On-Farm and Processing Factors Affecting Rabbit Carcass and Meat Quality Attributes

Sethukali Anand Kumar1,2, Hye-Jin Kim2, Dinesh Darshaka Jayasena3, Cheorun Jo2,4,5,*
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna, Kilinochchi 41000, Sri Lanka
2Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
3Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Export Agriculture, Uva Wellassa University of Sri Lanka, Badulla 90000, Sri Lanka
4Institute of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang 25354, Korea
5Department of Animal Product Technology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Padjadjaran, West Java 45363, Indonesia
*Corresponding author: Cheorun Jo, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, Tel: +82-2-880-4804, Fax: +82-2-873-2271, E-mail:

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Nov 09, 2022 ; Revised: Jan 20, 2023 ; Accepted: Jan 25, 2023

Published Online: Mar 01, 2023


Rabbit meat has high nutritional and dietetic characteristics, but its consumption rate is comparatively lower than other meat types. The nutritional profile of rabbit meat, by comparison with beef, pork, and poultry, is attributed to relatively higher proportions of n-3 fatty acids and low amounts of intramuscular fat, cholesterol, and sodium, indicating its consumption may provide health benefits to consumers. But, the quality attributes of rabbit meat can be originated from different factors such as genetics, environment, diet, rearing system, pre-, peri-, and post-slaughter conditions, and others. Different rabbit breeds and the anatomical location of muscles may also affect the nutritional profile and physicochemical properties of rabbit meat. However, adequate information about the effect of those two factors on rabbit meat is limited. Therefore, cumulative information on nutritional composition and carcass and meat quality attributes of rabbit meat in terms of different breeds and muscle types and associated factors is more important for the production and processing of rabbits. Moreover, some studies reported that rabbit meat proteins exhibited angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory characteristics and antioxidant properties. The aim of this review is to elucidate the determinants of rabbit meat quality of different breeds and its influencing factors. In addition, the proven biological activities of rabbit meat are introduced to ensure consumer satisfaction.

Keywords: meat quality; quality determinants; factors affecting quality; biological activity; rabbit breeds


The total production of rabbit meat worldwide in 2019 reached 883,936 tons. China is the largest rabbit meat-producing country in the world and produced 457,765 tons in 2019 and followed by North Korea (166,879 tons) and Egypt (44,893 tons; FAO, 2020). The worldwide per capita rabbit meat consumption was 0.242 kg in 2012 (Dalle Zotte, 2014). However, as rabbit meat consumption is not prevalent worldwide (Mancini et al., 2020), consumers are generally not aware of its high nutritional quality. Indeed, rabbit meat is characterized by high nutritional and dietetic properties, such as a high n-3/n-6 fatty acids ratio and low amounts of intramuscular fat, cholesterol, and sodium (Hernández et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2016). These excellent characteristics of rabbit meat would satisfy consumers who want to live healthily (Wang et al., 2020). Despite, consumers are reluctant to purchase rabbit meat because it is more expensive than poultry meat (Kallas and Gil, 2012) and has an undesirable typical wild flavor (Hoffman et al., 2004). Due to these reasons, the consumption rate of rabbit meat is still progressively declined (Cullere and Dalle Zotte, 2018). Nevertheless, the consumption rate of rabbit meat could be increased by developing value-added products, such as frozen, smoked, roasted, canned, cured, dried, sauce-picked products, and sausage-typed (Alekseeva et al., 2018; Yang and Li, 2010). Also, the processing would also mask the typical wild flavor of rabbit meat (Hoffman et al., 2004).

Animal husbandry is currently forced to increase meat production as to meet the demand of increasing world population (Ritchie et al., 2017). To meet consumer’s demand, farmers adopt different management practices to increase meat production. The expenses rise when high inputs are invested. To overcome these challenges, it is more important to critically evaluate and analyze the factors associated with production and processing of farm animals. Rabbit meat industry is still under the transititional stage. Although, it has more potential to satisfy consumer’s demand in terms of nutritional profile, but the production and processing sectors are not properly synchronized with the appropriate factors. During the past decades, researchers investigated several studies related to determinants of rabbit meat quality and influencing factors. Accordingly, the effect of genetic, age, environmental, management factors, pre-, peri-, and post-slaughter factors on nutritional characteristics, and carcass and meat quality attributes of rabbit were extensively performed (Apata et al., 2012; Cullere et al., 2018; Dalle Zotte et al., 2009; Paci et al., 2013; Simonová et al., 2020). However, few studies were only given importance to comparing different rabbit breeds and the anatomical location of muscles regardless nutritional composition and physicochemical properties (Dabbou et al., 2017; Martínez-Álvaro et al., 2018; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017; Perna et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2016). Moreover, commercial hybrid rabbits received more attention among reseachers as they have faster growth rate (Liste et al., 2009; Mancini et al., 2018; Mazzone et al., 2010). Nonetheless several studies revealed that other rabbit breeds had almost similar growth performance with high nutritional and meat quality profile than commercial hybrids (Chodová et al., 2014; D’Agata et al., 2009; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017). Therefore, comparison of meat quality of rabbit in terms of breeds will be worthy to understand the specific meat quality for rabbit deeply.

A few studies for bioactivity of rabbit meat was conducted (Chen et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022). Rabbit meat proteins are identified with health benefits, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory characteristics and antioxidant properties (Chen et al., 2021; Permadi et al., 2019). Further, the fatty acid profile of different rabbit breeds and muscle types had excellent nutritional values which helps to prevent some health issues (Dabbou et al., 2017; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017). However, since these researches are still in their infancy, reviewing the study of functionality for rabbits will be worthy positively increasing the consumption of rabbit meat. Therefore, this manuscript reviews the characteristics of rabbit meat and the parameters associated with the meat quality from different breeds. In addition, some recently reported biological activities of rabbit meat are also discussed.

Characteristics of Rabbit Meat by Breeds and Anatomical Location of Muscles

Physicochemical properties

The physicochemical properties of different rabbit breeds were summarized and represented in Table 1. The nutritional composition, including the moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and ash contents of different rabbit breeds were ranging from 62.10%–75.60%, 20.0%–26.18%, 0.44%–6.56%, and 0.67%–1.57%, respectively. Compared with beef, the moisture and protein contents are almost similar (73.87%–77.9% and 20.0%–22.87% respectively; Muchenje et al., 2008). Moreover, the purchasing decision of meat and meat products by consumers is mainly associated with the attractive appearance of the final product (Sujiwo et al., 2019). Overall, the CIE L* of different rabbit breeds ranges from 41.78–65.68. Czech White and Moravian White rabbit breeds had the highest CIE L* of bicep femoris (BF) muscles than Czech gold breeds, still, the Hyplus rabbits had average CIE L* compared to other local breeds (Chodová et al., 2014). Wang et al. (2016) revealed meat colour differences from longissimus lumborum (LL) and BF muscles of three rabbit genotypes, the highest CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b* were reported in Hyla (59.96–63.16), Tianfu Black (5.10–5.46) and Champagne (6.66–6.75) breeds for both muscles, respectively (Table 1). The higher proportion of myoglobin content and the type of muscle fibers might be contributed to more CIE a*, despite it could be affected by other factors such as exercise, diet, and genetic and environmental factors (Joo et al., 2013). In addition, the pH has a significant role in the keeping qualities of meat because it affects the protein structures and degradation, water holding capacity, colour, juiciness, and shelf life (Hulot and Ouhayoun, 1999). The pH range of commercial hybrids rabbit meat was 5.62–5.88 (Liste et al., 2009; Mancini et al., 2018; Mazzone et al., 2010; Paci et al., 2012; Table 1), whereas Vienna Blue and Burgundy Fawn breeds also had a similar pH range of commercial hybrid rabbit (Dalle Zotte et al., 2016). In contrast, the ultimate pH (pHu) of the SIKA breed was lower than hybrids, whilst sex and slaughter age were significantly contributed to this reduction in ultimate pH (Gašperlin et al., 2006). The pH of crossbreds of New Zealand White and California was 6.02–6.08 (Secci et al., 2020) which is almost similar to synthetic line R rabbits (Ramı´rez et al., 2004). Chinese rabbit breeds, such as Hyla (6.56), Champagne (6.48), and Tianfu Black (6.67) had higher pH compared to other rabbit breeds (Table 1; Wang et al., 2016).

Table 1. Physicochemical properties of different rabbit breeds
Breed Moisture CP% CF% Ash% CIE L* CIE a* CIE b* pH References
Pannon White rabbit 75.00 21.97–22.33 1.50–1.53 0.67–1.00 46.91–51.83 0.63–0.76 6.29–8.10 5.57–5.60 Simonová et al., 2020
New Zealand White 72.10–75.24 20.0–25.08 0.44–6.56 1.12–1.57 46.09–63.71 –1.07–6.90 0.34–0.67 5.40–5.75 Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2012; Menchetti et al., 2020; Perna et al., 2019
New Zealand White×California NR NR NR NR 45.69–53.54 3.23–14.88 1.36–5.81 6.02–6.08 Secci et al., 2019; Secci et al., 2020
Grimaud rabbits 62.10–75.11 21.50–22.97 0.87–1.03 1.21–1.25 50.60–54.04 –0.15–5.59 –0.41–6.04 5.38–6.23 Dabbou et al., 2017; Koné et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2019
Chinese rabbits NR NR NR NR 42.13–58.10 6.85–16.81 –15.24–0.54 6.21–6.27 Jia et al., 2017
Vienna Blue NR NR NR NR 53.2–58.2 2.87–3.76 –0.65–2.00 5.69–5.85 Dalle Zotte et al., 2016
Burgundy Fawn NR NR NR NR 53.4–58.6 2.62–4.10 –0.55–2.48 5.72–5.82 Dalle Zotte et al., 2016
Hyla NR NR NR NR 59.96–63.19 3.99–4.09 4.88–6.20 6.56 Wang et al., 2016
Champagne NR NR NR NR 59.31–61.87 4.04–4.63 6.66–6.75 6.48 Wang et al., 2016
Tianfu Black NR NR NR NR 58.54–61.29 5.10–5.46 4.64–5.20 6.67 Wang et al., 2016
Commercial hybrid NR NR NR NR 56.52–62.57 1.04–2.85 1.64–4.05 5.62–5.88 Liste et al., 2009; Mancini et al., 2018; Mazzone et al., 2010
Slow-growing rabbits 74.33–75.61 22.16–23.03 1.04–1.51 1.04–1.51 51.40–58.30 1.60–4.00 1.50–3.40 5.70–6.00 Paci et al., 2013
Local population NR NR NR NR 59.09 3.25 3.78 5.59 Paci et al., 2012
Grey coloured local rabbits 74.45–75.12 22.57–22.94 1.12–1.40 1.20–1.21 53.01–59.15 2.08–2.79 1.63–2.28 5.70–5.92 D’Agata et al., 2009
Spanish rabbit 73.10–75.60 21.00–21.30 1.90–3.90 NR 57.0–60.0 2.92–3.70 –1.13–0.58 NR Pla, 2008
Bianca italiana rabbit NR 24.62–26.18 0.93–1.09 NR NR NR NR 5.72–5.75 Liu et al., 2009
Synthetic Line R rabbits NR NR NR NR 50.17–50.63 5.29–5.86 2.47–2.85 6.00–6.02 Ramı´rez et al., 2004

CP, crude protein; CF, crude fiber; NR, not reported.

Download Excel Table

The proximate composition and pH values of rabbit meat obtained from different anatomical location of muscles was represented in Table 2. In accordance, North et al. (2018) recorded the crude fat content of hind leg muscles of New Zealand White rabbit breeds was in the range of 6.32%–6.56%. However, the crude fat content of longissimus thorasis et lumborum (LTL) muscles of the same rabbit breeds was about two folds lower than hind legs (2.88%–2.92%). Both LTL and hind leg muscles of rabbit meat had approximately 1.20%–1.25% of ash content (Table 2; Dabbou et al., 2017; D’Agata et al., 2009; North et al., 2018; Pla, 2008).

Table 2. Proximate composition and pH values of rabbit meat obtained from different anatomical location of muscles
Muscle Moisture CP% CF% Ash% pH References
LD 66.50–75.50 17.90–24.10 0.44–3.18 0.67–1.57 5.57–6.67 Koné et al., 2016; Mattioli et al., 2017; Simonová et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2016
LL 72.29–75.24 20.62–25.08 0.95–3.04 1.12–1.55 5.38–5.83 D’Agata et al., 2009; Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2012; Paci et al., 2012; Paci et al., 2013; Perna et al., 2019
LTL 73.30–75.11 22.50–26.18 0.87–2.92 1.20–1.25 5.58–6.08 Dabbou et al., 2017; Mancini et al., 2018; Menchetti et al., 2020; North et al., 2018; Secci et al., 2020
BF 72.10–75.60 20.00–22.94 1.12–6.56 1.20–1.25 5.64–6.23 D’Agata et al., 2009; Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2019; Mancini et al., 2018; North et al., 2018; Paci et al., 2013; Pla, 2008

CP, crude protein; CF, crude fiber; LD, Longissimus dorsi; LL, Longissimus lumborum; LTL, Longissimus thorasisetlumborum; BF, Bicep femoris.

Download Excel Table

The LL muscles had lower pH of 5.38–5.83 (D’Agata et al., 2009; Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2012; Paci et al., 2012; Paci et al., 2013; Perna et al., 2019; Table 2) compared to BF muscles (5.64–6.23) in rabbit (D’Agata et al., 2009; Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2016; Koné et al., 2019; Mancini et al., 2018; Paci et al., 2013). These slight differences in pH among different muscles might be from their glycolytic potential (Parigi Bini et al., 1992).

Fatty acids

In terms of total fatty acids, the rabbit breeds such as New Zealand White, Grimaud, Bianca italiana rabbit, Pannon White, and Grey coloured local rabbits had the highest proportion of saturated fatty acid (SFA) and followed by polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA; Dabbou et al., 2017; D’Agata et al., 2009; Dalle Zotte et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Mattioli et al., 2017; Table 3). In contrast, synthetic rabbit lines were shown the highest proportion of PUFA, followed by SFA and MUFA (Martínez-Álvaro et al., 2018; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017 respectively; Table 3). On the other hand, wild rabbits could be recommended as a good source of n-3 fatty acids (6.89%–13.27% of total fatty acids; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017), whilst synthetic rabbit lines have abundant n-6 with about 39.5% of total fatty acids (Martínez-Álvaro et al., 2018). In fact, the composition of fatty acids in different rabbit meat might be varied due to the level and source of fat in the diet added to alter the n-6 to n-3 ratio (Tres et al., 2008).

Table 3. Fatty acids and lipid indices (expressed as %) of different rabbit breeds and anatomical location of muscles
Variable SFA MUFA PUFA n-3 n-6 n3/n6 n6/n3 PUFA/SFA AI TI h/H References
 New Zealand White× California 0.84–36.82 0.63–23.67 NR 0.06–4.68 0.80–37.64 NR 11.32–14.43 NR NR NR NR Secci et al., 2020
 New Zealand White 34.70–50.11 21.00–36.52 20.58–40.70 2.47–4.28 17.21–25.99 0.17–4.40 4.89–9.06 0.90–1.10 0.60–1.25 0.84–2.23 1.54–1.78 Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Mattioli et al., 2017; Perna et al., 2019; Rasinska et al., 2018
 Russian rabbit 19.00–24.30 18.80–46.60 34.40–56.90 NR NR 0.30–0.40 NR NR NR NR NR Alekseeva et al., 2018
 Synthetic rabbit line 38.20 24.80 41.80 2.92 39.50 NR NR NR NR NR NR Martínez-Álvaro et al., 2018
 Wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) 27.67–29.54 12.02–14.47 38.78–41.11 6.89–13.27 25.16–32.00 NR 2.02–4.70 1.32–1.49 0.37–0.43 0.49–0.69 NR Papadomichelakis et al., 2017
 Crossbred (Grimaud) 36.48–42.93 25.90–30.99 26.08–37.46 2.47–9.64 22.94–27.40 NR 2.88–9.30 0.61–1.03 0.52–0.72 0.59–1.14 NR Dabbou et al., 2017
Bianca italiana rabbit 42.22–42.98 26.22–27.03 31.55–32.42 2.04–2.09 29.46–30.38 31.53–32.42 NR 0.75 NR NR RNR Liu et al., 2009
 Pannon White 37.40–38.50 26.10–26.50 35.30–36.00 NR NR NR 7.96–8.51 NR NR NR NR Dalle Zotte et al., 2009
 Grey coloured local rabbits (agouti or wild-type) 36.42–37.85 21.94–23.22 34.18–34.74 2.40–2.46 32.16–32.94 NR 0.52–0.57 0.92–0.94 NR NR NR D’Agata et al., 2009
 Spanish rabbits 41.30–42.60 29.40–35.60 21.90–28.90 2.40–2.70 19.40–25.30 NR 8.10–9.30 NR NR NR NR Pla, 2008
Anatomical location of muscles
 LD 38.20 24.80 41.80 2.92 39.50 NR NR NR NR NR NR Martínez-Álvaro et al., 2018
 LL 27.67–50.11 12.02–36.52 20.58–41.11 3.10–13.27 17.21–32.00 0.17–0.21 2.02–5.55 1.32–1.49 0.37–0.91 0.49–1.47 NR Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017; Perna et al., 2019
 LTL 36.48–42.98 25.90–30.99 26.08–37.46 2.04–9.64 22.94–30.38 NR 2.88–9.30 0.61–1.03 0.52–0.72 0.59–1.14 NR Dabbou et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2009
 Loin muscle 34.70–39.90 21.86–25.40 35.30–39.30 4.11–4.68 35.23–37.64 2.80–3.40 NR 0.90–1.10 NR NR NR Mattioli et al., 2017; Secci et al., 2019
 Hind leg 36.30–40.40 21.00–24.30 34.18–40.70 2.40–2.46 32.16–32.94 3.60–4.40 0.52–0.57 0.91–1.10 NR NR NR Mattioli et al., 2017

SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, mono unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, poly unsaturated fatty acids; AI, atherogenicity index; TI, thrombogenicity index; h/H, hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio; NR, not reported; LD, Longissimus dorsi; LL, Longissimus lumborum; LTL, Longissimus thorasisetlumborum.

Download Excel Table

The high percentage of SFA, followed by PUFA and MUFA pattern were observed in the LL muscle (Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017; Perna et al., 2019), LTL muscles (Dabbou et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2009) and loin muscles (Mattioli et al., 2017; Secci et al., 2019) which are represented in Table 3. The LL muscle was identified as a good nutritive value because it had higher ratios of n-3/n-6, PUFA/SFA, and atherogenicity index (AI; Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Papadomichelakis et al., 2017; Perna et al., 2019) compared to other muscles.

Sensory characteristics

Flavour is one of the sensory attributes that include olfactory (smell and aroma) and gustative (taste) perceptions (Ouhayoun and Dalle Zotte, 1996). Rabbit meat has a typical smell of grass (Li et al., 2018). It has been reported that more than 75 volatile flavor compounds have been found in rabbit meat, including acids, alcohols, ketones, esters, aldehydes, ethers, heterocyclic, and hydrocarbons. Based on the odour-active values, hexanal, nonanal, hexanoic acid, octanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and (E, E)-2,4-decadienal were considered as the key flavor components in rabbit meat (Wang et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2016). Furthermore, furan derivatives, amines, and intermediate aldehydes, especially hexanoic acid, hexanal, pentanal, and 2-pentyl furan, were recommended as the major components for the unique odor of rabbit meat (Xie et al., 2016).

The consumption of rabbit meat by consumers is also affected by this typical grass smell. The problem could be overcomed by the application of deodorizing methods, such as, soaking the rabbit meat in acid, alkali, and brewer’s yeast, which aids to reduce aldehydes in the meat (Li et al., 2018). However, it is a general suggested deodorizing method for rabbit meat because the presence of specific volatile compounds of each rabbit breeds were not yet studied.

Factors Affecting Carcass and Meat Quality Traits of Rabbit

Genetic factor

Genetic improvement of parental lines of rabbits is commonly considered during their selection for growth traits and this might affect carcass composition and meat quality (Pascual and Pla, 2007). In this regard, hybrids or genetic lines for fast growth have been taken into more consideration than local genotypes (Princz et al., 2009). In addition, the potential genetic improvement of rabbit meat characteristics is decided by the occurrence of specific genes in rabbits. Accordingly, Wang et al. (2017) proposed myogenic factor 5 (Myf5) single nucleotide polymorphism could be considered as a potential genetic marker for good meat quality selection in breeding programmes of Ira and Tianfu Black breed since it plays significant roles in muscle fiber formation and transcription of muscle-specific genes (Ujan et al., 2011). Apart from Myf5, calpastatin and myopalladin (MYPN) could also be considered as candidate genes for the genetic improvement of rabbit meat traits (Li et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017). Further, Wang et al. (2017) summarized specific gene sequences in Ira rabbits responsible for different meat qualities. Accordingly, genotypes of GG-AA-AA and AA-AG-AG could be used as genetic markers for increasing intramuscular fat and enhancing meat CIE a* and CIE b* in BF muscles, respectively. Similarly, rabbits with AAACTG haplotypes were used as a genetic marker to determine the good meat quality traits in rabbits. However, molecular genetics and gene sequencing-based studies on different rabbit breeds are more important to detect responsible gene sequences for different meat quality traits.

The genetic variability in physiological characteristics among pure breeds of rabbits is very high; for instance, a Flemish giant rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus) is five times heavier than a Netherlands Dwarf type at the adult weight (Dalle Zotte, 2002). The German giant (Risen)–one of the famous meat-skin type rabbit breeds–had recorded a soft and juicy texture in meat (Alekseeva et al., 2018). Slaughter weights of giant breeds Moravian Blue and the medium breeds Czech White were higher than commercial hybrid Hyplus (Chodová et al., 2014).

It has been identified that local populations had lower carcass yield and poor carcass quality attributes, such as meatiness, fatness, colur of muscles and fat, and meat:bone ratio than hybrid lines at the commercial market weight (about 2.5 kg). In contrast, local genotypes produce heavier carcasses than hybrid lines when they were slaughtered at an older age (D’Agata et al., 2009; Pla, 2008) because an increase in age encouraged them to gain more muscles. Chodová et al. (2014) reported that the weight of hind and loin parts was influenced by the size of breeds and genotype, respectively. Accordingly, the giant breed Moravian Blue had excellent weights for both hind and loin parts compared to commercial hybrid lines. Polak et al. (2006) outlined rabbits originated from the mother line and a hybrid of the father and mother line of SIKA genotypes contributed significant differences in colour parameters except CIE b* and for more tenderness in meat than those of father lines. However, the correlation between genetic lines and carcass quality attributes is very limited. Therefore, in-depth studies on the effect of genotypes of rabbits on carcass and meat quality attributes are necessary to provide a solid interpretation (Paci et al., 2012).


Rabbit meat quality is prominently influenced by the live weight of a rabbit and age at slaughter (Dalle Zotte, 2002; Szendrő et al., 2010). The approximate slaughter weight of a rabbit is 2 kg; however, it varies depending on the needs of the commercial market in different countries (Pascual and Pla, 2007). Several studies conducted that the live weights of rabbits slaughtered at about 70, 80, 90, and 100 days were 1.86–2.24 kg (Perna et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2016), 2.46–2.53 kg (Liu et al., 2009; Mazzone et al., 2010), 2.0–2.49 kg (Mancini et al., 2018; Menchetti et al., 2020; Pla, 2008) and 2.14–3.27 kg (D’Agata et al., 2009; Perna et al., 2019), respectively. However, it was evident that rabbit has a larger proportion of intestinal content, a decrease in carcass recovery percentage, and the reduction of fat deposits (Khalil and Al-Saef, 2008). However, it is difficult to conclude regarding the effect of age on carcass weight because the above-mentioned findings were conducted in different rabbit breeds, reared under different management practices, and changes in environmental conditions.

Bivolarski et al. (2011) demonstrated the effect of weaning age on meat and carcass characters in rabbits. The findings revealed that early-weaned rabbits possessed (21 days) significantly lower live weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage, and pH than normally weaned rabbits (35 days) due to differences in growth performances with respect to their age. As age increases, glycolytic energy metabolism increases, and oxidative metabolism, myoglobin level, and ultimate pH decrease (Dalle Zotte et al., 1996).

Tenderness was positively correlated with intramuscular fat and within age groups. Rabbits at 18 weeks old had tenderer and less fibrous LL muscle than those of 11 weeks old (Gondret et al., 1998). It is generally decreased with an increase in age, in relation to a decline in the solubility of collagen. Hence, Gondret et al. (1998) interpreted that increase in tenderness with age could be partly attributed to the noticeable age-related intramuscular fat content in the LL muscle of rabbits or changes in energy metabolism.

Environmental factors

Animal welfare and environmental enrichment such as temperature, relative humidity, and ventilation had been importantly considered during animal production (D’Agata et al., 2009; Dalle Zotte, 2002; Dalle Zotte et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2012). High ambient temperature is a major stress factor for rabbits because of their non-functional sweat glands (Zeferino et al., 2013). In accordance, ambient temperatures above the evaporative critical temperature (16.5°C in summer and 21.4°C in winter) cause adverse effects on live weight gain, meat quality, and health in rabbits (Marai et al., 2002). A similar pattern of negative results was observed in hybrid rabbits reared under intensive conditions (Zeferino et al., 2013). Moreover, high ambient temperature initiates lipid oxidation in cell membranes and it may also accelerate post-mortem metabolism and biochemical changes in muscle, such as lower pH, higher CIE L*, and drip loss (Sahin and Kucuk, 2003). To alleviate the negative effects of high ambient temperature, diets enriched with natural antioxidants such as polysaccharides and tannins could be used, which protect cells and tissues from lipoperoxidation damage (Liu et al., 2011).

Rabbits are usually kept either in cages or pens under an intensive rearing system. The European rabbit production has outlined the characteristics of the standard fattening system, emphasizing a 10% of mortality rate, 2.70 kg of live weight at slaughter, 2.85 feed conversion ratio, and 79 days old of age at slaughter. The climate change values are increased by the longer rearing of rabbits than the standard period, whereas, emissions from manure are also contributed to acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, and elevate CO2 and CH4 levels in the rabbit farm. These all direct and indirect inputs and emissions influence on rabbit production efficiency. The cage housing system is mainly used to keep bucks and does individually made by either wire-meshed nets or wood or bamboo, whereas, the pen housing system is widely applied for fattening or weaned rabbits kept as a group. The growth performance and meat yield are generally higher in farm animals reared under intensive than extensive rearing system.

In contrast, rabbits kept in outdoor housing system had higher slaughter weights than those of indoor rabbits (2,535 g vs 2,137 g; p<0.01), while carcass yield was higher in rabbits kept in indoor housing system (57.8% vs 58.4%; p<0.05) due to the higher skin percentage in outdoor rabbits (D’Agata et al., 2009). However, housing systems do not significantly influence on meat to bone ratio, and textural measurements, in particular, shear force in rabbits (D’Agata et al., 2009; Secci et al., 2019). Further, Dalle Zotte et al. (2009) demonstrated the effect of interactions of housing systems (cage vs pen) and gnawing stick, as well as, floor type (wire mesh vs. plastic net) and gnawing stick on rabbit meat quality. Accordingly, slaughter weight and the weight of hot and chilled carcasses were significantly affected by both types of interactions, in contrast, slaughter yield percentage, reference carcasses percentage, and meat to bone ratio were not significantly affected by them.

Meanwhile, several studies were conducted on obtaining rabbit meat from less intensive rearing system. For that, they evaluate the effect of stocking density, floor type, and group size on rabbit meat quality in order to find out the suitable alternative rearing methods for rabbits maintained in intensive management production (Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Szendrő and Dalle Zotte, 2011). Stocking density is one of the important factor in terms of production aspects and well being of rabbits. Paci et al. (2013) reported that dressing percentage, slaughter weight, pHu and meat to bone ratio were not generally affected by the different stocking densities of rabbits. But, rabbits kept at 2.5 rabbits/m2 had slightly higher dressing out percentages compared with 5 and 16 rabbits/m2 because of the higher frequency of aggressiveness and stressful conditions (Matics et al., 2014). Apart from that, the pHu values of LL and BF muscles of the 16 rabbits/cage group showed significantly higher than the 8 and 4 rabbits/cage groups (Paci et al., 2013). Trocino et al. (2004) studied the effect of two stocking densities (12.1 rabbits/m2 and 16.0 rabbits/m2) and compared two-floor types (galvanized wire net and galvanized steel bars) within cages on meat quality traits of rabbits slaughtered at 71 days of age. However, these conditions did not significantly influence muscle to bone ratio (7.98 vs. 7.89; 7.96 vs. 7.91 respectively) and cold dressing out percentage (58.7 vs. 58.9; 58.8 vs. 58.7, respectively). On the other hand, dressing out percentage, skin percentage, and meat to bone ratio were significantly affected by group size on rabbit carcass traits (Paci et al., 2013).


Once rabbits are selected for fast growth, proper feeding management should also be considered to provide the optimum level of digestible energy (DE), crude protein, crude fiber, and other feed additives which significantly enhance the carcass attributes. Previous research has compared the effect of ad libitum and restricted feeding on growth performance, and carcass and meat quality characteristics (Metzger et al., 2008). In addition, the inclusion of feed alternatives in animal feed is one of the effective modes to enhance rapid growth and sustainability. Plenty of alternatives such as probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, herbs and herbal extracts, enzymes, proteins, fatty acids, vitamins, and selenium were tested in rabbits to stabilize and improve health, and to increase the ultimate production and economic viability of rabbit farms (Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; Simonová et al., 2020).

Dalle Zotte et al. (1996) demonstrated that diet with a high energy content (12.16 MJ/kg) fed to rabbits from post-weaning to slaughter enhanced dissectible fat content and decreased the pHu in LL muscle. Similar results were observed by Carraro et al. (2007) when the starch level of feed was increased from 120 to 180 g/kg. In addition, Xiccato et al. (2002) reported that increasing starch content in feed enhanced slaughter yield in rabbits. However, increasing the dietary starch to acid detergent fiber (ADF) ratio during the fattening period did not affect the slaughter yield, carcass adiposity, and meatiness (Sartori et al., 2003).

Increasing crude fibre content (138, 163, and 198 g/kg) and decreasing energy level (10.2, 9.3, and 8.6 MJ/kg) in feed did not significantly affect the slaughter yield, carcass meatiness, or fatness in a rabbit. However, rabbits fed a more fibrous diet resulted in significantly leaner hind legs (Parigi Bini et al., 1992). These findings were further confirmed by the study of Carrilho et al. (2009); neither dietary crude fibre content nor the digestible fibre to ADF ratio affected carcass or meat quality.

A greater muscle growth would be gained, if the feed contains 10.5–11.0 g/MJ of digestible protein (DP) to DE ratio because it allows for the maximum expression of muscle protein synthesis. Increasing the ratio of DP to DE above 12 g/MJ caused significant reductions in dissectible fat deposit, whereas, above 14 g/MJ reduced meatiness in rabbit meat (Dalle Zotte, 2002). Furthermore, Carabaño et al. (2008) recommended adopting protein levels of 140 g/kg in commercial feeds from weaning to slaughter to improve the quality traits of rabbit meat.

Feed restriction could be either quantitative in terms of the proportion of restriction of the ad libitum intake and length or qualitative by lowering DE to less than 9.2 MJ/kg to improve the feed conversion ratio (Hernández and Zotte, 2010). The maximum outcome was achieved by early feed restriction followed by ad libitum feed intake (DE greater than 10.45 MJ/kg) because late restriction, after 56 days of age, reduced rabbit loin and perirenal fat incidence. Regarding meat and carcass quality traits, quantitative feed restriction in rabbits (less than 85% of the ad libitum diet) highly influenced on slaughter yield, carcass adiposity, and lipid content, whereas increased cooking loss, higher CIE L*, and lower CIE a* in longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle were observed in rabbit meat reared at 85%–90% of feed restriction from 4 weeks to slaughter at 11 weeks of age (Metzger et al., 2008). Larzul et al. (2004) practiced restricted feeding for Rex du Poitou® breed from 8 to 18 weeks of age to limit the carcass adiposity and to achieve the French standard slaughter weight (2.4 kg). Further, feed restriction in rabbits lowered the meat to bone ratio and intramuscular fat content in LD muscle (Hernández and Zotte, 2010). Comparatively, rabbits fed ad libitum were heavier and fattier and had a higher dressing percentage and proportion of muscle than those exposed to restricted feeding (Larzul et al., 2004).

Probiotics are integrated with rabbit rations to improve gut immunity, digestion, gastrointestinal microflora, and enzymatic activity (Lauková et al., 2016; Simonová et al., 2020). In addition, feed supplemented with probiotics contributed to an increase in body weight (Lauková et al., 2016; Matusevičius et al., 2006; Simonová et al., 2020). However, dietary supplementation with prebiotics did not enhance the conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) in rabbit meat (Mattioli et al., 2017).

Supplementation of the diet with vitamin C and vitamin E has been found to reduce lipid oxidation in rabbit meat during different storage conditions (Castellini et al., 2001). Besides studies related to the inclusion of vitamin E in rabbit diet have increased body weight, dressing percentage, and hot carcass weight and reduced drip loss in meat (Eiben et al., 2011). In general, herbs and extracts of spices comprise phytochemical compounds such as phenolic compounds and tannins which act as natural antioxidants (Dalle Zotte et al., 2016; López de Dicastillo et al., 2017). Interestingly, the use of antioxidants (vitamin E) in rabbit diets manipulated the composition of tissue lipids with a high PUFA content and also enhanced the oxidative stability of meat (Hernández, 2008). Supplementation of α-tocopherol in the diet had a strong relationship with meat and carcass quality traits of rabbits (Dal Bosco et al., 2001). Accordingly, rabbits fed α-tocopheryl acetate (240 mg/kg) had significantly greater body weight at slaughter and carcass weight, and also improve oxidative stability and overall quality of meat (Ebeid et al., 2013). On the other hand, α-tocopherol at 100 mg/kg of feed increased its content in rabbit meat by three folds (Tres et al., 2008).

Inclusion of dietary fat in low or moderate concentrations (20–60 g/kg and 3%–6%, respectively) increased the carcass yield and total dissectible fat level in rabbit meat (Meineri et al., 2010). Moreover, it influenced the physical properties of rabbit meat with increases in pHu and cooking loss (Meineri et al., 2010). Tres et al. (2008) evaluated the effects of replacing beef tallow added to rabbit feeds with different levels (0%, 1.5%, and 3%) of sunflower and linseed oil. Replacement of beef tallow by vegetable fats enhanced PUFA, however, the 3% inclusion of linseed oil in feed increased meat oxidation and reduced its oxidative stability. Perilla (Perilla frutescens) seeds supplemented diet increased CIE a* in BF than LD muscle in rabbits (Peiretti et al., 2011). Petacchi et al. (2005) marked that the inclusion of dietary CLA in the diet increased the amount of CLA in the intramuscular lipids of rabbits and lean tissue deposition (Corino et al., 2003). However, the efficiency depends on the age of the rabbit and the dosage level of CLA supplementation (Corino et al., 2002). For instance, high inclusion level of CLA in the diet at about 5 g/kg significantly decreased lipid content in rabbit meat (Corino et al., 2003).

Alagón et al. (2015) studied the effect of dietary inclusion of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) on carcass and meat quality of rabbits and found no significant differences in intramuscular fat, water holding capacity, cooking loss, and textural parameters at an inclusion level. However, barley and corn DDGS increased dissectible fat percentage whereas wheat DDGS enhanced the CIE a* of meat. Rabbits fed a higher dosage (2 kg/t) of natural extract from Lippia citriodora showed higher tenderness and juiciness in meat compared to a low dosage of 1 kg/t (Palazzo et al., 2015). In addition, rabbits fed byproducts of tomato processing (3%) had significantly higher slaughter weight and dressing out percentage and lower proportions of liver and kidney than rabbits fed with 6% (Peiretti et al., 2013). Rabbits fed 0.2% oregano (Origanum vulgare) and 0.1% oregano+0.1% rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) had significantly (p<0.01) higher carcass weight, live weight, and average daily gain compared with those fed 0.2% rosemary (Cardinali et al., 2015).

Moderate inclusion of indigenous feedstuff (alfalfa hay, barley, and wheat bran; 65%) in rabbit diet significantly improved slaughter weight and dressing percentage compared to low (42.5%) and higher (87.5%) inclusions. Peiretti and Meineri (2011) observed greater slaughter weights and dressing percentages in rabbits fed blue-green algae (Spirulina platensis) at 100 g/kg. In contrast, rabbits fed with blue-green algae at 150 g/kg than 50 g/kg and 100 g/kg of inclusion led to a lower proportion of leg and breast parts. Increasing levels of Spirulina declined omega-3 PUFA, but elevated lipid oxidation lowered the carcass and meat quality.

Pre-slaughter conditions

Pre-slaughter and post-slaughter handling have identified that it has less impact on the meat quality of rabbits as it is lean meat compared to other species (Ouhayoun, 1992). Despite this, literature still revealed that pre-slaughter conditions influenced on the ante and post-mortem biochemical processes and, therefore, meat quality of rabbits (Sabuncuoglu et al., 2011).

Starvation affects the pHu of muscle, reduces carcass yield, and, of course, animal welfare (María et al., 2006). Cavani and Petracci (2004) revealed increasing time duration of fasting causes body weight losses in rabbits. Accordingly, weight loss occurred about 3%–6% and 8%–12% of their body weight when rabbits were allowed for 12 hours and 36–48 hours of fasting, respectively.

Lambertini et al. (2006) reported that the longer transport time significantly lowered the slaughter weight compared to animals transported for the shortest time (4 hours: 2,422 g vs. 1 hour: 2,488 g; p<0.01). But dressing percentage was similar in both treatments with no significant differences (61.3%). The pH value of meat at 24 hours exhibited significant differences concerning transport time (4 hours: 6.01 vs. 2 hours: 5.88; p<0.05) because shorter transportation promotes the meat acidification process by accumulating lactate in muscles. Trocino et al. (2003) emphasized weight loss occurred in rabbits due to dehydration when they were exposed to 6–8 hours of transport, thus, lowering meat quality.

Lairage is a place where rabbits are unloaded from the truck and wait for slaughtering in designated holding pens (Składanowska-Baryza and Stanisz, 2019). The corticosterone level elevates in the blood of rabbits when they are prone to stress, including transportation stress (Składanowska-Baryza et al., 2018). The elevated cortisol level in the blood is associated with lower meatiness and causes stress before slaughter. It tends to reduce pH, lower water binding capacity, lighter colour and possibly tough meat. The lairage time minimizes the consequences of transport stress and decreases corticosterone levels (Verga et al., 2009). Liste et al. (2009) reported similar results. Accordingly, the corticosterone level was significantly higher in rabbits after 2 hours of lairage compared to 8 hours. Both treatments recorded almost the same pH values (5.8), but 2 hours of lairage had higher scores for tenderness than 8 hours of lairage (Liste et al., 2009).

Stunning is practiced to minimize the suffering and pain of animals. There are various stunning methods, including electrical, mechanical, and gas stunning (Apata et al., 2012). According to Składanowska-Baryza et al. (2020), body weight at slaughter was high in rabbits stunned by hitting the head with a narrow rod compared to those of non-penetrating captive bolt and electrical stunning (49 V for 15 seconds) methods. High dressing out percentage and lower pH at 24 hours after slaughtering were observed in electrically stunned rabbits than in mechanically stunned rabbits (Składanowska-Baryza et al., 2020). The pH of muscles 24 hours post-mortem from mechanically stunned rabbits was lower compared to the electrically stunned animals (Lafuente and López, 2014). Tenderness and juiciness were improved in high voltage and frequency (130 V and 172 Hz) than in medium voltage and frequency levels (49 V and 250 Hz). Mechanical stunned rabbits had high body weight compared to electrically stunned rabbits. López et al. (2008) compared electrical stunning to the halal slaughter and found that the performance of the halal slaughter does not negatively affect instrumental meat quality characteristics. They further found that the pH at 24 hours post-mortem was lower in meat from animals submitted to halal slaughter compared to those electrically stunned (49 V and 250 Hz for less than 2 seconds). It could be the result of lower lactic acid content in the muscles post-mortem. Apata et al. (2012) outlined all palatability traits were better in meat from rabbits stunned with gas compared to halal slaughter, in which, cooking loss, thermal shortening, and drip loss of meat were lower when the rabbits were stunned with gas.

During loading and unloading, body parts may injure and it causes bruises in carcasses, especially the thoracic region, legs, and inner loin (Buil et al., 2004). Similar meat defects might happen during the transportation, e.g. cage position and lying during transport. Nonetheless, the position of the truck (top, middle, and bottom) in the multi-floor cage rolling stand did not influence meat quality measurements (María et al., 2006). Mazzone et al. (2010) stated loading methods did not significantly affect meat quality traits, mainly pHu and pH loss.

Post-slaughter processing factors

Post-slaughter phase is one of the crucial points in rabbit production which can influence meat and carcass quality (Cavani et al., 2009). Thus, proper storage temperature and packaging method should be adopted to maintain the integrity of the carcass quality. Storage temperature can affect the changes in meat quality (Lan et al., 2016). Low-temperature storage above or below its freezing point is one of the preservation techniques used to keep the freshness of meat (Zhou et al., 2010). Conventional chilling, super-chilling, and frozen methods are applied to preserve rabbit meat (Cullere et al., 2018; Jia et al., 2017). Wang et al. (2018) interpreted the changes in metmyoglobin (MetMb) proportion in rabbit meat stored in refrigerated and super-chilling storage conditions. Accordingly, the percentage of MetMb was comparatively higher in refrigerated conditions than in super-chilling over the storage period. It might be in super-chilling and the redox stability of myoglobin (Wang et al., 2018).

Both fresh and processed rabbit meat products are generally chilled and frozen (Li et al., 2018). In terms of shelf life, frozen rabbit meat has an extended shelf life. However, the physicochemical properties and sensory quality of frozen rabbits are naturally altered during storage and thawing (Lan et al., 2016). Regarding pH, rabbit meat stored at –12°C and –18°C did not exhibit significant differences over the storage period. But samples stored at 4°C were gradually increased, meanwhile, samples at –4°C showed a decline for 10 days and increased during the rest of the storage period (Wang et al., 2020). However, samples stored at 4°C, –4°C, –12°C, and –18°C revealed similar patterns with regards to colour parameters, as increasing trends for CIE L* and CIE a* and decreasing trends for CIE b*. Secci et al. (2020) reported that the use of mirrors in the free-range areas had a significant difference in weight loss, pH, and colour of rabbit meat stored at –10°C for 80 days. In contrast, the interaction between storage and farming systems did not indicate any significant difference in weight loss, pH, and CIE L*, except CIE a* (p<0.05). Wang et al. (2018) verified the amount of MetMb in rabbit meat considerably increased (p<0.05) until 10 days of super-chilled storage (–3.5±0.5°C) and remained constant thereafter (p>0.05). Moreover, Lan et al. (2016) reported that the chilling method lowered the drip loss of rabbit hind legs compared with the super-chilled method. In addition, a higher drip loss was displayed in rabbit meat stored at –2.5°C compared with the samples stored at –4°C. This might be occurred due to the consequences of a higher rate of proteolysis at higher temperatures caused by the activity of bacterial enzymes and endogenous enzymes (Olsson et al., 2007).

Apart from low-temperature storage, proper packaging could be an alternative strategy to preserve rabbit meat from oxidation as species-specific characteristics, management, and environmental conditions make rabbit meat susceptible to oxidative phenomena (Lorenzo et al., 2014). Pereira and Malfeito-Ferreira (2015) compared the different packing methods on rabbit meat quality. Accordingly, rabbit carcasses packed in bulk, packed under air, and in a modified atmosphere (30% O2: 40% CO2: 30% N2) exhibited a pH varied between 6.01–6.36. Similarly, Rodríguez-Calleja et al. (2010) mentioned the time of chilled storage at 3±1°C of rabbit meat packaged under vacuum, 100% CO2, and a commercial gas blend (35% CO2: 35% O2: 30% N2) did not significantly affect the pH. They recommended the commercial atmosphere as the most effective method to maintain the rabbit meat color. Dal Bosco et al. (2018) outlined that the time of storage and the packaging affected the oxidative status of rabbit meat under the retail display and the packaging method itself significantly reduced the antioxidant content of loin meat.

Biological Activities of Rabbit Meat

Fatty acids in cardiovascular health

In terms of the nutritive value of foods, the Department of Health and Social Security (1994) London, recommended a ratio of 0.45 or higher for PUFA/SFA in foods to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Accordingly, wild rabbits had the highest PUFA/SFA ratio of 1.32–1.49 (Papadomichelakis et al., 2017) compared to other commercial rabbit breeds. New Zealand White rabbits (0.9–1.1; Mattioli et al., 2017), Grimaud breeds (0.61–1.03; Dabbou et al., 2017), and Grey-coloured rabbit breeds (0.92–0.94; D’Agata et al., 2009) had also better PUFA/SFA ratio than the recommended level. Also, the n3/n6 fatty acids ratio is recommended greater than 1.0 for a well-balanced diet (Bhardwaj et al., 2016). Mattioli et al. (2017) reported New Zealand White breed satisfied the recommended ratio of n3/n6 fatty acids (2.8–4.4). The cholesterol effect of a fat source is expressed by a ratio of hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic (h/H; Sinanoglou et al., 2015). New Zealand White breeds had approximately 1.54–1.78 (Rasinska et al., 2018) compared to other rabbit breeds. The AI and thrombogenicity index (TI) should be lower than 1.0 in foods for atherosclerosis and thrombosis prevention, respectively (Bobe et al., 2004). In this regard, wild rabbits satisfied both AI (0.3–0.43) and TI (0.49–0.69) indices within the recommended level (Papadomichelakis et al., 2017). Grimaud breed had better AI (0.52–0.72), however, TI (0.59–1.14) somewhat exceeded the recommended level (Dabbou et al., 2017).

Antihypertensive properties

Rabbit meat is also considered as a healthy meat food and suggested for patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases (Chen et al., 2021). Synthetic ACE inhibitors are broadly used to control hypertension, however, long-term intake of such synthetic drugs can lead to cause side effects such as decreased kidney function and increased risk of lung cancer (Hicks et al., 2018). Hence, ACE-inhibitory peptides derived from natural sources could provide safer therapies (Chen et al., 2022).

Proteins in rabbit meat are primarily found in the muscle (Chen et al., 2021). Chen et al. (2022) reported that proteins in rabbit meat represent an abundant source of potential bioactive peptides that could be a suitable material for preparing ACE-inhibitory peptides. Because MYH13 (0.0587 μM–1) and collagen proteins (0.0396–0.0518 μM–1) of rabbit meat had significantly higher ACE inhibitory potential (Chen et al., 2022). Hernández and Zotte (2010) stated that rabbit meat had amino acids that could potentially be as ACE inhibitors. Not only meat proteins but also hydrolysates of rabbit meat protein extracted using trypsin had high ACE inhibitory activity than pepsin and pancreatic enzyme (Permadi et al., 2019). The concentration of inhibitor (IC50) of a peptide should be ranged from 0.32 to 1,000 μM to reduce blood pressure (Panyayai et al., 2018). Chen et al. (2021) detected a novel ACE inhibitory peptide in rabbit meat protein hydrolysate, named ACE inhibitory tetrapeptide Trp-Gly-Ala-Pro (WGAP) which exhibited an ACE inhibition IC50 of 140.70±4.51 μM. It apparently says that WGAP in rabbit meat protein hydrolysate had the potential to reduce blood pressure and Chen et al. (2021) proved that 100 mg/kg WGAP significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive rats by up to 42.66±2.87 and 28.56±2.71 mmHg, respectively, after 4 hours of oral administration. It apparently interprets rabbit meat as a natural source of potent ACE inhibitory peptides and a promising functional food for the treatment of hypertension.

Antioxidant properties

The presence of three enzymes, such as catalase, glutathione peroxide (GSH-Px), and superoxide dismutase have been used to evaluate the antioxidant properties of meat (Ighodaro and Akinloye, 2018). Both catalase and GSH-Px break down hydrogen peroxide into harmless molecules, including oxygen and water. Removal of hydrogen peroxide by catalase enzyme inhibits lipid oxidation in stored meats, and GSH-Px has an excellent ability to reduce a large number of hydrogen peroxide processes (Decker and Xu, 1998). Hernández et al. (2002) stated the activity of GSH-Px in rabbit meat was good enough to control lipid oxidation compared to chicken, beef, and pork. Nonetheless, GSH-Px becomes less stable in refrigerator storage than catalase enzyme. The concentration of antioxidant enzymes including GSH-Px, superoxide dismutase, and aspartate aminotransferase were increased in rabbit hind limb fed with fermented Hybrid pennisetum silage with Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici (Shah et al., 2020). These findings demonstrated that the direct antioxidant properties of rabbit meat are very limited and intentionally manipulated by feeding feed additives and vitamin supplementations. Therefore, further studies are required to provide the underlying concept of the direct antioxidant properties of rabbit meat.

Future Perspectives for the Rabbit Meat Industry

Rabbit has more potential for commercial-level meat production as it has a shorter life cycle, and shorter gestation period, produces a large number of progenies, and has more tolerance to changes in environmental conditions. It has a comparatively faster growth rate and achieves about 2–2.5 kg of body weight within 3–4 months but it depends on diet and other management practices. It is noteworthy that well-planned and effective rabbit farming leads to continuous mass production. It helps producers to obtain an adequate quantity of raw meat for further processing. Consequently, it creates a platform for new enterprises and inventors. But the weak point in rabbit production is not having a well-structured distribution channel from suppliers, processors, wholesalers, and retailers to consumers. This has to be overcome in advance, before starting the mass production of rabbits.

Consumer’s priority is highly given to convenient meat products as it requires less time for food preparation and consumption, and clean-up (Brunner et al., 2010). But rabbit meat is mainly sold in the form of whole carcasses and cut-ups, less in the form of processed meat products (Petracci and Cavani, 2013). In order to drive the rabbit meat market, it is necessary to introduce a wide range of processed rabbit meat products into the commercial market. Moreover, rabbit meat-based dishes are linked with traditional recipes, take a long preparation time, and needed specific culinary skills to produce authentic attributes (Albonetti et al., 2017), which reduces the interest of consumers to purchase rabbit meat. This issue could be overcome by producing such products in the form of ready-to-cook and ready-to-eat products. Thus, rabbit meat consumption among consumers was expected to increase.

Consumers are unaware about nutritional importance of rabbit meat. Indeed, the nutritional profile of rabbit meat is excellent and also recommended for children by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to its chemical composition (Cullere and Dalle Zotte, 2018). However, this information has not yet reached a majority of consumers due to a lack of communication. It has to be widespread via proper marketing strategies, such as social networks, advertisements, magazines, and articles. Further, meat processors should design attractive labelling on rabbit meat products highlighting the significance of the products, approved by the WHO, children-oriented products, etc.

Extensive research studies revealed that the oxidative stability of rabbit meat and meat products was enhanced using different herbs and spices, essential oils, and feed additives. However, limited research studies were conducted on other biological activities of rabbit meat and meat products, such as anti-hypertensive, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, and anti-inflammatory. Carcass and meat qualities were influenced by many factors including genetics, breed, age and weight, management practices, environments, and pre- and post-slaughter conditions. However, the aforementioned factors have not been analyzed in detail to provide a solid conclusion on the meat and carcass qualities of rabbit meat. The recent consumption rate of rabbit meat is comparatively lower than other meat types. Thus, consumer perception regarding the nutritional and functional characteristics of rabbit meat is the initial step to be taken to promote the consumption of rabbit meat and its meat products.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.


This work was carried out with the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korea (No. NRF-2022R1A2C1005235).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Anand Kumar S, Kim HJ, Jayasena DD, Jo C. Methodology: Anand Kumar S, Kim HJ. Writing - original draft: Anand Kumar S, Kim HJ. Writing - review & editing: Anand Kumar S, Kim HJ, Jayasena DD, Jo C.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.



Alagón G, Arce O, Serrano P, Ródenas L, Martínez-Paredes E, Cervera C, Pascual JJ, Pascual M. 2015; Effect of feeding diets containing barley, wheat and corn distillers dried grains with solubles on carcass traits and meat quality in growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 101:56-62


Albonetti S, Minardi P, Trombetti F, Savigni F, Mordenti AL, Baranzoni GM, Trivisano C, Greco FP, Badiani A. 2017; In vivo and in vitro effects of selected antioxidants on rabbit meat microbiota. Meat Sci. 123:88-96


Alekseeva LV, Lukyanov AA, Bogdanova OV. 2018; Biologically active substance application efficiency for meat rabbit breeding. EurAsian J Biosci. 12:431-435.


Apata ES, Eniolorunda OO, Amao KE, Okubanjo AO. 2012; Quality evaluation of rabbit meat as affected by different stunning methods. Int J Agric Sci. 2:54.


Bhardwaj K, Verma N, Trivedi RK, Bhardwaj S, Shukla N. 2016; Significance of ratio of omega-3 and omega-6 in human health with special reference to flaxseed oil. Int J Biol Chem. 10:1-6


Bivolarski B, Vachkova E, Ribarski S, Uzunova K, Pavlov D. 2011; Amino acid content and biological value of rabbit meat proteins, depending on weaning age. Bulg J Vet Med. 14:94-102.


Bobe G, Young JW, Beitz DC. 2004; Invited review: Pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87:3105-3124


Brunner TA, van der Horst K, Siegrist M. 2010; Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption. Appetite. 55:498-506


Buil T, Maria GA, Villarroel M, Liste G, López M. 2004; Critical points in the transport of commercial rabbits to slaughter in Spain that could compromise animals’ welfare. World Rabbit Sci. 12:269-279


Carabaño R, Badiola I, Chamorro S, García J, García-Ruiz AI, García-Rebollar P, Gómez-Conde MS, Gutiérrez I, Nicodemus N, Villamide MJ, de Blas JC. 2008; New trends in rabbit feeding: Influence of nutrition on intestinal health. Span J Agric Res. 6:15-25


Cardinali R, Cullere M, Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Ruggeri S, Mattioli S, Castellini C, Trabalza Marinucci M, Dalle Zotte A. 2015; Oregano, rosemary and vitamin E dietary supplementation in growing rabbits: Effect on growth performance, carcass traits, bone development and meat chemical composition. Livest Sci. 175:83-89


Carraro L, Trocino A, Fragkiadakis M, Xiccato G, Radaelli G. 2007; Digestible fibre to ADF ratio and starch level in diets for growing rabbits. Ital J Anim Sci. 6:752-754


Carrilho MC, Campo MM, Olleta JL, Beltrán JA, López M. 2009; Effect of diet, slaughter weight and sex on instrumental and sensory meat characteristics in rabbits. Meat Sci. 82:37-43


Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, Bernardini M. 2001; Improvement of lipid stability of rabbit meat by vitamin E and C administration. J Sci Food Agric. 81:46-53


Cavani C, Petracci M. 2004; Rabbit meat processing and traceability. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, Puebla, Mexicopp p. 1318-1336


Cavani C, Petracci M, Trocino A, Xiccato G. 2009; Advances in research on poultry and rabbit meat quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:741-750


Chen J, Yu X, Chen Q, Wu Q, He Q. 2022; Screening and mechanisms of novel angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from rabbit meat proteins: A combined in silico and in vitro study. Food Chem. 370:131070


Chen J, Yu X, Huang W, Wang C, He Q. 2021; A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from rabbit meat protein hydrolysate: Identification, molecular mechanism, and antihypertensive effect in vivo. Food Funct. 12:12077-12086


Chodová D, Tůmová E, Martinec M, Bízková Z, Skřivanová V, Volek Z, Zita L. 2014; Effect of housing system and genotype on rabbit meat quality. Czech J Anim Sci. 59:190-199


Corino C, Magni S, Pastorelli G, Rossi R, Mourot J. 2003; Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on meat quality, lipid metabolism, and sensory characteristics of dry-cured hams from heavy pigs. J Anim Sci. 81:2219-2229


Corino C, Mourot J, Magni S, Pastorelli G, Rosi F. 2002; Influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on growth, meat quality, lipogenesis, plasma leptin and physiological variables of lipid metabolism in rabbits. J Anim Sci. 80:1020-1028


Cullere M, Dalle Zotte A. 2018; Rabbit meat production and consumption: State of knowledge and future perspectives. Meat Sci. 143:137-146


Cullere M, Dalle Zotte A, Tasoniero G, Giaccone V, Szendrő Z, Szín M, Odermatt M, Gerencsér Z, Dal Bosco A, Matics Z. 2018; Effect of diet and packaging system on the microbial status, pH, color and sensory traits of rabbit meat evaluated during chilled storage. Meat Sci. 141:36-43


Dabbou S, Gai F, Renna M, Rotolo L, Dabbou S, Lussiana C, Kovitvadhi A, Brugiapaglia A, De Marco M, Helal AN, Zoccarato I, Gasco L. 2017; Inclusion of bilberry pomace in rabbit diets: Effects on carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Sci. 124:77-83


D’Agata M, Preziuso G, Russo C, Dalle Zotte A, Mourvaki E, Paci G. 2009; Effect of an outdoor rearing system on the welfare, growth performance, carcass and meat quality of a slow-growing rabbit population. Meat Sci. 83:691-696


Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, Bernardini M. 2001; Nutritional quality of rabbit meat as affected by cooking procedure and dietary vitamin E. J Food Sci. 66:1047-1051


Dal Bosco A, Mattioli S, Cullere M, Szendrő Z, Gerencsér Z, Matics Z, Castellini C, Szin M, Dalle Zotte A. 2018; Effect of diet and packaging system on the oxidative status and polyunsaturated fatty acid content of rabbit meat during retail display. Meat Sci. 143:46-51


Dal Bosco A, Mourvaki E, Cardinali R, Servili M, Sebastiani B, Ruggeri S, Mattioli S, Taticchi A, Esposto S, Castellini C. 2012; Effect of dietary supplementation with olive pomaces on the performance and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 92:783-788


Dalle Zotte A. 2002; Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livest Prod Sci. 75:11-32


Dalle Zotte A. 2014; Rabbit farming for meat purposes. Anim Front. 4:62-67


Dalle Zotte A, Cullere M, Rémignon H, Alberghini L, Paci G. 2016; Meat physical quality and muscle fibre properties of rabbit meat as affected by the sire breed, season, parity order and gender in an organic production system. World Rabbit Sci. 24:145-154


Dalle Zotte A, Ouhayoun J, Parigi Bini R, Xiccato G. 1996; Effect of age, diet and sex on muscle energy metabolism and on related physicochemical traits in the rabbit. Meat Sci. 43:15-24


Dalle Zotte A, Princz Z, Metzger S, Szabó A, Radnai I, Biró-Németh E, Orova Z, Szendrő Z. 2009; Response of fattening rabbits reared under different housing conditions. 2. Carcass and meat quality. Livest Sci. 122:39-47


Decker EA, Xu Z. 1998; Minimizing rancidity in muscle foods. Food Technol. 52:54-59.


Department of Health and Social Security. 1994 Nutritional aspects of cardiovascular disease. Stationery Office, London, UK. .


Ebeid TA, Zeweil HS, Basyony MM, Dosoky WM, Badry H. 2013; Fortification of rabbit diets with vitamin E or selenium affects growth performance, lipid peroxidation, oxidative status and immune response in growing rabbits. Livest Sci. 155:323-331


Eiben C, Végi B, Virág G, Gódor-Surmann K, Kustos K, Maró A, Odermatt M, Zsédely E, Tóth T, Schmidt J, Fébel H. 2011; Effect of level and source of vitamin E addition of a diet enriched with sunflower and linseed oils on growth and slaughter traits of rabbits. Livest Sci. 139:196-205


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. 2020. Production of meat. Available from at Nov 20, 2021.


Gašperlin L, Polak T, Rajar A, SkvarÈa M, Zlender B. 2006; Effect of genotype, age at slaughter and sex on chemical composition and sensory profile of rabbit meat. World Rabbit Sci. 14:157-166


Gondret F, Juin H, Mourot J, Bonneau M. 1998; Effect of age at slaughter on chemical traits and sensory quality of Longissimus lumborum muscle in the rabbit. Meat Sci. 48:181-187


Hernández P. 2008; Enhancement of nutritional quality and safety in rabbit meat. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italypp p. 367-383


Hernández P, Ariño B, Grimal A, Blasco A. 2006; Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of three rabbit lines selected for litter size or growth rate. Meat Sci. 73:645-650


Hernández P, López A, Marco M, Blasco A. 2002; Influence of muscle type, refrigeration storage and genetic line on antioxidant enzyme activity in rabbit meat. World Rabbit Sci. 10:141-146


Hernández P, Zotte AD. 2010; Influence of diet on rabbit meat quality. In Nutrition of the rabbit. In: de Blas C, Wiseman J, editors. (ed)CABIWallingford, UK pp:163-178


Hicks BM, Filion KB, Yin H, Sakr L, Udell JA, Azoulay L. 2018; Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and risk of lung cancer: Population based cohort study. BMJ. 363:k4209


Hoffman LC, Nkhabutlane P, Schutte DW, Vosloo C. 2004; Factors affecting the purchasing of rabbit meat: A study of ethnic groups in the Western Cape. J Consum Sci. 32:26-35


Hulot F, Ouhayoun J. 1999; Muscular pH and related traits in rabbits: A review. World Rabbit Sci. 7:15-36


Ighodaro OM, Akinloye OA. 2018; First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alex J Med. 54:287-293


Jia G, Liu H, Nirasawa S, Liu H. 2017; Effects of high-voltage electrostatic field treatment on the thawing rate and post-thawing quality of frozen rabbit meat. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 41:348-356


Joo ST, Kim GD, Hwang YH, Ryu YC. 2013; Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci. 95:828-836


Kallas Z, Gil JM. 2012; A dual response choice experiments (DRCE) design to assess rabbit meat preference in Catalonia: A heteroscedastic extreme‐value model. Br Food J. 114:1394-1413


Khalil MH, Al-Saef AM. 2008; Methods, criteria, techniques and genetic responses for rabbit selection: A review. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italypp p. 1-22


Koné AP, Cinq-Mars D, Desjardins Y, Guay F, Gosselin A, Saucier L. 2016; Effects of plant extracts and essential oils as feed supplements on quality and microbial traits of rabbit meat. World Rabbit Sci. 24:107-119


Koné AP, Desjardins Y, Gosselin A, Cinq-Mars D, Guay F, Saucier L. 2019; Plant extracts and essential oil product as feed additives to control rabbit meat microbial quality. Meat Sci. 150:111-121


Lafuente R, López M. 2014; Effect of electrical and mechanical stunning on bleeding, instrumental properties and sensory meat quality in rabbits. Meat Sci. 98:247-254


Lambertini L, Vignola G, Badiani A, Zaghini G, Formigoni A. 2006; The effect of journey time and stocking density during transport on carcass and meat quality in rabbits. Meat Sci. 72:641-646


Lan Y, Shang Y, Song Y, Dong Q. 2016; Changes in the quality of superchilled rabbit meat stored at different temperatures. Meat Sci. 117:173-181


Larzul C, Thébault RG, Allain D. 2004; Effect of feed restriction on rabbit meat quality of the Rex du Poitou®. Meat Sci. 67:479-484


Lauková A, Simonová MP, Chrastinová Ľ, Plachá I, Čobanová K, Formelová Z, Chrenková M, Ondruška Ľ, Strompfová V. 2016; Benefits of combinative application of probiotic, enterocin M-producing strain Enterococcus faecium AL41 and Eleutherococcus senticosus in rabbits. Folia Microbiol. 61:169-177


Li S, Zeng W, Li R, Hoffman LC, He Z, Sun Q, Li H. 2018; Rabbit meat production and processing in China. Meat Sci. 145:320-328


Liste G, Villarroel M, Chacón G, Sañudo C, Olleta JL, García-Belenguer S, Alierta S, María GA. 2009; Effect of lairage duration on rabbit welfare and meat quality. Meat Sci. 82:71-76


Liu H, Zhou D, Tong J, Vaddella V. 2012; Influence of chestnut tannins on welfare, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and lipid oxidation in rabbits under high ambient temperature. Meat Sci. 90:164-169


Liu HW, Dong XF, Tong JM, Zhang Q. 2011; A comparative study of growth performance and antioxidant status of rabbits when fed with or without chestnut tannins under high ambient temperature. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 164:89-95


Liu HW, Gai F, Gasco L, Brugiapaglia A, Lussiana C, Guo KJ, Tong JM, Zoccarato I. 2009; Effects of chestnut tannins on carcass characteristics, meat quality, lipid oxidation and fatty acid composition of rabbits. Meat Sci. 83:678-683


López de Dicastillo C, Bustos F, Valenzuela X, López-Carballo G, Vilariño JM, Galotto MJ. 2017; Chilean berry Ugni molinae Turcz. fruit and leaves extracts with interesting antioxidant, antimicrobial and tyrosinase inhibitory properties. Food Res Int. 102:119-128


López M, Carrilho MC, Campo MM, Lafuente R. 2008; Halal slaughter and electrical stunning in rabbits: Effect on welfare and muscle characteristics. In: 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italypp p. 1201-1206


Lorenzo JM, Batlle R, Gómez M. 2014; Extension of the shelf-life of foal meat with two antioxidant active packaging systems. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 59:181-188


Mancini S, Mattioli S, Nuvoloni R, Pedonese F, Dal Bosco A, Paci G. 2020; Effects of garlic powder and salt additions on fatty acids profile, oxidative status, antioxidant potential and sensory properties of raw and cooked rabbit meat burgers. Meat Sci. 169:108226


Mancini S, Secci G, Preziuso G, Parisi G, Paci G. 2018; Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) powder as dietary supplementation in rabbit: Life performances, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:867-872


Marai IFM, Habeeb AAM, Gad AE. 2002; Rabbits’ productive, reproductive and physiological performance traits as affected by heat stress: A review. Livest Prod Sci. 78:71-90


María GA, Buil T, Liste G, Villarroel M, Sañudo C, Olleta JL. 2006; Effects of transport time and season on aspects of rabbit meat quality. Meat Sci. 72:773-777


Martínez-Álvaro M, Blasco A, Hernández P. 2018; Effect of selection for intramuscular fat on the fatty acid composition of rabbit meat. Animal. 12:2002-2008


Matics Z, Szendrő Z, Odermatt M, Gerencsér Z, Nagy I, Radnai I, Dalle Zotte A. 2014; Effect of housing conditions on production, carcass and meat quality traits of growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 96:41-46


Mattioli S, Cardinali R, Balzano M, Pacetti D, Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, Frega NG. 2017; Influence of dietary supplementation with prebiotic, oregano extract, and vitamin E on fatty acid profile and oxidative status of rabbit meat. J Food Qual. 2017:3015120


Matusevičius P, Ašmenskaitė L, Žilinskienė A, Gugolek A, Lorek MO, Hartman A. 2006; Effect of probiotic bioplus 2B® on performance of growing rabbit. Vet ir Zootech. 56:54-59.


Mazzone G, Vignola G, Giammarco M, Manetta AC, Lambertini L. 2010; Effects of loading methods on rabbit welfare and meat quality. Meat Sci. 85:33-39


Meineri G, Cornale P, Tassone S, Peiretti PG. 2010; Effects of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seed supplementation on rabbit meat quality, oxidative stability and sensory traits. Ital J Anim Sci. 9:e10


Menchetti L, Brecchia G, Branciari R, Barbato O, Fioretti B, Codini M, Bellezza E, Trabalza-Marinucci M, Miraglia D. 2020; The effect of Goji berries (Lycium barbarum) dietary supplementation on rabbit meat quality. Meat Sci. 161:108018


Metzger S, Bianchi M, Cavani C, Petracci M, Gyovai M, Biró-Németh E, Radnai I, Szendrő Z. 2008; Effect of nutritional status of kits on carcass traits and meat quality (preliminary results). In: Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italypp p. 1399-1404


Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Raats JG, Strydom PE. 2008; Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Meat Sci. 79:20-28


North MK, Dalle Zotte A, Hoffman LC. 2018; The effects of quercetin supplementation on New Zealand White grower rabbit carcass and meat quality: A short communication. Meat Sci. 145:363-366


Olsson GB, Seppola MA, Olsen RL. 2007; Water-holding capacity of wild and farmed cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) muscle during ice storage. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 40:793-799


Ouhayoun J. 1992; Quels sont les facteurs qui influencent la qualité de la viande de lapin?. Cuniculture Magazine. 105:137-142.


Ouhayoun J, Dalle Zotte A. 1996; Harmonization of muscle and meat criteria in rabbit meat research. World Rabbit Sci. 4:211-218


Paci G, Cecchi F, Preziuso G, Ciampolini R, D’Agata M. 2012; Carcass traits and meat quality of two different rabbit genotypes. Ital J Anim Sci. 11:e45


Paci G, Preziuso G, D’Agata M, Russo C, Dalle Zotte A. 2013; Effect of stocking density and group size on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of outdoor-reared rabbits. Meat Sci. 93:162-166


Palazzo M, Vizzarri F, Nardoia M, Ratti S, Pastorelli G, Casamassima D. 2015; Dietary Lippia citriodora extract in rabbit feeding: Effects on quality of carcass and meat. Arch Anim Breed. 58:355-364


Panyayai T, Sangsawad P, Pacharawongsakda E, Sawatdichaikul O, Tongsima S, Choowongkomon K. 2018; The potential peptides against angiotensin-I converting enzyme through a virtual tripeptide-constructing library. Comput Biol Chem. 77:207-213


Papadomichelakis G, Zoidis E, Pappas AC, Hadjigeorgiou I. 2017; Seasonal variations in the fatty acid composition of Greek wild rabbit meat. Meat Sci. 134:158-162


Parigi Bini R, Xiccato G, Cinetto M, Dalle Zotte A. 1992; Effect of slaughter age and weight on rabbit carcass and meat quality. Zootec Nutr Anim. 18:173-187.


Pascual M, Pla M. 2007; Changes in carcass composition and meat quality when selecting rabbits for growth rate. Meat Sci. 77:474-481


Peiretti PG, Gai F, Rotolo L, Brugiapaglia A, Gasco L. 2013; Effects of tomato pomace supplementation on carcass characteristics and meat quality of fattening rabbits. Meat Sci. 95:345-351


Peiretti PG, Gasco L, Brugiapaglia A, Gai F. 2011; Effects of perilla (Perilla frutescens L.) seeds supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and fatty acid composition of rabbits. Livest Sci. 138:118-124


Peiretti PG, Meineri G. 2011; Effects of diets with increasing levels of Spirulina platensis on the carcass characteristics, meat quality and fatty acid composition of growing rabbits. Livest Sci. 140:218-224


Pereira M, Malfeito-Ferreira M. 2015; A simple method to evaluate the shelf life of refrigerated rabbit meat. Food Control. 49:70-74


Permadi E, Jamhari J, Suryanto E, Bachruddin Z, Erwanto Y. 2019; The potential of hydrolysate from rabbit meat protein as an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Bul Peternak. 43:31-37


Perna A, Simonetti A, Grassi G, Gambacorta E. 2019; Effect of a cauliflower (Brassica oleraceae var. botrytis) leaf powder-enriched diet on performance, carcass and meat characteristics of growing rabbit. Meat Sci. 149:134-140


Petacchi F, Buccioni A, Giannetti F, Capizzano G. 2005; Influence of CLA supplementation on the lipid quality of rabbit meat. Ital J Anim Sci. 4:556-558


Petracci M, Cavani C. 2013; Rabbit meat processing: Historical perspective to future directions. World Rabbit Sci. 21:217-226


Pla M. 2008; A comparison of the carcass traits and meat quality of conventionally and organically produced rabbits. Livest Sci. 115:1-12


Polak T, Gašperlin L, Rajar A, Žlender B. 2006; Influence of genotype lines, age at slaughter and sexes on the composition of rabbit meat. Food Technol Biotechnol. 44:65-73.


Princz Z, Dalle Zotte A, Metzger S, Radnai I, Biró-Németh E, Orova Z, Szendrő Z. 2009; Response of fattening rabbits reared under different housing conditions. 1. Live performance and health status. Livest Sci. 121:86-91


Ramírez JA, Oliver MÀ, Pla M, Guerrero L, Ariño B, Blasco A, Pascual M, Gil M. 2004; Effect of selection for growth rate on biochemical, quality and texture characteristics of meat from rabbits. Meat Sci. 67:617-624


Rasinska E, Czarniecka-Skubina E, Rutkowska J. 2018; Fatty acid and lipid contents differentiation in cuts of rabbit meat. CyTA J Food. 16:807-813


Ritchie H, Rosado P, Roser M. 2017. Meat and dairy production. Available from at Dec 15, 2022.


Rodríguez-Calleja JM, Santos JA, Otero A, García-López ML. 2010; Effect of vacuum and modified atmosphere packaging on the shelf life of rabbit meat. CyTA J Food. 8:109-116


Sabuncuoglu N, Coban O, Lacin E, Ceylan ZG, Ozdemir D, Ozkan A. 2011; Effect of pre-slaughter environment on some physiological parameters and meat quality in New Zealand rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Trop Anim Health Prod. 43:515-519


Sahin K, Kucuk O. 2003; Heat stress and dietary vitamin supplementation of poultry diets. Nutr Abstr Rev Ser B Livest Feeds Feeding. 73:41R-50R


Sartori A, Queaque PI, Trocino A, Xiccato G. 2003; Increasing dietary starch to ADF ratio in phase feeding programs for early weaned rabbits. Ital J Anim Sci. 2:432-434.


Secci G, Bovera F, Musco N, Husein Y, Parisi G. 2020; Use of mirrors into free-range areas: Effects on rabbit meat quality and storage stability. Livest Sci. 239:104094


Secci G, Ferraro G, Fratini E, Bovera F, Parisi G. 2019; Differential scanning calorimetry as a fast method to discriminate cage or free-range rabbit meat. Food Control. 104:313-317


Shah AA, Liu Z, Qian C, Wu J, Sultana N, Zhong X. 2020; Potential effect of the microbial fermented feed utilization on physicochemical traits, antioxidant enzyme and trace mineral analysis in rabbit meat. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 104:767-775


Simonová MP, Chrastinová Ľ, Lauková A. 2020; Effect of beneficial strain Enterococcus faecium EF9a isolated from Pannon White rabbit on growth performance and meat quality of rabbits. Ital J Anim Sci. 19:650-655


Sinanoglou VJ, Koutsouli P, Fotakis C, Sotiropoulou G, Cavouras D, Bizelis I. 2015; Assessment of lactation stage and breed effect on sheep milk fatty acid profile and lipid quality indices. Dairy Sci Technol. 95:509-531


Składanowska-Baryza J, Ludwiczak A, Pruszyńska-Oszmałek E, Kołodziejski P, Bykowska M, Stanisz M. 2018; The effect of transport on the quality of rabbit meat. Anim Sci J. 89:713-721


Składanowska-Baryza J, Ludwiczak A, Pruszyńska-Oszmałek E, Kołodziejski P, Racewicz P, Stanisz M. 2020; Effect of electrical and mechanical stunning on rabbit meat quality traits. Ann Anim Sci. 20:709-724


Składanowska-Baryza J, Stanisz M. 2019; Pre-slaughter handling implications on rabbit carcass and meat quality: A review. Ann Anim Sci. 19:875-885


Sujiwo J, Kim HJ, Song SO, Jang A. 2019; Relationship between quality and freshness traits and torrymeter value of beef loin during cold storage. Meat Sci. 149:120-125


Szendrő Z, Dalle Zotte A. 2011; Effect of housing conditions on production and behaviour of growing meat rabbits: A review. Livest Sci. 137:296-303


Szendrő Z, Matics Z, Gerencsér Z, Nagy I, Lengyel M, Horn P, Dalle Zotte A. 2010; Effect of dam and sire genotypes on productive and carcass traits of rabbits. J Anim Sci. 88:533-543


Tres A, Bou R, Codony R, Guardiola F. 2008; Influence of different dietary doses of n-3- or n-6-rich vegetable fats and α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation on raw and cooked rabbit meat composition and oxidative stability. J Agric Food Chem. 56:7243-7253


Trocino A, Xiccato G, Queaque PI, Sartori A. 2003; Effect of transport duration and gender on rabbit carcass and meat quality. World Rabbit Sci. 11:23-32


Trocino A, Xiccato G, Queaque PI, Sartori A. 2004; Group housing of growing rabbits: Effect of stocking density and cage floor on performance, welfare, and meat quality. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, Puebla, Mexicopp p. 1277-1282


Ujan JA, Zan LS, Ujan SA, Wang HB. 2011; Association between polymorphism of MyF-5 gene with meat quality traits in indigenous Chinese cattle breeds. In: International Conference on Asia Agriculture and Animal, Singaporepp p. 50-55


Verga M, Luzi F, Petracci M, Cavani C. 2009; Welfare aspects in rabbit rearing and transport. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:191-204


Wang J, He ZF, Li HJ, Liu YN. 2013; Determination of flavour compounds in rabbit meat by HS-SPME/GC-MS. Food Sci. 34:212-217.


Wang J, Hu Y, Elzo MA, Shi Y, Jia X, Chen S, Lai S. 2017; Genetic effect of Myf5 gene in rabbit meat quality traits. J Genet. 96:673-679


Wang J, Su Y, Elzo MA, Jia X, Chen S, Lai S. 2016; Comparison of carcass and meat quality traits among three rabbit breeds. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 36:84-89


Wang Z, He Z, Gan X, Li H. 2018; Interrelationship among ferrous myoglobin, lipid and protein oxidations in rabbit meat during refrigerated and superchilled storage. Meat Sci. 146:131-139


Wang Z, He Z, Zhang D, Li H, Wang Z. 2020; Using oxidation kinetic models to predict the quality indices of rabbit meat under different storage temperatures. Meat Sci. 162:108042


Xiccato G, Trocino A, Sartori A, Queaque PI. 2002; Effect of dietary starch level and source on performance, caecal fermentation and meat quality in growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 10:147-157


Xie Y, He Z, Lv J, Zhang E, Li H. 2016; Identification the key odorants in different parts of Hyla rabbit meat via solid phase microextraction using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 36:719-728


Yang J, Li H. 2010; Current situation of rabbit meat processing in China. Food Sci. 31:429-432.


Zeferino CP, Komiyama CM, Fernandes S, Sartori JR, Teixeira PSS, Moura ASAMT. 2013; Carcass and meat quality traits of rabbits under heat stress. Animal. 7:518-523


Zhou GH, Xu XL, Liu Y. 2010; Preservation technologies for fresh meat: A review. Meat Sci. 86:119-128