ARTICLE

# Ribose-induced Maillard Reaction as an Analytical Method for Detection of Adulteration and Differentiation of Chilled and Frozen-thawed Minced Veal

1Department of Food Hygiene and Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 30, 2019 ; Revised: Jan 20, 2020 ; Accepted: Feb 09, 2020

Published Online: Apr 30, 2020

## Abstract

Quality control of meat products is one of the main concerns of consumers, governmental control authorities, and retailers. The purpose of this study was to employ ribose-induced Maillard reaction in detection of meat adulteration and differentiation of fresh-chilled from frozen-thawed minced veal. The browning intensity was assessed through measuring the absorbance at 420 nm with a spectrophotometer as well as the direct analysis of the color and pH. The results showed that CIE b*, CIE a*, and A420* values in the extract of fresh-chilled veal were significantly (p<0.05) higher than frozen-thawed samples. The extract of frozen meat samples stored at −18°C became significantly darker and more yellowish compared to −4°C. The results showed that the A420* value in the frozen-thawed veal stored at −4°C and −18°C was reduced by approximately 17.22±3.53% and 11.68±2.49%, respectively, compared with fresh-chilled veal. The findings also showed that the storage temperature of minced veal and the heating time in this reaction had a significant effect on all tested variables (p<0.0001). The proposed method can be considered as an easy, quick, and inexpensive test for differentiating between the fresh-chilled and frozen-thawed minced veal.

Keywords: Maillard reaction; minced veal; adulteration; differentiation; frozen-thawed

## Introduction

Most consumers in Iran and other countries are inclined to have fresh, natural color, properly-chilled, and delicate meat of a typical texture without muscle drop, leakage and microbial contamination. In contrast, industrial-commercial consumers, producers, and vendors are more inclined to consume frozen meat owing to its long storage capability and quality preservation (Atanassova et al., 2018). Currently, various methods of meat storage have been developed throughout the world. However, freezing is the most efficient and widely used method for maintaining the nutritional value of meat even after long storage (Rahman et al., 2014). Freezing plays an important part in preserving the quality and safety of meat (Leygonie et al., 2012). However, the consequences of freezing and thawing are still a major problem affecting the quality of meat (Leygonie et al., 2012).

During the freezing process, ice crystals are formed in the extracellular space, causing mechanical damage and volume changes in cellular structures (Dalvi-Isfahan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018). The crystal formation causes punctures in the cell membrane and the leakage of proteins, vitamins, and minerals from the intracellular into the extracellular space; this contributes to microbial growth (Leygonie et al., 2012), thereby reducing the quality of fresh meat (Hui et al., 2004); therefore, the price of frozen meat is lower compared with fresh meat. The lower marketability of frozen meat has led to some adulteration and illegal sale of frozen-thawed meat as fresh one (Ballin and Lametsch, 2008). Appropriate analytical methods are required to enforce the regulations and obtain comprehensive information on the measures of adulteration in the supply of frozen-thawed meat instead of fresh meat. For the detection of adulteration, various studies have been conducted on the use of different methods such as enzymatic methods, particularly hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH), DNA-based methods, IR and NMR techniques, biographical imaging methods and electron microscopy, impedance measurement, and sensory methods (Ballin and Lametsch, 2008; Chen et al., 2016; Elahi et al., 2016; Grunert et al., 2016; Sánchez-Alonso et al., 2014). Nevertheless, most of these methods are not thorough enough to differentiate fresh from frozen-thawed meat because each has its own pros and cons in diagnosis. Tan et al. (2012; 2013) introduced a spectroscopy method based on the Maillard reaction to identify the minced veal of chicken and pork and their freshness index (Ames, 1998; Tan et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013). A large number of researchers have indicated the use of Maillard reaction by studying the taste, color and aroma of food, its effect on the sensory characteristics, and the toxicity of the resulting material (Chen et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2018; Karangwa et al., 2016; Meinert et al., 2009; Tamanna and Mahmood, 2015).

Maillard's reaction is a non-enzymatic browning between the amine group of free amino acids, peptides, or proteins and the carbonyl reactive groups of reducing sugars or carbonyl components such as aldehydes and ketones derived from the oxidation of lipids, occurring during the thermal or food storage processing (Ames, 1998; Karangwa et al., 2016). At the end of this reaction, brown nitrogenous polymers and copolymers, known as melanoidin, are formed, inducing a change in the colors from brown to black. The pH and browning intensity are two distinctive features of Maillard reaction that change following 95°C heating. Protein is the main substrate for the reaction of Maillard. The changes in protein during the freeze-thaw cycle lead to protein oxidation and reduce its functional properties. Storage of meat under freezing conditions significantly reduces the amount of denaturation enthalpy, the number of sulfhydryl groups, and the protein solubility, and increases the carbonyl and disulfide content of the protein. The free NH2 group may react with the aldehyde compounds resulting from lipid oxidation (Tan et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013). Protein changes in the freezing process also include changes in the amino acid side chains and polymer formation, reduced ATPase activity, altered amino acid composition, increased sensitivity to proteolytic enzymes, and reduced protein water holding capacity (WHC) (Hui et al., 2004; Tan et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013). Besides, the total amount of essential and nonessential amino acids and the amount of each protein amino acid decreases throughout the freezing storage (Baranenko et al., 2014). These changes are dependent on the structural specification of amino acids, the chemical structure of their radicals, their solubility in the water, and the freezing temperature of the meat (Baranenko et al., 2014). As a result, denaturation, oxidation, and structural changes of protein reduce the reaction of the protein and ribose, thereby decreasing the production of melanoidin and changing the Maillard reaction parameters such as color, pH, and absorption rate. Therefore, the Maillard reaction relies on measuring the absorbance of melanoidin (A420*) obtained from the extracted minced veal and ribose could provide an alternative method.

To date, the application of the Maillard reaction has not been studied as a means of differentiating between fresh red meat and frozen-thawed meat. This method was previously evaluated in poultry and pork meat by some researchers (Ivanova et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2013). The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the capability of applying the Maillard reaction as an alternative method for differentiation and identification of from frozen-thawed minced veal. The Maillard parameters such as pH changes, colorimetric parameters (CIE a*, CIE b*, and CIE L*), and absorbance at 420 nm were measured at different heating times to find the most optimal separation condition and cut-off value.

## Materials and Methods

Materials

Sucrose and D-ribose for Maillard reaction and other chemical materials (analytical grade) used in this research were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The selected materials under research included 500 g meat isolated from the Biceps femoris muscles of three calves aged no more than six months purchased from the butcher’s. The meat was placed in a refrigerator at 4°C for 24 h after slaughter.

Sample preparation

At first, all visible fats were removed from the meat surface. The samples collected from each calf (3 batches) were separately divided into three equal parts. Samples were cooled in a refrigerator at 4°C two hours before being used in a grinding machine (PA-82; Mainca, Barcelona, Spain) equipped with a 4.5 mm plate. A total of 180 packed veal samples were stored at different temperatures, including 20 packed samples in a chilled condition at 4°C, 20 packed samples in a super chilled condition at −4°C, and 20 packed samples in a freezing condition at −18°C from each batch. Four replicates of the samples were taken for five different heating times. The chilled samples were tested on the first day, while others were tested after one month. Prior to analysis, each sample was thawed for 4 h at 5°C under natural convection.

Physicochemical analysis

The chemical compositions of the samples were determined following the standard methods prior to the experiment. Ash, moisture, and protein content in meat samples were determined based on the standard method (AOAC, 2010). Lipid was extracted for total lipid content, determined following the procedure of Bligh et al. (1959). Results were reported based on moisture percentage (Bligh and Dyer, 1959).

Evaluation of ribose-induced Maillard reaction rate

Induction of the Maillard reaction in the minced veal samples and the extraction of water-soluble melanoidin from samples extracted by heating ribose with minced veal were performed according to the procedure described by Tan et al. (2012) with certain modifications. In this experiment, ribose was employed to induce the Maillard reaction and sucrose was applied as a blank. Minced veal was manually mixed (10% w/w) with D-ribose in a 30 mL universal glass bottle individually. The bottle which contained 7 g ribose-minced veal mixture (ca 6.4 g minced veal and 0.64 g D-ribose) was heated at 95±1°C for 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 min in the water bath (water / fluid bath GFL 1008, Berlin, Germany). The heated samples were instantly made cold in ice water, left at room temperature for up to 1 hour before analysis, and ground to obtain homogenous powder by use of a mortar and pestle; 20 mL of distilled water was then added. In the following, the extraction procedure was done according to Tan et al. (2013). Controlling was done with sucrose, a non-reducing sugar, instead of ribose. Absorbance was judged at 420 and 550 nm employing a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 25, Perkin Elmer, CA, USA) for the absorbance of brown polymers generated in the Maillard reaction as the browning index (A420*). The corrected absorbance value was calculated as proposed by Tan et al. (2013). Any turbidity in the extract was corrected by absorption at 550 nm according to equation (1):

${\text{A}}_{420*}={\text{A}}_{420}-{\text{A}}_{550}-\text{B}$
(1)

where A420* is the absorption of browning at 420 nm, A550 is the absorption of 550 nm for samples and B is the absorption at 420 nm for a blank sample (Morales and Van Boekel, 1998).

The pH of blank and meat samples was assessed through applying a digitalized pH meter (MP230, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland), (AOAC, 2010). The calibration of pH meter was performed by use of two standard buffers of pH 4.0 and 7.0 at 23°C.

Color measurement

The color of the supernatant was measured using a Hunter Lab colorimeter (Color Flex EZ Spectrophotometer, Reston, USA). The color was evaluated via CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b* system. CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b* values were determined as indicators of lightness, redness, greenness, yellowness and blueness, respectively (+a*=redness, –a*=green, +b*=yellow, –b*=blue).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed on the average of four replicates of the samples. In data analysis, the normality of the data was primarily investigated using a one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction and Shaprovix. For normal data, analysis of variance and Tukey and Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed, and for abnormal data, the Dan-Bonferroni tests were applied. In the same analysis, the results of mixed models were further used. To cluster the results, hierarchical algorithm and the Complete Linkage (or Furthest Neighbor) was utilized. The software used in this study was IBM-SPSS software (SPSS, Windows version 20, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), (Proc glimmix procedure). The significance level was considered to be less than 0.05.

## Results and Discussion

Physicochemical results

Table 1 shows the mean analysis of the physicochemical compositions of the three batches of fresh meat samples. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) regarding the physicochemical characteristics of the meat samples.

Table 1. Physicochemical composition of three batches of veal meat
Batch Moisture (%) Crude protein (%) Ash (%) Lipid (%) pH
1 76.05±0.050 18.60±0.300 0.73±0.050 1.27±0.045 5.59±0.005
2 75.40±0.300 20.95±0.450 0.56±0.015 2.55±0.050 5.58±0.005
3 75.60±0.001 18.80±0.100 0.60±0.010 1.15±0.020 5.61±0.005
Mean±SD 75.68±0.145 19.45±0.496 0.63±0.036 1.66±0.284 5.59±0.006

Table 2 shows the results pertaining to the evaluation of Maillard parameters depending on different storage temperatures. The Maillard's browning reaction was commenced by adding ribose to meat samples and after heating at 95°C. In the present study, ribose-induced method was used owing to its high Maillard reaction in terms of pH reduction and browning intensity (Ashoor and Zent, 1984; Beck et al., 1990; Tan et al., 2012). However, in the blank sample, the color did not change due to the presence of sucrose instead of ribose, which is consistent with the results of other researchers (Tan et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013). Browning in all the minced veal samples was shown by increasing the heating time. The process of these changes at different heating times is shown in Fig. 1, where a gradual reduction occurred in CIE L* and pH (Fig. 1c and 1d), and an increase was observed in CIE b* up to 60 min and CIE a* up to 80 min, after that time (Fig. 1a and 1b).

Table 2. Ribose-induced Maillard reaction parameters for chilled and frozen minced veal as a function of heating time at 95°C
Responding variables Storage temperature (°) Heating time (min)
20 40 60 80 100
CIE a* 4 9.55±0.10eA 13.11±0.06dA 14.65±0.06bA 15.02±0.07aA 13.56±0.06cA
−4 8.91±0.08eC 11.9±0.05dC 13.14±0.08bC 14.3±0.08aC 13.26±0.24cB
−18 9.18±0.06eB 13.11±0.07dB 14.01±0.1bB 14.72±0.17aB 13.37±0.15cB
CIE b* 4 29.37±0.13dA 32.35±0.20bA 33.97±0.03aA 30.98±0.34cA 25.38±0.08eA
−4 27.68±0.71dC 28.90±0.23bC 30.24±0.11aC 27.54±0.13cC 23.38±0.15eC
−18 28.26±0.32dB 29.93±0.05bB 31.48±0.04aB 28.64±0.31cB 24.06±0.05eB
CIE L* 4 47.32±0.15aC 36.8±0.25bC 35.30±0.23cC 32.13±0.25dC 25.42±0.15eC
−4 49.57±0.09aA 39.32±0.1bA 38.20±0.05cA 34.35±0.06dA 26.74±0.06eA
−18 48.65±0.43aB 38.21±0.08bB 37.05±0.18cB 33.4±0.24dB 26.23±0.05eB
pH 4 5.21±0.12aC 4.97±0.06bB 4.76±0.09cC 4.65±0.05dC 4.64±0.08eB
−4 5.44±0.05aA 5.13±0.03bA 5.01±0.03cA 4.90±0.06dA 4.72±0.02eA
−18 5.32±0.07aB 4.96±0.10bB 4.84±0.04cB 4.77±0.09dB 4.66±0.04eB
A420* 4 0.342±0.04eA 0.796±0.05dA 1.359±0.05cA 1.595±0.02bA 1.907±0.06aA
−4 0.234±0.01eB 0.622±0.01dB 1.123±0.01cC 1.424±0.03bB 1.783±0.04aB
−18 0.243±0.02eB 0.653±0.03dB 1.199±0.02cB 1.466±0.06bB 1.813±0.07aB

Data are represented as mean±SD of four measurements per sample. Values in the same column for the same variable with the same letter are not significantly different (p>0.05).

Different superscripts (A–C) for the same responding variables indicate significant differences between fresh minced veal and frozen thawed veal (at −4°C and −18°C)at the p<0.05 level.

Different superscripts (a–e) within the row indicate significant differences between the heating time at the p<0.05 level.

Fig. 1. Change in parameters obtained from the Maillard reaction (CIE a*, CIE b*, CIE L*, pH, and A420*) marked by (a, b, c, d, and e) in ordinary, ribose-induced and minced veal stored at three temperatures (4°C, −4°C, and −18°C (as a function of heating time at 95°C.

The extracts obtained from the Maillard reaction became darker and more yellowish. As reported by another researcher, the formation of browning polymers (melanoidins) reduces the CIE L* and increases the CIE b* (Morales and Van Boekel, 1998; Tan et al., 2012). Increase in CIE b*, CIE a*, and A420* value may be explained by the formation of yellow pigments in non-enzymatic browning reactions in the meat between amine and lipid oxidation products, increasing at longer heating times (Wang et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2009).

Changes in pH value and color parameters were used as an indicator for the development of the Maillard reaction as indicated by other researchers (Ivanova et al., 2014). Moreover, the present results are in line with those of Tan et al. (2012). The obtained results in this study showed that the extracts of chilled samples heated with ribose had less pH and CIE L* compared with the frozen ones (Table 2). However, CIE b*, CIE a*, and A420* values in the extract of fresh-chilled veal were significantly (p<0.05) higher than frozen-thawed samples (Table 2). Furthermore, the extract yielded from fresh-chilled veal became darker and more yellowish compared with frozen samples, and the extract yielded from frozen meat samples at −18°C became darker and more yellowish compared with super chilled at −4°C (Table 2). This can be attributed to the biochemical changes in the meat proteins during the freezing temperatures and storage conditions which can reduce the access to the basic amino acids participating in the Maillard reaction (Tan et al., 2013). These results are consistent with a similar research conducted by Dalle Zotte et al. (2016) on rabbit meat. They asserted that pH, CIE b*, and CIE a* of the frozen rabbit meat were lower than the non-frozen one (Dalle Zotte et al., 2016).

The pH value was lower in the extracts obtained from fresh-chilled samples in comparison with the frozen ones; the pH of frozen samples was significantly (p<0.05) lower than those stored at higher temperatures (−4°C). Chilled, super-chilled, and frozen veal samples were reduced by 11%, 13%, and 12.5%, respectively (Table 2). This can be ascribed to factors such as loss of basic amine groups and formation of less basic compounds by amine and condensation between the free amino and carbonyl groups of the substrates, yielding organic acids (Beck et al., 1990; Tan et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013).

In this study, the browning intensity of the extract was evaluated by measuring the absorbance at 420 nm with a spectrophotometer as well as the direct analysis of the color. The A420* value increased significantly (p<0.0001) with the increase in the heating time up to 100 min. The A420* value achieved from the extracted fresh-chilled meat was the highest; moreover, the A420* value achieved from the extracted frozen meat sample was higher than the extract of the super-chilled sample, possibly due to the undesirable effects of storage on meat proteins (Fig. 1e). Baranenko et al. (2014) reported that the number of amino acids was significantly reduced in frozen meat in comparison to the fresh meat and at higher temperatures of freezing compared with lower temperatures (−24°C compared to −35°C). This process was expressed by the reaction of the carboxylates and the formation of nitrogen compounds (Baranenko et al., 2014).

Factorial experiment was performed to study the effects of two factors, namely the type of minced veal (X1) (fresh-chilled at 4°C, super chilled at −4°C and frozen meat at −18°C) and the duration of heating (X2) (20, 80, 60, 40, and 100 min), on the output of the Maillard reaction via ribose induction (pH, CIE L*, CIE a*, CIE b* and A420*). The results showed that the impact of X1 and X2 was significant on all variables (p<0.0001) (Table 3). The interaction between X1 and X2 significantly influenced the Maillard reaction parameters, indicating that they did not function independently; therefore, the changes in CIE and A420* values were pertinent to their interactions. The results of this study further showed that with the increase up to 60 min in the heating time, the distance between each parameter increased among the three types of meat stored at different temperatures (Fig. 1). This can be due to the progression of the Maillard reaction and accumulation of the reaction products. However, by raising the heating time up to 100 min, these parameters became closer and the differentiation distance among the three types of meat was reduced (Fig. 1), due to the increased moisture and pH reduction, limiting the Maillard reaction (Easa et al., 1996; Tan et al., 2012). The rate of the reaction is low at the highest or lowest water activity (aw) values (Davidek et al., 1990; Macrae et al., 1993). The effect of pH is highly dependent on the moisture content (Harrison and Dake, 2005). In this study, by ribose induction in veal following the heating, Maillard reaction was developed, yielding increased amounts moisture and reduced pH. The results showed that the A420* value and the browning factor in both fresh and frozen-thawed meat samples were increased by raising the heating time; however, according to the different dendrograms drawn corresponding to different heating times, the highest subtraction was found to be due to the lowest similarity and maximum confidence interval between fresh and frozen-thawed meat at 60 min compared to 80 and 100 min. Moreover, in all parameters, the maximum confidence interval between meat samples stored at three different temperatures was obtained following 60 min heating at 95°C (Fig. 1), which is in accordance with the findings of Tan et al. (2012).

Table 3. The results of the factorial experiment for pH, CIE components, and A420* of ribose-induced Maillard reactions in stored minced veal meat at three temperatures (4°C, −4°C, and −18°C)
Source Type III sum of squares df Mean square F-value p-value
a*
X1 23.094 2 11.547 982.120 <0.0001
X2 652.071 4 163.018 13,865.611 <0.0001
X1×X2 5.733 8 0.717 60.950 <0.0001
Error 1.94 165 0.012
Total 29,936.718 180
b*
X1 255.14 2 127.570 1,930.641 <0.0001
X2 1,180.806 4 295.201 4,467.570 <0.0001
X1×X2 22.540 8 2.818 42.641 <0.0001
Error 10.903 165 0.066
Total 150,871.711 180
L*
X1 152.047 2 76.024 2,152.823 <0.0001
X2 9,536.817 4 2,384.204 67,515.406 <0.0001
X1×X2 8.335 8 1.042 29.504 <0.0001
Error 5.827 165 0.035
Total 250,549.404 180
pH
X1 1.193 2 0.597 132.480 <0.0001
X2 9.265 4 2.316 514.263 <0.0001
X1×X2 0.174 8 0.022 4.839 <0.0001
Error 0.743 165 0.005
Total 4,389.809 180
A420*
X1 0.871 2 0.436 261.805 <0.0001
X2 56.281 4 14.070 8,455.243 <0.0001
X1×X2 0.062 8 0.008 4.663 <0.0001
Error 0.275 165 0.002
Total 276.873 180

X1, type of stored temperature of veal meat (4°C, −4°C, and −18°C); X2, duration of heating (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 min).

Complete linkage ensures that all items in a cluster are within a maximum distance (or minimum similarity) from one another (Johnson and Wichern, 2007). Therefore, in this research, complete linkage clustering was used to group the fresh and frozen-thawed meat samples (4°C, −4°C, and −18°C) with different Maillard reaction parameters over the heating time. After grouping all 36 samples into three statistically significant clusters, all the dendrograms showed similar patterns with different degrees of similarities. A rendered dendrogram relying on 60 min of heating classified the meat samples into statistically significant clusters: cluster 1 (samples 1–12 of super-chilled minced veal), cluster 2 (samples 13–24 of frozen minced veal), and cluster 3 (samples 25–36 of fresh-chilled minced veal), with the lowest similarity (slightly more than 25%) between clusters 12 (cluster 1 and 2 totally) and clusters 3 (Fig. 2). Similarities between these clusters increased at 20 and 100 min of heating time. Therefore, Maillard reaction can further be employed to differentiate between chilled minced veal and frozen-thawed meat. The analysis of the confidence interval has been done for separation purposes by other researchers (Kumar et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2012; Virkler and Lednev, 2009). The results showed no overlap between the two types of meat and the two freezing storage temperatures (−4°C and −18°C). Moreover, fresh-chilled and frozen-thawed meat were significantly different regarding Maillard reaction parameters (p<0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Dendrogram showing the clustering of Maillard reaction parameters (CIE a*, CIE b*, CIE L*, pH, and A420*) of ribose-induced Maillard reaction of minced veal at three temperatures (4°C, −4°C, and −18°C); systems were obtained from a heating treatment of 60 min at 95°C.

Fig. 3 shows the A420* value obtained from fresh-chilled, super-chilled, and frozen samples respectively stored at 4°C, −4°C, and, −18°C, as a function of heating time of 60 min at 95°C with ribose. The results obtained from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve corroborated the suitability of the cut-off value (threshold limit) of 1.25 for the evaluation and differentiation of a minced veal. The A420* cut-off value was used to determine whether the veal samples were previously frozen or not. Therefore, the obtained A420* value should be compared with the cut-off value. The results of this study showed that the procedure is suitable for distinguishing between chilled and frozen-thawed veal using the proposed cut-off value of A420*. The result of the variance analysis was used to compare the mean changes of A420* value between different batches of different calves. The results showed that the A420* value in the frozen-thawed veal stored at −4°C and −18°C was reduced by approximately 17.22±3.53% and 11.68±2.49% compared with fresh-chilled veal. This result further indicated that there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the mean changes of three minced veal stored at −4°C and −18°C compared to 4°C obtained from three different calves (3 batches). According to the results obtained in this study, the possible use of the Maillard reaction for differentiation between fresh and frozen thawed minced veal was suggested instead of the current analytical techniques.

Fig. 3. The A420* value of fresh-chilled, super-chilled, and frozen samples stored at 4°C, −4°C, and −18°C, respectively, as a function of 60 min heating time at 95°C.

## Conclusion

Storage under freezing conditions affects the protein quality of minced veal, thereby impacting its functional characteristics. A420* value was related to the storage duration in both fresh and frozen-thawed meat. Due to denaturation and oxidization proteins, the obtained A420* value of fresh-chilled minced veal was higher than the previously frozen one. On the other hand, A420* value was lower in samples stored at a higher temperature (−4°C), implying the possible applications of the Maillard reaction to reveal the inadequate temperature during frozen storage. The results showed the capability of diagnostic criteria and differentiated between fresh and frozen-thawed minced veal. Nonetheless, more research is required to investigate the impact of the storage temperature, freezing time, repeated freeze-thaw cycles, freezing rate, and type of muscle tissue on ribose-induced Maillard reaction, to try out the proposed method and make it a diagnostic tool for differentiating between fresh and frozen-thawed meat.

## Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by a PhD grant no. 3/41950 from the Research Council of the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

## Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

## References

1.

Ames JM. 1998; Applications of the Maillard reaction in the food industry. Food Chem. 62:431-439

2.

AOAC. 2010 Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edAOAC International. Gaithersburg MD, USA: .

3.

Ashoor SH, Zent JB. 1984; Maillard browning of common amino acids and sugars. J Food Sci. 49:1206-1207

4.

Atanassova S, Stoyanchev T, Yorgov D, Nachev V. 2018; Differentiation of fresh and frozen-thawed poultry breast meat by near infrared spectroscopy. Bulg J Agric Sci. 24:162-168.

5.

Ballin NZ, Lametsch R. 2008; Analytical methods for authentication of fresh vs thawed meat: A review. Meat Sci. 80:151-158

6.

Baranenko D, Kolodyaznaya V, Broyko Y. 2014; Effect of cold treatment on the amino acid composition of veal. Agron Res. 12:705-716.

7.

Beck J, Ledl F, Sengl M, Severin T. 1990; Formation of acids, lactones and esters through the Maillard reaction. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 190:212-216

8.

Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959; A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian J Biochem Physiol. 37:911-917

9.

Chen TH, Zhu YP, Wang P, Han MY, Wei R, Xu XL, Zhou GH. 2016; The use of the impedance measurements to distinguish between fresh and frozen-thawed chicken breast muscle. Meat Sci. 116:151-157

10.

Chen X, Yu J, Cui H, Xia S, Zhang X, Yang B. 2018; Effect of temperature on flavor compounds and sensory characteristics of Maillard reaction products derived from mushroom hydrolysate. Molecules. 23:E247

11.

Dalle Zotte A, Cullere M, Rémignon H, Alberghini L, Paci G. 2016; Meat physical quality and muscle fibre properties of rabbit meat as affected by the sire breed, season, parity order and gender in an organic production system. World Rabbit Sci. 24:145-154

12.

Dalvi-Isfahan M, Hamdami N, Le-Bail A. 2016; Effect of freezing under electrostatic field on the quality of lamb meat. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 37:68-73

13.

Davidek J, Velisek J, Pokorny J. 1990; Chemical changes during food processing (Development in food science). Elsevier. New York, NY, USA: pp p. 230-294.

14.

Easa AM, Armstrong HJ, Mitchell JR, Hill SE, Harding SE, Taylor AJ. 1996; Maillard induced complexes of bovine serum albumin: A dilute solution study. Int J Biol Macromol. 18:297-301

15.

Elahi S, Lawrance P, Topping J, Ellison S, Woolfe M. 2016; Poultry marketing controls – inter-laboratory validation of a method to detect previously frozen chicken breasts by determination of HADH activity. Food Control. 68:186-191

16.

Grunert T, Stephan R, Ehling-Schulz M, Johler S. 2016; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy enables rapid differentiation of fresh and frozen/thawed chicken. Food Control. 60:361-364

17.

Harrison TJ, Dake GR. 2005; An expeditious, high-yielding construction of the food aroma compounds 6-acetyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline. J Org Chem. 70:10872-10874

18.

Hui YH, Cornillon P, Legaretta IG, Lim MH, Murrell KD, Nip WK. 2004 Handbook of frozen foods. Marcel Dekker. New York, NY, USA: .

19.

Ivanova I, Ivanov G, Shikov V, Ivanova S. 2014; Analytical method for differentiation of chilled and frozen-thawed chicken meat. Acta Univ Cibiniensis Ser E Food Technol. 18:43-53

20.

Jiang W, Chen Y, He X, Hu S, Li S, Liu Y. 2018; A study of the tyramine/glucose Maillard reaction: Variables, characterization, cytotoxicity and preliminary application. Food Chem. 239:377-384

21.

Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 2007 Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th edPrentice Hall. Harlow, UK: .

22.

Karangwa E, Murekatete N, de Dieu Habimana J, Masamba K, Duhoranimana E, Muhoza B, Zhang X. 2016; Contribution of crosslinking products in the flavour enhancer processing: The new concept of Maillard peptide in sensory characteristics of Maillard reaction systems. J Food Sci Technol. 53:2863-2875

23.

Kumar M, Gupta RK, Nath K, Rathore RK, Bayu G, Trivedi R, Husain M, Prasad KN, Tripathi RP, Narayana PA. 2008; Can we differentiate true white matter fibers from pseudofibers inside a brain abscess cavity using geometrical diffusion tensor imaging metrics?. NMR Biomed. 21:581-588

24.

Leygonie C, Britz TJ, Hoffman LC. 2012; Impact of freezing and thawing on the quality of meat: Review. Meat Sci. 91:93-98

25.

Macrae R, Robinson RK, Sadler MJ. 1993 Encyclopaedia of food science, food technology, and nutrition. Academic Press. London, UK: .

26.

Meinert L, Schäfer A, Bjergegaard C, Aaslyng MD, Bredie WLP. 2009; Comparison of glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, ribose, and mannose as flavour precursors in pork; the effect of monosaccharide addition on flavour generation. Meat Sci. 81:419-425

27.

Morales FJ, van Boekel MAJS. 1998; A study on advanced Maillard reaction in heated casein/sugar solutions: Colour formation. Int Dairy J. 8:907-915

28.

Rahman MH, Hossain MM, Rahman SME, Hashem MA, Oh DH. 2014; Effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on beef quality and safety. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 34:482-495

29.

Sánchez-Alonso I, Moreno P, Careche M. 2014; Low field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) relaxometry in hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) muscle after different freezing and storage conditions. Food Chem. 153:250-257

30.

Tamanna N, Mahmood N. 2015; Food processing and Maillard reaction products: Effect on human health and nutrition. Int J Food Sci. 2015:526-762

31.

Tan TC, Abbas FMA, Azhar ME. 2012; Characterization of the ribose-induced Maillard reaction in minced chicken and minced pork: A potential means of species differentiation. Int Food Res J. 19:481-489.

32.

Tan TC, Alkarkhi AFM, Easa AM. 2013; Ribose-induced Maillard reaction as a quality index in frozen minced chicken and pork meats. J Food Quality. 36:351-360

33.

Virkler K, Lednev IK. 2009; Blood species identification for forensic purposes using raman spectroscopy combined with advanced statistical analysis. Anal Chem. 81:7773-7777

34.

Wang Z, He Z, Gan X, Li H. 2018; The effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the meat quality of rabbit. World Rabbit Sci. 26:165-177

35.

Xia X, Kong B, Liu Q, Liu J. 2009; Physicochemical change and protein oxidation in porcine Longissimus dorsi as influenced by different freeze–thaw cycles. Meat Sci. 83:239-245

##### Journal Title Change

We announce that the title of our journal and related information were changed as below from January, 2019.

 Before (~2018.12) After (2019.01~) Journal Title Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources Food Science of Animal Resources Journal Abbreviation Korean J. Food Sci. An. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. eISSN 2234-246X 2636-0780 pISSN 1225-8563 2636-0772 Journal Homepage http://www.kosfaj.org Same JCR Citation Indexing SCIE SCIE

I don't want to open this window for a day.