Table 1 Capture efficiency (CE) of immunomagnetic beads (IMBs) against E. coli O157:H7 in ham, beef, egg, and cheese samples
Food samples | Ham | Beef | Egg | Cheese (Ricotta) |
Inoculum concentration (CFU/g) | CE (%) of IMB method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of conventional method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of IMB method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of conventional method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of IMB method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of conventional method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of IMB method (CFU/mL) | CE (%) of conventional method (CFU/mL) |
101 | 8.8±1.0c*(8.7×100) | 0.0±0.0e | 7.5±1.0c*(6.7×100) | 0.0±0.0d | 5.8±1.2c*(5.7×100) | 0.0±0.0e | 7.5±4.9b*(4.0×100) | 0.0±0.0c |
102 | 17.3±2.3a*(4.8×101) | 1.7±0.5de(2.0×100) | 16.3±1.6a*(1.3×101) | 1.9±0.6d(1.3×101) | 10.7±0.9b*(8.3×101) | 1.8±0.2de(1.4×101) | 11.8±3.1a*(5.4×101) | 2.0±0.5c(0.9×101) |
103 | 13.1±0.6b*(3.4×102) | 1.9±0.1de(2.4×101) | 13.2±0.4b*(8.2×102) | 0.9±0.2d(5.4×101) | 10.5±0.3b*(8.8×102) | 1.3±0.1de(1.1×102) | 10.9±0.3a*(1.6×102) | 1.5±0.2c(2.3×101) |
104 | 12.8±0.7b*(2.8×103) | 1.4±0.0e(1.5×102) | 12.2±0.4b*(6.5×103) | 0.8±0.1d(5.1×102) | 14.4±1.1a*(7.4×103) | 1.9±0.1d(1.1×103) | 8.9±0.3ab*(1.2×103) | 0.8±0.1c(1.2×102) |
105 | 8.8±0.7c*(3.2×104) | 0.8±0.0e(1.3×103) | 11.9±0.8b*(1.6×104) | 0.4±0.1d(1.4×103) | 10.1±0.6b*(5.2×104) | 1.1±0.0de(8.1×103) | 6.8±0.2b*(1.1×104) | 0.4±0.0c(6.9×102) |
106 | 3.6±0.1d*(1.6×105) | 0.7±0.1e(1.6×104) | 5.8±0.4c*(4.4×105) | 0.4±0.0d(2.9×104) | 6.6±0.4c*(4.5×105) | 1.1±0.7de(8.4×104) | 6.9±2.0b*(0.9×105) | 0.4±0.0c(4.6×103) |
Means±SE with different superscript letters within the same column differ significantly at p<0.05.
* Significant difference (p<0.05) in CE between IMB-based method and conventional method for a given inoculum concentration in a given food sample.