ARTICLE

Impact of Creatine Supplementation on the Quality and Storage Characteristics of Emulsified Pork Sausages

Sol-Hee Lee1,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-7095, So-Young Jang1,https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1146-2695, Sanghun Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-0848, Gyutae Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-1097, Sehyuk Oh1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-2512, Sang-Jun Beak1https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6388-4317, Jungseok Choi1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-0410
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
*Corresponding author : Jungseok Choi, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea, Tel: +82-43-261-2551, Fax: +82-43-261-2773, E-mail: jchoi@chungbuk.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 24, 2025 ; Revised: Feb 27, 2025 ; Accepted: Apr 07, 2025

Published Online: Nov 01, 2025

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effect of creatine supplementation on the quality and storage characteristics of emulsified pork sausages. Creatine powder was added at levels of 0.5% (CS1), 1.0% (CS2), 1.5% (CS3), and 2.0% (CS4). Quality characteristics were evaluated on day 0, while storage characteristics were assessed on day 7 following storage under sealed conditions at 4°C to monitor potential changes over time. The pH increased with higher creatine levels. The cooking yields of CS2 and CS3 were comparable to that of the control group, suggesting that creatine supplementation did not adversely affect the water-holding capacity during cooking. Hardness was highest in CS4, while gumminess and chewiness values were significantly higher in CS2, CS3, and CS4 compared to the control. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and total bacterial count values tended to decrease as creatine addition increased, with CS4 being the most suitable formulation for emulsified pork sausages enriched with creatine. However, sensory evaluation scores decreased with increasing creatine levels, indicating the need for further studies to improve sensory properties while maintaining benefits of creatine addition.

Keywords: emulsified pork sausage; creatine; quality properties; storage characteristics

Introduction

In modern society, as the number of nuclear families consisting of 1–2 people increases, main consumption choices in eating habits are economic efficiency and convenience (Kim et al., 2018). Accordingly, the trend of convenience food is increasing. In particular, the popularity of meat products manufactured using meat is steadily growing (Dhir and Singla, 2019). Among various meat products, emulsified sausages are products manufactured by combining meat and salt to extract salt-soluble proteins that can bind fat and water (Dickinson, 2012). Since emulsified sausages can easily use additives, they can be manufactured into various products.

Food additives are continuously being studied because they can affect physical properties or nutritional characteristics of emulsified sausages (Rogers, 2001; Santhi et al., 2017). In addition, research and development are ongoing due to the addition of various additives to the wellness trend (Ponnampalam et al., 2019). Zaini et al. (2020) have conducted a study to improve physical or nutritional characteristics by adding banana peels. One study has been conducted to improve protein content and anti-nutritional factors by adding pigeon peas (Gomezulu and Mongi, 2022). Accordingly, it can be seen that research is ongoing to improve nutritional and protein characteristics of products by adding additives.

Creatine (N-carbamimidoyl-N-methylglycine) is exogenously consumed and endogenously synthesized through complex interorgan processes (Clarke et al., 2021). Creatine is a substance involved in the body’s energy production process and is known to be helpful for those who need protein supplementation (Antonio et al., 2021). In addition, research results have been reported that it can be used as an antioxidant directly or indirectly (Qasim and Mahmood, 2015; Sestili et al., 2011). Therefore, it is thought that creatine can be used as an additive to improve the nutritional and storage properties of the product.

Therefore, this study was conducted to determine whether pork emulsified sausages with added creatine could improve nutritional properties without changing physical properties or enhance storage stability by performing direct or indirect antioxidant functions. After producing creatine sausages according to the amount of addition, an experiment was conducted to analyze the appropriate amount of addition.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of emulsified pork sausage

The manufacturing process for emulsified pork sausages involved preparation of pork loin and back fat (Bosungnokdon, Seoul, Korea). Pork loin and back fat were ground using a grinder equipped with a 5 mm plate (PC-114L, Mainca, Barcelona, Spain). The ground pork loin was sequentially mixed with salt, CurePhos 700 (BK Giulini, Ludwigshafen, Germany), nitrite, and half the amount of ice to extract salt-soluble proteins. Then, pork back fat, admixture, remaining ice, and creatine (Nutricost, Vineyard, UT, USA) were added and emulsified using a silent cutter (CM-21, Mainca) at 5°C for 1 min (Table 1). Afterwards, the emulsified mass, which did not exceed 10°C, was filled into 45ø fiber casings (Kalle, Wiesbaden, Germany) using a vacuum filler (VF-608, Handtmann, Cypress, CA, USA) and heated in a chamber (Metatek, Nonsan, Korea) at 80°C for approximately 40 min until the core temperature reached 75°C. Cooked sausages were cooled, sealed, and used for subsequent experiments.

Table 1. Formulation and experimental design for emulsified pork sausages
Treatments Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
Pork lean meat 69.57 69.57 69.57 69.57 69.57
Pork Fat 17.39 17.39 17.39 17.39 17.39
Water 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04
Total 100 100 100 100 100
Salt 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Curafos 700 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
NaNo2 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Sugar 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Garlic powder 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Vitamin-C 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Creatine 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Download Excel Table
pH

Before and after cooking, samples were weighed and mixed with distilled water in a ratio of 1:10. The mixture was then homogenized using a stomacher (400 Circulator, Seward, Bohemia, NY, USA) for 30 s and the pH was measured using a pH meter (pH-200L, Istek, Seoul, Korea).

Color

Cooked emulsified sausage color was measured using a spectrocolorimeter (JX-777, Color Techno. System, Tokyo, Japan) standardized with a white plate (L=94.04, a=0.13, b=0.51). A D65 white fluorescent light source was used. Results are expressed in terms of CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*. The hue angle was determined using tan–1(CIE b*/CIE a*), while chroma was calculated as (CIE a*×2+CIE b*×2)1/2.

Water holding capacity

The water holding capacity (WHC) was measured following the method described by Laakkonen et al. (1970). The weight of a 2 mL tube specifically designed for WHC measurement was recorded. Subsequently, 0.5±0.05 g of each sample was accurately weighed and placed in a tube. Combined weight of the tube and the sample was measured before cooking the tube in a water bath at 80°C for 20 min. After cooking, the tube was cooled at room temperature for 10 min and then centrifuged at 447.2×g for 10 min at 4°C. The weight was recorded again and the water-holding capacity was calculated using the formula provided below:

WHC = Total moisture  ( % ) Free moisture  ( % ) Moisture  ( % ) × 100
(1)
Free moisture = Weight before centrifugation Weight after centrifugation Weight of sample × Fat coefficient × 100
(2)
Fat coefinicent = Fat  ( % ) 100
(3)
Cooking yield

The emulsified pork mixture was filled into the casing and the initial weight was recorded. After heating and cooling at 80°C for 40 min, the final weight was measured and the cooking yield was calculated as a percentage.

Cooking yield  ( % ) = Sample weight after cooking Sample weight before cooking × 100
(4)
Texture profile analysis

To evaluate textural properties of emulsified sausages, samples were cut into cube shapes with dimensions of 1×1×1 cm. Experiments were conducted using a rheometer (Compac-100, Sun Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a φ20 mm adapter to perform mastication and cutting tests. Experimental conditions were as follows: a head speed of 1.0 mm/s, a distance of 1.0 mm, and a force of 2.0 kg. Hardness (kg), springiness, and cohesiveness were measured directly, while gumminess (kg) and chewiness (kg) were derived from these values.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) analysis was conducted on samples collected on the 7th day. A 10 g sample was homogenized with 15 mL of cold 10% perchloric acid and 25 mL of triple-distilled water at 11,180×g for 10 s using a homogenizer. The homogenate was filtered through a Whatman No. 2 filter paper. Subsequently, 5 mL of the filtrate was mixed with 5 mL of 0.02 M thiobarbituric acid solution. The mixture was thoroughly blended and left in a dark, cool place for 16 h. Absorbance was then measured at 529 nm using a spectrophotometer (DU-650, Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA). Triple-distilled water was used as a blank. In this study, the standard curve calculated with malondealdehyde was y=0.1975–0.0011 (r=0.999), and the data were calculated by inputting the absorbance value into this formula. TBA values are expressed as milligrams of malonaldehyde per kilogram of sample (mg malonaldehyde/kg).

Volatile basic nitrogen

Volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) analysis was conducted for samples collected on the 7th day. A 10 g sample was homogenized with 90 mL of distilled water at 11,180×g for approximately 30 s. The homogenate was filtered using a Whatman No. 2 filter paper and the filtrate was used for further analysis. One milliliter of the filtrate was placed in the outer chamber of a Conway unit. In the inner chamber, 1 mL of 0.01 N boric acid solution and 50 mL of an indicator solution (0.066% methyl red+0.066% bromocresol green) were added. After applying glycerin to the lid’s contact surface for sealing, the lid was then closed. Subsequently, 1 mL of 50% potassium carbonate (K2CO3) solution was added to the outer chamber and the unit was immediately sealed. The container was gently mixed horizontally and incubated at 37°C for 120 min. After incubation, the boric acid solution in the inner chamber was titrated with 0.02 N sulfuric acid (H2SO4). VBN content was expressed as milligrams per 100 g of sample (mg%):

VBN  ( mg% ) = ( a b ) × F × 14.007 Amount of sample × 100
(5)

a: Amount of sulfuric acid injected (mL).

b: Amount of sulfuric acid injected into blank (mL).

F: 0.02N H2SO4 standardization index.

Total bacteria count

Total bacteria count (TBC) was determined using a serial dilution method for samples stored for 7 days. A 10 g sample was homogenized in 90 mL of 0.1% peptone solution using a stomacher bag for 30 s. The homogenized sample was serially diluted and inoculated onto plate count agar. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, colonies were counted using a colony counter. Results are expressed as Log CFU/g.

Sensory evaluation

This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chungbuk National University (IRB Approval Number: CBNU-202302-HR-0017). The institution stated in advance that it would protect the rights and privacy of all participants. The panel consisted of 10 people aged 20–30 years who had experience eating emulsified sausages. The panel was trained on sufficient knowledge of samples, terminology, and evaluation criteria. Each sample was randomly presented with a 1 min interval between tests. Trained panelists conducted sensory evaluations to assess appearance, elasticity, juiciness, off-flavor, flavor, saltiness, and overall acceptability. The assessment utilized a 9-point hedonic scale, where 1 represented “very poor” and 9 represented “excellent”. Sausages from each treatment group were cut into approximately 1 cm square pieces and presented to the 10 panelists for evaluation. Each panelist rated samples based on the given criteria.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses for this experiment were performed using the General Linear Model procedure in the SAS program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was employed to compare treatment means, with significance set at the 5% level.

Results and Discussion

pH and Color

The pH before and after cooking and color after cooking of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine are presented in Table 2. The uncooked pH of CS1 was significantly lower than those of other treatments, while CS3 exhibited the highest value (p<0.05). This can be attributed to the relatively high pH of the creatine powder used in this study (7.19). Cooked pH values were generally higher than uncooked values, which could be explained by denaturation of proteins during cooking. This process can disrupt internal hydrogen and soluble bonds within protein molecules, resulting in the release of alkaline groups from the protein structure (Yu et al., 2017). Cooked pH values of CS1 and CS2 were significantly (p<0.05) lower than that of the control, consistent with the trend observed in uncooked pH values.

Table 2. pH values of cooked and uncooked emulsified pork sausages added with creatine and color of cooked emulsified pork sausages added with creatine
Traits Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
pH of uncooked 5.93±0.00c 5.89±0.00d 5.92±0.00c 5.97±0.01a 5.95±0.00b
pH of cooked 6.06±0.02a 6.00±0.00b 6.03±0.02b 6.07±0.00a 6.07±0.00a
CIE L* 79.60±0.62 80.05±0.76 79.50±0.36 79.74±0.30 79.76±0.17
CIE a* 5.50±0.12bc 5.42±0.14c 5.56±0.12ab 5.60±0.06ab 5.66±0.0a
CIE b* 8.75±0.08c 8.87±0.21bc 8.98±0.19b 9.19±0.15a 9.04±0.08ab
Hue value 57.84±0.59c 58.57±0.80ab 58.24±0.45abc 58.66±0.56a 57.93±0.21bc
Chroma 10.34±0.11c 10.39±0.24bc 10.56±0.23ab 10.76±0.14a 10.66±0.09a

CS1: sausage addition creatine 0.5%, CS2: sausage addition creatine 1.0%, CS3: sausage addition creatine 1.5%, CS4: sausage addition creatine 2.0%.

a–d Means with different superscriptions within the same row differ (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

Regarding color properties, CIE L * showed no significant differences among treatments. However, CIE a* exhibited an increasing trend with higher creatine levels, except in the control group. Among the treatments, CS4 displayed the highest CIE a* value, likely due to creatine’s role in stabilizing the inherent red color of meat (Kanokruangrong et al., 2025). CIE b* initially increased with creatine addition but decreased in CS4. The hue angle, a metric where 0° indicates CIE a* and 90° indicates CIE b* (Bao et al., 2020), was lowest in the control group but highest in CS3. Chroma, which measures color saturation or intensity (Tiwari et al., 2022), increased with higher levels of creatine. This trend likely reflects simultaneous increases in CIE a* and CIE b*. As noted by Pathare et al. (2013), higher chroma values correspond to greater perceived color intensity, suggesting that creatine-enhanced sausages may appeal more strongly to consumers in terms of visual quality.

Water holding capacity and cooking yield

Table 3 presents WHC and cooking yield of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine. WHC refers to the ability of meat to retain water, which is highly correlated with pH and cooking yield (Warner, 2023). However, WHC showed no significant differences between control and treatment groups in this study.

Table 3. Water holding capacity (WHC) and cooking yield (%) of emulsified pork sausages added with creatine
Traits (%) Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
WHC 75.89±6.65 73.10±4.76 71.67±1.65 73.19±6.50 71.83±6.43
Cooking yield 95.30±0.62a 94.47±0.56b 95.10±0.61ab 94.90±0.23ab 94.45±0.38b

CS1: sausage addition creatine 0.5%, CS2: sausage addition creatine 1.0%, CS3: sausage addition creatine 1.5%, CS4: sausage addition creatine 2.0%.

a,b Means with different superscriptions within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

Cooking yield was significantly higher in the control group than in CS1 and CS4 (both p<0.05). However, CS2 and CS3 showed no significant differences in cooking yield from the control. This trend appears to be influenced by relatively higher pH values observed in CS2 and CS3. Janicki and Buzała (2013) have reported that dietary creatine supplementation can improve WHC in pork, reducing drip loss and enhancing meat quality. These findings aligned with the observation that creatine-enhanced sausages might exhibit improved textural and economic attributes, both of which are critical to consumer satisfaction and product marketability (Priya et al., 2022). Based on these results, creatine supplementation at levels of 1.0% and 1.5% appears to improve cooking yield while maintaining desirable product characteristics. These concentrations of creatine may provide practical advantages for enhancing product performance and consumer appeal.

Texture profile analysis

Texture properties of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine are summarized in Table 4. Hardness was significantly higher in CS4 than in other treatments (p<0.05), while springiness did not differ significantly among groups. This could be attributed to the powdered form of creatine and its role as an additive that could support muscle contraction (Tian et al., 2023). Gumminess increased with increasing creatine levels, with CS2, CS3, and CS4 showing significantly higher values than the control (p<0.05). A similar trend was observed for chewiness, indicating consistency in the influence of creatine on textural properties. Cohesiveness was significantly higher in CS2 than in the control (p<0.05). Mirsadeghi et al. (2019) have reported that creatine generated during cooking can enhance texture characteristics such as gumminess and chewiness. Additionally, Chen et al. (2017) have found that thermal degradation products, including free amino acids (e.g., glucose, creatine, creatinine), can improve cohesiveness, stickiness, and elasticity in meat products. These findings suggest that supplementing creatine at levels of 1.5% and 2.0% can enhance textural qualities of pork sausages, contributing to improved sensory properties and potentially influencing protein enrichment. This level of supplementation appears to be optimal for improving product texture while leveraging functional benefits of creatine.

Table 4. Texture profile analysis of emulsified pork sausages added with creatine
Traits Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
Hardness (kg) 2.65±0.31b 2.94±0.27b 2.9±0.16b 2.99±0.37b 3.43±0.33a
Springiness 81.85±7.13 80.27±6.02 80.53±2.99 80.11±2.32 77.48±2.96
Gumminess (kg) 1.64±0.35b 2.03±0.52ab 2.37±0.26a 2.35±0.46a 2.51±0.58a
Chewingness (kg) 1.34±0.28b 1.65±0.49ab 1.91±0.25a 1.89±0.40a 1.95±0.48a
Cohesiveness 62.36±13.23b 68.74±14.58ab 80.71±6.30a 78.23±8.71ab 72.76±13.34ab

CS1: sausage addition creatine 0.5%, CS2: sausage addition creatine 1.0%, CS3: sausage addition creatine 1.5%, CS4: sausage addition creatine 2.0%.

a,b Means with different superscriptions within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table
Volatile basic nitrogen, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and total bacteria count

VBN, TBARS, and TBC values of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine after 7 days of storage are presented in Table 5. VBN values showed no significant differences between control and treatment groups, indicating that creatine supplementation did not lead to protein spoilage during storage. TBARS, a measure of lipid oxidation, was the highest in the control group. It exhibited a decreasing trend as creatine content increased. Lawler et al. (2002) have reported that creatine has antioxidant properties, such as scavenging ABTS+, Oo−2, and OONO radicals. Similarly, Lahučký et al. (2012) have demonstrated that dietary supplementation with creatine and vitamin E can increase alpha-tocopherol levels in pork, further enhancing its oxidative stability. These antioxidant effects might have contributed to reduced TBARS values in creatine-treated sausages.

Table 5. VBN, TBARS, and TBC of emulsified pork sausages added with creatine at 7 days after storage
Traits Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
VBN (mg/100 g) 9.93±0.42 8.92±1.55 7.96±0.19 7.82±0.01 8.10±0.01
TBARS (mg MDA/kg) 0.06±0.01a 0.04±0.01ab 0.04±0.01ab 0.03±0.02ab 0.03±0.02b
TBC (CFU/g) 4.23±0.22a 4.19±0.31ab 3.96±0.36b 3.91±0.38b 3.83±0.12b

CS1: sausage addition creatine 0.5%, CS2: sausage addition creatine 1.0%, CS3: sausage addition creatine 1.5%, CS4: sausage addition creatine 2.0%.

a,b Means with different superscriptions within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).

VBN, volatile basic nitrogen; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; TBC, total bacteria count.

Download Excel Table

TBC also decreased with increasing creatine levels. CS2, CS3, and CS4 showed significantly lower TBC values than the control group (p<0.05). This reduction in bacterial count can also be attributed to antioxidant and potential antimicrobial effects of creatine. Marques and Wyse (2019) have suggested that creatine could exert direct and indirect antioxidant effects, further enhancing the preservation of meat products. Tsvetkova et al. (2023) reported that creatine exhibits high ABTS radical scavenging activity. Given that free radicals play a crucial role in lipid peroxidation, this radical-scavenging property suggests that creatine may contribute to the inhibition of lipid peroxidation by reducing oxidative stress. Additionally, since oxidative stress can influence microbial growth and survival, creatine’s antioxidant activity may also play a role in modulating microbial populations, potentially contributing to microbial inhibition. However, further research is needed to establish a direct link between creatine and antimicrobial effects. These findings suggest that creatine supplementation can improve the storage stability of emulsified pork sausages. Optimal creatine levels for enhancing storage properties appear to be 1.5% and 2.0% as these concentrations could provide superior oxidative and microbial stability.

Sensory evaluation

Table 6 presents sensory evaluation results of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine at various levels. Appearance scores were the highest for CS2 and CS3, indicating improved visual appeal with creatine supplementation at these levels. Juiciness, flavor, off-flavor, and springiness did not show significant differences among treatment groups. These results suggest that creatine does not adversely affect sensory attributes while contributing positively to quality improvements. The overall acceptability was the highest for CS1, which could be attributed to its relatively higher scores for juiciness, flavor, and off-flavor than other treatment groups. Mora et al. (2008) have reported that higher concentrations of creatine/ creatinine in products could lead to a bitter taste, which is thought to be due to the chemical structure of creatine containing nitrogen (guanidine group; Perla and Jayanty, 2013). Therefore, this may explain the decrease in overall acceptability as creatine levels increased. Based on sensory evaluation results, creatine supplementation at 1.0% and 1.5% could enhance the appearance of sausages, while 0.5% creatine achieved the highest overall acceptability. These findings indicate that while moderate creatine supplementation can improve quality and appearance, further studies are needed to optimize sensory acceptability, particularly for higher supplementation levels.

Table 6. Sensory evaluation of emulsified pork sausages added with creatine
Traits Control CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4
Appearance 5.75±1.48ab 6.00±1.41b 7.38±1.22ab 7.63±1.32a 6.63±2.18ab
Juiciness 5.88±1.17 6.00±1.50 5.38±2.06 5.88±1.62 6.00±1.73
Flavor 6.63±0.70 6.38±1.22 6.13±1.45 5.63±1.73 6.00±0.87
Off-flavor 3.75±1.09 3.50±1.00 3.63±1.22 4.00±1.66 3.75±1.92
Springiness 6.00±0.71 6.38±0.99 7.00±1.12 6.63±1.58 6.38±1.80
Overall preference 6.56±0.50ab 6.67±1.20a 6.56±1.32ab 6.56±1.22ab 6.11±1.12b

CS1: sausage addition creatine 0.5%, CS2: sausage addition creatine 1.0%, CS3: sausage addition creatine 1.5%, CS4: sausage addition creatine 2.0%.

a,b Means with different superscriptions within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

Conclusion

This study evaluated the quality and storage characteristics of emulsified pork sausages supplemented with creatine at 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% levels. Creatine addition elevated pH values without significantly affecting water-holding capacity, and the cooking yield improved in the 0.5% and 2.0% groups relative to the control. Texture profile analysis indicated that hardness increased with creatine treatment, while chewiness and gumminess also tended to rise, supporting previous findings on textural enhancement.

Regarding storage properties, creatine did not alter VBN values, implying negligible effects on protein spoilage. In contrast, TBARS and total bacterial counts declined with higher creatine levels, highlighting its antioxidant capacity and beneficial impact on oxidative and microbial stability. Despite these improvements, sensory evaluations revealed reduced overall acceptability at higher creatine concentrations, likely due to bitterness from increased creatine/creatinine conversion.

In conclusion, while creatine supplementation can enhance the quality and storage attributes of pork sausages, addressing the associated sensory drawbacks remains essential. The study recommends 1.5% to 2.0% creatine levels, contingent upon further refinements to improve flavor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry through the High Value-added Food Technology Development Project, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (321028-5). This work was supported by Chungbuk National University Glocal30 project (2024).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Lee SH, Jang SY, Beak SJ, Choi J. Data curation: Lee SH, Jang SY, Park S. Formal analysis: Lee SH, Jang SY, Park G, Beak SJ, Choi J. Methodology: Lee SH, Park S, Park G, Oh S. Software: Lee SH, Park S. Validation: Lee SH, Jang SY. Investigation: Choi J. Writing - original draft: Lee SH, Jang SY, Beak SJ. Writing - review & editing: Lee SH, Jang SY, Park S, Park G, Oh S, Beak SJ, Choi J.

Ethics Approval

Sensory evaluation of this study was approved by the Chungbuk National University’s Ethics Committee (Authority No: CBNU-202302-HR-0017).

References

1.

Antonio J, Candow DG, Forbes SC, Gualano B, Jagim AR, Kreider RB, Rawson ES, Smith-Ryan AE, VanDusseldorp TA, Willoughby DS, Ziegenfuss TN. 2021; Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: What does the scientific evidence really show?. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 18:13

2.

Bao W, Wei M, Xiao K. 2020; Investigating unique hues at different chroma levels with a smaller hue angle step. J Opt Soc Am A. 37:671-679

3.

Chen J, He Z, Qin F, Chen J, Cao D, Guo F, Zeng M. 2017; Inhibitory profiles of spices against free and protein-bound heterocyclic amines of roast beef patties as revealed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and principal component analysis. Food Funct. 8:3938-3950

4.

Clarke H, Hickner RC, Ormsbee MJ. 2021; The potential role of creatine in vascular health. Nutrients. 13:857

5.

Dhir B, Singla N. 2019; Consumption pattern and health implications of convenience foods: A practical review. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 38:1-9

6.

Dickinson E. 2012; Emulsion gels: The structuring of soft solids with protein-stabilized oil droplets. Food Hydrocoll. 28:224-241

7.

Gomezulu AD, Mongi RJ. 2022; Protein content and anti-nutritional factors in pigeon pea and effect of its protein isolate on physical properties and consumer preference of beef sausages. Appl Food Res. 2:100047

8.

Janicki B, Buzała M. 2013; The role of creatine in the organism of pigs and its effect on the quality of pork: A review. Ann Anim Sci. 13:207-215

9.

Kanokruangrong S, Kebede B, Carne A, Stewart I, Bekhit AEDA. 2025; Metabolomic investigation of fresh beef, lamb and venison using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in relation to colour stability. Food Chem. 463:141447

10.

Kim S, Lee K, Lee Y. 2018; Selection attributes of home meal replacement by food-related lifestyles of single-person households in South Korea. Food Qual Prefer. 66:44-51

11.

Laakkonen E, Wellington GH, Sherbon JN. 1970; Low‐temperature, long‐time heating of bovine muscle 1. Changes in tenderness, water‐binding capacity, pH and amount of water‐soluble components. J Food Sci. 35:175-177

12.

Lahučký R, Bučko O, Haščík P, Liptaj T. 2012; Effects of creatine and vitamin E on muscle energetic metabolism, antioxidant stability and meat quality of pigs. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun. 60:151-160

13.

Lawler JM, Barnes WS, Wu G, Song W, Demaree S. 2002; Direct antioxidant properties of creatine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 290:47-52

14.

Marques EP, Wyse ATS. 2019; Creatine as a neuroprotector: An actor that can play many parts. Neurotox Res. 36:411-423

15.

Mirsadeghi H, Alishahi A, Ojagh M, Pourashouri P. 2019; The effect of different kinds of chitosans and cooking methods on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in huso (Huso huso) fillet. J Food Process Preserv. 43e14253

16.

Mora L, Sentandreu MÁ, Toldrá F. 2008; Effect of cooking conditions on creatinine formation in cooked ham. J Agric Food Chem. 56:11279-11284

17.

Pathare PB, Opara UL, Al-Said FAJ. 2013; Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6:36-60

18.

Perla V, Jayanty SS. 2013; Biguanide related compounds in traditional antidiabetic functional foods. Food Chem. 138:1574-1580

19.

Ponnampalam EN, Bekhit AED, Bruce H, Scollan ND, Muchenje V, Silva P, Jacobs JL. 2019; Production strategies and processing systems of meat: Current status and future outlook for innovation: A global perspective.In Sustainable meat production and processing. In: Galanakis CM, editor.edAcademic Press. MA, USA: pp p. 17-44

20.

Priya RK, Rawson A, Vidhyalakshmi R, Mohan RJ. 2022; Development of vegan sausage using banana floret (Musa paradisiaca) and jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) as a meat substitute: Evaluation of textural, physico‐chemical and sensory characteristics. J Food Process Preserv. 46e16118

21.

Qasim N, Mahmood R. 2015; Diminution of oxidative damage to human erythrocytes and lymphocytes by creatine: Possible role of creatine in blood. PLOS ONE. 10e0141975

22.

Rogers RW. 2001; Manufacturing of reduced-fat, low-fat, and fat-free emulsion sausage.In Meat science and applications. In: Hui YH, Hui YH, Nip WK, Rogers R, editors.edCRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA: pp p. 459-478

23.

Santhi D, Kalaikannan A, Sureshkumar S. 2017; Factors influencing meat emulsion properties and product texture: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 57:2021-2027

24.

Sestili P, Martinelli C, Colombo E, Barbieri E, Potenza L, Sartini S, Fimognari C. 2011; Creatine as an antioxidant. Amino Acids. 40:1385-1396

25.

Tian J, Cheng X, Yu L, Jiang M, Gao W, Lu X, Zhang W, Wen H. 2023; Role of creatine supplementation on the myofibre characteristics and muscle protein synthesis of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Br J Nutr. 130:185-201

26.

Tiwari S, Upadhyay N, Singh AK. 2022; Stability assessment of emulsion of carotenoids extracted from carrot bio-waste in flaxseed oil and its application in food model system. Food Biosci. 47:101631

27.

Tsvetkova D, Kostadinova I, Vezenkov L, Marinov L. 2023; Determination of radical scavenging activity of creatine lysinate against methanol solutions of ABTS. J Adv Pharm Edu Res. 13:150-155

28.

Warner RD. 2023; The eating quality of meat: IV—Water holding capacity and juiciness.In Lawrie’s meat science. 9th ed In: Toldrá F, editor.edWoodhead. Cambridge, UK: pp p. 457-508

29.

Yu TY, Morton JD, Clerens S, Dyer JM. 2017; Cooking-induced protein modifications in meat. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 16:141-159

30.

Zaini HBM, Sintang MDB, Pindi W. 2020; The roles of banana peel powders to alter technological functionality, sensory and nutritional quality of chicken sausage. Food Sci Nutr. 8:5497-5507