Table 4. The range analysis of flavourzyme on DH obtained from the L9 (34) orthogonal experiment
| No. | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | DH (%) |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 42.64 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 40.98 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 32.47 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 46.76 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 34.65 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 35.34 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 35.96 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33.56 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 43.45 |
| K1 | 38.70 | 41.79 | 37.18 | 40.25 | |
| K2 | 38.92 | 36.4 | 43.73 | 37.43 | |
| K3 | 37.66 | 37.09 | 34.36 | 37.60 | |
| Best level | A2 | B1 | C2 | D1 | |
| R | 1.26 | 5.39 | 9.37 | 2.65 | |
| R order | C>B>D>A | | | | |
Four controllable variables, including time (A), temperature (B), pH (C), and the amount of flavourzyme added (D) were selected for optimization.
DH, degree of hydrolysis.