Table 2. Effect of UV-C treatment on total aerobic bacteria of the prosciutto

Variable Irradiation time (s) Total bacterial (Log CFU/g) Reduction rate (%)1)
Control 0 6.92±0.21abc -
265/102) 5 6.30±0.00abc 75.90
10 6.80±0.07abc 24.10
20 6.99±0.38abc –16.87
40 6.60±0.22abc 52.41
120 6.92±0.31abc –1.20
300 7.00±1.20abc –19.32
600 6.03±0.73c 87.21
265/50 5 6.91±0.54abc 1.20
10 6.17±0.70abc 82.05
20 6.13±0.47abc 83.86
40 6.62±0.94abc 49.58
120 6.71±1.07abc 37.59
300 7.16±0.40ab –72.69
600 6.88±0.06abc 8.03
275/10 5 6.23±0.49abc 79.76
10 6.81±0.21abc 22.29
20 6.94±0.43abc –4.82
40 6.78±0.18abc 27.71
120 7.25±0.22a –112.85
300 6.97±1.08abc –13.21
600 6.78±0.28abc 26.91
275/50 5 6.96±0.36abc –10.24
10 6.12±0.23ab 84.04
20 6.50±0.17abc 62.05
40 6.54±0.37abc 57.83
120 6.71±1.07abc 37.59
300 7.16±0.40ab –72.69
600 6.88±0.06abc 8.03
Reduction rate: 1–(N/N0) %; N0, untreatment total aerobic bacteria counts on dry cured ham (control); N, UV-irradiated total aerobic bacteria counts on dry cured ham.
Wavelength (nm)/watt (mW).
Means with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
UV-C, ultraviolet-C.