Table 1 Identification results of LDA, BP-ANN and SVM models
Models | Subsets | Sample type | Sample number | Discrimination results |
Fresh | Secondary fresh | Stale | Discrimination rate (%) |
LDA | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 91.67a |
Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 16 | 3 |
Stale | 20 | 0 | 1 | 19 |
Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 93.33b |
Secondary fresh | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
BP-ANN | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 95.00c |
Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 18 | 1 |
Stale | 20 | 0 | 1 | 19 |
Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Secondary fresh | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
SVM | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 98.33d |
Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 19 | 0 |
Stale | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 93.33e |
Secondary fresh | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
a LDA model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, three secondary fresh samples were misclassified as stale meat, one stale sample was misclassified as secondary meat.
b LDA model in the prediction set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat.
c BP-ANN model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat, one stale sample was misclassified as secondary fresh meat.
d SVM model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat.
e SVM model in the prediction set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat.
LDA, linear discriminant analysis; BP-ANN, back propagation artificial neural network; SVM, support vector machine.