vivo. J. Proteome Res. 2008; 7:375-385.

34.

Yun B., Oh S., Griffiths M. W. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates the virulence of Clostridium difficile. J. Dairy Sci. 2014; 97:4745-4758.

35.

Yun B., Oh S., Song M., Hong Y. S., Park S., Park D. J., Griffiths M. W., Oh S. Inhibitory effect of epigallocatechin gallate on the virulence of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027. J. Food Sci. 2015; 80:M2925-M2931.