ARTICLE

Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Mycotoxins in Eggs and Chicken Feeds from Farms to Retail Markets

Minhwa Lee1, Dong Joo Seo1, Su Been Jeon1, Hyun Ee Ok2, Hyelee Jung2, Changsun Choi1,*, Hyang Sook Chun2,*
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
2Advanced Food Safety Research Group, BK21 Plus, Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
*Corresponding authors: Hyang Sook Chun, Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea. Tel: +82-31-670-3290, Fax: +82-31-676-8741, E-mail: hschun@cau.ac.kr Changsun Choi, Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea. Tel: +82-31-670-4589, Fax: +82-31-676-8741, E-mail: cchoi@cau.ac.kr

Copyright © 2016, Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Apr 30, 2016 ; Revised: Jun 22, 2016 ; Accepted: Jun 26, 2016

Published Online: Aug 30, 2016

Abstract

Contamination by foodborne pathogens and mycotoxins was examined in 475 eggs and 20 feed samples collected from three egg layer farms, three egg-processing units, and five retail markets in Korea. Microbial contamination with Salmonella species, Escherichia coli, and Arcobacter species was examined by bacterial culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The contamination levels of aflatoxins, ochratoxins, and zearalenone in eggs and chicken feeds were simultaneously analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection after the post-derivatization. While E. coli was isolated from 9.1% of eggs, Salmonella species were not isolated. Arcobacter species were detected in 0.8% of eggs collected from egg layers by PCR only. While aflatoxins, ochratoxins, and zearalenone were found in 100%, 100%, and 85% of chicken feeds, their contamination levels were below the maximum acceptable levels (1.86, 2.24, and 147.53 μg/kg, respectively). However, no eggs were contaminated with aflatoxins, ochratoxins, or zearalenone. Therefore, the risk of contamination by mycotoxins and microbes in eggs and chicken feeds is considered negligible and unlikely to pose a threat to human health.

Keywords: eggs; contamination; foodborne pathogens; mycotoxins; safety

Introduction

Contamination of chickens and eggs by Salmonella species and Escherichia coli has caused many outbreaks (Greig and Ravel, 2009). As handling fecal material, dust, and dirt in nests and layer cages can contaminate eggs from layer farms, the World Health Organization (WHO) performed a risk assessments for the presence of Salmonella species in eggs and broiler chickens (WHO, 2002). E. coli, Salmonella species, and Staphylococcus aureus are commonly found in eggs; hence, the microbial safety of eggs needs to be ensured with refrigeration at all stages, from farms to retail markets. Previous studies identified Arcobacter butzleri, A. cryaerophilus, and A. skirrowii in patients with chronic enteritis or septicemia, and traced the contamination sources to chicken carcasses, chicken intestinal contents, pork, beef, and drinking water (Douidah et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2010). However, the prevalence of Arcobacter species in eggs has not been examined, to our knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate microbial contamination in eggs collected at each stage of commercial production, to enhance their microbial safety.

Contamination by mycotoxins occurs frequently in chicken feeds containing maize and other cereals (Greco et al., 2014; Jang et al., 2007a, 2007b; Thirumala-devi et al., 2002). Ingestion of mycotoxin-contaminated feed by chickens causes several health problems, which leads to large economic losses in terms of egg quality and quantity. The common mycotoxins found in eggs are aflatoxins (AFs), ochratoxin (OTA), zearalenone (ZEA), and fumonisins (Greco et al., 2014; Iqbal et al., 2014; Jia et al., 2016). In addition, a combination of AFs and ZEA in feeds was shown to synergistically reduce the laying performance, egg quality, and feed intake of laying hens (Jia et al., 2016). However, despite the importance of eggs as a nutritious and beneficial commodity, there is little information on co-occurring mycotoxin contaminations in eggs and chicken feed in Korea.

Therefore, this study aimed to examine the contamination levels of foodborne pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella species, and Arcobacter species) and mycotoxins (AFs, OTA, and ZEA) in eggs collected at various stages from chicken farms to retail markets.

Materials and Methods

Collection of eggs and feeds

In total, 475 eggs and 20 kinds of commercial chicken feeds were collected from three egg layer farms, three egg-processing units, and five retail markets. One egg farm was located in Jeollabuk-do; the other facilities were located in Gyeonggi-do. Thirty eggs were collected from the egg layer farms, 180 eggs were obtained from the egg-processing units, and 265 eggs from 25 different brands were sampled at the retail markets. Twenty chicken feeds comprised 8 layer feeds for chick, 5 layer feeds for pullet, and 7 layer feeds for hen, which were commercially available in Korea (Daehan Feed Co., Daejoo Co., Hanil Feed Co., and Nonhyup Feed Co.).

Microbial examination

The surface of each eggshell was swabbed with a sterile cotton stick. The swabbed cotton sticks were vortexed and suspended in 0.1% (w/v) peptone water. E.coli and Salmonella species were isolated using the standard protocols of the food code established by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) in Korea. Briefly, EC broth (Oxoid) and MacConkey agar (Oxoid) were used to isolate E. coli. Rappaport Vassiliadis broth (Oxoid) and XLD agar were used to isolate Salmonella species.

Arcobacter species were isolated as described by Lee et al. (2010). Each sample was mixed with Arcobacter-selective broth (Oxoid) including a cefoperazone, amphotericin, and teicoplanin (CAT)-selective supplement (Oxoid) at a 1:10 ratio and incubated in microaerobic conditions at 37℃ for 48 h. The enriched broth was inoculated and incubated in Arcobacter-selective agar (Oxoid) at 37℃ for 48 h. To detect Arcobacter species, species-specific multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with boiled enriched broth, as described previously (Lee et al., 2010).

Mycotoxin analysis

To evaluate the occurrence of AFs (sum of AFB1, AFG1, AFB2, and AFG2), OTA, and ZEA, egg and chicken feed samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with fluorescence detection after post-derivatization. The extraction procedures were in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The samples were extracted as described by Ok et al. (2015) with a few modifications.

Whole egg without eggshell was homogenized with a blender for 5 min at room temperature under continuous agitation. Further, 2 g sample was transferred to a polypropylene centrifuge tube (50 mL), and 2 mL water was added and vortexed for 2 min. Subsequently, each egg sample (20 g) was placed in a 200-mL beaker with 84 mL 90% acetonitrile and 0.5 g sodium carbonate and homogenized for 5 min using a high-speed blender (Ultra Turrax, IKA). For feed samples, 25 g sample was extracted with 100 mL 80% methanol and 2.5 g sodium chloride. After extraction, both egg and feed samples were filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 1), and 4 mL filtrate extract was diluted with 36 mL PBS containing 1% Tween 20. After filtration through a GF/B filter, 25 mL filtrate was passed through an immunoaffinity column (IAC; AOZ WB, Vicam) at a flow rate of one drop per second. The IAC was washed with 15 mL PBS and 15 mL water, and dried by passing air rapidly through the column. The toxins were eluted with 3 mL methanol containing 0.1% acetic acid. The eluent was evaporated in a water bath at 50℃. Dried residues were reconstituted with 0.5 mL methanol/water (50:50, v/v) and filtered through a syringe filter (0.2 mm).

The HPLC system (Agilent 1200 series, Agilent Technologies) consisted of an autosampler system, four pumps, a column oven, and a fluorescence detector. The analytical column was a Symmetry C18, 3.5 mm, 4.6 × 150 mm column (Waters). To enhance the fluorescence activity of AFB1 and AFG1, a PHRED photochemical derivatization system (AURA Industries, USA) was applied before fluorescence detection. The excitation and emission wavelengths were respectively 360 and 455 nm (0-17 min) for AFs, 276 and 460 nm (17-22 min) for ZEA, and 225 and 460 nm (22-35 min) for OTA. The injection volume was 50 mL. The mobile phase was pumped at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min under gradient elution at 35℃. The optimal HPLC conditions for the mobile phase (methanol, acetonitrile, and 0.1% acetic acid) were established as follows: 0-10 min, isocratic elution (27:14:59, by vol.); 10-12 min, gradient elution (27:14:59 to 10:44:46, by vol.); 12-28 min, isocratic elution (10:44:46, by vol.); and 28-33 min, column re-equilibration (27:14:59, by vol.). For column re-equilibration, a 2-min delay was employed between injections.

Quality control parameters for mycotoxin analysis

The HPLC performance parameters such as limit of detections (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), recovery, and repeatability were determined for AFB1, AFG1, AFB 2, AFG2, OTA, and ZEA. The LOD and LOQ for spiked samples were determined at signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 and 10:1, respectively. Method precision was evaluated in terms of repeatability at three concentrations on the same day with three replicate analyses of each spiked sample. The results showed a good linear response and coefficient of determination for all analyzed mycotoxins (R2>0.998). The recoveries were ascertained by spiking 1, 2, and 5 mg/kg AFB1, AFG1, or OTA; 0.3, 0.6, and 1.5 mg/kg AFB 2 or AFG2; and 10, 20, and 50 mg/kg ZEA in non-contaminated eggs (Table 2). The method showed good recoveries for all the spiked samples in the range of 71-118% with relative standard deviation (RSD) 2-20%.

Table 1. Microbial contamination of eggs collected from farms to retailers
Sampling site Salmonella species E. coli Arcobacter species
Egg layer farms (3) 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 4/30 (13.3%)
Egg-processing units (3) 0/180 (0%) 16/180 (8.9%) 0/180 (0%)
Retail markets (5) 0/265 (0%) 27/265 (10.1%) 0/265 (0%)
Total 0/475 (0%) 43/475 (9.05%) 4/475 (0.84%)
Download Excel Table
Table 2. HPLC parameters for analyzing aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone in eggs and chicken feed
Parameter      Mycotoxin Concentration spiked (μg/kg) Recovery (%) RSDa (%) LODb (μg/kg) LOQc (μg/kg)
Aflatoxin B1 1 108.7 15.81 0.07 0.26
2 117.8 8.60
5 102.4 2.41
Aflatoxin B2 0.3 118.3 4.44 0.02 0.08
0.6 112.5 11.40
1.5 100.7 2.58
Aflatoxin G1 1 118.1 2.85 0.13 0.32
2 98.2 13.79
5 88.3 7.94
Aflatoxin G2 0.3 110.4 6.50 0.02 0.07
0.6 96.3 15.65
1.5 76.4 6.50
Ochratoxin A 1 71.4 9.38 0.10 0.65
2 71.6 2.97
5 78.9 6.06
Zearalenone 10 74.9 16.40 1.30 8.00
20 76.8 9.42
50 105.4 19.74

aRSD, relative standard deviation. Precision is statedas mean percent RSD. bLOD, limit of detection. cLOQ, limit of quantification.

Download Excel Table
Data analysis

The AFs, OTA, and ZEA concentrations were presented as the mean of three measurements. The coefficient of determination (R2) was obtained by regression analysis using SPSS software (IBM, PASW Statistics 19, USA). The results for toxins were not corrected for analytical recovery.

Results and Discussion

Contamination by foodborne bacteria

The microbial contamination results for eggs are shown in Table 1. Salmonella species were not isolated from any of the 475 eggs collected from egg layers, egg-processing units, and retail markets. E. coli was isolated from 43 eggshell swabs, of which 16 and 27 obtained from egg-processing units and retail markets, respectively. Interestingly, E. coli was not isolated from eggs obtained from egg layers. Arcobacter species were not isolated from eggshell swabs, because they are fastidious bacteria. However, species- specific multiplex PCR detected A. butzleri 16S ribosomal DNA in Arcobacter-enriched broth prepared from four eggs collected from egg layers.

The first isolation of Salmonella Enteritidis was reported from eggs at a grocery market in Korea in 2013; the annual microbiological survey was negative for Salmonella contamination of chicken eggs distributed from farms to markets between 2000 and 2011 (Kim et al., 2013). As the high risk of Salmonella contamination was addressed in outbreak data, risk assessments of eggs, performed by the US Department of Agriculture and Health Canada, showed that the overall contamination frequency of Salmonella species was as low as 0.03% (Greig and Ravel, 2009; Health Canada, 2000; USDA-FSIS, 1998; WHO, 2002). In the WHO risk assessment of Salmonella, the attack rate of Salmonella serovars and the dose-response of Salmonella outbreak were analyzed in various models and cases (WHO, 2002). Various Salmonella serotypes including Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Heidelberg, Cubana, Infantis, Newport, and Oranienburg were associated with the outbreaks of Salmonella species contaminating chicken, eggs, and other foods (Greig and Ravel, 2009; Health Canada, 2000; WHO, 2002). Because S. Enteritidis is frequently isolated from slaughtered chickens in Korea, there is a high possibility of egg contamination (Lee et al., 2007). Although this study did not isolate Salmonella species, the number of eggs examined herein was too limited to conclude that there was no contamination. Therefore, intensive risk assessment and microbial monitoring of eggs should be undertaken in Korean farms and markets.

The statistics on foodborne outbreaks by the MFDS in Korea indicate that pathogenic E. coli outbreaks occur more frequently than those of Salmonella or other food-borne bacteria. Although an association between raw eggs and E. coli outbreaks was not officially reported, eggs could be a source of contamination. In this study, the overall isolation rate of E. coli in eggs was as high as 9.05%. Interestingly, E. coli was isolated only from egg-processing units and retail markets. This may imply that contamination with E. coli occurs during egg processing or packaging.

Although Arcobacter species were not isolated in bacterial culture, multiplex PCR identified the contamination of A. butzleri in eggs collected from layer farms. When A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus were isolated from chickens and intestinal contents (Lee et al., 2010), the isolation rate from enriched broth was lower than the detection rate by multiplex PCR. Thus, detection of A. butzleri by multiplex PCR indicated that four eggs were contaminated with Arcobacter species in this study. Because Arcobacter species can grow at room temperature and penetrate a micropore structure similar to the eggshell, bacterial internalization under various storage conditions should be examined in further studies.

Detection of mycotoxins in eggs and chicken feeds

In the present study, 475 eggs, collected from farms to retailers, and 20 chicken feeds were analyzed for the incidence of AFs, OTA, and ZEA (Table 3). The results showed that no egg samples were positive for AFs, OTA, or ZEA; however, these mycotoxins were detected in 100, 100, and 85%, respectively, of the 20 commercial chicken feeds analyzed. The maximum levels of AFs (sum of AFB 1, AFG1, AFB2, and AFG2), OTA, and ZEA were 1.86, 2.24, and 147.53 μg/kg, respectively. Of the AFs, the level of AFB1 in chicken feeds was 0.09-1.70 μg/kg with a mean of 0.38 μg/kg.

Table 3. Contamination of eggs and chicken feeds by aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone
Number of Samples Sampling site Mycotoxin Positive sample Mean (μg/kg) Range
Egg (n=30) Egg layer farms (3) Aflatoxins 0/30 - a -
Ochratoxin A 0/30 - -
Zearalenone 0/30 - -
Egg (n=180) Egg-processing units (3) Aflatoxins 0/180 - -
Ochratoxin A 0/180 - -
Zearalenone 0/180 - -
Egg (n=265) Retail markets (5) Aflatoxins 0/265 - -
Ochratoxin A 0/265 - -
Zearalenone 0/265 - -
Feed (n=20) Egg layer farms (3) Aflatoxins 20/20 (100%)b 0.56 (0.38)c 0.10−1.86 (0.09−1.70)c
Ochratoxin A 20/20 (100%) 0.77 0.14-2.24
Zearalenone 17/20 (85%) 35.02 5.17-147.53

aNot detected. bThe data in parenthesis represent the percentage of positive samples. cThe data in parentheses represent aflatoxin B1.

Download Excel Table

Several studies reported limited data for AFs, OTA, or ZEA contamination in eggs. Iqbal et al. (2014) reported that 28, 35, and 32% of eggs (n=80) collected from Pakistan were contaminated with AFs, OTA, and ZEA, respectively. A report by Amirkhizi et al. (2015) showed that 58% of egg samples from Iran were contaminated with AFB1 at 0.30-16.36 μg/kg. Herzallah (2009) demonstrated AFs contamination levels of 0.15-6.36 μg/kg in analyzed food products, with a mean of 1.23 μg/kg from 10 eggs. However, no egg samples in this study were contaminated with AFs, OTA, or ZEA. These data were consistent with the previous finding that ZEA in feed are not transferred to eggs (Danicke et al., 2002).

Jang et al. (2007a, 2007b) reported that 85% of 41 poultry feeds in Korea were contaminated with OTA, and detected levels ranged from 0.27 to 3.39 μg/kg. In Pakistan, 24% of 123 poultry feeds were contaminated with AFB1, and detected levels ranged from 0.43 to 2.54 μg/kg (Iqbal et al., 2014). When AFs and OTA were analyzed in Indian poultry feed ingredients using indirect competitive enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay, their levels in groundnut cake, maize, mixed feed, sorghum, and millet were 10-3500 μg/kg and 0-400 μg/kg, respectively (Thirumal-devi et al., 2002).

Mycotoxin contamination in eggs could be attributed to feed quality, and in animal feed might induce sanitary disturbances, animal mortality, and secondary contamination in human consumers via eggs, meat, or milk (Greco et al., 2014). Therefore, regulation of mycotoxin levels in feed is important. The commission regulation of the European community set maximum levels for AFB1, OTA, or ZEA in various animal feeds (European Commission, 2006), whereas the Korea Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) set maximum acceptable levels only for AFs (10 μg/kg) and OTA (200 μg/kg) in chicken or broiler feeds. However, no maximum acceptable level for ZEA has been established for animal feed in Korea (MAFRA, 2010). We found that the levels of AFs and OTA in all domestic chicken feeds were below the maximum acceptable levels. Consequently, the occurrence and incidence of AFs, OTA, and ZEA in eggs and chicken feeds are considered negligible and unlikely to pose a threat to human health in South Korea.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that E. coli and A. butzleri contaminated eggs from farms to retail markets. Even though AFs, OTA, and ZEA were found to be under the maximum acceptable level in chicken feeds, they were not detected in eggs in Korea. However, continuous surveillance is recommended, given the high consumption and importance of eggs as a nutritious food in Korea.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through (High Value-added Food Technology Development Program), funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (313023-3).

References

1.

Amirkhizi B., Arefhosseini S. R., Ansarina M., Nemati M. Aflatoxin B1 in eggs and chicken livers by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and HPLC. Food Addit. Contam. Part B. 2015; 8:245-249.

2.

Danicke S., Ueberschar K. H., Halle I., Matthes S., Valenta H., Flachowsky G. Effect of addition of a detoxifying agent to laying hen diets containing uncontaminated or Fusarium toxin-contaminated maize on performance of hens and on carryover of zearalenone. Poult. Sci. 2002; 81:1671-1680.

3.

Douidah L., De Zutter L., Bare J., Houf K. Towards a typing strategy for Arcobacter species isolated from humans and animals and assessment of the in vitro genomic stability. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014; 11:272-280.

4.

European Commission (EC) Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed. 2006

5.

Greco M. V., Franchi M. L., Golba S. L. R., Pardo A. G., Pose G. N. Mycotoxins and mycotoxigenic fungi in poultry feed for food-producing animals. Sci. World J. 2014; 14:1-9.

6.

Greig J. D., Ravel A. Analysis of foodborne outbreak data reported internationally for source attribution. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009; 130:77-87.

7.

Health Canada Risk assessment model for Salmonella Enteritidis. 2000Unpublished Health Canada Document

8.

Herzallah S. M. Determination of aflatoxins in eggs, milk, meat and meat products using HPLC fluorescent and UV detectors. Food Chem. 2009; 114:1141-1146.

9.

Iqbal S. Z, Nisar S., Asi M. R., Jinap S. Natural incidence of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and zearalenone in chicken meat and eggs. Food Control. 2014; 43:98-103.

10.

Jang H.-S., Jo H.-J., Lee K.-E., Lee C. Survey of the presence of aflatoxins in compound feeds and feed ingredients. Korean J. Fd Hyg. Safety. 2007a; 22:346-352.

11.

Jang H.-S., Kim D.-H., Lee K.-E., Lee C. Survey of the presence of ochratoxin A in compound feeds and feed ingredients distributed in Korea. Korean J. Fd Hyg. Safety. 2007b; 22:353-358.

12.

Jia R., Ma Q., Fan Y., Ji C., Zhang J., Liu T., Zhao L. The toxic effects of combined aflatoxins and zearalenone in naturally contaminated diets on laying performance, egg quality and mycotoxins residues in eggs of layers and the protective effect of Bacillus subtilis biodegradation product. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016; 90:142-150.

13.

Kim Y. J., Song B. R., Lim J. S., Heo E. J., Park H. J., Wee S. H., Oh S. M., Moon J. S. First report on isolation of Salmonella Enteritidis from eggs at grocery stores in Korea. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 2013; 33:239-243.

14.

Lee H. W., Hong C. H., Jung B. Y. Characteristics of Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry carcasses. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2007; 30:339-351.

15.

Lee M. H., Cheon D. S., Choi S., Lee B. H., Jung J. Y., Choi C. Prevalence of Arcobacter species isolated from retail meats in Korea. J. Food Prot. 2010; 73:1313-1316.

16.

Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) Control of livestock and fish feed act. (No. 10219). 2010.

17.

Ok H. E., Chung S. H., Lee N., Chun H. S. Simple high-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous analysis of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone in dried and ground red pepper. J. Food Prot. 2015; 78:1226-1231.

18.

Thirumala-devi K., Mayo M. A., Reddy G., Reddy D. V. R. Occurrence of aflatoxin and ochratoxin A in Indian poultry feeds. J. Food Prot. 2002; 65:1338-1340.

19.

USDA-FSIS Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment. Shell Eggs and Egg Products. Final Report. Prepared for FSIS by the Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment Team. 1998; p. 268Available from: www.fsis.usda.gov/ophs/risk/contents.htmAccessed [7 January 2016]

20.

World Health Organization (WHO) Risk assessment of Salmonella in eggs and broiler chickens. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: 2002.

FSAR Special Section Invitation


We are pleased to invite you to submit special section paper for Food Science and Animal Resources (FSAR). Both full-length research articles and review articles are welcome for the following issues.

 - Benefits: All the accepted papers for the special topics are eligible for the 50% article processing charge (APC) discount.
 - Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2023

The topics of interest for the special issue include:
 ■ Innovative strategies to improve the quality of animal-based products
  (Editor: Dr. Young Min Choi)
  - Application of proteomics and lipidomics in quality of meat and milk products
  - Functional ingredients and additives for structure formation
  - Meal kits and home meal replacement (HMR), Etc.

 ■ Innovative safety and freshness control of animal-based products
 (Editor: Dr. Changsun Choi)
  - High pressure processing
  - Plasma technology
  - Advanced active packaging and sensor technology (quality indicator, time-and temperature indicator, etc)
  - Edible coating, etc.


I don't want to open this window for a day.