ARTICLE

Comparative Analysis of Meat Quality and Muscle Transcriptome between Landrace and Jeju Native Pig

Na-Young Kim1,2,https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6702-3615, Sanghoon Lee1,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-337X, Hyeon-Ah Kim2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4203-9857, Yong-Jun Kang2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-7831, In-Cheol Cho2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3459-1999, Jong-Eun Park1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-3463
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology, College of Applied Life Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea
2Subtropical Livestock Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju 63242, Korea

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author : In-Cheol Cho, Subtropical Livestock Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju 63242, Korea, Tel: +82-64-754-5716, Fax: +82-64-754-5713, E-mail: choic4753@korea.kr
*Corresponding author : Jong-Eun Park, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology, College of Applied Life Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea, Tel: +82-64-754-3338, Fax: +82-64-725-2403, E-mail: jepark@jejunu.ac.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 26, 2024 ; Revised: Feb 12, 2025 ; Accepted: Mar 12, 2025

Published Online: Nov 01, 2025

Abstract

Jeju native pig (JNP) is an indigenous breed originating from Korea, characterized by short black hair, small stature, and superior meat quality compared with commercial breeds. This study investigated meat quality and transcriptome differences in the Longissimus dorsi muscles of Landrace and JNP pigs. Phenotypic analysis of meat quality traits was performed on each breed, revealing significant differences in cooking loss, crude fat, moisture, CIE L*, CIE a*, shear force, pH, hardness, gumminess, and chewiness (p<0.05). JNP exhibited significantly higher intramuscular fat content and CIE a* (p<0.001), which increases consumer preference, suggesting that JNP have superior meat quality traits. To understand transcript expression differences, indicating differences in meat quality characteristics and growth between the two breeds, RNA sequencing was performed on Longissimus dorsi muscle samples from each breed. Overall, 427 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were upregulated in JNP, while 821 genes were upregulated in Landrace. Among these, MYH2, MYH6, MYH7B, MYO5B, IGF1, IGFBP5, SFRP2, EGFL6, MATN3, HAPLN1, FBLN7, and LINGO1 were key candidate genes. Enrichment analysis in Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways suggested DEG are involved in biological processes such as the cell cycle, extracellular space, collagen trimer, platelet-derived growth factor binding, and motor proteins. This study provides important insights into the genetic expression characteristics of Landrace and JNP and elucidates the mechanisms related to economic traits, such as superior meat quality and growth rate. Additionally, these findings provide foundational data for improving meat quality and suggest strategies for the genetic improvement of both breeds.

Keywords: Jeju native pig; meat quality; growth ability; muscle characteristics; RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)

Introduction

As society progresses, consumer preference for meat has evolved from focusing solely on quantity to prioritizing quality (Henchion et al., 2014). Specifically, the growing demand for better tasting and quality pork has led to increased research efforts to develop high-quality pork (Becker et al., 2013). Understanding how genetic differences affect meat-quality traits is critical.

Jeju native pig (JNP) is a livestock breed traditionally raised in Jeju and is one of the indigenous breeds representing Korean native pigs that has been preserved without crossbreeding with external breeds (Han et al., 2010). JNP has adapted well to the climate and environment of Jeju, demonstrating robustness (Kwon et al., 2001), and possesses unique genetic traits owing to its long-term isolation on the island (Cho et al., 2009; Cho et al., 2011). Although JNP has the disadvantages of lower growth rates and litter sizes compared to other commercial breeds (e.g., Landrace, Duroc, and Yorkshire), it is known for its firm fat, red meat color, rich juiciness, and high intramuscular fat content, which contribute to a higher consumer preference for JNP pork (Cho et al., 2011; Cho et al., 2019). Therefore, comparative genomic studies between JNP and other commercial pig breeds are necessary to understand the unique genetic traits of JNP and to produce better-quality pork.

Meat quality is closely related to skeletal muscle structure, metabolic characteristics, and muscle fiber properties (Herault et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2013b). In this study, gene expression analysis was conducted using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of muscle tissues from Landrace and JNP pigs to understand the differences in meat quality traits between the two breeds and produce high-quality pork. RNA-seq technology is a valuable tool in quantitative gene expression research, providing biological information and helping to identify causative variants underlying complex trait changes (Hudson et al., 2012). This technology allows the comparison of gene expression changes under various conditions by analyzing the transcriptome. Proper analysis of the data obtained from this process is crucial to ensure the reliability of the results and accurately understand the physiological mechanisms of an organism (Yendrek et al., 2012).

Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differences in gene expression between Landrace and JNP pigs using RNA-seq analysis to elucidate the muscle characteristics of JNP and to identify major genetic factors related to economically significant traits. We hypothesized that differences in meat quality and productivity between these breeds may be due to variations in gene expression patterns. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of how variations in gene expression patterns affect muscle growth, meat quality, and other physiological traits. These findings will provide crucial foundational data for improving pig breeds and developing production strategies.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals and design

This study used eighteen pigs, including nine Landrace pigs (five males and four females) and nine JNP pigs (three males and six females), all of which were raised at the experimental farm of the National Institute of Animal Science, Jeju, Korea. The piglets were weaned at 21 days of age and provided ad libitum access to food and water. All male pigs were castrated. For the analysis, the pigs were slaughtered after being held for 2 h in a lairage following transport to the slaughterhouse. Longissimus dorsi samples were collected from the left side of the carcass, which had been chilled for approximately 18 h in a 0°C carcass cooling room after slaughter. The average age of the Landrace pigs and JNP was 173.89±1.11 and 280.33±25.33 days, respectively. The carcass weight for the Landrace pigs and JNP was 78.22±14.22 and 83.72±24 kg, respectively. All experiments were conducted under identical environmental conditions. Longissimus dorsi muscle samples were collected after slaughter from the same commercial slaughterhouse (Jeju Livestock Cooperative, Jeju, Korea) for meat quality analysis. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Institute of Animal Science and the study was conducted in accordance with the committee guidelines (Approval Number: NIAS2020469).

Meat quality analysis

The proximate analysis of longissimus dorsi samples was performed using AOAC (2002) methods specific crude moisture, crude fat, crude protein, and crude ash contents determination. The crude moisture and crude fat content were measured using a CEM automatic extraction device (Labwave 9000/FAS 9001, CEM, Matthews, NC, USA). The crude protein was analyzed using a Kjeltec System (Kjeltec Auto 2400/2460, Foss Tecator AB, Hoganas, Sweden). The crude ash content was measured using an ash analyzer (MAS 7000, CEM). The pH was measured by mixing 9 g of the sample with 21 mL of distilled water, grinding the mixture, and then using a pH meter (Orion Star A211, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The meat color was measured by exposing the cut surface to air for approximately 30 min after cutting the muscle, and the values of CIE L*, a*, and b* were measured three times using a chromameter (CR-400, Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) and the average value was applied. The standard color plate used was a white tile of Y=92.40, x=3,136, and y=0.3196, and was measured using the color difference of the sample. Cooking loss (%) was calculated by cutting the sample into 3.0 cm thick steaks, placing it in a constant-temperature water bath (Model WSB-45, Dehan Scientific, Wonju, Korea) at 80°C until the core temperature of the sample reached 70°C, cooling it in running water for 30 min, removing any moisture remaining on the surface of the muscle sample, and measuring the weight. The difference in weight before and after heating was calculated as a percentage. The shear force was measured using a sample that had undergone cooking loss measurement. The samples were collected parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers using a diameter of 1.27 cm and then measured using a texture analyzer (5543, Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) equipped with a Warner–Bratzler shear blade. To measure the shear force, the sample was cut perpendicularly to the direction of the muscle fibers. The load cell was 50 kg, and the crosshead speed was 400 mm/min (Wheeler, 2001). Texture profile analysis (TPA) measurements were conducted according to the de Huidobro method (de Huidobro et al., 2005). For the TPA measurements, the unheated longissimus dorsi muscles were shaped to a certain size (5×5×5 cm). Subsequently, the samples were compressed twice to 70% of the center of the sample at a speed of 1 mm/s using a universal testing machine (Load cell: 500 N; Instron) equipped with a cylindrical probe with a diameter of 1 cm. The texture measurement results were calculated for hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness.

Statistical analysis

To analyze the meat quality phenotypic data collected from the longissimus dorsi muscle, R statistical software (v4.2.2, https://www.R-project.org/) was used. For each dataset, the normality of each dataset was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. If normality was confirmed, the equality of variances between groups was tested using an F-test. For datasets with equal variances, an independent two-sample t-test was conducted to compare the mean values between the two groups. In cases where equal variances were not assumed, Welch’s t-test was applied. For datasets that did not meet the assumption of normality, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed as a non-parametric alternative to compare the two groups.

RNA isolation and quality assessment

Longissimus dorsi muscles were stored in a –80°C ultra-low temperature freezer until RNA isolation. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The RNA had an A260/280 ratio of 1.8–2.0 and an A260/A230 ratio of 2.0–2.6.

Library construction

The RNA isolated from each sample was used to independently prepare libraries according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Globin Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Libraries were quantified using KAPA Library Quantification kits for Illumina Sequencing platforms according to the Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Quantification Protocol Guide (#KK4854, Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), and their quality was verified using TapeStation D1000 ScreenTape (#5067-5582, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Indexed libraries were subjected to Illumina NovaSeq (Illumina) and paired-end (2×100 bp) sequencing was performed at Macrogen.

Reads mapping, gene expression quantification, and differential expression analysis

The quality of the raw data was checked for total read bases (bp), read bases, GC (%), AT (%), Q20 (%), and Q30 (%) using the fastQC program (v0.12.0, https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Low-quality reads were removed using Trimmomatic (v0.39) and the trimmed reads were rechecked using fastQC. The trimmed data were then mapped to the pig reference genome using Hisat2 (v2.2.1) software. The reference genome assembly used was Sscrofa11.1 (GCA_000003025.6) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The data mapped in SAM format was converted into a BAM file using Samtools (v1.17). The converted BAM file was then analyzed for gene expression quantification using the featureCounts (subread - 2.0.6) software. When performing feature counts, the reference annotation file used was Sscrofa11.1 (GCF_000003025.6) from NCBI. The quantified gene read counts were used as data for differentially expressed genes (DEG) analysis.

Differential expressed gene analysis

DEG analysis was performed on the read count data obtained from the featureCounts program using the EdgeR of Bioconductor package (v3.40.2) in R to identify differences between Landrace and JNP. Data normalization was performed using the Trimmed Mean of M-values method to identify DEGs. The adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) was determined using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. After that, DEGs with FDR<0.01 and Log2 fold change (Log2 FC)≥2 were identified. DEGs were divided into upregulated and downregulated genes according to their Log2 FC values. The identified DEGs were used for subsequent analyses.

Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway, and network analysis of differentially expressed genes

Enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway were conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/) web tool. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs identified functions and pathways associated with biological differences in breeds based on Sus scrofa, and GO and KEGG pathways were filtered at FDR<0.05. Furthermore, the DEG results were visualized as networks of functional pathways and biological processes using ClueGO (v2.5.10) and CluePedia (v1.5.10) in the Cytoscape (v3.10.1) environment, and the relationships between genes and their biological functions were analyzed to identify major groups (p<0.05).

Results

Meat quality traits between Landrace and Jeju native pig

The meat quality characteristics of Landrace and JNP were compared. Table 1 shows meat quality traits between Landrace and JNP. JNP exhibited significantly lower values for moisture, CIE L*, cooking loss, shear force, hardness, gumminess and chewiness than those of Landrace. In contrast, crude fat, pH, and CIE a* of JNP were significantly higher than Landrace pigs (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in crude protein, crude ash, CIE b*, cohesiveness, springiness, or gumminess between the two breeds.

Table 1. Comparison of meat quality traits between Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP)
Item JNP Landrace p-value
Moisture (%) 66.56±1.29 75.81±0.27 ***
Crude fat (%) 12.48±1.89 1.35±0.30 ***
Crude protein (%) 19.06±0.51 19.73±0.27 ns
Crude ash (%) 2.79±0.09 2.84±0.04 ns
pH 5.87±0.04 5.53±0.04 ***
CIE L* 49.55±1.07 56.23±0.55 ***
CIE a* 14.91±0.46 9.76±0.56 ***
CIE b* 6.74±0.42 7.62±0.32 ns
CL (%) 19.77±0.82 31.64±1.22 ***
Shear force (kgf) 3.32±0.22 4.72±0.30 **
Hardness (gf) 3.09±0.21 3.99±0.43 *
Cohesiveness 0.09±0.01 0.14±0.04 ns
Springiness 20.69±2.00 21.78±2.35 ns
Gumminess (gf) 0.27±0.02 0.64±0.20 *
Chewiness (gf) 5.01±0.31 7.35±0.59 **

Data are mean±SEM.

* p<0.05;

** p<0.01;

*** p<0.001;

ns nonsignificant.

CL, cooking loss.

Download Excel Table
Transcriptome comparative analysis

We identified the transcriptomes of the longissimus dorsi muscles of the nine Landraces and JNP. An average of ~7.5 Gb of total read bases was generated from 18 samples, and the GC content of the generated transcripts was 48.6%–57.7% and the AT content was 42.3%–51.9%. The Q20 and Q30 percentages were 97.9%–98.6% and 94.3%–95.8%, respectively. The raw statistics of the paired-end data for Landrace and JNP are shown in Table 2. The generated sequences were mapped to the reference genome, and 89.53%–98.16% of the total sequences were mapped to each sample (Table 3).

Table 2. Summary of raw data statistics for paired-end RNA sequencing of muscle tissues from Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP)
Sample Total read bases (bp) Total reads GC (%) AT (%) Q20 (%) Q30 (%)
L22.60 7,433,412,746 73,598,146 56.3 43.7 98.0 94.8
L22.64 8,580,898,794 84,959,394 56.2 43.8 98.1 94.9
L22.65 6,758,049,380 66,911,380 56.8 43.2 98.1 94.9
L22.67 6,227,141,870 61,654,870 55.6 44.4 98.1 94.9
L22.74 7,243,256,410 71,715,410 57.7 42.3 98.1 95
L22.75 7,770,068,572 76,931,372 56.9 43.1 98.0 94.6
L22.76 7,883,736,194 78,056,794 54.8 45.2 97.9 94.3
L22.77 7,523,263,760 74,487,760 57.5 42.5 98.2 95.3
L22.79 7,272,645,390 72,006,390 57.2 42.8 98.0 94.9
J.3 7,783,211,500 77,061,500 49.1 50.9 98.7 95.8
J.4 7,263,213,404 71,913,004 48.1 51.9 98.5 95.5
J.6 6,777,487,638 67,103,838 49.3 50.7 98.6 95.7
J.7 8,014,948,122 79,355,922 52.4 47.6 98.5 95.6
J.9 7,994,422,498 79,152,698 48.6 51.4 98.4 95.3
J.10 6,635,286,910 65,695,910 50.2 49.8 98.5 95.6
J.11 8,053,656,372 79,739,172 49.9 50.1 98.5 95.6
J.12 7,603,276,970 75,279,970 51.1 48.9 98.5 95.5
J.13 7,394,824,484 73,216,084 51.9 48.1 98.5 95.4

L, Landrace; J, Jeju native pig.

Download Excel Table
Table 3. Mapping rates of muscle tissues from Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP)
Sample Mapping rate (%)
L22.60 97.8
L22.64 97.8
L22.65 97.6
L22.67 97.3
L22.74 97.6
L22.75 97.6
L22.76 97.9
L22.77 98.2
L22.79 97.6
J.3 95.5
J.4 96.9
J.6 95.5
J.7 92.2
J.9 95.4
J.10 94.5
J.11 94.6
J.12 92.4
J.13 89.5

L, Landrace; J, Jeju native pig.

Download Excel Table

Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed the distinct differences between Landrace and JNP muscle tissue samples (Fig. 1). Each sample consisted of two principal components (PC1 and PC2) that accounted for 35.10% of the total variability.

kosfa-45-6-1770-g1
Fig. 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) of muscle tissue samples from Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP). Red spots indicate JNP muscle and blue spots indicate Landrace muscle.
Download Original Figure
Mapping, differential expression, and clustering analysis of transcriptomes

The DEGs between the Landrace and the JNP were identified, and 427 and 821 up and down-regulation genes were identified based on log2 FC≥2 and FDR<0.01 (Fig. 2). Among the DEG, there are 837 protein-coding genes, 352 IncRNAs, 6 miRNAs, 8 C_regions, 3 misc_RNAs, 8 rRNAs, 8 transcribed pseudogenes, 6 tRNAs, 24 V_segments, and 1 other.

kosfa-45-6-1770-g2
Fig. 2. Volcano plot of Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP) groups. Significant DEG were identified using cut.off of: |Log2 FC|≥2 and FDR<0.01. Top 5 upregulated and downregulated genes, along with 3 genes with the highest FDR. FDR, false discovery rate; DEG, differentially expressed genes.
Download Original Figure

Among all DEGs, the top five upregulated genes are lactase (LCT), LOC102166056, ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motorized domain containing 4B (ANKS4B), LOC110256793, and sclerostin (SOST), and the top five downregulated genes are R3H and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 1-like (LOC110258721), immunoglobulin lambda variable 8-61-like (LOC102167964), LOC110258102, Ig gamma-3 chain region-like (LOC110258349), and granzyme A (GZMA).

A heatmap of the expression patterns of the Landraces and JNP was generated, and the clustering of samples and genes was derived (Fig. 3). Differential expression of genes in the Landrace and JNP breeds was significant. Several DEGs were upregulated in Landrace pigs compared with JNP pigs. Clustering revealed that samples within the same breed showed similar expression patterns and tended to form close clusters.

kosfa-45-6-1770-g3
Fig. 3. Heatmap using DEG in the muscle tissues between Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP) groups. Red indicates higher expression levels, while blue indicates lower expression levels. L, Landrace; J, JNP; DEG, differentially expressed genes.
Download Original Figure
Function and pathway analysis of the differentially expressed genes

A total of 1,248 DEGs were functionally categorized into three main groups: biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). The DEGs were associated with 39 BP terms, 7 CC terms, and 5 MF terms. The detailed functional analysis results are presented in Figs. 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Supplementary Table S1.

Functional annotations discovered for BP included the positive regulation of the cell cycle (GO:0045787), collagen fibril organization (GO:0030199), and extracellular matrix organization (GO:0030198; Fig. 4). Functional annotations of CC included the extracellular space (GO:0005615), collagen trimer (GO:0005581), extracellular matrix (GO:0031012), and extracellular matrix (GO:0031012; Fig. 5). Functional annotations for MF included platelet-derived growth factor binding (GO:0048407) and extracellular matrix structural constituents (GO:0005201; Fig. 6).

kosfa-45-6-1770-g4
Fig. 4. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological process (BP) categories in muscle tissues of Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP). Color gradient indicates the false discovery rate (FDR), with red representing higher significance and blue representing lower significance.
Download Original Figure
kosfa-45-6-1770-g5
Fig. 5. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of cellular components (CC) categories in muscle tissues of Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP). Color gradient indicates the false discovery rate (FDR), with red representing higher significance and blue representing lower significance.
Download Original Figure
kosfa-45-6-1770-g6
Fig. 6. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of molecular functions (MF) categories in muscle tissues of Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP). Color gradient indicates the false discovery rate (FDR), with red representing higher significance and blue representing lower significance.
Download Original Figure

A KEGG pathway analysis was conducted to analyze the interactions of DEGs with biological systems, which indicated that the DEGs were associated with 23 KEGG pathways (Fig. 7). The identified KEGG pathways included cell adhesion molecules (CAM; ssc04514), motor proteins (ssc04814), and cell cycle (ssc04110).

kosfa-45-6-1770-g7
Fig. 7. Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in muscle tissues of Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP) were identified based on the differential expression genes (DEG). Color gradient indicates the false discovery rate (FDR), with red representing higher significance and blue representing lower significance.
Download Original Figure
Network analysis

Network analysis indicated significant differences in the interactions of GO and KEGG pathways between breeds. GO network analysis results showed significant differences in fibrillar collagen trimers, animal organ development, motor activity, and cell surface (Fig. 8), whereas the KEGG pathway network analysis results showed significant differences in cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions and CAMs (Fig. 9). Network analysis confirmed the interrelationships between each term and pathway.

kosfa-45-6-1770-g8
Fig. 8. Gene Ontology (GO) network analysis of differentially expressed genes in the muscle tissues between Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP) groups.
Download Original Figure
kosfa-45-6-1770-g9
Fig. 9. Differentially expressed genes in the KEGG pathway network analysis in the muscle tissues between Landrace and Jeju native pig (JNP) groups. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

Genes expressed in the cells of a specific tissue provide fundamental information for understanding the function and physiology of that tissue. This study listed genes expressed through RNA-seq of muscle tissues of Landrace and JNP breeds and showed significant differences between the two breeds. DEGs were identified, and their functions and related biological pathways were understood through GO and KEGG pathway analyses. Furthermore, the correlation between the biological pathways was confirmed through network analysis.

Meat quality differences between Landrace and Jeju native pig

This study analyzed differences in meat quality between Landrace and JNP. The results revealed the following significant differences in meat quality characteristics.

Generally, cooking loss, from a sensory point of view, implies less meat shrinkage and less meat juice loss after cooking (Martens et al., 1982). In this study, cooking loss was lower in JNP. Previously, Cho et al. (2011) reported that JNP produces more meat juice than other commercial breeds, which is consistent with the results of the present study (Cho et al., 2011).

Furthermore, an increase in intramuscular fat content is considered to have a positive effect on the eating quality of pork (Fernandez et al., 1999). The intramuscular fat content was higher in the JNP, suggesting that JNP may provide a flavorful taste.

In the context of meat color, the CIE a* is generally regarded as a crucial indicator of freshness and quality for consumers (Faustman and Cassens, 1990). JNP demonstrated a higher CIE a* compared to Landrace, indicating that JNP possesses a more intense reddish hue. The analysis of intramuscular fat content and meat color showed a trend consistent with previous findings, indicating that slower-growing breeds exhibit higher intramuscular fat content and increased CIE a* (Latorre et al., 2008). This heightened CIE a* in JNP, relative to other commercial breeds, may enhance its appeal to consumers (Cho et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2009). Consequently, the meat color of JNP, especially CIE a*, may positively influence on consumer preferences for pork, with this distinction potentially playing a significant role in purchasing decisions.

JNP exhibited a lower moisture content than Landrace, which aligns with the negative correlation between moisture and fat in meat (Jankowiak et al., 2019; Savell et al., 1986; Watanabe et al., 2018). Given JNP’s higher fat content this lower moisture content is consistent with this established relationship. Shear force, an indicator of meat tenderness, suggests that higher values correspond to tougher meat. In addition, it is reported that TPA parameters, which include hardness, gumminess and chewiness, show a significant positive correlation with both direct and indirect sensory evaluation variables of tenderness (Choe et al., 2016). Our study demonstrated that JNP showed a lower shear force value, hardness, gumminess and chewiness, suggesting it is likely to offer a more tender texture compared to Landrace. While the pH value significantly differed between the JNP and Landrace, both maintained normal pH level, indicating no adverse effects on meat storage or freshness (van der Wal et al., 1988).

Genetic factors influence the quality of meat (Cameron, 1990; Sellier and Monin, 1994). Therefore, the distinct genetic backgrounds of the two varieties are likely responsible for these observed differences. The unique genetic traits of JNP, cultivated over a prolonged period of isolation on Jeju Island, suggest that it significantly enhances its meat quality. This study elucidates the exceptional meat quality attributes of JNP by detailing the variations in meat characteristics, thereby offering valuable insights for advancing future breeding programs and varietal improvements.

Impact of transcriptomic differences in muscle tissue between Landrace and Jeju native pig

RNA-seq analysis was performed to identify the genetic background of the differences in meat quality between Landrace and JNP breeds. RNA-seq analysis showed that 427 and 821 DEGs were significantly upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in the longissimus dorsi muscles of the Landrace and JNP breeds. GO and KEGG pathway analyses of the molecular interactions and biological functions of the DEGs identified 89 GO terms and 33 KEGG pathways.

GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in longissimus dorsi muscle revealed terms primarily associated with the extracellular matrix, collagen, and the regulation of cell division. This indicates that these DEGs play a crucial role in the composition of extracellular matrix and contribute significantly to individual growth process. DEGs related to growth [insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF1), insulin like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5), secreted frizzled related protein 2 (SFRP2), EGF like domain multiple 6 (EGFL6), matrilin 3 (MATN3), hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (HAPLN1), fibulin 7 (FBLN7), leucine rich repeat and Ig domain containing 1 (LINGO1)] were identified in this abundant biological process. Genes related to growth were highly expressed in the Landraces. The IGF1, IGFBP5, SFRP2, EGFL6, MATN3, HAPLN1, FBLN7, and LINGO1 genes upregulated in Landrace pigs were all genes related to growth characteristics known to regulate cell growth and differentiation.

IGF1 mediates the growth-promoting effect of growth hormones (Stewart and Rotwein, 1996), and a positive correlation has been reported between plasma IGF1 levels and growth performance in pigs (Owens et al., 1991). Additionally, IGFBP5 affects the IGF signaling pathway by regulating binding to insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors (Conover et al., 1993). Especially, the IGF system, mainly encompassing IGF and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP), has been documented to enhance protein synthesis while concurrently suppressing protein degradation rates, thereby facilitating myofiber hypertrophy (Oksbjerg et al., 2004). Moreover, a robust positive correlation exists between myofiber hypertrophy and shear force within the scope of this study (Silva et al., 2015), the observed upregulation of IGF1 and IGFBP5 expression in Landrace, despite the absence of direct investigation into myofiber characteristics and composition in this study, implies that Landrace may possess hypertrophied and more robust myofiber attributes. This expression profile could elucidate Landrace’s observed tougher meat quality compared to JNP as determined through DEG analysis. SFRP2 regulates cell growth and differentiation associated with muscle formation and has been reported to influence skeletal muscle development in pigs (Ma et al., 2016). EGFL6 promotes angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, and cell proliferation (Chim et al., 2011). Similarly, MATN3 has been reported as a matrilin (MATN) family gene involved in muscle growth and differentiation (Dominique and Gérard, 2006; Elkina et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2017), while HAPLN1 has been reported to play an essential role in cartilage and tissue formation (Spicer et al., 2003). Moreover, FBLN7 has been reported to be expressed in various tissues such as cartilage, bone, and blood vessels and to be involved in various developmental processes (Chakraborty et al., 2020). In addition, LINGO1 is involved in the proliferation and differentiation of muscle satellite cells and the regulation of fat accumulation (Velleman et al., 2022). The upregulated expression of growth-related genes in Landrace appears to indicate the difference in growth performance between Landrace and JNP, which is likely associated with a previous study that reported that Landrace has a higher growth rate than JNP (Hwang et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2010). Moreover, differences in muscle fiber characteristics, such as fiber number and type, occur depending on growth rate (Ruusunen and Puolanne, 2004), and these characteristics influence meat quality (Herault et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2013b). Therefore, the differences observed in the meat quality analysis between Landrace and JNP are likely attributed to the expression of growth-related genes in Landrace.

KEGG pathway analysis identified a pathway closely related to exercise-related proteins and the cell cycle. DEGs related to this pathway [myosin heavy chain 2 (MYH2), myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6, LOC100736765), myosin heavy chain 7B (MYH7B), myosin heavy chain 15 (MYH15), myosin VB (MYO5B)] are muscle-related genes known to affect muscle development and function. Among them, MYH2, MYH6, MYH7B, and MYO5B were upregulated in JNP, and MYH15 were upregulated in the Landraces. These genes are the myosin heavy chain (MYH) family associated with myosin, playing a crucial role in muscle development and muscle growth and effect muscle fiber composition and affect muscle fiber characteristics (Cheng et al., 2019; Kong et al., 2017; Mu et al., 2017). The MYH2 gene encodes MyHC IIA, a myosin heavy-chain isoform expressed in type IIA muscle fibers (Tajsharghi et al., 2014). Type IIA muscle fibers are oxidative muscle fibers, and the expression level of oxidative muscle fibers has been reported to be positively correlated with pH, red meat color (Hämäläinen and Pette, 1993), and intramuscular fat content (Eggert et al., 2002; Hausman et al., 2009; Hou, 2015; Joo et al., 2013). This trend is consistent with the results of meat quality analysis, which showed that JNP had significantly higher pH, red meat color, and intramuscular fat content (p<0.05), This also aligns with studies reporting a negative correlation between the area percentage of type IIA fibers and carcass weight (Karlsson et al., 1993; Kim et al., 2013a). MYH7B gene encodes slow-tonic MyHC, which is expressed in slow-tonic muscle fibers (Rossi et al., 2010). Although research on slow-tonic MyHC remains limited, further investigation into the relationship between MYH7B and pork quality is necessary, given that muscle fiver type significantly influences meat quality.

The MYO5B gene encodes a protein belonging to the V-type myosin family and has been reported to be involved in cell motility and intracellular transport of various substances (van Ijzendoorn et al., 2020). Furthermore, MYO5B encodes an actin filament-based protein (Overeem et al., 2020). Actin filaments are a central structural feature of all muscle tissues and play an essential role in the structure and function of muscle fibers (Geeves and Holmes, 1999). These results indicate that skeletal muscle tissue and structure are key factors that characterize differences in gene expression between breeds. The diversity of myofibrillar protein isoforms is related to the characteristics of muscle fibers, which affects meat quality (Choi and Kim, 2009). Genes related to these muscle fiber characteristics are believed to be responsible for the superior meat quality of JNP.

Network analysis confirmed the interactions of biological pathways between the pig breeds. Differences in fibrillar collagen trimers are expected to reflect variations in skin and connective tissue characteristics between breeds, as collagen, a major component of the connective tissue, is known to affect the shear force and tenderness of meat (Lepetit, 2008).

Animal organ development influences productivity traits, including growth rate. Muscle development is closely associated with overall growth (Oksbjerg et al., 2004), and muscle growth rate and obesity have been linked to changes in the muscle transcriptome (Zhao et al., 2011). Therefore, differences in gene expression among breeds may contribute to variations in organ or tissue growth patterns. Discrepancies in motor activity are anticipated to account for the observed differences in motor abilities and behavioral traits across breeds. Differences in pig behavioral characteristics among breeds have been reported (Yoder et al., 2011). Nevertheless, the impact of pig activity on the rate of muscle protein degradation remains ambiguous. While some studies indicate that physical activity does not influence the growth performance or carcass characteristics of pigs (Gentry et al., 2002; Lopez-Bote et al., 2008), other studies suggest that it affects meat color and juiciness (Enfalt et al., 1993; Geverink et al., 1998). Therefore, further research is essential to elucidate the relationship between exercise activity, growth characteristics, and pork quality.

In summary, the primary objective of this study was to identify differences in meat quality traits and genetic variations between Landrace and JNP breeds and to compare the expression of genes related to meat quality and growth characteristics in pigs. Meat quality trait analysis revealed that JNP meat was juicier and tender, possessed better intramuscular fat, and exhibited a redder meat color than Landrace meat, suggesting a higher preference for JNP meat. Transcriptome expression analysis of the longissimus dorsi muscle of the two breeds revealed that GO term analysis showed significant differences in cell cycle regulation, collagen complexes, and extracellular matrix organization, while KEGG pathway analysis identified differences in motor proteins and cell cycle-related pathways. Several candidate genes related to growth and muscle characteristics were identified. In Landrace pigs, genes known to be mainly related to growth (IGF1, IGFBP5, SFRP2, EGFL6, MATN3, HAPLN1, FBLN7, LINGO1) were highly expressed, whereas in JNP pigs, genes known to be related to muscle fiber characteristics (MYH2, MYH6, MYH7B, MYO5B) showed higher expression.

Conclusion

In conclusion, transcriptome analysis demonstrated significant differences between Landrace and JNP breeds, which likely relate closely to the variations in growth ability, muscle characteristics, and meat quality traits observed between the two breeds. The disparities in gene expression between Landrace and JNP suggest differences in growth and muscle fiber composition, and we hypothesize that JNP’s unique gene expression pattern positively influences its meat quality characteristics. These findings provide essential foundational data for understanding the differences in meat quality characteristics between the two breeds and the relationship between gene expression and metabolic pathways, offering valuable insights for future breeding programs.

Supplemenrary Materials

Supplementary Materials

kosfa-45-6-1770-suppl1.xlsx

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ017598)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This research was also supported by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) program through the Jeju RISE center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-17-001).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Cho IC. Data curation: Kim NY, Kim HA, Kang YJ. Formal analysis: Kim NY, Kim HA. Methodology: Kim HA, Kang YJ, Cho IC. Software: Kim NY, Park JE. Validation: Kim NY, Lee S, Cho IC, Park JE. Investigation: Kim NY, Kim HA, Kang YJ. Writing - original draft: Kim NY, Lee S. Writing - review & editing: Kim NY, Lee S, Kim HA, Kang YJ, Cho IC, Park JE.

Ethics Approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Institute of Animal Science and the study was conducted in accordance with the committee guidelines (Approval Number: NIAS2020469).

References

1.

AOAC. 2002 Official methods of analysis. 16th edAOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: .

2.

Becker D, Wimmers K, Luther H, Hofer A, Leeb T. 2013; A genome-wide association study to detect QTL for commercially important traits in swiss large white boars. PLOS ONE. 8e55951

3.

Cameron ND. 1990; Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass traits, meat and eating quality traits in pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 26:119-135

4.

Chakraborty P, Dash SP, Sarangi PP. 2020; The role of adhesion protein Fibulin7 in development and diseases. Mol Med. 26:47

5.

Cheng Z, Zhang N, Wang Y, Le B, Zhang W, Song P, Guo X, Gao P, Cai C, Cao G, Li B. 2019; Screening of candidate genes for muscle fiber characteristics in pig using RNA-seq. Acta Vet Zootech Sin. 50:918-929.

6.

Chim SM, Qin A, Tickner J, Pavlos N, Davey T, Wang H, Guo Y, Zheng MH, Xu J. 2011; EGFL6 promotes endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis through the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. J Biol Chem. 286:22035-22046

7.

Cho IC, Han SH, Fang M, Lee SS, Ko MS, Lee H, Lim HT, Yoo CK, Lee JH, Jeon JT. 2009; The robust phylogeny of Korean wild boar (Sus scrofacoreanus) using partial D-loop sequence of mtDNA. Mol Cells. 28:423-430

8.

Cho IC, Park HB, Ahn JS, Han SH, Lee JB, Lim HT, Yoo CK, Jung EJ, Kim DH, Sun WS. 2019; A functional regulatory variant of MYH3 influences muscle fiber-type composition and intramuscular fat content in pigs. PLOS Genet. 15e1008279

9.

Cho IC, Park HB, Yoo CK, Lee GJ, Lim HT, Lee JB, Jung EJ, Ko MS, Lee JH, Jeon JT. 2011; QTL analysis of white blood cell, platelet and red blood cell‐related traits in an F2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs. Anim Genet. 42:621-626

10.

Choe JH, Choi MH, Rhee MS, Kim BC. 2016; Estimation of sensory pork loin tenderness using Warner-Bratzler shear force and texture profile analysis measurements. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 29:1029-1036

11.

Choi YM, Kim BC. 2009; Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest Sci. 122:105-118

12.

Conover CA, Clarkson JT, Durham SK, Bale LK. 1993; Cellular actions of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3.In Current directions in insulin-like growth factor research. In: Roith D, Raizada MK, editors.edSpringer. New York, NY, USA: pp p. 255-266

13.

de Huidobro FR, Miguel E, Blázquez B, Onega E. 2005; A comparison between two methods (Warner–Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Sci. 69:527-536

14.

Dominique JE, Gérard C. 2006; Myostatin regulation of muscle development: Molecular basis, natural mutations, physiopathological aspects. Exp Cell Res. 312:2401-2414

15.

Eggert JM, Depreux FFS, Schinckel AP, Grant AL, Gerrard DE. 2002; Myosin heavy chain isoforms account for variation in pork quality. Meat Sci. 61:117-126

16.

Elkina Y, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Springer J. 2011; The role of myostatin in muscle wasting: An overview. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2:143-151

17.

Enfalt AC, Lundström K, Hansson I, Karlsson A, Essén-Gustavsson B, Håkansson J. 1993; Moderate indoor exercise: Effect on production and carcass traits, muscle enzyme activities and meat quality in pigs. Anim Sci. 57:127-135

18.

Faustman C, Cassens RG. 1990; The biochemical basis for discoloration in fresh meat: A review. J Muscle Foods. 1:217-243

19.

Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J, Lebret B. 1999; Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat: 1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. Longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci. 53:59-65

20.

Geeves MA, Holmes KC. 1999; Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu Rev Biochem. 68:687-728

21.

Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Blanton JR, Miller MF. 2002; Impact of spontaneous exercise on performance, meat quality, and muscle fiber characteristics of growing/finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 80:2833-2839

22.

Geverink NA, Kappers A, van de Burgwal JA, Lambooij E, Blokhuis HJ, Wiegant VM. 1998; Effects of regular moving and handling on the behavioral and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for subsequent meat quality. J Anim Sci. 76:2080-2085

23.

Hämäläinen N, Pette D. 1993; The histochemical profiles of fast fiber types IIB, IID, and IIA in skeletal muscles of mouse, rat, and rabbit. J Histochem Cytochem. 41:733-743

24.

Han SH, Shin KY, Lee SS, Ko MS, Jeong DK, Oh HS, Yang BC, Cho IC. 2010; SINE indel polymorphism of AGL gene and association with growth and carcass traits in Landrace × Jeju Black pig F2 population. Mol Biol Rep. 37:467-471

25.

Hausman GJ, Dodson MV, Ajuwon K, Azain M, Barnes KM, Guan LL, Jiang Z, Poulos SP, Sainz RD, Smith S, Spurlock M, Novakofski J, Fernyhough ME, Bergen WG. 2009; Board-invited review: The biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals. J Anim Sci. 87:1218-1246

26.

Henchion M, McCarthy M, Resconi VC, Troy D. 2014; Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Sci. 98:561-568

27.

Herault F, Vincent A, Dameron O, Le Roy P, Cherel P, Damon M. 2014; The longissimus and semimembranosus muscles display marked differences in their gene expression profiles in pig. PLOS ONE. 9e96491

28.

Hou Y, Jing L, Zhao Y, Wang S, Liu A, Zhao S, Li X. 2015; Identification of genome regions and important variations associated with expression level of MYH genes and its correlation with meat quality traits in pigs. Front Agric Sci Eng. 2:237-241

29.

Hudson NJ, Dalrymple BP, Reverter A. 2012; Beyond differential expression: The quest for causal mutations and effector molecules. BMC Genomics. 13:356

30.

Hwang IH, Park BY, Cho SH, Kim JH, Choi YS, Lee JM. 2004; Identification of muscle proteins related to objective meat quality in Korean native black pig. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 17:1599-1607

31.

Jankowiak H, Bocian M, Barczak J. 2019; The effect of intramuscular fat content on the meat quality of PLW × PL pigs. Ital J Food Sci. 31:87-97.

32.

Joo ST, Kim GD, Hwang YH, Ryu YC. 2013; Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci. 95:828-836

33.

Karlsson A, Enfält AC, Essén-Gustavsson B, Lundström K, Rydhmer L, Stern S. 1993; Muscle histochemical and biochemical properties in relation to meat quality during selection for increased lean tissue growth rate in pigs. J Anim Sci. 71:930-938

34.

Kim DH, Seong PN, Cho SH, Kim JH, Lee JM, Jo C, Lim DG. 2009; Fatty acid composition and meat quality traits of organically reared Korean native black pigs. Livest Sci. 120:96-102

35.

Kim GD, Kim BW, Jeong JY, Hur SJ, Cho IC, Lim HT, Joo ST. 2013a; Relationship of carcass weight to muscle fiber characteristics and pork quality of crossbred (Korean native black pig × Landrace) F2 pigs. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6:522-529

36.

Kim GD, Ryu YC, Jeong JY, Yang HS, Joo ST. 2013b; Relationship between pork quality and characteristics of muscle fibers classified by the distribution of myosin heavy chain isoforms. J Anim Sci. 91:5525-5534

37.

Kim NK, Lim JH, Song MJ, Kim OH, Park BY, Kim MJ, Hwang IH, Lee CS. 2008; Comparisons of longissimus muscle metabolic enzymes and muscle fiber types in Korean and western pig breeds. Meat Sci. 78:455-460

38.

Kim NK, Park HR, Lee HC, Yoon D, Son ES, Kim YS, Kim SR, Kim OH, Lee CS. 2010; Comparative studies of skeletal muscle proteome and transcriptome profilings between pig breeds. Mamm Genome. 21:307-319

39.

Kong BW, Hudson N, Seo D, Lee S, Khatri B, Lassiter K, Cook D, Piekarski A, Dridi S, Anthony N, Bottje W. 2017; RNA sequencing for global gene expression associated with muscle growth in a single male modern broiler line compared to a foundational Barred Plymouth Rock chicken line. BMC Genomics. 18:63

40.

Kwon OS, Park JC, Huh TY. 2001 Korean native black pigs: Standard guideline for farmer. Rural Development Administration. .

41.

Latorre MA, Pomar C, Faucitano L, Gariépy C, Méthot S. 2008; The relationship within and between production performance and meat quality characteristics in pigs from three different genetic lines. Livest Sci. 115:258-267

42.

Lepetit J. 2008; Collagen contribution to meat toughness: Theoretical aspects. Meat Sci. 80:960-967

43.

Lopez-Bote CJ, Toldrá F, Daza A, Ferrer JM, Menoyo D, Silió L, Rodríguez MC. 2008; Effect of exercise on skeletal muscle proteolytic enzyme activity and meat quality characteristics in Iberian pigs. Meat Sci. 79:71-76

44.

Ma Y, Yang Y, Sun W, Zhou R, Li K, Tang Z. 2016; SFRP2 affects prenatal muscle development and is regulated by microRNA-1/206 in pigs. J Integr Agric. 15:153-161

45.

Martens H, Stabursvik E, Martens M. 1982; Texture and colour changes in meat during cooking related to thermal denaturation of muscle proteins1. J Texture Stud. 13:291-309

46.

Mu L, Wang W, Zhao B, Hu S, Zhao B, Chen Y, Wu X. 2017; Analysis of muscle fiber traits and MYH6 gene expression level in Fujian yellow rabbit. J Zhejiang Univ Agric Life Sci. 43:365-370.

47.

Oksbjerg N, Gondret F, Vestergaard M. 2004; Basic principles of muscle development and growth in meat-producing mammals as affected by the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 27:219-240

48.

Overeem AW, Li Q, Qiu YL, Cartón‐García F, Leng C, Klappe K, Dronkers J, Hsiao NH, Wang JS, Arango D, van Ijzendoorn SCD. 2020; A molecular mechanism underlying genotype‐specific intrahepatic cholestasis resulting from MYO5B mutations. Hepatology. 72:213-229

49.

Owens PC, Conlon MA, Campbell RG, Johnson RJ, King R, Ballard FJ. 1991; Developmental changes in growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) and IGF-binding proteins in plasma of young growing pigs. J Endocrinol. 128:439-447

50.

Rossi AC, Mammucari C, Argentini C, Reggiani C, Schiaffino S. 2010; Two novel/ancient myosins in mammalian skeletal muscles: MYH14/7b and MYH15 are expressed in extraocular muscles and muscle spindles. J Physiol. 588:353-364

51.

Ruusunen M, Puolanne E. 2004; Histochemical properties of fibre types in muscles of wild and domestic pigs and the effect of growth rate on muscle fibre properties. Meat Sci. 67:533-539

52.

Savell JW, Cross HR, Smith GC. 1986; Percentage ether extractable fat and moisture content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. J Food Sci. 51:838-839

53.

Sellier P, Monin G. 1994; Genetics of pig meat quality: A review. J Muscle Foods. 5:187-219

54.

Silva DRG, Torres Filho RA, Cazedey HP, Fontes PR, Ramos ALS, Ramos EM. 2015; Comparison of Warner–Bratzler shear force values between round and square cross-section cores from cooked beef and pork longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 103:1-6

55.

Spicer AP, Joo A, Bowling RA. 2003; A hyaluronan binding link protein gene family whose members are physically linked adjacent to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan core protein genes: The missing links. J Biol Chem. 278:21083-21091

56.

Stewart CE, Rotwein P. 1996; Growth, differentiation, and survival: Multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiol Rev. 76:1005-1026

57.

Tajsharghi H, Hammans S, Lindberg C, Lossos A, Clarke NF, Mazanti I, Waddell LB, Fellig Y, Foulds N, Katifi H, Webster R, Raheem O, Udd B, Argov Z, Oldfors A. 2014; Recessive myosin myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia associated with MYH2 mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 22:801-808

58.

van der Wal PG, Bolink AH, Merkus GSM. 1988; Differences in quality characteristics of normal, PSE and DFD pork. Meat Sci. 24:79-84

59.

van Ijzendoorn SCD, Li Q, Qiu Y, Wang JS, Overeem AW. 2020; Unequal effects of myosin 5b mutations in liver and intestine determine the clinical presentation of low‐gamma‐glutamyltransferase cholestasis. Hepatology. 72:1461-1468

60.

Velleman SG, Coy CS, Abasht B. 2022; Effect of expression of PPARG, DNM2L, RRAD, and LINGO1 on broiler chicken breast muscle satellite cell function. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 268:111186

61.

Watanabe G, Motoyama M, Nakajima I, Sasaki K. 2018; Relationship between water-holding capacity and intramuscular fat content in Japanese commercial pork loin. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 31:914-918

62.

Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M. 2001 Shear force procedures for meat tenderness measurement. Roman L. Hruska U. S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, NE, USA: .

63.

Yendrek CR, Ainsworth EA, Thimmapuram J. 2012; The bench scientist’s guide to statistical analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Res Notes. 5:506

64.

Yoder CL, Maltecca C, Cassady JP, Flowers WL, Price S, See MT. 2011; Breed differences in pig temperament scores during a performance test and their phenotypic relationship with performance. Livest Sci. 136:93-101

65.

Zhao X, Mo D, Li A, Gong W, Xiao S, Zhang Y, Qin L, Niu Y, Guo Y, Liu X. 2011; Comparative analyses by sequencing of transcriptomes during skeletal muscle development between pig breeds differing in muscle growth rate and fatness. PLOS ONE. 6e19774