ARTICLE

Bovine Colostrum-Derived Extracellular Vesicles May Accelerate the Growth of Akkermansia muciniphila by Regulating Energy Metabolism in Intestinal Anaerobic Coculture System

Daye Mun1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-7632, Sangdon Ryu2,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-8385, Hye Jin Choi1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5977-2780, An Na Kang1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-6234, Dong-Hyun Lim3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-0198, Sangnam Oh4,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-412X, Younghoon Kim1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-0657
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2Honam National Institute of Biological Resources, Mokpo 58762, Korea
3Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
4Department of Food and Nutrition, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea
*Corresponding author : Sangnam Oh, Department of Food and Nutrition, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea, Tel: +82-63-220-3109, Fax: +82-63-220-2054, E-mail: osangnam@jj.ac.kr
*Corresponding author : Younghoon Kim Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, Tel: +82-2-880-4808, Fax: +82-2-873-2271, E-mail: ykeys2584@snu.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 14, 2024 ; Revised: Aug 23, 2024 ; Accepted: Sep 03, 2024

Published Online: Jul 01, 2025

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles derived from milk are known to play a significant role in regulating gut microbiota. However, few studies have focused on the effects of these vesicles on specific bacterial species. This study aimed to investigate how bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles (BCEVs) affect the growth and viability of commensal bacteria, specifically Akkermansia muciniphila. BCEVs and A. muciniphila were co-cultured to measure growth rates using spectrophotometry, and cell viability was assessed at the endpoints. Additionally, to determine whether BCEVs enhance the survival of A. muciniphila in the presence of Caco-2 cells, an anaerobic co-culture experiment was conducted to determine the specific interaction between intestinal epithelial cells and gut microbiota using a Transwell system. The results showed that co-culture with BCEVs increased the growth rate and viability of A. muciniphila. Consistent with this, increased viability of A. muciniphila was observed when it was co-cultured with Caco-2 cells. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that BCEVs regulate nitrogen metabolism in A. muciniphila, enhancing the growth rate and viability. Thus, regulating beneficial gut bacteria, such as A. muciniphila, through BCEVs presents a novel biological approach that positively impacts human health.

Keywords: extracellular vesicles; bovine colostrum; Akkermansia muciniphila; intestinal anaerobic coculture system

Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small membrane-enclosed vesicles released into the extracellular environment (Choi et al., 2023; Robbins and Morelli, 2014). EVs play an important role in cell-to-cell communication by delivering proteins, lipids, RNA, and DNA to recipient cells (Bok et al., 2024; Tkach and Thery, 2016). Since these characteristics, EVs are involved in various physiological processes and play a role in cancer and immune diseases (van Niel et al., 2018). EVs can be categorized into exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies based on their origin, size, and mode of release (Zaborowski et al., 2015). In addition, they are increasingly being studied as biomarkers and therapeutics for diseases because of the specificity of their internal miRNAs (Chae et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2023a; McKelvey et al., 2015; Park and Kim, 2023; Zhang et al., 2024).

A growing body of evidence suggests that milk-derived EVs can benefit gut health by reshaping the gut microbiota (Lee et al., 2023b). Oral administration of milk-derived EVs to C57BL/six mice for 8 weeks increased the abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae in the large intestine (Tong et al., 2020). The same researchers reported that the oral administration of milk-derived EVs to a mouse model of colitis increased Akkermansia in the intestine (Tong et al., 2021). The oral administration of milk-derived EVs to mice with dextran sodium sulfate-induced chronic colitis increased Bifidobacterium, Lachnoclostridium, and Lachnospiraceae in the gut (Du et al., 2022). Furthermore, feeding milk-derived EVs to mice with osteoarthritis increased Ruminococcaceae and Akkermansiaceae and decreased Proteobacteria in the gut (Liu et al., 2023).

Akkermansia, specifically Akkermansiamuciniphila, is a bacterium that belongs to the next generation probiotics and is beneficial for gut health (Karamzin et al., 2021; Park et al., 2024). A. muciniphila degrades mucin, a major component of the mucus layer of the gut (Kim et al., 2023). This promotes mucin production by the goblet cells, which improves the integrity of the intestinal barrier (Kim et al., 2021; Kwak et al., 2024). Notably, A. muciniphila has been reported to be low in abundance in the gut of patients with inflammatory bowel disease or metabolic disorders, and may modulate anti-inflammatory activity (Derrien et al., 2017). However, little is known regarding the regulation of gut microbiota by colostrum-derived EVs and its mechanisms. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether colostrum-derived EVs could regulate the growth of commensal bacteria, specifically A. muciniphila.

Materials and Methods

Samples

Colostrum samples from healthy Holstein cows were collected within 3 days after delivery. After milking, the milk samples were immediately refrigerated and transported to the laboratory for further analysis.

Isolation and characterization of bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles

The colostrum was centrifuged at 1,200×g for 10 min for defatting, and then at 16,000×g for 1 h to pellet the cell debris. The supernatant was centrifuged at 50,000×g for 1 h to generate the whey fraction. The whey fraction was ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g to remove large particles. The supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 135,000×g for 90 min to pellet the EVs. The EVs were then resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed under the same conditions, and frozen at –80°C until use (Fig. 1A). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to confirm the morphology of BCEVs, as previously described (Choi et al., 2023). The average size and particle concentration of the isolated EVs were measured using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; Malvern NanoSight NS300, Malvern Technologies, Malvern, UK). For further characterization of EVs, the expression of CD63 was determined using a western blot assay, as previously described (Shimizu et al., 2021).

kosfa-45-4-1090-g1
Fig. 1. Characterization of BCEVs. (A) Schematic of the isolation of BCEVs from colostrum sample. (B) Photograph of isolated BCEVs. (C) TEM images of BCEVs. Scale bar: 200 nm. (D) NTA of BCEVs. (E) Western blot analysis of EV markers, CD63. White arrows indicate BCEVs. EV, extracellular vesicle; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BCEVs, bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis.
Download Original Figure
Bacterial culture

A. muciniphila strain KCTC 15667 was cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) with 0.5% mucin type II (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Bacteroides intestinalis KCTC 5441, Bacteroidesfragilis KCTC 5013, Phocaeicola massiliensis KCTC 5470 were cultured in BHI-supplemented (BHIS) medium (Bacic and Smith, 2008) in anaerobic chamber (COY Laboratories, Grass Lake, MI, USA). For bacterial inoculation, A. muciniphila was cultured for two days, whereas Bacteroides and Phocaeicola were cultured for 1 d before use in the experiment. To evaluate the growth curves of each bacterial strain supplemented with BCEVs, 1×109 or 1×1010 particles/mL of BCEVs or PBS were added to the BHI or BHIS broth, and then each bacterial strain was inoculated. The absorbance (OD600) of the bacterial cultures was measured every 2 h for 2 d for A. muciniphila and the number of viable cells was measured at the endpoint. Cultures of Bacteroides and Phocaeicola were measured every 2 h for 1 d.

Small-scale anaerobic bacterial-aerobic cell line co-culture system

Caco-2 cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Inserts with 0.4 μm pore size (apical part) were placed in a 12-well plate (basal part) and Caco-2 cells were seeded in the apical part. After culturing Caco-2 cells in a conventional aerobic 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 3 weeks, the apical part was inoculated with A. muciniphila and BCEVs in an anaerobic chamber (COY Laboratories). Apical inserts were sealed with airtight butyl rubber to maintain the anaerobic conditions, then the plates were incubated again in an aerobic 5% CO2 at 37°C for 2 d, and the survival of A. muciniphila in the apical part was checked. Dissolved oxygen concentration was measured using a Milwaukee MW600 PRO (Milwaukee Instruments, Rocky Mount, NC, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Scanning electron microscopy

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, the cultured cell culture inserts were fixed with Karnovsky's fixative overnight at 4°C and stained with 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane part of the insert was then gradually dehydrated using ethanol. The membrane was thoroughly dried with hexamethyldisilazane, platinum coated, and imaged using field emission SEM (Sigma-Aldrich; Carl Zeiss, Cambridge, UK).

Transcriptomic analysis

For transcriptome analysis, A. muciniphila cultured with BCEVs or PBS was grown to mid-log (OD600=0.35). The pellet was immediately harvested by centrifugation and RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The quantity and quality of the extracted RNA were measured using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax ABS Plus, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Library construction and sequencing were performed by Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). Libraries were prepared using the NEBNext rRNA Depletion (Bacteria) and TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Gold Kit and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq platform. Preprocessed trimmed reads were mapped to known reference genomes using the Bowtie software. After read mapping, the HTSeq program was used to extract gene-specific read counts for each sample based on the gene annotation of the species. EdgeR was used to perform differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis to select DEGs between the two groups, and genes that met the conditions of |fold change (fc)|≥1.5 and exactTest raw p-value<0.05 were extracted. If known gene information was available, functional annotation and gene-set enrichment analysis based on the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases were performed on the DEGs (Munyaneza et al., 2024).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between the two groups were performed using Student’s t-test, and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare different treatment groups. Each group was compared using Tukey’s test to assess any differences from the control and between the treatments, unless otherwise indicated. Growth rates were analyzed using the Growthcurver R package. Statistical analyses and visualizations were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Characterization of bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles

Milk-derived EVs play a role in modulating the gut microbiota, particularly by increasing the abundance of Akkermansia, which has recently been considered a next-generation probiotic (Hänninen et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2021). Therefore, this study aimed to determine how BCEVs interact with gut microbiota, specifically with A. muciniphila. We isolated and identified BCEVs from colostrum by ultracentrifugation (Fig. 1), following the guidelines of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (Théry et al., 2018). TEM imaging confirmed their morphology (Fig. 1C), NTA determined their size and concentration (Fig. 1D), and western blotting assays identified CD63 as a protein marker for EVs, confirming the successful isolation of BCEVs (Fig. 1E). The average size of the BCEVs was 147.6 nm.

Growth rate and viability of commensal bacteria

To assess the effect of BCEVs on the growth rate of A. muciniphila, two concentrations of BCEVs were co-cultured with A. muciniphila and the growth rates were measured (Fig. 2A). Both concentrations significantly increased the growth rate of A. muciniphila. To verify the direct effects on the growth of A. muciniphila, cell viability was measured at the endpoint. Both concentrations significantly increased cell viability compared to the control, which was consistent with previous results (Fig. 2B). In contrast, co-culture of BCEVs did not affect the growth rate of the gut commensals B. intestinalis and B. fragilis and tended to decrease the growth rate of P. massiliensis (Figs. 2C, D, and E). These results suggest that BCEVs can regulate the growth rate differently depending on the species and that they increase the growth rate of A. muciniphila.

kosfa-45-4-1090-g2
Fig. 2. Growth rate and viability of commensal bacteria treated with BCEVs. (A, B) Growth rate (A) and cell viability at the end point (B) of Akkermansia muciniphila co-incubated with PBS or BCEVs (1×109 and 1×1010 particles/mL). (C–E) Growth rates of Bacteroides intestinalis (C), Bacteroides fragilis (D), and Phocaeicola massiliensis (E) co-cultured with PBS or BCEVs (1×109 and 1×1010 particles/mL). All data are presented as the mean±SD. The two groups were compared using Student’s t-test, and one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett’s test analyzed the differences among multiple groups. Asterisks represent statistical significance at * p<0.05, ** p<0.01. Growth rate was calculated using the Growthcurver package of R. PBS, phosphate-buffered saline control; BCEVs, bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles.
Download Original Figure
Co-culture of Akkermansia muciniphila with Caco-2 cells

To assess whether BCEVs exerted a similar influence on the growth of A. muciniphila in the presence of intestinal epithelial cells, a co-culture system of anaerobic bacteria and Caco-2 cells was established (Fig. 3A). The amount of dissolved oxygen was significantly lower in the apical portion of the wells with rubber than in those without rubber, with no significant difference in the basal portion (Fig. 3B). In addition, the number of colonies of A. muciniphila was measured, and it was found that A. muciniphila could not survive in the absence of rubber; the number of colonies was significantly higher when co-inoculated with A. muciniphila and BCEVs than when inoculated with A. muciniphila alone (Fig. 3C). SEM images also showed that more A. muciniphila was observed when co-cultured with BCEVs, which is consistent with previous results (Fig. 3D). These results confirmed the establishment of a co-culture system of anaerobic bacteria and cells and showed that treatment with BCEVs enhanced the viability of A. muciniphila even in the presence of intestinal epithelial cells.

kosfa-45-4-1090-g3
Fig. 3. Establishment of a small-scale anaerobic bacterial-aerobic cell line co-culture system. (A) Schematic of a small-scale anaerobic bacterial-aerobic cell line co-culture system. (B) Amount of dissolved oxygen in the Transwell plate. (C) Viability of Akkermansia muciniphila in the apical part. (D) SEM image of the apical part. Upper panel: ×3.0 k; Lower panel: ×5.0 k. Orange arrow indicates A. muciniphila. All data are presented as the mean±SD. The two groups were compared using Student’s t-test, and one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett’s test analyzed the differences among multiple groups. Asterisks represent statistical significance at * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001. BCEVs, bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles; BHI, brain heart infusion; SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Download Original Figure
Transcriptome analysis of Akkermansia muciniphila

After confirming that BCEVs promoted the growth of A. muciniphila, transcriptomic analysis was performed by extracting RNA from A. muciniphila cells co-incubated with PBS or BCEVs to identify the mechanism of increased growth. Of the 2,201 observed genes, 70 DEGs with |fc|≥1.5 & raw p<0.05 were identified, and 23 and 47 genes were up- and downregulated, respectively, in the BCEVs-treated group compared to the PBS-treated group (Fig. 4A and Table 1). GO terms and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed to predict the function of the identified DEGs. Among the 70 DEGs, 35 genes had no hits in GO analysis, 12 genes were involved in metabolic processes, and 10 genes were involved in cellular and biological processes (Fig. 4B). KEGG pathway analysis showed that the two-component system and nitrogen metabolism-related pathway was significantly increased when co-cultured with BCEVs, and protein export was decreased (Table 2). In particular, Amuc_1252 and Amuc_1253, genes related to glutamine synthetase, were upregulated following BCEVs treatment. Thus, it was predicted that BCEVs might promote the growth of A. muciniphila by regulating nitrogen metabolism, particularly of glutamine synthetase.

kosfa-45-4-1090-g4
Fig. 4. Transcriptomic analysis of Akkermansia muciniphila influenced by BCEVs. (A) Volcano plot showing differential gene expression in A. muciniphila treated with BCEVs compared to PBS control. Significant upregulation is indicated by blue dots (FC≥1.5, p<0.05) and significant downregulation by orange dots (FC≤–1.5, p<0.05). Grey dots represent genes with no significant changes. (B) Pie chart illustrating the distribution of biological processes affected in A. muciniphila after BCEVs treatment. BCEVs, bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline control; FC, fold change.
Download Original Figure
Table 1. Top five differentially expressed genes between negative control and bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles treated Akkermansia muciniphila
Upregulated Downregulated
Gene Definition FC Gene Definition FC
Amuc_1300 Adenylylsulfate reductase, thioredoxin dependent 5.446 Amuc_1922 Putative ferredoxin –2.192
Amuc_1253 Glutamate synthase (ferredoxin) 2.249 Amuc_0875 Glycoside hydrolase family 16 –1.760
Amuc_0910 Transcriptional regulator, LysR family 2.188 Amuc_2028 Transcriptional regulator, MarR family –1.685
Amuc_1252 Glutamine synthetase catalytic region 2.057 Amuc_0095 Ribosomal protein L33 –1.678
Amuc_1153 Potassium-transporting ATPase, C subunit 1.897 Amuc_0860 Anaerobic ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase activating protein –1.676

FC, fold change.

Download Excel Table
Table 2. KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes between negative control and bovine colostrum-derived extracellular vesicles treated Akkermansia muciniphila
Upregulated Downregulated
Gene Description FC Gene Description FC
Two-component system Protein export
 Amuc_0736 Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1.678  Amuc_0240 Twin-arginine translocation protein, TatA/E family subunit –1.567
 Amuc_0830 Potassium-transporting ATPase, A subunit 1.569  Amuc_1047 Preprotein translocase, SecE subunit –1.670
 Amuc_1153 Potassium-transporting ATPase, C subunit 1.897
Nitrogen metabolism
 Amuc_1252 Glutamine synthetase catalytic region 2.057
 Amuc_1253 Glutamate synthase (ferredoxin) 2.249

KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; FC, fold change.

Download Excel Table

Discussion

This study confirmed the effect of BCEVs on A. muciniphila growth. Co-culture with BCEVs increased the growth rate and viability of A. muciniphila. Consistent with this, increased viability of A. muciniphila was observed when it was co-cultured with Caco-2 cells. Transcriptomic analysis revealed an increase in nitrogen metabolism-related genes in BCEV-treated A. muciniphila. These results suggest that treatment with BCEVs modulates the expression of genes in A. muciniphila, specifically by regulating energy metabolism, resulting in increased growth.

A. muciniphila has been found to be beneficial for gut health in several recent studies (Choi et al., 2024; Karamzin et al., 2021). Increased colonization by A. muciniphila enhances the expression of cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein H in the gut, which alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress, intestinal barrier leakage, and endotoxemia in the blood caused by inflammatory stress (Wade et al., 2023). A. muciniphila ameliorates transmural colonic wall defects by promoting interleukin (IL)-22 secretion via myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (Bachmann et al., 2022). A. muciniphila also has a major effect on intestinal homeostasis, mediated by alpha kinase 1 in enterocytes in vitro (Martin-Gallausiaux et al., 2022). The outer membrane protein of A. muciniphila has been shown to exert a proinflammatory function by inducing the secretion of IL-10 (Ottman et al., 2017). Considering this, it is possible that BCEVs increase the growth of A. muciniphila, which may enhance the anti-inflammatory responses in the gut. This growth promotion may also strengthen the role of A. muciniphila in maintaining gut homeostasis and supporting the gut barrier. Further research is needed to investigate how BCEVs influence A. muciniphila within the broader gut microbiome and their potential therapeutic applications.

As research on the potential of various dietary EVs to modulate the gut microbiome grows, the impact of EVs on bacterial growth and the mechanisms involved are increasingly being investigated. A previous study showed that milk-derived EVs promoted the growth of Escherichia coli MG1655 and Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1, which was attributed to the bacterial gene regulation properties of milk-derived EVs (Yu et al., 2019). Milk-derived EVs are taken up by bifidobacteria and promote the growth of bifidobacteria by promoting carbohydrate metabolism (Luo et al., 2023). Human urine-derived exosomes inhibit the growth of E. coli associated with urinary tract infections (Hiemstra et al., 2014). Furthermore, miRNAs have been shown to enter bacteria, regulate bacterial genes, and affect bacterial growth (Liu et al., 2016). In this study, treatment with BCEVs had a minimal impact on the growth of other commensal bacteria but significantly increased the growth rate and viability of A. muciniphila. These findings demonstrate that BCEVs can influence the growth rate and survival of gut commensal bacteria, particularly in a bacteria-specific manner. Further research involving a broader range of microbial species is necessary to elucidate the interactions between colostrum-derived EVs and microorganisms.

With the development of culturomic techniques and the growing importance of characterizing individual bacteria, the need to understand anaerobic bacterial–host interactions has increased (Na and Guan, 2022). Therefore, attempts have been made to develop a human gut mimetic system that can be co-cultivated with anaerobic bacteria (Kim, 2023; Moossavi et al., 2022; Sasaki et al., 2020). In a previous study, a system for co-culturing human organoids and anaerobic bacteria using a Transwell cell culture insert and butyl rubber was devised, demonstrating that commensal gut microbiota such as A. muciniphila, Bifidobacterium adventitiae, B. fragilis, and Clostridium butyricum could survive in this system and influence gene expression in human cells (Sasaki et al., 2020). Umehara and Aoyagi (2023) developed a system that allowed the co-culture of aerobic cells and anaerobic bacteria using a cell culture insert and liquid paraffin, and reported that Bifidobacterium bifidum had a higher growth rate in the upper section containing mineral oil (Umehara and Aoyagi, 2023). In the present study, to verify whether the growth-promoting effects of BCEVs on A. muciniphila persist in the presence of intestinal epithelial cells, we developed a simple anaerobic culture system using a Transwell cell culture insert to co-culture Caco-2 cells and anaerobic bacteria. The system effectively maintained a significantly reduced oxygen concentration in the apical insert sealed with butyl rubber, confirming the viability of A. muciniphila under these conditions. Additionally, it was observed that A. muciniphila viability increased when co-cultured with BCEVs in this system. These findings suggest that BCEVs could enhance the growth of A. muciniphila even in the presence of intestinal epithelial cells. Further analysis is required to assess the impact of increased A. muciniphila on Caco-2 cells following BCEV treatment.

Transcriptomic analysis confirmed that glutamate metabolism in A. muciniphila was regulated by BCEVs. Glutamate is considered highly important in bacterial metabolism and is known for its role in linking nitrogen and carbon metabolism (Commichau et al., 2006; Commichau et al., 2008). Additionally, it is known to influence pathways, such as protein synthesis and the TCA cycle (Feehily and Karatzas, 2013), allowing us to predict that BCEV-treated A. muciniphila may have adapted to its environment and increased its energy metabolism, which increased its growth. However, the transcriptomic results in this study showed that the differences in gene expression were slight, and only a few genes were identified in the predicted pathways. Therefore, further analysis is needed to identify more precise mechanisms.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that BCEVs significantly enhance the growth rate and viability of A. muciniphila, in the presence and absence of host cells. This effect appears to be partially mediated by the modulation of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first transcriptomic analysis exploring the impact of colostrum-derived EVs on the growth of A. muciniphila. Considering our initial findings, further studies are needed to elucidate the specific roles of colostrum-derived EVs and microRNAs in bacterial growth dynamics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant, funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2021R1A2C3011051) and by Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (RS-2023-00230754), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN, Lim DH, Oh S, Kim Y. Data curation: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN. Formal analysis: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN. Methodology: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN. Software: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN. Validation: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN, Lim DH, Oh S, Kim Y. Investigation: Oh S, Kim Y. Writing - original draft: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN, Lim DH, Oh S, Kim Y. Writing - review & editing: Mun D, Ryu S, Choi HJ, Kang AN, Lim DH, Oh S, Kim Y.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Bachmann R, Van Hul M, Baldin P, Léonard D, Delzenne NM, Belzer C, Ouwerkerk JP, Repsilber D, Rangel I, Kartheuser A, Brummer RJ, De Vos WM, Cani PD. 2022; Akkermansia muciniphila reduces peritonitis and improves intestinal tissue wound healing after a colonic transmural defect by a myd88-dependent mechanism. Cells. 11:2666

2.

Bacic MK, Smith CJ. 2008 Laboratory maintenance and cultivation of Bacteroides species. Curr Protoc Microbiol 9: 13C.1.1-13C.1.21.

3.

Bok EY, Seo SY, Lee HG, Kim EJ, Cho A, Jung YH, Hur TY, So KM, Lee SL, Wimalasena SH. 2024 Exosomes isolation from bovine serum: Qualitative and quantitative comparison between ultracentrifugation, combination ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, and exoeasy methods. J Anim Sci Technol (in press).

4.

Chae J, Choi Y, Lee J, Park H, Jeong Y, Cho E, Kim Y, Kim T, Sa S, Cho H. 2023; An intelligent method for pregnancy diagnosis in breeding sows according to ultrasonography algorithms. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:365-376

5.

Choi H, Mun D, Ryu S, Kwak MJ, Kim BK, Park DJ, Oh S, Kim Y. 2023; Molecular characterization and functionality of rumen-derived extracellular vesicles using a Caenorhabditis elegans animal model. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:652-663

6.

Choi Y, Lee W, Kwon JG, Kang A, Kwak MJ, Eor JY, Kim Y. 2024; The current state of phage therapy in livestock and companion animals. J Anim Sci Technol. 66:57-78

7.

Commichau FM, Forchhammer K, Stülke J. 2006; Regulatory links between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Curr Opin Microbiol. 9:167-172

8.

Commichau FM, Gunka K, Landmann JJ, Stülke J. 2008; Glutamate metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: Gene expression and enzyme activities evolved to avoid futile cycles and to allow rapid responses to perturbations of the system. J Bacteriol. 190:3557-3564

9.

Derrien M, Belzer C, de Vos WM. 2017; Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions. Microb Pathog. 106:171-181

10.

Du C, Wang K, Zhao Y, Nan X, Chen R, Quan S, Xiong B. 2022; Supplementation with milk-derived extracellular vesicles shapes the gut microbiota and regulates the transcriptomic landscape in experimental colitis. Nutrients. 14:1808

11.

Feehily C, Karatzas KAG. 2013; Role of glutamate metabolism in bacterial responses towards acid and other stresses. J Appl Microbiol. 114:11-24

12.

Hänninen A, Toivonen R, Pöysti S, Belzer C, Plovier H, Ouwerkerk JP, Emani R, Cani PD, De Vos WM. 2018; Akkermansia muciniphila induces gut microbiota remodelling and controls islet autoimmunity in NOD mice. Gut. 67:1445-1453

13.

Hiemstra TF, Charles PD, Gracia T, Hester SS, Gatto L, Al-Lamki R, Floto RA, Su Y, Skepper JN, Lilley KS, Karet Frankl FE. 2014; Human urinary exosomes as innate immune effectors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 25:2017-2027

14.

Karamzin AM, Ropot AV, Sergeyev OV, Khalturina EO. 2021; Akkermansia muciniphila and host interaction within the intestinal tract. Anaerobe. 72:102472

15.

Kim HW, Lee SY, Hur SJ, Kil DY, Kim JH. 2023; Effects of functional nutrients on chicken intestinal epithelial cells induced with oxidative stress. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:1040-1052

16.

Kim R. 2023; Advanced organotypic in vitro model systems for host–microbial coculture. BioChip J. 17:147-173

17.

Kim S, Shin YC, Kim TY, Kim Y, Lee YS, Lee SH, Kim MN, O E, Kim KS, Kweon MN. 2021; Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. 13e1892441

18.

Kwak MJ, Ha DJ, Park MY, Eor JY, Whang KY, Kim Y. 2024; Comparison study between single enzyme and multienzyme complex in distiller’s dred grains with soluble supplemented diet in broiler chicken. J Anim Sci Technol. 66:398-411

19.

Lee S, Kang S, Heo J, Hong Y, Vu TH, Truong AD, Lillehoj HS, Hong YH. 2023a; MicroRNA expression profiling in the lungs of genetically different Ri chicken lines against the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:838-855

20.

Lee SY, Lee DY, Mariano E Jr, Yun SH, Lee J, Park J, Choi Y, Han D, Kim JS, Joo ST, Hur SJ. 2023b; Study on the current research trends and future agenda in animal products: An asian perspective. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:1124-1150

21.

Liu Q, Hao H, Li J, Zheng T, Yao Y, Tian X, Zhang Z, Yi H. 2023; Oral administration of bovine milk-derived extracellular vesicles attenuates cartilage degeneration via modulating gut microbiota in DMM-induced mice. Nutrients. 15:747

22.

Liu S, da Cunha AP, Rezende RM, Cialic R, Wei Z, Bry L, Comstock LE, Gandhi R, Weiner HL. 2016; The host shapes the gut microbiota via fecal microrna. Cell Host Microbe. 19:32-43

23.

Luo Y, Bi J, Lin Y, He J, Wu S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Song S, Guo H. 2023; Milk-derived small extracellular vesicles promote bifidobacteria growth by accelerating carbohydrate metabolism. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 182:114866

24.

Martin-Gallausiaux C, Garcia-Weber D, Lashermes A, Larraufie P, Marinelli L, Teixeira V, Rolland A, Beguet-Crespel F, Brochard V, Quatremare T, Jamet A, Doré J, Gray-Owen SD, Blottière HM, Arrieumerlou C, Lapaque N. 2022; Akkermansia muciniphila upregulates genes involved in maintaining the intestinal barrier function via ADP-heptose-dependent activation of the ALPK1/TIFA pathway. Gut Microbes. 14:2110639

25.

McKelvey KJ, Powell KL, Ashton AW, Morris JM, McCracken SA. 2015; Exosomes: Mechanisms of uptake. J Circ Biomark. 4:7

26.

Moossavi S, Arrieta MC, Sanati-Nezhad A, Bishehsari F. 2022; Gut-on-chip for ecological and causal human gut microbiome research. Trends Microbiol. 30:710-721

27.

Munyaneza JP, Kim M, Cho E, Jang A, Choo HJ, Lee JH. 2024 Genome-wide association studies of the fatty acid composition of Korean native chicken breast meat. J Anim Sci Technol (in press).

28.

Na SW, Guan LL. 2022; Understanding the role of rumen epithelial host-microbe interactions in cattle feed efficiency. Anim Nutr. 10:41-53

29.

Ottman N, Reunanen J, Meijerink M, Pietila TE, Kainulainen V, Klievink J, Huuskonen L, Aalvink S, Skurnik M, Boeren S, Satokari R, Mercenier A, Palva A, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Belzer C. 2017; Pili-like proteins of Akkermansia muciniphila modulate host immune responses and gut barrier function. PLOS One. 12e0173004

30.

Park T, Yoon J, Yun Y, Unno T. 2024; Comparison of the fecal microbiota with high-and low performance race horses. J Anim Sci Technol. 66:425

31.

Park YB, Kim JM. 2023; Identification of long non-coding RNA-mRNA interactions and genome-wide lncRNA annotation in animal transcriptome profiling. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:293-310

32.

Robbins PD, Morelli AE. 2014; Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol. 14:195-208

33.

Sasaki N, Miyamoto K, Maslowski KM, Ohno H, Kanai T, Sato T. 2020; Development of a scalable coculture system for gut anaerobes and human colon epithelium. Gastroenterology. 159:388-390 E5

34.

Shimizu A, Sawada K, Kobayashi M, Yamamoto M, Yagi T, Kinose Y, Kodama M, Hashimoto K, Kimura T. 2021; Exosomal CD47 plays an essential role in immune evasion in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 19:1583-1595

35.

Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith GK, Ayre DC, Bach JM, Bachurski D, Baharvand H, Balaj L, Baldacchino S, Bauer NN, Baxter AA, Bebawy M, Beckham C, Bedina Zavec A, Benmoussa A, Berardi AC, Bergese P, Bielska E, Blenkiron C, Bobis-Wozowicz S, Boilard E, Boireau W, et al. 2018; Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the international society for extracellular vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 7:1535750.

36.

Tkach M, Théry C. 2016; Communication by extracellular vesicles: Where we are and where we need to go. Cell. 164:1226-1232

37.

Tong L, Hao H, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Lv Y, Zhang L, Yi H. 2020; Oral administration of bovine milk-derived extracellular vesicles alters the gut microbiota and enhances intestinal immunity in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. 64:1901251

38.

Tong L, Hao H, Zhang Z, Lv Y, Liang X, Liu Q, Liu T, Gong P, Zhang L, Cao F, Pastorin G, Lee CN, Chen X, Wang JW, Yi H. 2021; Milk-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate ulcerative colitis by regulating the gut immunity and reshaping the gut microbiota. Theranostics. 11:8570-8586

39.

Umehara Y, Aoyagi H. 2023; Development of a simple cultured cell–anaerobic microbial co-culture system using liquid paraffin. J Biosci Bioeng. 135:487-492

40.

van Niel GD, angelo G, Raposo G. 2018; Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19:213-228

41.

Wade H, Pan K, Duan Q, Kaluzny S, Pandey E, Fatumoju L, Saraswathi V, Wu R, Harris EN, Su Q. 2023; Akkermansia muciniphila and its membrane protein ameliorates intestinal inflammatory stress and promotes epithelial wound healing via CREBH and miR-143/145. J Biomed Sci. 30:38

42.

Yu S, Zhao Z, Xu X, Li M, Li P. 2019; Characterization of three different types of extracellular vesicles and their impact on bacterial growth. Food Chem. 272:372-378

43.

Zaborowski MP, Balaj L, Breakefield XO, Lai CP. 2015; Extracellular vesicles: Composition, biological relevance, and methods of study. BioScience. 65:783-797

44.

Zhang J, Zhao C, Yao M, Qi J, Tan Y, Shi K, Wang J, Zhou S, Li Z. 2024; Transcriptome sequencing reveals non-coding RNAs respond to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Haemophilus parasuis co-infection in Kele piglets. J Anim Sci Technol. 66:663-681