Table 2. Lipidomic approaches for authentication of meat product

No Title Refs yr Objectives Equipment Lipids result
1 Authentication of butter from lard adulteration using high-resolution of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography (Fadzillah et al., 2017) 2017 Lard NMR, HPLC Triacylglycerol and fatty acids
2 Quantitative analysis of lard in animal fat mixture using visible Raman spectroscopy (Lee et al., 2018) 2018 Lard Raman spectroscopy Quantitative fat oil
3 Liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry were used to develop a lamb authentication method: A preliminary study (Wang et al., 2020) 2020 Meat UHPLC-QTOF-MS Multiple triglyceride (TG), diacylglycerol (DG), and PL
4 Characterization and discrimination of selected China’s domestic pork using an LC-MS-based lipidomic approach (Mi et al., 2019) 2019 Raw pork meat LC-MS 61 glycerolipids, 17 glycerophospholipids, 4 sterol lipids, 2 sphingolipids, 3 polyketides, 7 fatty acyls and 6 prenol lipids
5 Meat, the metabolites: An integrated metabolite profiling and lipidomics approach for the detection of the adulteration of beef with pork (Trivedi et al., 2016) 2016 Meat GC-MS and UHPLC-MS Fatty acid
NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; UHPLC-QTOF-MS, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography- quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; UHPLC-MS, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.