Table 1. Interspecies characteristics of BSH

Strain	Q1)	CA	DCA	CDCA	Reference
Lactobacillus
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356	2	-			Liong and Shah (2005)
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356-A
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356-B
L. acidophilus ATCC 4357	2	+			Liong and Shah (2005)
L. acidophilus ATCC 4357-A
L. acidophilus ATCC 4357-B
L. casei ASCC 1521	1	−			Liong and Shah (2005)
L rhamnosus strain ASCC 290	1	+			Liong and Shah (2005)
L. casei ATCC 15820	1	+			Liong and Shah (2005)
L. acidophilus LA1	2	+	+		Kumar et al. (2012)
L. acidophilus LA1-A
L. acidophilus LA1-B
L. fermentum K73		+	+++		Hernández-Gómez et al. (2021)
L. plantarum 299v	1	+	++		Hernández-Gómez et al. (2021)
L. rhamnosus GG	1	+	+++		Hernández-Gómez et al. (2021)
L. johnsonii YB334		+	−		Zhu et al. (2022)
L. plantarum Y14			++		Liu et al. (2021)
L. paracasei subsp. X11			−		Zhang et al. (2021)
L. acidophilus NCK 1909					Foley et al. (2021)
L. acidophilus NCK 1909-A
L. acidophilus NCK 1909-B
L. gasseri NCK2253					Foley et al. (2021)
L. gasseri NCK2253-A		−−−	−−−	−−−
L. gasseri NCK2253-B		+++	+++	+++
L. paragasseri strain JCM 5343T	3
L. paragasseri strain JCM 5343T-A		−−	+	−	Kusada et al. (2022a)
L. paragasseri strain JCM 5343T-B
L. paragasseri strain JCM 5343T-C		−	+	−	Kusada et al. (2022b)
L. salivarius NRRL B-30514		+	−	+	Wang et al. (2012)
L. gasseri strain FR4		+	+		Rani et al. (2017)
L. brevis ATCC 367	1	++	++	+++	Ru et al. (2019)
L. acidophilus NCDC291		++	+		Kumar et al. (2012)
L. plantarum Lp91	1	+	−		Kumar et al. (2012)
L. plantarum WCFS1	4				Lambert et al. (2008)
L. plantarum WCFS1-1		+++	+++	+++
L. plantarum WCFS1-2		NA	NA	NA
L. plantarum WCFS1-3		+	+	+
L. plantarum WCFS1-4		+++	+++	+++
L. rhamnosus strain E9	1	+	+	+	Kaya et al. (2017)
L. fermentum NCDO394	1	+	+	+	Kumar et al. (2013)
L. acidophilus PF01	1	−−−	−−−	−−−	Oh et al. (2008)
L. johnsonii PF01	2				Chae et al. (2013)
L. johnsonii PF01-A		−−−	−−	−−
L. johnsonii PF01-C		++	++	++
Bifidobacterium
B. longum ATCC 15708		+	+	+	Kim et al. (2004b)
B. infantis KL 412		+ +	+ +	+ +	Kim et al. (2004b)
B. suis NRRL B-41407	1	+	+	+	Jarocki et al. (2014)
B. pseudocatenulatum DSM 20439	1	+	+	+	Jarocki et al. (2014)
B. animalis subsp. lactis NRRL B-41405	1	+ +			Jarocki et al. (2014)
B. catenulatum DSM 20224	1	+			Jarocki et al. (2014)
B. longum SBT2928		+	+ +	+	Tanaka et al. (2000)
B. bifidum ATCC 11863	1	+	+	+	Kim et al. (2004a)
B. animalis Bi30	1	+ +	+ +	+ +	Jarocki (2011)
B. longum BB536		–	+	+	Grill et al. (1995);Li et al. (2021)
Enterococcus
E. faecalis CU30-2	1	+ + +	+ + +	+ + +	Eom and Kim (2011)
E. faecalis T2	1	+	+	+ +	Chand et al. (2016)
E. faecium CRL183			-		Taranto et al. (2000)
Bacteroides
B. fragilis ATCC 25285	2	+	+	+	Li et al. (2021);Stellwag and Hylemon (1976)
B. fragilis ATCC 25285-A
B. fragilis ATCC 25285-B

Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Bacteroides bile salt hydrolase information about G/T ratio by cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid affinity of BSH.
The affinity of glycine-conjugated bile salt is greater, and the difference is less than 3 times is (+), between 3 and 10 times is (++), and more than 10 times is (+++). The same applies to taurine-conjugated bile salt, denoted with (−). Inactive BSH is denoted by NA.
In addition, the number of multiple BSH genes present in the strain was reported as “Q”.
BSH, bile salt hydrolase; CA, cholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid.